nikolov, who is with the team bigusinfo, they talk about the fact that the media today are independent media in the country, they are perceived as enemies, and there are of course a lot of non-public processes, which... i would not like to talk about today, but, well, there is not public pressure, in including the editorial office of ukrainian pravda, and of course it is unpleasant, because in the conditions of a full-scale war you have to think about unity, you already have a lot of challenges, including the safety of your employees, here you also face internal pressure, and how it manifests itself in what it manifests itself in various, these are attempts to discredit, and as we saw it with the example of bigusinfo, attempts to stick some incomprehensible labels of agents of the kremlin and so on and the like, that is, it is still relevant, and media attacks, including those directed at members of our editorial office, well , we basically saw the bigus case, which also showed the value of independent journalism for this country and the reaction, the healthy reaction of society, that

nikolov's apartment and described the door to him.hooligans are the customers, there are whole groups of people who want to generally kill the reputation of anti-corruption officers in ukraine. anti-corruptionists are not people who can be liked or disliked. it is clear that they criticize. individuals in banking, that they are obviously exposed to a flurry of criticism, but these are people who, among other things, make it possible to save billions of hryvnias for the state, that is, the anti-corruption center, other anti-corruption organizations, the schemes that they expose, this is serious enough money for the state budget that comes in, this is a big saving, it disrupts whole schemes, fine, but mr. oleksiy, look, in addition to the anti-corruption schemes, in addition to ... that the western partners are very sensitive precisely to attacks on anti-corruption bodies, which they at least support, but we simply have a criminal history, one of two proceedings, one of two cases, criminal proceedings opened against vitaly shabunin for

this is stated in the article of investigative journalist yury nikolov.s means that the newly elected supervisory boards have the right to appoint the heads of the oblenergo board. most of the members of the five oblenergos, except for mykolaiv oblenergo, were chosen precisely from the submission of minorities. shareholders, due to their subordinate status as salaried employees, one gets the impression that they are carrying out external instructions, according to nikolov, there are reasons to believe that the decision-making center is precisely in the ministry of energy under the leadership of herman hluchenko. well, as they say, the head of energy in the office of president shurma said that this is not his topic, there is no reaction from zelenskyy yet, is there a threat that, as they say, under the noise of war , under the rumble of war, someone thinks as if on that to earn, and there we are talking about quite serious money. unfortunately, i think it is quite possible, i am not ready to comment on this, i did not understand this particular topic, but