daravi, there are several reasons for rejecting your order, one of which is the number of trade deficit we talked about the events related to import restrictions, such as household appliances, car imports, the queue that exists for the allocation of width, etc., and finally the rate increase that exists. i think it is in economic books, in the book of fortune, and something called the assumption of stability. we don't have other conditions, and this is a union. well, if it is a union, it is worse than the one that assumes the stability of other conditions, see if the same union that you have, can it be a medium of exchange in a situation where a financial asset called width in the country can be used at all? it has an effect, that is, the concept that you refer to is only the concept that you have in the market, sir, the trade balance should be like this . we have to solve this issue that i am faced with two phenomena, i don't come when i want to talk about this , i want to put forth theories, i just pay attention to the market, where the demand and the demand are about exports and impo

daravi. the fact that you don't agree with the policy of fixing the exchange rate means that now you are saying that we should float the exchange rate for import and export, that is , we will take 2850 and leave it to the market to determine the price, whatever the price, whatever the price . now we have a 35% surplus in the market, that is, the surplus of our trade balance, our exports compared to our imports is 35%, this means that the price must come. who said below 285. or it should be 40 tomans. the price should come down. i have parallel supply. i have 22 billion dollars in supply. why doesn't the government come down? why doesn't the price go down? why is the price going up? because you dismissed the currency asset as a financial asset, you gave it a point. you gave him the point of not controlling his circulation. the best means of the underground economy. exchange has become an underground economy and there is a terrible demand for it. and you closed this to him. these two phenomena

daravi, how many reasons can you give for rejecting your order, one is that it is a fractional number we talked about the commercial aspects of the import restrictions, such as household appliances , car imports, the queue that exists for the allocation of width, etc. , and finally the price increase that exists. what i am doing is that in the economic books, in the books , we don't have anything called the assumption of stability of other conditions, and this is a union. well , if it is a union, it is worse than the one that assumes the stability of other conditions. see, this is the same union that you have. it is established that a financial asset called land can be a medium of exchange in the country does it have an effect at all? it means that the concept you have is just the concept you are putting forward in the land market. sir, the trade balance should be like this. i am faced with 2 phenomena, i don't come when i want to talk about this , i want to present theories, i just pay attention to the market where the supply and demand is about export and import, but i don't want to

was that we don't want the irgc air force, i said we don't want the irgc air force, i didn't have a daravice, when he wrote, we want the irgc air force and this is the description of his duties, the meaning is that we want this , the country needs this, and the work went forward, sir, at that time i remember being the president in 1964 i held the first meeting for building rockets from libya. we had taken it and brought it there for our reverse engineering. the experts were afraid to open it. it means they were worried. the gentleman gave them courage and said, "why didn't you open it?" now they said something, and the gentleman said, "don't be afraid to do this . the need of the front is pressing. they may express that they will use it." god bless ali muhammad, the first pickaxe of the ground-to-ground missile factory. and he is well remembered, the father of iran's rockets, we remember shahid tehrani moghadam, yes , i saw a picture, how young were you and shahid tehrani moghadam, are you working on rockets? when you were there, did you think that we were old from the beginning, and the a

daravi, who will have a debate about the issue that at your service i said that our most important question that basically, which policy is used in managing and controlling the market? karater and the central bank in the current situation we are talking about, which policy should it adopt, continue to stabilize the land price , which market should it focus more on, the informal market, the market it is providing for imports , which one do we want regarding this? let's talk , if you are interested in this discussion, this economic debate about supply and demand rates , follow us on khabar network, please. thank you. you are with the higher program, i ask for permission mr. yazdizadeh, let me start with the question of which point of view you are in favor of , are you in favor of stabilization or should we float the rate from now on ? i am definitely in favor of stabilizing the exchange rate , not fixing it. i mean to set an exchange rate. look , don't forget about the exchange rate. it is two-sided, that is, one side is the value of your national currency, and the other side is the currency.

daravi, see what they are discussing. firstly, regarding the balance of our trade balance . . if the exchange rate is to be determined in a market where the supply of foreign currency and the demand for imports are the source of this supply , it can be whatever it wants to be, the government is the government itself , it is also the largest importer, from its oil income , it imports 10 billion dollars, 12 billion basic goods , and 15 billion imports. you can't come tell me, sir, i consider imports, but they don't consider exports, so we have free trade, even if we didn't have it, even if we didn't have it. in the world, the countries whose trade balance becomes negative do not necessarily devalue the currency with the same policies as you said, it is not for countries like us, it is for all countries, the multi-rate system is implemented with different definitions, they manage the imports that demand they should reduce the import and in fact they can keep the price of land and yet you say that we have a deficit because of you. look, you depend on the economic evidence. you sho