mr. kneedler.r kneedler: justiceanmay it please the court: in robinson, this court held that the government cannot criminalize stus. and respde has conceded here today that the city cannot criminalize the at of being homeless. our narrow submission in this case is that government cannot circve the principle of robinson by making it unlawful for a person to reside in the jurisdiction if he has that at. that is what the ordinances here do as applied to someone who has nowhere else to sleep, which i an essential human function, the ornances are the equivalent of making it a crime to be homess while living in grants pass. although we think the ninth circuit was right to recognize that the core principle robinson is implicated in this case, the court was wrong to award broad injunctive relief in the circumans and manner in which it did. the robinson principle require an individualized determination, and the ninth circuit's ilure to require such a determination and its issuance of mu bader injunctive rel