attarts to veer into the joint action or doing something together where the governme idoing things making disns. it is not just advising the platforms. the rubric may well be state action, but the rubric may be mo fnd in the joint action cases then offer significant encouragement. justice barrett: how do we conserhe relationship between those things? because i agree with you, bantam books is about drawing the line there, b tre are some times when things veer io e joint action space where we might say there is a state action, and there is a dispute in this case about which framework is the right e. what advice do you have? . etcher: if i were the court, i would want to be cautious abo ming too definitive pronouncements. i wld say, here, what is allenged is that the persuasion provision of information and that when thos are issued the main yardstick wi be bantam books, and the concern is, have you crossed the ne from trying to persuade to trying to threaten and btais the right way to draw the line. there are a lot of different briefs -- and many aeehis is the right line, in this context. i think