and then, you know, in talking to city attorney gibner, the way he explained it is, it would really require sort of a out of control person in this role who really just can't get along with others, or wants to make a name for him or herself. really doesn't cooperate and goes above and beyond their duties. i said in that case, we have more protection in this regard then if there was a rogue da or rogue city attorney or rogue controller, because in this case, the controller could just fire this person if they got out of control. there wouldn't have to be a recall or election in the future. i really don't agree with the contents that letter, and years ago, when i worked for supervisor compos, i worked on public advocate piece of legislation that shared similarities to this and always thought it was a good idea. i thought having a city employee who's at the leadership--the number one job is exclusively to look and become a expert and truly understand what is happening in the city to prevent fraud and corruption, it makes a lot of sense. the city attorney has a lot of responsibility. the distric