freedom for private enterprise, this was a big plus, by the way, kosygin fought for this all his life, but the dogmas of susovoy’s great comrades, basically, they interfered, well, well, then the process went on, because look how they gained strength, these rukh , this was an anti-russian organization, no, softly, softly, but... what kind of book was it ukraine, not russia, it was written by comrade kuchma, yes, kuchma had such a book, but ukraine is not russia, it sounds like that, yes ukraine is not russia, yes, but in essence it is directed against russia, for the department is complete, they’ve finished the game, and then i ’ll tell you, they started this war, they started the war because they were quiet, politically correct. declare that they will join nato. this is what the americans would do in this case, if we did something like this, let’s say, now in venezuela or cuba, next to america, what would they do, our enemies do not stop and continue to pump, setting russia on fire from all sides , then the caucasus, then our outskirts, then the former soviet republics, everywhere th

the chinese themselves later, even after densapin, said that we are equal. attempts to re-launch the kosygin said that a working group on economic reform was created in eighty-two , which included mikhail sergeevich gorbachev, vladim ivanovich dolgikh , then secretary the central committee for heavy industry, the newly elected secretary of the central committee for economics nikolai ivanovich ryshkov, the so-called economic department was reformatted just for him, but it did not come out of nowhere, by the way, it was created on the basis of the department of planning and financial bodies, so what to say that androp was the only unique reformer - this is an incorrect interpretation, in fact, the question is whether androv was a reformer at all, he is so interesting, but the fact that andrpov, in my opinion, did not see development along the chinese path, this obviously, especially since the chinese path was not very obvious, it was only... in the seventy- ninth year den seau with the seventy-eighth, seventy-ninth, actually the second captivity of mitsk in february of the seventy-eighth year

kasygin’s economic reform, which was the first attempt at such liberalization of the economy, yes, but kosyginorms, and romanov didn’t want this liberalization, then he waited for brezhnev to die, and then he decided to turn around, well, 15 months, you have now uttered this word liberalization twice, that is, i understand correctly, in fact gorbachev developed and deepened, as he said, what it was not even he who started, but andropov, yes, it was he who deepened, but in his narrow circle, as he... spoke to limited people, i think that's exactly what gorbachev did most adequately reproduces what andropov wanted to do, now andropov is being acquitted, they say that he was dansiapin and they say that in china it turned out differently from us, their boatbrod fell contrary to the laws of physics butter side up, but excuse me, there everything was not done quite the same as ours, there, first of all, the party was strengthened, there control was strengthened. therefore, it seems to me that andropov did not have a very good attitude towards the role of the party and that it was precisely under gor