are three times four times more powerful than the bombs used by the americans against kheroshima and nagasaki four times, we have many times more of them. on the european continent, and even if the americans bring theirs from the usa, we still have many times more, but if it comes down to it, god forbid, and i really don’t want to, i’ll shout at each other, that’s what it means, but then, you said, we let's reduce casualties, but they can increase indefinitely, this is the first, second, of course, these same europeans will have to think, if - it means that those with whom we will exchange such blows will not exist, the americans will also get involved in this exchange of blows already level of strategic weapons or not, i very much doubt it, and the europeans should also think about it, this is certainly true, but i still proceed from the fact that it will never come to that if we want to achieve our goals in... ukraine as quickly as possible , then the current contingent to us not enough, but we have a different tactic, we are squeezing out the enemy in the donbass, vladimir putin said durin

nagasaki. and. the most important legacy franklin roosevelt left the world was the united nations organization. from the earliest days of world war, fdr worked to create a postwar organization dedicated to global cooperation and peace through collective security. on january 1st, 1942, he welcomed representatives of 25 allied nations to the white house to sign a declaration pledging each to defend life liberty in dependance and religious freedom and preserve human rights and justice. fdr, this wartime coalition, the united nations and later led efforts to expand it into a postwar international organization. and returning from this trip, the defense of the refreshed, inspired with a firm belief that we have made a good start on the road to a world of peace and am confident that the congress and the american people will accept the results of this conference as the beginning of a permanent structure of peace upon which we can begin to build an underground that better world in which our children and

but for going to get all the vic to the shadow, all the spectra of what happened in nagasaki and a russian. i obviously casa a long shadow over today's world as well, but nevertheless, china, along with the us along with the u. k. funds, many others all spending vast sums of money on then you can the hospital's a gallery. i wonder if i can turn the discussion on his head slightly and off this because one argument put forward by so cool nuclear weapons up to this is precisely that they are very direct conflicts between major powers. should we gary to some degree? welcome to, i think is certainly true that in the period after the 2nd world war, the presence of nuclear weapons, especially in the stand off between the united states and the soviet union. the presence of nuclear weapons certainly imposed caution and constraint on the leaders of both countries because they recognized that the use of nuclear weapons would lead to mutual allied elation. as you said, mutually assured destruction. so from that standpoint, nuclear weapons did have a stabilizing impact at the same time as the other gue

but for going to get all the vic to the shadow or the spectra of what happened in nagasaki and a russian. i obviously casa, a long shadow over today's world as well. but nevertheless, china, along with the us along with the u. k. funds many others are spending vast sums of money on that and you can at hospitals. gary, i wonder if i can turn the discussion on his head slightly and off this because one argument put forward by so co nuclear weapons up to this is precisely that they of a direct conflicts between major powers. should we gary to some degree? welcome to, i think is certainly true that in the period after the 2nd world war, the presence of nuclear weapons, especially in the stand off between the united states and the soviet union. the presence of nuclear weapons certainly imposed caution and constraint on the leaders of both countries because they recognized that the use of nuclear weapons would lead to mutual allied elation. as you said, mutually assured destruction. so from that standpoint, nuclear weapons did have a stabilizing impact at the same time as the other guess said

hiroshima, nagasaki, 20 k-tn. our tactical nuclear weapons are 70-75 kilotons.uclear weapon. let's not argue not only about use, but also about the threat of use. for some reason , the west believes that russia will never use it. we have a nuclear doctrine. look at what it says. if someone's actions threaten our sovereignty and territorial integrity, we will consider it possible to use all the means available to us. you can't treat it lightly, superficially, you have to treat... i know what mr. valery, you don't really like to comment on putin and in general, what he says, but i will still ask, what does it mean to have a professional attitude to the topic of nuclear weapons in putin's variation, i, as a world, should discuss this with him professionally, well, what he translates, what he said, if you think that i'm not... i'm crazy enough not to give this order, then you're wrong, i'm already ripe for dragging everyone behind you, look at me, you see what a maniac i am, then i can go further, this is what he told them, this is in his understanding is a professi

united states, the only country that used nuclear weapons during world war ii world war hiroshima, nagasaki kilotons. our tactical nuclear weapons are 70-75 kilotons. this is such a tactical nuclear weapon. let's not argue not only about use, but also about the threat of use. for some reason, the west believes that russia will never use it. we already have a nuclear doctrine. look at what it says. if someone's actions threaten our sovereignty and territorial integrity, we will consider it possible to use all the means available to us. you can't treat it lightly, superficially, you have to treat it professionally. i i know that you don't really like to comment, mr. valery. and in general, well, what he says, but i will still ask, and what does it mean to have a professional attitude to the topic of nuclear weapons, in putin's variation, i, as a world, should discuss this with him professionally, well, what he translates, that what did he say, if you think i'm not crazy enough not to give this order, then you're wrong, i 've already sighted in order to... drag everyone along, look at me, you

the whole, the vic, to the shadow or the suspect of what happened in nagasaki and a russian. i obviously casa, a long shadow of a today's world as well, but nevertheless, china, along with the us along with the u. k. funds, many others are spending vast sums of money on that. and you can the hospital's a gallery. i wonder if i can turn the discussion on his head slightly and off this because one argument put forward by so cool nuclear weapons up to this is precisely that they are very direct conflicts between major powers. should we gary to some degree? welcome to, i think is certainly true that in the period after the 2nd world war, the presence of nuclear weapons, especially in the stand off between the united states and the soviet union. the presence of nuclear weapons certainly imposed caution and constraint on the leaders of both countries because they recognized that the use of nuclear weapons would lead to mutual allied elation. as you said, mutually assured destruction. so from that standpoint, nuclear weapons did have a stabilizing impact at the same time as the othe

but if you're going to get all the of it to the shadow or the spectra of what happened in nagasaki and a russian, i obviously casa a long shadow over today's world as well. but nevertheless, china, along with the us along with the u. k. funds many others are spending vast sums of money on that and you can the hospital's a gallery. i wonder if i can turn the discussion on his head slightly and off this because one argument put forward by so cool nuclear weapons up to this is precisely that they are very direct conflicts between major powers. should we gary to some degree? welcome to, i think is certainly true that in the period after the 2nd world war, the presence of nuclear weapons, especially in the stand off between the united states and the soviet union. the presence of nuclear weapons certainly imposed caution and constraint on the leaders of both countries because they recognized that the use of nuclear weapons would lead to mutual allied elation. as you said, mutually assured destruction. so from that standpoint, nuclear weapons did have a stabilizing impact at the same time as

hiroshima, nagasaki - 20 kloton. our tactical nuclear weapons are 70-75 kton.ic. let's not argue not only about use, but also about the threat of use. for some reason , the west believes that russia will never use it. we have a nuclear doctrine. look at what it says. if someone's actions threaten our sovereignty and territorial integrity, we will consider it possible to use all the means available to us. you can't treat it lightly, superficially. you have to behave professionally, i know that you don't really like to comment on putin, mr. valery and in general, well, what he says, but i will still ask, and what does it mean to treat the subject of nuclear weapons professionally in putin's variation, i, as a world, should discuss this with him professionally, well, what he translates, what he said, if you... think i'm not crazy enough not to order this, you're wrong, i'm ripe for everyone to follow, look at me, you'll see , what a maniac i am, then i can go further, this is what he told them, this is in his understanding a professional assessment, because in fac

hiroshima, nagasaki - 20 km. our tactical nuclear weapons are 70-75 kton.ctical nuclear weapon. let 's not only prove to use, but... as for the threat of use, for some reason the west believes that russia will never use it, but we have a nuclear doctrine, look at what it says: if someone's actions threaten our sovereignty and territorial integrity, we will consider it possible to use all available we have the means, you can't treat it lightly, superficially, you have to treat it professionally, i know. mr. valery, you don’t really like to comment on putin and, in general, what he says, but i will still ask, and what does it mean to treat the nuclear issue professionally weapons in the putin variation, me me, how is the world supposed to professionally discuss this with him, well, what he translates, what he said, if you think i'm not crazy enough not to order this, then you are wrong. "i have already matured to pull everyone along, look at me, you see what a maniac i am, then i can go further, this is what he told them, this is a professional assessment in

, nagasaki, well, it is known that not they led to the fact that japan surrendered, the surrender of japan was a consequence of the fact that, in fact, the soviet union , despite the agreement with japan, started a war, occupied a significant territory in majura, and accordingly, the japanese army simply could not start this and after that they already announced capitulation what is the general state of the economy in ukraine today, so what, what to do with the current ukrainian economy, well , you know, how to start and finish there, you can talk a lot, it is obvious that, first of all, mechanisms should be created that would stimulate work small and medium-sized businesses, because large businesses are largely in worse conditions, because... they are hit more often, in this regard, small and medium-sized businesses are less dependent on such attacks, but on the other hand , it is necessary to create conditions for them , and definitely we need some kind of adequate and transparent and honest conversation with society about mobilization and economic reservation, business cannot func

nuclear weapons are three times more powerful than the bombs used by the americans against kheroshima and nagasakimes, we have many times more of them on the european continent, and even if the americans bring theirs... from the usa, we still have many times more, but if it comes, god forbid, yes, no matter what i really want, i will cross myself, that means, but then you said, we will reduce the sacrifices, but they can grow indefinitely, this is the first , second, of course, these same europeans will have to think about it, if, therefore, those with whom we exchange such blows will not exist, they will get involved... are the americans already at the level of strategic weapons in this exchange of blows or not? i very much doubt it, and the europeans should also think about this, of course, but i still proceed from the fact that it will never come to this, we do not have such a need, because our armed forces are not just gaining experience. since in vanity such things should not be mentioned , you behave so responsibly, speak so responsibly, but we are dealing with absolutely irresponsible and c

the only country is the united states that used nuclear weapons in the second world war ferashima, nagasaki tactical nuclear weapons, well, let’s not bring them to use, not only even before the threat of use. that means, forming an opinion about russia, there is no need to form an image of an enemy from russia, you are only harming yourself, with this, you know, you came up with the idea that russia wants to attack nato, you have gone completely crazy, or something, stupid, in general, like this table who came up with this, it’s nonsense, you know, it’s bullshit, but it would be, it would be nonsense, yes, if there weren’t an idea to fool one’s... that’s what it’s done for, that’s what these threats are for and scarecrows for burghers in germany, in france and other parts of europe, that's why such a threat does not exist. obviously, at this meeting, which lasted more than 3 hours, it was as open as possible, informal, very detailed, the conversation was very specific, and in many ways, friendly. on the part of russia , there is no talk of any threat to the western world, as vladimir putin

such a conclusion to the second world war, this was , among other things, the attack on jeroshima and nagasakiou, it’s scary that generations are there... and the ideological support of the united states, which perfectly rested on the european union, these are the main two points: first, the main theater of military operations is normandy, films saved the average person and so on, the second two were generally opposed, these were generally two kind of awkward regimes, well, of course. but the focus is shifted to the communist party of the soviet union to hitler’s third reich and young people know nothing more about it other than that. now we come to the main questions. we started with you, now we are summing up the results with you, we started from the moment of truth, by and large we are now experiencing such an important electoral cycle, a single voting day is behind us, a new assembly in a completely rethought all-belarusian format people's assembly, of course , there are presidential elections in the twenty-fifth year ahead, and we understand that this is not just the appointment of some i

weapons are three times more powerful than the bombs used by the americans - against kheroshima and nagasakitimes more in number, on the european continent and even if the americans bring theirs from the usa, we still have many times more. but if it comes, god forbid, that i really don’t want to, i’ll cross myself, that means, but then you said, we will reduce the casualties, but they can increase indefinitely, this is the first, second, of course, these same europeans will have to think, if, then, those with whom we exchange such blows will not exist, will get involved, americans in this exchange. strikes are already at the level of strategic weapons or not, i very much doubt it, and the europeans should also think about it, that’s for sure, but i still proceed from the fact that it will never come to that, we don’t have such a need, because our the armed forces are not just they are gaining experience, increasing their efficiency, our defense-industrial complex is demonstrating its effective work, i have already said many times, i can repeat it, we have increased the production of ammuniti

nuclear weapons are three times more powerful than the bombs used by the americans against kheroshima and nagasaki four times, but i still proceed from the fact that it will never come to that, we don’t even need to think about this topic . vladimir putin found himself in a rather unusual situation: he had to constantly moderate the ardor of the discussion moderator; an ardent anti-western was chosen for this role. political scientist sergei karaganov. he stated that it is extremely important for russia to accelerate the pace of military operations and strive for escalation, including with the use of nuclear weapons. putin categorically rejected both. he believes that higher speed is only possible with large losses, but for him , concern for human lives is more important. this position impressed the forum guests, especially, putin emphasized, with the russian character , no nuclear weapons are needed. putin emphasized that diplomacy is above all. especially in matters relating to nuclear weapons, he said very convincingly that is going to use nuclear weapons and this is a message to the whole worl

three times more powerful, four times, than the bombs used by the americans against kheroshima and nagasaki, three to four times, we have many times more of them in number, of course, these same europeans will have to think, if, therefore, those with whom we will exchange such blows are not... and understanding my responsibility, i still proceed from the fact , what the general staff, the ministry of defense proposes, speed is important, but even more important is caring for the life and health of our guys who are fighting at the front. therefore, combat work is going on, but since the beginning of this year, 40 settlements have been liberated, 880 square kilometers, i think, we are gradually we are pushing the enemy out of the territory of donbass from other adjacent territories, but the general staff and the ministry of defense have plans. implementation and achievement of all our goals, we are acting according to this plan, i am sure that all these plans will be realized. there is no need to mobilize in russia. we do not have any need to mobilize, we are not planning this, because last y

the elements of such a conclusion to the second world war, this included the attack on jeroshima and nagasakineeling there it is formed in a circle, it is perfectly ingrained in their heads that the soviet union did not take berlin, the whole history is an ideological support of the united states, which perfectly supported the european union, these are the main two points: the first main theater of military operations is normandy, films saved the ordinary area and so on, the second two were and are generally opposed, these were generally two kind of regimes. and we understand that this is not just the appointment of some individual who will symbolize power there, a huge number of dots that need to be connected with each other in order to maintain our subjectivity, the sovereignty that oleg sergeevich spoke about today, let’s listen, the president met with the head of the central election commission and they also touched upon the topic of the upcoming elections, we will try to conduct the elections in such a way that the mosquito does not undermined, we are honestly decent with... capable of h

three times more powerful, four times, than the bombs used by the americans against kheroshima and nagasaki, three to four times, we have many times more of them in number, of course, these same europeans will have to think about it, if those with whom we will exchange such blows are not... and understanding my responsibility, i still proceed from the fact that suggests the general staff, the ministry of defense, speed is important, but even more important is concern for the life and health of our guys who are fighting at the front. therefore, combat work is going on, but since the beginning of this year 40, 7 settlements, i think, have been liberated, 880 square kilometers, i think, we are gradually we are pushing the enemy out of the territory of donbass from other adjacent territories, but the general staff and the ministry of defense have plans. implementation and achievement of all our goals, we are acting according to this plan, i am sure that all these plans will be realized. there is no need to mobilize in russia. we have no need to mobilize, we are not planning this, because last y

weapons three times more powerful than four the bombs used by the americans against kheroshima and nagasaki are three to four times higher; our number is many times greater. hello, mikhail vladimirovich, good afternoon, tell us how the st. petersburg economic forum and the city of hero sevastopol, today they are connected with each other, that is, what did you manage to find out here on the forum, i don’t know, useful, what opportunities do you have in your region? squad, after that russia was baptized, and after that orthodoxy began to spread throughout the entire territory of our huge country, therefore, among the complex of buildings, one of the unique ones, there is nothing like it anywhere in the world, this is the museum of christianity, where just a little there i will reveal the secrets, while it is planned that prince vladimir will personally introduce his personal history life and how he came to christianity and why it is important, and this is of course only there. and sber, sber, which means, in the person of german oskarovich gref, today participated in the signing, made the de

nuclear weapons are three times more powerful than the bombs used by the americans against kheroshima and nagasakiree to four times, we have many times more in number, of course, these same europeans will have to think , if it means those with whom we will exchange... or numbers that are not a commercial secret, well, i would like to note the keen interest in the forum of the world media, the forum event is covered by 4216 media representatives from russia and foreign countries. over 5 years, vep has provided russian economy with projects worth over 20 trillion rubles. the head of the corporation stated this while speaking at the techno-morning session at the st. petersburg international economic forum. we are reaching a figure of approximately 22 trillion, in preparing a strategy that should be approved in the coming months, ours is a strategy for technology and innovative development, probably this is the most important block of the strategy, and this is the task for us, traditional projects with new knowledge , connect with new technologies. among the technology strategy projects development of

the only country, the united states, that used nuclear weapons in the second world war , horashima, nagasaki5 kiloton, such a tactical nuclear weapon, let’s not only not lead to use, even to the threat of use, for some reason in the west they believe that russia will never use it. we have a nuclear doctrine, look what is written, use is possible in exceptional cases, i do not believe that such a case has arisen, and there is no such need, but this is a doctrine, it is a living instrument, and we do not rule out making some changes to this doctrine, if not god willing, it comes to some kind of strikes, then everyone should understand that russia has a warning system, early warning of a missile attack. before the president, i perfectly understand his hesitation; when i think about this issue, that is, about the use of nuclear weapons, i myself am overcome with moral trepidation, but i also know that if our opponents, as well as people in general, do not understand, that such a possibility exists, we are doomed in the current world, which is falling apart, and we will not be able to build a new

nuclear weapons are three times more powerful than the bombs used by the americans against kheroshima and nagasaki we have many times more in number, of course, these same europeans will have to think if, therefore, those with whom we exchange such blows will not exist, they knit. in this exchange of strikes, are the americans already at the level of strategic weapons or not? i really doubt. and europeans should think about this too. dumbly, but, but, i still proceed from the fact that it will never come to this, well, for now europeans and americans, instead of listening to the signals that are heard these days from st. petersburg, continue to celebrate the landing of the normandy allies, the anniversary, and today a video is being circulated on social networks where american president joe biden unexpectedly turns around during the ceremony... with his back to the national flags, this could be considered a gross violation of protocol, it could be attributed to, let’s say, the poor health of american presidents, the american president, but it is absolutely certain that this video is probably still

the baby and fat man bombs dropped by the united states on the japanese cities of jeroshima and nagasaki force japan to capitulate. the world is entering a new era. the era of atomic energy. my father told me that after a shift they wrung out their shirts, because when there was no automation, everything went manually. with freed hands, when in the end steam was supplied to the turbine, igor vasilyevich kurchatov congratulated us all on a light steam. for our country it was an upsurge flag, a flag of superiority, it was not us who made the bomb first, this is a rare case when we are proud that we are not the first, the second, here is a peaceful atom, a nuclear power plant - our absolute superiority. the overseas ally in the anti-hitler coalition is rapidly becoming a former one. more than 50 targets planned by the united states of america for nuclear bombing already on the territory of the ussr are forcing moscow to devote all its efforts to creating a symmetrical response. first the bomb, forget about the rest, very clear. requirements of the nuclear project curator lavrentiy beria. an

so i think we've gotten so far from here hero hiroshima and nagasaki and the potholes out in the desert. those are huge explosions. we want this war to stay cold. neil: and the communications, i know very few people read these things, but listed at least 28 times china as a maligning force. to what end? what do you think that was about? >> well, they've shifted positions. remember, russia was kind of the soviet union and china we can't care about. now it's china and rush is a -- russia is the smaller partner. what did we do? what did richard nixon do? he looked for detente with china, and get to a cease-fire in ukraine and start to peel away the proxies that china is using to distract us everywhere. korea is the same thing. you know, this whole adventure, this is north korea stirring up trouble on behalf of china. neil: you know, greg dalia, a global investor, and he's looking at history, and punishments meted out and europe adding to that with a 38% tariff on such vehicles, but that's the kind of stuff we did to japan before things got really bad and the attack on pearl harbor goes bac

dropped usa on japanese kheroshima and nagasaki, bombs, baby and fat man, force japan to capitulate.a new era, the era of atomic energy. my father told me that after changing shirts, they wrung out their shirts, because there was no automation then, everything went on. in private mode he returned

victory in the great patriotic war. war, the bombs dropped by the united states on japanese jeroshima and nagasakiorce a baby and a fat man to force japan to capitulate. the world is entering a new era. the era of atomic energy. as my father told me, after the shift they wrung out the shirts, because there was no automation then, everything went manually, he returned with burnt hands. when in the end steam was supplied to the turbine, igor vasilyevich kurchatov congratulated us all on the light steam. for our country it was raising the flag, flag championship, we were not the first to make the bomb, this is a rare case when we are proud that we are not the first, the second, here is a peaceful atom, a nuclear power plant, our absolute primacy. the overseas ally in the anti-hitler coalition is rapidly becoming a former one. more than fifty targets planned by the united states of america for nuclear bombing already on the territory of the ussr are forcing moscow to devote all its efforts to creating a symmetrical response. first the bomb, forget about the rest, the very clear demand of the curator o

august 1945, the americans. dropped two atomic bombs on japan, destroying the cities of jeroshima and nagasakie reported to joseph stalin about the creation of a superweapon in the united states 4 years before this terrible event . tragedy and proposed a plan on how to get all the materials developed by americans. and already in the spring of 1942, soviet nuclear scientists began creating an atomic bomb. in march 1946, former british prime minister winston churchill declared an anglo-saxon cold deal against the soviet union at an american college in the town of fulton. central and eastern europe. warsaw, berlin, prague, vienna, budapest, belgrade, bucharest, sofia. all of these famous cities and the populations in their areas found themselves within what i call the soviet sphere. all of them in one form or another are subject not only to soviet influence, but also to significant and increasing control from moscow. after world war ii, the united states, with the support of great britain, tried to force. one troy 35 dollars, with which the united states proposed to replace an ounce of pure gold,

weapons are three to four times more powerful than the bombs the americans used against kheroshima and nagasakiour times. we have many times more of them. of course, these same europeans will have to think about it. but even more important is concern for the life and health of our guys who are fighting at the front, so combat work is going on, but since the beginning of this year, 40 settlements there, i think , have been liberated, 880 square kilometers, i think, we are gradually squeezing the enemy out. .. from the territory of donbass and from other adjacent territories, the general staff and the ministry of defense have plans for the implementation and achievement of all our goals, we are acting according to this plan, i am sure that all these plans will be realized. the entire world media followed vladimir putin’s speech at the plenary session of the pmf. the speech of the russian president was broadcast and even commented on live . there were some surprises, abur. new business partners who are ready to turn a blind eye to the fighting in ukraine. even in britain they saw with western sanc

and the atomic bombing of nagasaki and what he _ the atomic bombing of nagasaki and what he said was the war is turning not necessarily to the advantage of japan _ not necessarily to the advantage of japan. that is the mood in the conservative party.— conservative party. isabel oakeshott. _ conservative party. isabel oakeshott, what - conservative party. isabel oakeshott, what do - conservative party. isabel oakeshott, what do you l conservative party. isabel- oakeshott, what do you make of conservative party. isabel— oakeshott, what do you make of this defection? reform would love a businessman like this backing their cause. {iii businessman like this backing their cause. . ., , businessman like this backing their cause. .. , , y cause. of course. i listened very carefully to _ cause. of course. i listened very carefully to what _ cause. of course. i listened very carefully to what you _ cause. of course. i listened very carefully to what you said. - cause. of course. i listened very carefully to what you said. i - cause. of course. i listened very | carefully to what you said. i th

amikan strategic bombers, those that destroyed kheroshima and nagasaki, b-29s, and then the b-52 flying fortresses. the war was so fierce and difficult for the us-led coalition that at the end of 1950, the american commander, army general, douglas macarthur requested 34 atomic bombs from the us president and mapped their target. president harry truman wavered this time and refused, because by that time the ussr already had its own bomb. by the spring of 1951 truman simply fired general macarthur. the bloody war eventually ended in a draw in 1953. soviet combat aviation played a decisive role in allowing the complete liberation of north korea. if it were not for the ussr, then such a country as the dprk would not exist now. our help was decisive then, and the memory of it became part of the north korean genotype. hence the speed of convergence now, there is nothing to be surprised about, there are no secrets. and it is clear that pyongyang is sensitive to security issues and has an unyielding desire to possess nuclear weapons in addition to its missile arsenal. as for vietnam, here, too,

nuclear weapons are three times more powerful than the bombs used by the americans against kheroshima and nagasakive many times more in number. on the european continent, and even if the americans bring theirs from the usa, we still have many times more, but if it comes, god forbid, yes, which i really didn’t want, i’ll switch, that means, but then you said, we’ll reduce victims, but they can grow indefinitely, this is the first, second, of course, these are the same europeans will have to think, if... it means that those with whom we will exchange such blows will not exist, whether the americans will get involved in this exchange of blows already at the level of strategic weapons or not, i very much doubt it, and the europeans should also think about it, this is unconditional, but i still proceed from the fact that it will never come to this, we do not have such a need. because our armed forces are not just gaining experience and increasing their efficiency, our defense-industrial complex is demonstrating its effectiveness work, i have already said many times, i can repeat it, we have increased t

and russia today hav that are 100,000 times more powerful than the bombs that destroyed hiroshima and nagasaki but we have over 1500 that could be delivered relatively quickly by the united states. or bite land base sea -based missiles, long range bombers and the majority from either present each present has the sole authority to decide whether orit not to use these weapons. this is why an issue that affects all of us. it works beneath the surface we do not talk much. the nuclear weapons and spread its rising as we speak. there is a short draft from un secretary-general and he put it this way. the world is on a knife's edge because of the rising risk of nuclear weapons use in global nuclear arms race. >> a bookabout spring she offers a scenario and a hypothetical nuclear launc htening it is a reminder of the have known for a long time. it is a com read every would need to take a look i in the nuclear arms states there is no guarantee a nuclear war can be contained. the devastation would be extraording. it is a compelling read if you happen to read it and one night several hours. >> recovered o

a memorial will be built at nagasaki community park in santa rosa.it will honor the 31 people killed in the fires across sonoma and napa counties in october of 2017, and highlight the community's strength. the county is taking submissions from artists through mid-july. it's a situation northern california is too familiar with. a catastrophic collapse since a highway crumbling down a mountain. a good sign for your wallet and late summer road trips. the positive signs gas prices won't skyrocket. >> and it's another breezy to windy afternoon. we have some clouds at the coast, some blue skies and some haze. we do have a warm up coming up and i'll show i live in vancouver, washington and i write mystery novels. as i was writing, i found that i just wasn't sharp and that doesn't work when you're writing a mystery and i knew i needed to do something so i started taking prevagen. i realized that i was much more clear, much sharper. i was remembering the details that i was supposed to. prevagen keeps my brain working right. prevagen. at stores everywhere with

and what he _ the atomic bombing of nagasaki and what he said was the war is turning not necessarilyabel oakeshott, what do you l conservative party. isabel- oakeshott, what do you make of conservative party. isabel— oakeshott, what do you make of this defection? reform would love a businessman like this backing their cause. {iii businessman like this backing their cause. . ., , businessman like this backing their cause. .. , , y cause. of course. i listened very carefully to _ cause. of course. i listened very carefully to what _ cause. of course. i listened very carefully to what you _ cause. of course. i listened very carefully to what you said. i i cause. of course. i listened very | carefully to what you said. i think it's fine _ carefully to what you said. i think it's fine to — carefully to what you said. i think it's fine to change _ carefully to what you said. i think it's fine to change your— carefully to what you said. i think it's fine to change your mind. i carefully to what you said. i think| it's fine to change your mind. the facts _ it's fine to change your mind. the

bombs dropped in the united states and on japanese jeroshima and nagasaki by the kid and the fat mand is entering a new era, the era of atomic energy. as my father told me, after the shift they wrung out the shirts, because there was no automation then, everything went manually, he returned with burnt hands. when in the end steam was supplied to the turbine, igor vasilyevich kurchatov congratulated us all on the light steam. for our country it was raising the flag, the flag of superiority, it was not us who made the bomb first, this is a rare case when we... for nuclear bombing already on the territory of the ussr, they force moscow to throw all its efforts into creating a symmetrical response. first the bomb, forget about the rest, the very clear demand of the curator of the atomic project lavrentiy beria. and when, after successful tests near semipalatinsk in forty years...

nuclear weapons are three times more powerful than the bombs used by the americans against kheroshima and nagasaki, three to four times, at there are many times more of us in number, of course, these same europeans will have to think, if that means those with whom we will exchange such blows will not exist, the americans will get involved in this... with an exchange of blows already at the level of strategic weapons or not, i very much doubt it, and the europeans should also think about it, of course, but i still proceed from the fact that it will never come to this, during the discussion at the plenary session, they also talked about the topics of conducting a special military operations, vladimir putin said, they can speed up. but the price will be too high. is it possible to increase the speed of solving the problems we face? can. but this is directly proportional to the losses. understanding my responsibility, i still proceed from what the general staff, the ministry of defense proposes, speed is important, but even more important is caring for the life and health of our guys who are fighting

and in a nuclear version it will be the equivalent of 50 kilotons in nagasaki, destroyed by the unitedcket under the fuselage of a fighter is a dagger. the parameters are secret. it is known that it hits not only ground targets, but also destroys ships , including aircraft carriers. at the border of the stratosphere , it flies at a speed of mach 12 for 3,000 km, while also maneuvering to bypass air defenses. its main carrier is mik-31, carries one dagger tu-22. there is nothing here that we would violate, there is nothing unusual compared to the work of the same nato bloc, the same exercises are regularly held there. the western press writes a lot about the exercises, and if on television it is simply a statement: the two armies involved combat aircraft and tanks in a new stage of exercises aimed at showing their military partnership to the world, then the newspapers are trying to analyze, not forgetting about the thesis of russia on ... does not melt, even the british have to admit the reasons and the possible outcome. warnings of nuclear escalation in ukraine are heard more and more

hiroshima nagasaki 20 kt. our tactical nuclear weapons are 70-70 75 k-tn. such a tactical nuclear weapon. we do not prove not only the use, but also the threat of use. for some reason, the west believes that russia will never use this. we have a nuclear doctrine. look at what it says. if someone's actions will threaten our sovereignty, territorial integrity. we consider it possible. well, actually what they are they keep saying, and again, you didn't have to go there to listen to it one more time, all this, you know, all this scaremongering, but what are they really going to use, no non-tactical nuclear weapons, no that's all, that's all simple forget it, this is just pressure on... on the psyche, and what they are going to do, putin also said, and you know, well, in fact , they are doing it all, so he started talking about the fact that, well, we know that if they apply atakamsy there, or stormshedov, then these are flight tasks introduced by foreign operators, and therefore, we will somehow act like this, try to create threats for the western world somewh

hiroshima, nagasaki - 20 km. our tactical nuclear weapons are 70-75 kton.tactical nuclear weapon. let 's not argue not only about use, but also about the threat of use. for some reason , the west believes that russia will never use it. we already have a nuclear doctrine. look at what it says: if someone's actions threaten our sovereignty and territorial integrity, we will consider possible, use all the means available to us. you can't treat it lightly, superficially, you have to treat it professionally. i know, mr. valery, that you don't really like to comment on putin, and in general, what he says, but i will still ask, what does it mean to become a professional? on the topic of nuclear weapons in putin's variation, how should the world professionally discuss this with him? well, what he translates, what he said, if you think that i'm not crazy enough not to give this order, then you 're wrong, i've already made a visa in order to will drag everyone behind them, look at me, you see what a maniac i am, then i can go further, that's... what he told them, in

number of dead, in principle, on the part of russia has already been exceeded. the number of dead in nagasakin hirosiv, that is, you understand the scale of russia's losses in the war against ukraine. yes, mr. valery, and it is clear that there are two important summits ahead for ukraine, this is the global peace summit that will be held on june 15-16 in switzerland, and in july the nato summit, the anniversary summit of the north atlantic alliance, will be held in relation to the first one. summit, global summit of peace, three of the 10 points of zelenskyi's peace plan seem to have been agreed for consideration at this summit, but latvian president edgar rinkevich says that ukraine's victory in the war must be based on the ukrainian peace formula, and he stated this at the security forum in riga, in the answer to the question of what he means by ukraine's victory. i have a very simple answer to your question: we support the peace formula of president zelenskyi, this is the first, second, ukraine should become a member of the eu and a member of nato, this is what a complete victory will mean

of the situation for going to get all the way over to the shadow or the spectra of what happened in nagasaki and a russian. i obviously casa a long shadow over today's world as well. but nevertheless, china, along with the us along with the u. k. funds, many of those all spending vast sums of money on the nuclear hospitals. gary, i wonder if i can turn the discussion on his head slightly and off this because one argument put forward by so cool nuclear weapons up to this is precisely that they of a direct conflicts between major powers. should we gary to some degree? welcome to, i think is certainly true that in the period after the 2nd world war, the presence of nuclear weapons, especially in the stand off between the united states and the soviet union. the presence of nuclear weapons certainly imposed caution and constraint on the leaders of both countries because they recognized that the use of nuclear weapons would lead to mutual allied elation. as you said, mutually assured destruction. so from that standpoint, nuclear weapons did have a stabilizing impact at the same time as the other g

. >> harry truman would not have done harry truman would not have done hiroshima and nagasaki despite trump's baseless accusations of a two-tier justice system that seems to be working well in his favor right now, judge aileen cannon is entertaining his claim that a special counsel investigation is unlawful, and the supreme court has taken his time weighing trump's immunity claim for nearly two months, potentially delaying the january 6 case until after the election. >> let's discuss now with a yale law political science professor aqeel reed amar, he clerk for supreme court justice stephen breyer, and is the author of the words that made us america's constitutional conversation also with me, debra pearlstein, professor of constitutional law at princeton. she clerked for a supreme court justice john paulson stevens. debra, let me start with you first. thanks to both you for being on with us. the court took less than three weeks to decide us versus nixon which clarified the extent of executive privilege during the watergate scandal. obviously, this is a different case, but why is it tak

weapons are three times more powerful than the bombs used by the americans in four against kheroshima and nagasakimore of them on the european continent, and even if the americans bring theirs... from the usa, we still have many times more, but if it comes to that, god forbid, yes, no matter what i really want, i ’ll cross myself, that’s what it means, but then here you are they said, we will reduce the casualties, but they can grow indefinitely, this is the first, second, of course, these same europeans will have to think, if, then, those with whom we will exchange such blows will not exist? are the americans already at the level of strategic weapons in this exchange of strikes or not? i very much doubt it, and the europeans should also think about it, of course, but i still proceed from the fact that it will never come to this, we don’t even need to think about this topic, please, and i too everyone i would ask again for such things in vanity. a number of circumstances that in one way or another affect certain regions of the world, and we must, of course, think about this. and a potential advers

particularly clear since we are today the only nation that has actually used nuclear weapons and hiroshima and nagasaki. so one would think that we are the ones who should very clearly express our limitations, such as no 1st use of which i believe was something that president biden said he intended before he came into office. so i think rush has actually been much more clear under what circumstances they would be obliged to respond, but not preemptively, as the west seems to say. there was a message of sorts sent, died as well, president put and saying that russia is considering supplying long range weapons to other countries. essentially in a tips for top reciprocal over the western arming of ukraine will not give those countries paused for thoughts. i don't know, i don't know what we'll give these countries. pause for thought. i think we do have an election coming up. and i observed that the great momentum among voters and younger people against the genocide occurring and the gods did seem to register with the biden administration, at least to begin to pretend he supports a ceasefire and other matter

being killed, and the number of dead in in principle, on the part of russia , the number of dead in nagasaki and in cherasim has already exceeded, that is, you understand the scale of russia's losses in the war against ukraine. yes, mr. valery, and it is clear that there are two important summits ahead for ukraine - this is the global peace summit, which will be held on june 15-16 in switzerland, and in july the nato summit, the anniversary summit of the north atlantic alliance, regarding the first summit, the global peace summit, three of the 10 points of zelenskyi's peace plan have apparently been agreed upon for consideration at this summit, but latvian president edgars rinkevičs says that ukraine's victory in the war should be based on the ukrainian peace formula, and he stated this at the security forum in riga, in response to a question about what he means by ukraine's victory. i have a very simple answer to your question: we support president zelensky's peace formula, this is the first. second, ukraine should become a member of the eu and a member of nato, that's what the complete vic

nuclear weapons three times more powerful than the bombs used by the americans against kheroshima and nagasakit, god forbid, and i really don’t want to, i’ll shout out to you. that means, but then you said, we will reduce the sacrifices, but they can increase indefinitely, this first, second, of course, these same europeans will have to think, if those with whom we exchange such blows do not exist, whether the americans will get involved in this exchange of blows at the level of strategic weapons or not, i very much doubt it. how many times in their concessions do putin, lukashenko, together, synchronously, for good reason , say: “guys, why are you raising these nuclear issues? we are never going to do this, we don’t want to.” why are we conducting this exercise, so that this never happens, so that those who stand behind europe this is, first of all, america, great britain, they understood that it would not be possible to sit on the island if there was such a conflict, and this is in fact the only deterrent to these issues, and there is one more. the middle east, the middle east project, the p