the less a convenient kremlin narrative, nato chief in stoughton berg and other allied governments, were constantly to rebuff. nato has no plans to the boy forces to uh, to ukraine, finished. president alexander step says he won't be sending troops either. ends doesn't support the idea of acting alone. i think it's very important that when we are part of the allies, we work as an alliance and helped him separate books. more allied scrutiny of mccullin's actions may be on the way with parents as announcement. it would be sending mirage. spider jets, as the rest of nato has agreed to focus on the delivery of f sixteens. ukrainian president zalinski just said he's grateful for more support as we just heard the francis, promising to send me the arch fight address to ukraine, and president maxwell wants to be good on his promise by the end of the you. be awesome if again, let's frank lead wish if that could be too late to defend offer. i'll show scott and defensive. yes, so not going to be, well, we're not going to be see seeing them in useful quantities and they'll probably get around $25.00

berg, though beijing faces at decisive response from the west, has made it very clear that it cannot continue in the way. it is like, uh, it is today, which china really tries to have a normal relationship with you to be in. and they tell us that the same time are enabling a restaurant to conduct a more risk against you being country. this has done about how this trying to change has its behavior and what kind of consequences should and these have for, for instance, our trade relations to are they to say. but it has to be an issue that we need to address because to continued us to do today is not a viable r t contributor. carl john spoke to the program earlier. he believes nato tries to impose its will, out of frustration because most school invasion there under able to stand off to the block in china and russia are one of the few truly sovereign states in the world right now. russia and china can say no to the united states. this is what nato alliance does, not like me to not believing and sovereignty of nation states. and they like to impose or will. and this what they mean when sa

i mean, last year in stoughton berg has said, nato is discussing, bringing its nuclear weapons into combust readiness. the block street said its arsenal was being bolstered because of a suppose, a growing fred from russia and china, your side president spooks person dmitri pest golf responded to those remarks what mr. stolt and byrne said clearly does not fit into the context of the same declaration. that was adopted on the eve, which was not signed by off, where to if i am not mistaken, it outlines the end admissibility of such rhetoric. this is nothing but another escalation of tension. the seriousness of stolen beg statement should really be dismissed all down, play this better because language is a very clear threat to what he sees as needed. so he's focus, he said the member states result to deploy more nuclear weapons. that means taking the amount of storage, i'm placing them on stand by his side to a grubbing threat from, from both russia and showing that he describes nato as a nuclear lions, which kind of undermines its claims to be an alliance for pace. but he didn't throw you into

i think under stoughton, for the nato has released to the, to the challenges that have come from right from aggression against to crane. clearly data was assisting you crane. and in every way it's kim and stone. burke has been a very, i would say, study and strong presence in terms of, in the individual countries, you know, getting the call from him to help more to help more and, and constantly really because of this, the individual capitalist who makes the decisions and by the way that does have been very good about making decisions on helping you crate. i think that was a factor. i'm good to selection, that's a student who has been very firm in a study handle the tool or this is almost like, please say that we hear every day. but in this case, it didn't mean that he was applying study pressure to individual nato capitals to do the maximum in terms of providing equipment from their own stocks to ukraine. now, assuming martha is actually officially confirmed as the next step, nato secretary general, what improvements do you think you could make? i think it will be an important material