et cetera et cetera et cetera. >> see a clever this is she got over $200 million in donations. pro kamala harris thanks it's an anti- joe biden thing he went completely gaga. it comes back to a massive part for a long period of time finally being exposed for what it was in a complete lie. the man was unfit for office for a long time the top they had their money kept it back. so many literally answer the question what day is it. >> they have put it to anybody ready. >> apparently not biden. and i guess she just inspires more confidence than him. >> i think were good. >> egg and a holdback for tomorrow clique. >> gonna keep those in my pocket. and and, yeah, they have been reborn hard now we have to look at their vp pick the if the advantage because they know he is vice president pick and the problem is with that pic. after everything happened said his vice president could be a broomstick. well they have the same off the field issues the president does so it's a distraction. is vp needs to be a policy guy somebody no personality just as the paperwork and baddest of all stays out

. >> et cetera et cetera et cetera >> a continuation of an early story we touched on from quote commitris she says he's backpedaling. is he backpedaling tyrus or he says yes to everything he's not saying yes to this mick president trump is done a good joe playing chest of their checkers they want do this and this needs like like you know what we're going to wait. is a need to do just had the greatest debate of all time why would you be in a big rush they need you more than you need that my love that attitude. >> you were on the debate team right. >> i also love this. >> what are the book is about this kind of stuff what i would say as you can still book me if he doesn't back out. [ laughter ] >> emily could he. >> is this strategic base who say we don't know she's the nominee. >> first of all the campaign released a statement and he said he would debater and he said i want to bait or twice absolutely but in the interest of fair democracy we won't schedule it until we have an official nominee so i like that he's not punching down you sitting back and playing golf and wading for the fres

. >> et cetera et cetera et cetera >> a continuation of an early story we touched on from quote commits she says he's backpedaling. is he backpedaling tyrus or he says yes to everything he's not saying yes to this mick president trump is done a good joe playing chest of their checkers they want do this and this needs like like you know what we're going to wait. is a need to do just had the greatest debate of all time why would you be in a big rush they need you more than you need that my love that attitude. >> you were on the debate team right. >> i also love this. >> what are the book is about this kind of stuff what i would say as you can still book me if he doesn't back out. [ laughter ] >> emily could he. >> is this strategic base who say we don't know she's the nominee. >> first of all the campaign released a statement and he said he would debater and he said i want to bait or twice absolutely but in the interest of fair democracy we won't schedule it until we have an official nominee so i like that he's not punching down you sitting back and playing golf and wading for the freshm

cetera, et cetera, et cetera." [ laughter ] >> seth: well, i do hope you come back and join us.30 rock. i hope it is special for you to be back in the building as well. >> absolutely, always. this is like my old high school. [ light laughter ] >> seth: yeah. >> i spent so much time in this building when i was, you know, in my 20s. late at night, we used to sleep in our office and run all through this building like maniacs. >> seth: yeah. well, we're very lucky you did, and it is always great to have you back. thanks so much. >> thanks for having me. >> seth: what a pleasure. [ cheers and applause ] eddie murphy, everybody. "beverly hills cop: axel f" begins streaming on netflix july 3rd. we'll be right back with nicola yoon. [ cheers and applause ] ♪ (gentle ambient music) - design a training program. - guys, let's do some trivia. - oh yes, let's do it. - i'm gonna win. - how should i plant this if my garden doesn't receive direct sunlight? hmm. - i was right! - good job. - next question. - it starts with an empty prompt, and the most advanced ai at your fingertips. (bright musi

cetera, et cetera, et cetera it's much better than the old days were the put the money on the stump let the state do what they want. what's wrong with putting money on the stump? i really did not have a good answer. it takes money away from the people who need it. creates all sorts of other players, traverse incentives, and cost localities that the higher people to fill out all this paperwork in these demands. it's one of the things that had not occurred to me. you can overcome the knowledge problem. you also open yourself up to who is deciding at the local level what to do with this money? is the knowledge truly any better or use it for purposes other than you would help. that's why we got the appliance stuff tacked onto the no child left behind act that started 65 and money you're supposed to spend less on helping kids. instead it was like this icicle needs a new football field because her proud of the team we spend it on that. we spent on things other than that. we live in a world of trade-offs and that is where it get tough. cook till thick revenue-sharing cells capture problem

cetera, et cetera, et cetera it's much better than the old days were the put the money on the stumpet the state do what they want. what's wrong with putting money on the stump? i really did not have a good answer. it takes money away from the people who need it. creates all sorts of other players, traverse incentives, and cost localities that the higher people to fill out all this paperwork in these demands. it's one of the things that had not occurred to me. you can overcome the knowledge problem. you also open yourself up to who is deciding at the local level what to do with this money? is the knowledge truly any better or use it for purposes other than you would help. that's why we got the appliance stuff tacked onto the no child left behind act that started 65 and money you're supposed to spend less on helping kids. instead it was like this icicle needs a new football field because her proud of the team we spend it on that. we spent on things other than that. we live in a world of trade-offs and that is where it get tough. cook till thick revenue-sharing cells capture problem ar

cetera, et cetera, et cetera. those are the things that democrats have stood for, have been trying to push and republicans while occasionally plant paying lip service to some of them, have repeatedly sort in the way. >> so this is the one that you highlighted this in your piece that i really do not understand this is a tweet from 2019. he says, it turns out that normal amount jerrycans care more about their family's than their jobs and want a family policy that doesn't shunt their chart, their kids into crap daycare so they can enjoy more freedom in scare quotes in the paid labor force, doesn't make sense. >> yeah, the idea of like i just read it kind of little people's need for affordable child care don't get it. i especially since his wife okay. >> we have to republicans three republicans at the table to who help me understand this, brian, like, what is he talking to? >> listen from florida, i gather is clearly the birth of his child, him being a father headed significant enough to impact him that he looked at a

et cetera, et cetera. et cetera.ional and not really quite brilliant. >> so, emma webb filled with lots of, i mean, very descriptive language, talking about britain needing to navigate our way to calmer waters. well, you weren't impressed by that. you weren't sort of touched on an emotive, creative level . creative level. >> definitely not, i think it would be difficult even for a labour supporter to be touched on any emotional level by that drab speech. but look, i think, talking about being unburdened by doctrine, he started his premiership with a lie because we just we just simply know that it's going to be true. and it's not it's not just about the wokery to use that term, but it's also that i think, and maybe this is something that we'll be discussing maybe in a week's time. it's also the potential constitutional damage that this government could do. if you look at the constitutional damage done by tony blair in 1997 with that whopping majority, now they've got a whopping majority here, but don't really have the

both are talking about the need to protect so secret and medicare et cetera, et cetera et cetera. you look at today there's a gao study talked about by very credible military analyst like arthur herman, a difficult and how broken are discussed in social base is an from the industrialization. .. think anybody who's been to a european council meeting will understand will get there are together but necessity, i think they do well under any circumstance so the champion are vladimir putin is the more the second phase, donald trump. if they are on the stage giving the messages in recent years i think they will find way forward and it will all be through the european union tornado, it will be various coalitions and the possibilities of france, poland and germany and together they can have techniques but at the end of the day we can have faith in putin. >> it's unfair question. the subtie sometimes inside there at odds. it is the view of nato -- resolve earlier today but some of it based on the fact that there is a view of the relations? the manor care about for policy but it's not clear

. >> et cetera, et cetera, you guessed it, et cetera. >> a continuation of an early story.>> it's a real change in mood and the party and around the country we have to be careful. to much tribalism is going on very difficult race democrats enjoy yourself and feel good but it's tough sledding ahead. >> i kinda think i heard what he said but i wasn't sure. >> i always say the enjoy yourself feel good but tough sledding ahead. you agree with them? >> i don't want to but, yeah,. tribalism can get out of hand i always say that leah i think it's a tough race ahead don't how you cannot of the opinion that we just cannot predict anything anymore the last couple weeks of taught us that. >> i think he is telling the democrats to slow their role phrase i just came up with. >> looks like democrats told him to slow his role because he wasn't allowed in the democratic networks. we see the streams from his home and outs time forever a fall in line and bend the knee was a reluctant 1 he wanted to say tough sledding ahead but i think translating that he said it's the same [ bleep ] you're p

both are talking about the need to protect so secret and medicare et cetera, et cetera et cetera. you look at today there's a gao study talked about by very credible military analyst like arthur herman, a difficult and how broken are discussed in social base is an from the industrialization. .. think anybody who's been to a european council meeting will understand will get there are together but necessity, i think they do well under any circumstance so the champion are vladimir putin is the more the second phase, donald trump. if they are on the stage giving the messages in recent years i think they will find a way forward and it will all be through the european union tornado, it will be various coalitions and the possibilities of france, poland and germany and together they can have techniques but at the end of the day we can have faith in putin. >> it's unfair question. the subtitle sometimes inside there at odds. it is the view of nato -- resolve earlier today but some of it based on the fact that there is a view of the relations? the manor care about for policy but it's not cl

[inaudible] i know -- et cetera, et cetera, et cetera, many, many things in life, many things.use he was shocked at the answers that trump was giving. i know from experience. host: ok, james. catherine in tuscaloosa, alabama, democrat. caller: i want to see if anybody else has it problem. -- has this problem. during the doctor's video my audio was cut off. i heard a few. i turned to other channels and had audio. this happens from time to time when i'm watching c-span. i was wondering if anybody else has that problem, muted, turned off or i figure it is accidental but it is really bothersome. host: terry in cleveland, tennessee, republican. good morning. caller: i'm terry, and i have been trying to keep up with who is supposed to be running this year against trump? obama? jill? or biden? because he is not doing anything and he is not going to be able to do anything the next four years. i'm 69 years old. i shouldn't have to be working, but i have to work two different jobs just to make ends meet. and that ain't right. thank you. host: let's talk to joe next, baltimore, independen

. >> et cetera et cetera. you guessed it, et cetera. >> greg: a continuation of an earlier story. they find out democrats are now finally focusing on age. what a surprise. suddenly now it is bad to be old. pretend you are a democrat pundit. [applause] >> that is my fault. that is my fault. asked me the question. >> greg: so, are you surprised. >> i will see y'all in two weeks. pretend he asked the question. hey, tyrus, it is greg. he's too old to run. bullet proof. it is fine. bulletproof. understand? he got shot in the ear by his brain. he would have finished the speech if his bodyguards were this a much shorter. >> greg: kat? i do not think this age thing is going to work unless they do it strictly visually. put kamala up against trump but other than that when he talks there is no difference. >> he is old, he is, is quite old actually. but that is the number of his age. what do you want me to do about that exactly? and the republicans did spend a lot of time focusing on it. i said with me and biden it was never the age. it was he was not old -- he was an old 81. it is not about

. (♪) >> et cetera et cetera you guessed it, et cetera. >> i guess obama says he's not going to back? >> i appreciate that. let me tell you a quick story from an outsider of the great dave chapelle. he didn't opening monologue and i happen to remember when he invited kamala harris to his green room, she brought a friend an inch -- and introduced him, it was the mayor of san francisco. she thought it was funny that somebody was a barack obama fan, call them on the phone and it turned out to what -- they went to school together and they were all friends. when dave chapelle said this, there's even been reports that obama and kamala harris are second cousins, that's not true but were they classmates o canada yes. with all good friends? yes. the family is all tied together, obama is going to back her peer she's going to become the president, that's not a conspiracy, that's the rules. >> to his point he is not going to endorse because twitter is not big enough for that [ bleep ]. it's went to be at the dnc and him and michelle will walk out and they will stand up and be like i'm here to en

cetera, et cetera, et cetera. got joe biden, bad night, terrible night, worst night in debate history, no doubt about it, yet at the same time in the last 3 1/2 years the strongest economy in the world, strongest dollar in 50 years, strongest alliances in the history of nato, and i could go on and on and on. i don't mind them being offended and deeply disturbed by what they saw last wednesday night with joe biden. i'm just concerned why they aren't disturbed by a guy going about calling for treason against his enemies, even generals. >> we democrats wring our hands. we've been accused of being too soft. but we don't -- the fact that on our side we're taking a moment to say, oh, okay, what happened here? you know, interested to see the abc news interview tonight and how the president does there, how he does in the campaign. there's the big nato summit next week. to put thursday night in context and understand what we're really dealing with here, that's the responsible thing to do. i think it really brings to the fo

cetera, et cetera, et cetera, and was going to build a wall because the crisis was so bad.he trump administration had in their documentation, that illegal border crossings from mexico were at a 50-year low before donald trump came into office. a 50-year low under barack obama and joe biden. >> mm-hmm. >> illegal immigration has shot up, but the president said something last night that, again, democrats should talk about on the campaign trail when illegal immigration comes in. first of all, they can once again talk about how it was donald trump that killed the toughest border security bill drafted by a conservative republican from oklahoma because he thought it would hurt him politically, but then what else did he say? he said illegal border crossings are lower now than when donald trump left office. that's one. two, that crime, which republicans are talking about, which americans have been talking about a good bit, but now there's such -- so many good things are happening and things are moving in a great direction. violent crime is at a 50-year low. let me say it again, dem

cetera, et cetera, et cetera, process was open, it was fair to run, only three people ran.hem of being trumpish when he says, do we say the process doesn't matter, that the voters don't have a say? i think, that is a clear -- and again, the reason i underlined it before, is that's what those -- the jerry nadler -- >> i think it's a good question. >> senator warner, that's the question that democrats are going to have to answer. this looks like a real shot across the bow for those who are saying, ignore what the voters say, get out of the race. >> let's bring in elaina plott collabaro, in your latest for the atlantic, in it you analyze as you see as the administration's lack of focus on the vice president. you write, four months before the election and one week after biden's disastrous debate performance against donald trump, harris' capacity to lead the democratic party and the free world has never been more relevant. and yet, many americans after three years of the west wing's poor stewardship of harris, are now looking at their vice president as if for the first time. you

this is a very important discussion sometimes people say it's theoretical, et cetera, et cetera., tells you the policy you should pursue come, to us to take on, how to do with other countries, et cetera. >> okay. matt i'm going to come back to you to way back in but i want to turn first to bonny point also heard about this and has thoughts on the question of end-state. maybe you could offer a perspective here. >> rush, thank you very much. the light of to be at also being on stage with both matt and bridge who i work with. in terms of thinking through in stage, discovered question we need to think through. we need to think about what can the united states realistically cheap given our capabilities? here i think appreciate matt clarifying your paper is not about regime change because try to affect domestic policy change in china was bombed hard disk of much harder than trying to to help china operates internationally. we will probably are all agree our party should be china's actual behavior. and to the extent we can hope for a change internally within china but that shouldn't be

this is a very important discussion sometimes people say it's theoretical, et cetera, et cetera.no, tells you the policy you should pursue come, to us to take on, how to do with other countries, et cetera. >> okay. matt i'm going to come back to you to way back in but i want to turn first to bonny point also heard about this and has thoughts on the question of end-state. maybe you could offer a perspective here. >> rush, thank you very much. the light of to be at also being on stage with both matt and bridge who i work with. in terms of thinking through in stage, discovered question we need to think through. we need to think about what can the united states realistically cheap given our capabilities? here i think appreciate matt clarifying your paper is not about regime change because try to affect domestic policy change in china was bombed hard disk of much harder than trying to to help china operates internationally. we will probably are all agree our party should be china's actual behavior. and to the extent we can hope for a change internally within china but that shouldn't b