bestgar, referring to the allocation of subsidies to the beginning of the chain or to the end of the chain in any way , that is, without monitoring, without follow-up, you are definitely wrong, whether it is the beginning of the chain or the end of the subsidy chain. if you don't allocate enough monitoring, you won't get the desired output . let's face it, this is the easiest thing for the subsidy executive to do is for you to come and give the end of the chain and not have anything to do with monitoring and don't do those hard steps and hard work, but if you gave, did you pay at the beginning of the chain , were the supervisions enough? it was standard, we had experience, but without supervision, we have allocated, but without supervision, without effective supervision, if effective supervision. if there is , the beginning of the chain will be more effective than you look at the issue from the point of view of production. if you don't support the different parts of the production from the beginning of the chain, they will leave the cycle of competition over time. this is the same cl