0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
president trump's lawyer awkwardly brought it up with brett kavanaugh. kavanaugh was trying to focus on this question of why president trump wasn't prosecuted for insurrection, and we've been talking about that a little bit tonight, this idea that because trump hasn't been charged specifically with insurrection, that suddenly seemed to create this incredible clarity among all the justices that had that thing happened, then this would be something that there would be an easy answer to when we know what to do when this would be settled in a definitive way. i just wanted to ask here, your reaction to that. it doesn't seem clear to me why it's necessary for trump to be charged with or convicted of insurrection for the constitution's ban on insurrection serving in office to be effectuated. what did you think of how that part of it was handled? >> i was a little frustrated at how deeply disrespectful i felt that the court was about the process that happened in the colorado trial court. there was a trial on the merits. there were, as you just heard, meaningful
president trump's lawyer awkwardly brought it up with brett kavanaugh. kavanaugh was trying to focus on this question of why president trump wasn't prosecuted for insurrection, and we've been talking about that a little bit tonight, this idea that because trump hasn't been charged specifically with insurrection, that suddenly seemed to create this incredible clarity among all the justices that had that thing happened, then this would be something that there would be an easy answer to when we...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
president trump's lawyer awkwardly brought it up with brett kavanaugh. while brett kavanaugh was trying to focus on this question of why president trump wasn't prosecuted for insurrection, and we've been talking about that a little bit tonight, this idea that because trump hasn't been charged specifically with insurrection, that suddenly seemed to create this incredible clarity among all the justices that had that thing happened, then this would be something that there would be an easy answer to when we know what to do when this would be settled in a definitive way. i just wanted to ask here, your reaction to that. it doesn't seem clear to me why it's necessary for trump to be charged with or convicted of insurrection for the constitution's ban on insurrection serving in office to be effectuated. what did you think of how that part of it was handled? >> i was a little frustrated at how deeply disrespectful i felt that the court was about the process that happened in the colorado trial court. there was a trial on the merits. there were, as you just heard,
president trump's lawyer awkwardly brought it up with brett kavanaugh. while brett kavanaugh was trying to focus on this question of why president trump wasn't prosecuted for insurrection, and we've been talking about that a little bit tonight, this idea that because trump hasn't been charged specifically with insurrection, that suddenly seemed to create this incredible clarity among all the justices that had that thing happened, then this would be something that there would be an easy answer...
0
0.0
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
man that is now supreme court justice brett kavanaugh. and then there was this move to just like release all this this information will allegations are not facts and just because somebody has reported something to the fbi doesn't mean it's true and we saw all this wild stuff released about brett kavanaugh, who was unfairly smeared by a lot of this. here we have apparently the same situation except it's against joe biden right? >> exactly. and by the way, i mean, if people come to the fbi all the time, make allegations, the fbi puts it down in these documents called the 1023, and that's what republicans then released to the public yeah, it seems in retrospect wildly irresponsible. just released ten 23s without any sort of context as to how credible an individual might be. and now we know the fbi thinks this guy is not credible at all, right. >> made it all up. >> all right, evan perez, thanks so much. appreciate at the top, democrat on the house intelligence committee is going to be here next, we'll talk to him about as plus. more importan
man that is now supreme court justice brett kavanaugh. and then there was this move to just like release all this this information will allegations are not facts and just because somebody has reported something to the fbi doesn't mean it's true and we saw all this wild stuff released about brett kavanaugh, who was unfairly smeared by a lot of this. here we have apparently the same situation except it's against joe biden right? >> exactly. and by the way, i mean, if people come to the fbi...
0
0.0
Feb 11, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
president trump's lawyer awkwardly brought it up with brett kavanaugh.dent trump wasn't prosecuted for insurrection, and we've been talking about that a little bit tonight, this idea that because trump hasn't been charged specifically with insurrection, that suddenly seemed to create this incredible clarity among all the justices that had that thing happened, then this would be something that there would be an easy answer to when we know what to do when this would be settled in a definitive way. i just wanted to ask here, your reaction to that. it doesn't seem clear to me why it's necessary for trump to be charged with or convicted of insurrection for the constitution's ban on insurrection serving in office to be effectuated. what did you think of how that part of it was handled? >> i was a little frustrated at how deeply disrespectful i felt that the court was about the process that happened in the colorado trial court. there was a trial on the merits. there were, as you just heard, meaningful findings from that court. the notion that trial courts can't
president trump's lawyer awkwardly brought it up with brett kavanaugh.dent trump wasn't prosecuted for insurrection, and we've been talking about that a little bit tonight, this idea that because trump hasn't been charged specifically with insurrection, that suddenly seemed to create this incredible clarity among all the justices that had that thing happened, then this would be something that there would be an easy answer to when we know what to do when this would be settled in a definitive...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
kavanaugh. joining us now is yale law school professor akhil amar, he is the author of the book the words that made us: america's constitutional conversation 1760 to 1840, and host of the podcast america's constitution. professor, thank you very much for joining us tonight. i'm so glad you're here to expand on this, because i've mentioned once or twice not every presidential candidate necessarily gets on all 50 ballots in this country because there's a variety of ballot access, hurdles, that are deliberately put in place. the bigger states tenth of the most expensive hurdles to get over, like new york and california. and so, it is possible for a presidential candidate not to be on every ballot. and where it stands tonight with only maine in colorado saying they -- he's not going to be on the ballot, those are two states donald trump has never won. so it has no effect on his electoral college count. he could go back and get the same electoral college count he got against hillary clinton, even not
kavanaugh. joining us now is yale law school professor akhil amar, he is the author of the book the words that made us: america's constitutional conversation 1760 to 1840, and host of the podcast america's constitution. professor, thank you very much for joining us tonight. i'm so glad you're here to expand on this, because i've mentioned once or twice not every presidential candidate necessarily gets on all 50 ballots in this country because there's a variety of ballot access, hurdles, that...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
kavanaugh.ning us now is yell law school professor akilah maher. he is the author of the book, the words that made us america's constitutional conversation 1760, 1840, and also the podcast, america's constitution. professor, thank you so much for joining us tonight. i am so glad that you are here to expand on this. i mentioned once or twice that not every presidential candidate necessarily gets on all 50 ballots in this country because there is a variety of ballot access hurdles deliberately in place, but the bigger states tend to have the most expensive hurdles to get over like new york and california. so, it is possible for a presidential candidate not to be an every ballot, and where it stands tonight, with only maine and colorado saying that he is not going to be on the ballot, those are two states that donald trump has never won. it has no effect on his electoral college account. he could go back and get the same electoral county going against hillary clinton, even not being on the ballots.
kavanaugh.ning us now is yell law school professor akilah maher. he is the author of the book, the words that made us america's constitutional conversation 1760, 1840, and also the podcast, america's constitution. professor, thank you so much for joining us tonight. i am so glad that you are here to expand on this. i mentioned once or twice that not every presidential candidate necessarily gets on all 50 ballots in this country because there is a variety of ballot access hurdles deliberately in...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> well, you know who also seems to have said exactly that is brett kavanaugh, because brett kavanaugh now on the supreme court, obviously, was part of that same group of special counsel, and obviously thought that bill clinton when out of office would be able to be prosecuted for crimes. let's call it for what it is. the only person who is really saying that is somebody who is currently indicted, trying to figure out how to -- >> trying to duck a trial. >> is failed in the district court, it has failed in the court of appeals. if the supreme court takes it, it will fail there. it is really, it's strategy that defense counsel has which is delay. that is really the purpose, not really the merits of the case. >> yeah, andrew weissmann on more than one topic on this special historic week, thank you, sir. we'll be right back. [sfx: game controller] when occasional heartburn won't let you sleep. [sfx: game controller] get fast relief with tums+ heartburn + sleep support. love food back and fall asleep faster. ♪ tums tums tums tums ♪ eggs make all our family moments better. especially when t
>> well, you know who also seems to have said exactly that is brett kavanaugh, because brett kavanaugh now on the supreme court, obviously, was part of that same group of special counsel, and obviously thought that bill clinton when out of office would be able to be prosecuted for crimes. let's call it for what it is. the only person who is really saying that is somebody who is currently indicted, trying to figure out how to -- >> trying to duck a trial. >> is failed in the...
0
0.0
Feb 12, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
, kavanaugh because brett kavanaugh also, who is now on the supreme court obviously, was part of thatpecial counsel. and obviously thought that bill clinton went out of office, would be able to be prosecuted. let's just call it for what it is. the only person who has really saying that is somebody who is currently indicted, trying to figure out how to, and -- i >> mean, this has failed in the district court it has failed in the court of appeals. the supreme court takes it will fail there. it is really, i mean -- it is a strategy that fence counsel has which is delay. that is really the purpose. it's not really the merits of the case. >> yeah andrew weissmann, on more than one topic on this special historic week, thank you really when you have chronic kidney disease... ...there are places you'd like to be. like here. and here. not so much here. farxiga reduces the risk of kidney failure which can lead to dialysis. ♪far-xi-ga♪ farxiga can cause serious side effects, including ketoacidosis that may be fatal, dehydration, urinary tract or genital yeast infections, and low blood sugar. a r
, kavanaugh because brett kavanaugh also, who is now on the supreme court obviously, was part of thatpecial counsel. and obviously thought that bill clinton went out of office, would be able to be prosecuted. let's just call it for what it is. the only person who has really saying that is somebody who is currently indicted, trying to figure out how to, and -- i >> mean, this has failed in the district court it has failed in the court of appeals. the supreme court takes it will fail there....
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
kavanaugh said what does it mean, who designs it, who defines it, and i don't think you have to be aawyer to ask and want to know the answer to and colorado did not have a good answer to it. >> john: kavanaugh brought up there are provisions to remove a person from office if they are found guilty of insurrection. but to be found guilty, a person has to be charged, tried, and convicted. none of those things have happened with donald trump. so, the state of colorado just says oh, we think it's insurrection and therefore we are going to bar them from the ballot. i think a lot of the members of the supreme court said well, who are you to make that decision and then the broader question of and why should you get to decide for everybody else. >> and then how does it not create untenable patch work. and justice alito asked jason murray who was arguing for colorado, he said you are not helping me understand how this will not become an unmanageable situation. p>> sandra: kerri, i believe jonathan turley is back with us as we continue to wait, i believe we are inside the two-minute warning now
kavanaugh said what does it mean, who designs it, who defines it, and i don't think you have to be aawyer to ask and want to know the answer to and colorado did not have a good answer to it. >> john: kavanaugh brought up there are provisions to remove a person from office if they are found guilty of insurrection. but to be found guilty, a person has to be charged, tried, and convicted. none of those things have happened with donald trump. so, the state of colorado just says oh, we think...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
john roberts, amy coney barrett and the very controversial brett kavanaugh. this is known. hearings and barrett dispatched to florida to help the legal team deal with absentee ballots and she claims she barely remembered it. >> i did work on bush v. gore. i did work on behalf of the republican side. to be totally honest i can't remember exactly when piece of the case it was. >> that's interesting. i can't remember that. another controversial conservative stalwart, brett kavanaugh was a partisan lawyer on the bush team and we checked and found him discussing the same case in 2000 right after the supreme court heard the oral arguments. he was dealing with the recount litigation and i think we have -- do we still have that sound to play? not even then -- we do. my bad. i'll just show you this. i want you to see how even then he knew the game. he was doing everything in his power to be a partisan advocate for bush to get a partisan result where the court would do things that made bush winner and president, but he still knew you don't admit that, you talk about how, well, the co
john roberts, amy coney barrett and the very controversial brett kavanaugh. this is known. hearings and barrett dispatched to florida to help the legal team deal with absentee ballots and she claims she barely remembered it. >> i did work on bush v. gore. i did work on behalf of the republican side. to be totally honest i can't remember exactly when piece of the case it was. >> that's interesting. i can't remember that. another controversial conservative stalwart, brett kavanaugh...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i'll just point out that in many others cases, justice kagan defended democracy, but brett kavanaugh conservative brethren have not. it was a little ironic hear justices like kavanaugh and roberts suddenly come out swinging for voting rights and democracy when they have spent much of their careers allowing situates to restrict or revoke voting rights. >> there was a question about that. one of the justices asked if this would be a disenfrancement and the response from the lawyer for colorado was donald trump participated in insurrection and part of that was trying to disenfranchise millions of voters by say their vote department count and he should stay in office. he shouldn't have a second chances. >> i think that's a very powerful argument. really an argument from the 14th amendment, which according to murray and the plaintiffs in this case, was designed to protect democracy against office holders who would subvert it, who would wield the power of their office to affect antithe democratic results, to nullify the rights of the people, including access to the ballot. but the justices
i'll just point out that in many others cases, justice kagan defended democracy, but brett kavanaugh conservative brethren have not. it was a little ironic hear justices like kavanaugh and roberts suddenly come out swinging for voting rights and democracy when they have spent much of their careers allowing situates to restrict or revoke voting rights. >> there was a question about that. one of the justices asked if this would be a disenfrancement and the response from the lawyer for...
0
0.0
Feb 10, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brett kavanaugh, because brett kavanaugh also, who is now on the supreme court obviously, was part off special counsel, and obviously thought that bill clinton went out of office, would be able to be prosecuted for crimes. let's just, let's just call it for what it is. the only person who is really saying that is somebody who is currently indicted, trying to figure out how -- >> exactly. i >> mean, this has failed in the district court, it has failed in the court of appeals, this supreme court if it takes, it will fail there. it is really, i mean it is a strategy that the defense counsel has, which is delay. that is really the purpose, it's not really the merits of the case. >> yeah, andrew weissmann, on more than one topic on this special historic week, thank you sir. we will be right back. sir. we will be right back. (jen) so we partner with verizon. their solution for us? a private 5g network. (ella) we now get more control of production, efficiencies, and greater agility. (marquis) with a custom private 5g network. our customers get what they want, when they want it. (jen) now we'
brett kavanaugh, because brett kavanaugh also, who is now on the supreme court obviously, was part off special counsel, and obviously thought that bill clinton went out of office, would be able to be prosecuted for crimes. let's just, let's just call it for what it is. the only person who is really saying that is somebody who is currently indicted, trying to figure out how -- >> exactly. i >> mean, this has failed in the district court, it has failed in the court of appeals, this...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice brett kavanaugh elicited some icof the stronges push at this point, the point of whether thisinsurrection and the implications of that. he elicited some of the strongest pushback on that today from jason murray, one of the lawyers in colorado. >> in trying to figure out what section three means to the extent of its elusive language or vague language. what about the idea that you should think about democracy, think about the right of the people to elect candidates of their choice, of letting the people decide. your position has the effect of disenfranchising voters to a significant degree. what about the background principle, if you'd agree on -- >> a good like to make three points of that, justice kavanaugh. the first is that constitutional safeguards, but for the purpose of safeguarding our democracy, not just for the next election cycle but for generations to come. second, section three is designed to protect our democracy in that very way. the framers of section three new from painful experience that those who violently expose their oath to the constitution cannot be truste
justice brett kavanaugh elicited some icof the stronges push at this point, the point of whether thisinsurrection and the implications of that. he elicited some of the strongest pushback on that today from jason murray, one of the lawyers in colorado. >> in trying to figure out what section three means to the extent of its elusive language or vague language. what about the idea that you should think about democracy, think about the right of the people to elect candidates of their choice,...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice brett kavanaugh, trump appointee -- >> what about the idea that we should think about democracyt the right of the people to elect candidates of their choice, of letting the people decide. >> reporter: and justice elena kagan, appointed by bill clinton -- >> i think the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the united states. >> reporter: justice amy coney barrett agreeing. >> it doesn't seem like a state call. >> reporter: chief justice john roberts warning that if the court upholds colorado, a new weapon could be introduced into the country's polarized political life -- red states going after democrats, blue states after republicans. >> i would expect that, you know, a goodly number of states will say, whoever the democratic candidate is, you're off the ballot, and others, for the republican candidate, you're off the ballot. it will come down to just a handful of states that are going to decide the presidential election. that's a pretty daunting consequence. >> reporter: but looming over these arguments, the national
justice brett kavanaugh, trump appointee -- >> what about the idea that we should think about democracyt the right of the people to elect candidates of their choice, of letting the people decide. >> reporter: and justice elena kagan, appointed by bill clinton -- >> i think the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the united states. >> reporter: justice amy coney barrett agreeing. >> it doesn't seem like...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and the question is, can trump get three more votes from brett kavanaugh, amy coney barrett or -- >>neel gorsuch. >> justice gorsuch and chief justice roberts? that's -- it's just a hard question. i don't know. this is such an unusual situation. >> i mean, we're in the wild, wild west. i'm surprised a tumbleweed has not gone across the screen as we look at the novel things happening. and one would say, this court does not want to venture into politics. they are probably reeling over the bush v. gore and hanging chads. this case does go to an issue the supreme court does want to be involved in. it's the question of separation of powers. not so much an election year, but whether there can be a check or balance on the head of the executive branch. shouldn't the court weigh in on an issue like that? >> back in the day, i was covering the recount in florida. we were having these discussions about will the supreme court want to get involved? i remember people saying, they want to be above the fray. they don't want to be involved. of course,they did get involved. here, it's a similar scenar
and the question is, can trump get three more votes from brett kavanaugh, amy coney barrett or -- >>neel gorsuch. >> justice gorsuch and chief justice roberts? that's -- it's just a hard question. i don't know. this is such an unusual situation. >> i mean, we're in the wild, wild west. i'm surprised a tumbleweed has not gone across the screen as we look at the novel things happening. and one would say, this court does not want to venture into politics. they are probably...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice brett kavanaugh asked if congress should be enforcing the ban instead of courts. it is one of the off ramps the supreme court could choose to take with a narrow ruling that avoids confronting weightier issues. >> these are difficult questions and you look right at section five of the 14th amendment. that tells you congress has the primary role here. >> reporter: the court doesn't even need to decide the court issues in this case. whether trump engaged in insurrection. if that would disqualify him from the ballot. they could decide on a more narrow issue. whether it is up to congress to enforce this ban rather than the courts. whether this ban applies to the presidency or if it only applies to office holders and not office seekers but all signs do point to a win for trump. and this court could decide fairly quickly, case in point, back in 2000, the supreme court decided bush v. gore where they halted the recount to florida, they decided that case one day after they heard oral arguments. jessica schneider, cnn, washington. >>> donald trump is another step closer to
justice brett kavanaugh asked if congress should be enforcing the ban instead of courts. it is one of the off ramps the supreme court could choose to take with a narrow ruling that avoids confronting weightier issues. >> these are difficult questions and you look right at section five of the 14th amendment. that tells you congress has the primary role here. >> reporter: the court doesn't even need to decide the court issues in this case. whether trump engaged in insurrection. if...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> reporter: justice brett kavanaugh asked whether congress should be enforcing the increase ban, insteadf courts. it's an off-ramp that the supreme court could take. >> these are different questions, and you look right as section 5 of the 14th amendment, as the chief justice said, that tells you congress has the primary role here. >> reporter: so really the supreme court doesn't need to get to the core issues or those core decisions in this case, those being whether there was an insurrection, erin, or whether donald trump may have committed an insurrection. instead there's several questions that do provide that off-ramp. does the court even have the jurisdiction, or is this congress's role? does the 14thally, section 3, even apply to the presidency? there's a lot of choices that the supreme court can make to not decide the big sure here, but really all si-- >>> i have to go to jason murray, the lawyer who argued to bar trump from the colorado ballot. i know this was a momentous day for the country, annual certainly for you. this was your first time arguing before the supreme court. you w
. >> reporter: justice brett kavanaugh asked whether congress should be enforcing the increase ban, insteadf courts. it's an off-ramp that the supreme court could take. >> these are different questions, and you look right as section 5 of the 14th amendment, as the chief justice said, that tells you congress has the primary role here. >> reporter: so really the supreme court doesn't need to get to the core issues or those core decisions in this case, those being whether there...
0
0.0
Feb 26, 2024
02/24
by
BLOOMBERG
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
kavanaugh.y are all confused about the law. they say it is so broad sweeping. how does it even get implemented? why are we talking about this? it's not looking good for the states. ed: it's great to have you on the show. i urge the audience to check out emily's quicktake because you get a clear understanding of what is a complicated story. sticking with d.c., we are waiting on some news from the commerce department. it could, anytime, potentially regarding grants from the chips act. guess who's with us? bloomberg's kailey leinz. we have our eye on the flow of capital from this key piece of lawmaking. what do you think is going on? >> we heard from the commerce secretary when she hinted there should be a drumbeat of bigger announcements in the next 6-12 weeks. bloomberg's own reporting indicates they want to have the grants announced by the end of march. could we get more hints from the commerce secretary when she speaks in moments to give an update on chips act implementation. we are talking 35
kavanaugh.y are all confused about the law. they say it is so broad sweeping. how does it even get implemented? why are we talking about this? it's not looking good for the states. ed: it's great to have you on the show. i urge the audience to check out emily's quicktake because you get a clear understanding of what is a complicated story. sticking with d.c., we are waiting on some news from the commerce department. it could, anytime, potentially regarding grants from the chips act. guess who's...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
kavanaugh's nomination in 2017. travelling to the southern border together with me in 23018 to show the -- in 2018 to show the world how the trump administration was ripping innocent children out of their parents' affirms. writing, editing, annotating our office's comprehensive 80-page report on the trump administration's attacks on immig immigration and asylum in 2019. reorienting our entire commun indications operation to a virtual operation when the pandemic hit. supporting oregon communities after the labor day wildfires in 2020. cleaning up my hideaway after it was ransacked by insurrectionists on january 6, 2021. and through it all, filling in for long stretches when we were down a digital director or speechwriter or deputy press secretary. as one of our team members put it, she's unstoppable. and my staff talked about how, in addition to her communications at that moments, she's always the first to welcome and support a new member of our team, whether that member is in washington, d.c., or in oregon. in 2017,
kavanaugh's nomination in 2017. travelling to the southern border together with me in 23018 to show the -- in 2018 to show the world how the trump administration was ripping innocent children out of their parents' affirms. writing, editing, annotating our office's comprehensive 80-page report on the trump administration's attacks on immig immigration and asylum in 2019. reorienting our entire commun indications operation to a virtual operation when the pandemic hit. supporting oregon...
0
0.0
Feb 2, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
kavanaugh. either side need all three of those for how this is resolved. again, it could be a 5-4 ruling. chief justice john roberts doesn't want a 5-4 ruling. he wants the center to go with either the trump -- the pro-trump forces or those who are trying to keep him off the ballot. >> so much prep that goes into all of this. really appreciate it. thank you. >> sure. >>> the newest c nn polling shos donald trump narrowly leading president biden in a hypothetical matchup. there are cracks beginning to emerge when it comes to biden's michigan coalition. >> we are not happy with biden. we understand that the other option is not an option that's favorable to us. >> he is not somebody i can trust. >>> the coalition that helped president biden win michigan in 2020 could show cracks this year. he visited the battleground state yesterday. he focused on improving the lives of the middle class. that state has a large arab american population, some of whom showed up to protest biden's support of israel in
kavanaugh. either side need all three of those for how this is resolved. again, it could be a 5-4 ruling. chief justice john roberts doesn't want a 5-4 ruling. he wants the center to go with either the trump -- the pro-trump forces or those who are trying to keep him off the ballot. >> so much prep that goes into all of this. really appreciate it. thank you. >> sure. >>> the newest c nn polling shos donald trump narrowly leading president biden in a hypothetical matchup....
0
0.0
Feb 2, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
kavanaugh, all nine, just to get someone ready for next thursday, kate. >> yeah, i mean, standing up before those justices, if anyone ever sat through those, it's a different beast. it's a beast all on its own. then with the unprecedented nature of what the justices could be deciding here and doing here, it adds an entirely new level to all of this. good to see you, joan. thank you. sara? >>> coming up, humpback whales, once on the brink of extinction, made a spectacular comeback. now, scientists say they're facing their biggest existential threat. this is a great story. we'll have bill weir come in and explain. bastian >>> this sunday cnn will take you to the far corners -- i know, corners, reaches, you decide what shape of the earth for a special report on the climate crisis. cnn's bill weir embedded with a team of researchers tracking humpback whales to reveal how the crisis is impacting them and how they might actually help beat it. bill is here. tell me more! tell us more. >> they are the biggest allies we have, literally the biggest allies on the planet and it is so good we sav
kavanaugh, all nine, just to get someone ready for next thursday, kate. >> yeah, i mean, standing up before those justices, if anyone ever sat through those, it's a different beast. it's a beast all on its own. then with the unprecedented nature of what the justices could be deciding here and doing here, it adds an entirely new level to all of this. good to see you, joan. thank you. sara? >>> coming up, humpback whales, once on the brink of extinction, made a spectacular...
0
0.0
Feb 28, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
kavanaugh.re were reports earlier today in the hill that trump's campaign manager and josh holmes, who has been mitch mcconnell's top political adviser, had been in talks. maybe there would be an endorsement, what this says about talks will come out in time. clearly this was a moment and really talks a lot as i say about the rnc, who is republican party of the future and clearly standard bearer is donald trump and has been since 2015. although there are divisions within the republican party, there are decisions about where movement and momentum is and i think this is part of a basket of decisions mitch mcconnell made. clearly not the only issue, in that basket. >> harris: some will be personal. they are personal. martha maccallum, thank you, we'll be watching "the story." bring in jacqui heinrich. where is she, is she at the white house? clearly you are, give an update from there. >> we've reached out to the white house to glean whether the president got a heads up on this. yesterday you had big
kavanaugh.re were reports earlier today in the hill that trump's campaign manager and josh holmes, who has been mitch mcconnell's top political adviser, had been in talks. maybe there would be an endorsement, what this says about talks will come out in time. clearly this was a moment and really talks a lot as i say about the rnc, who is republican party of the future and clearly standard bearer is donald trump and has been since 2015. although there are divisions within the republican party,...
0
0.0
Feb 20, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
retired judge michael mcconnell and justice brett kavanaugh, who also -- his remarks were on chief justiceehnquist and the nondelegation doctrine. >> judge kavanaugh's seat. >> i like the trendline on this by the way. >> thinking about the conversations, you have been a judge for a few years. how has your service as a judge furthered your sense of pluralism in american government? >> there is a deep connection between respect for pluralism and the rule of law. i have thought a lot over the past four or five years about the role of a judge. the role is to uphold the law. when judges are upholding the constitution, statutory limits on the administered of agencies, which is a big part of my job i , think that leave space for pluralism. that leaves an opening for liberty, it keeps the government within its limits. i think there is an important connection between pluralism of the rule of law. therefore the power of judicial review. >> a criticism of judges is that their work is not rule of law enough that they treat their job as a value judgment on behalf of the american people. as the supreme
retired judge michael mcconnell and justice brett kavanaugh, who also -- his remarks were on chief justiceehnquist and the nondelegation doctrine. >> judge kavanaugh's seat. >> i like the trendline on this by the way. >> thinking about the conversations, you have been a judge for a few years. how has your service as a judge furthered your sense of pluralism in american government? >> there is a deep connection between respect for pluralism and the rule of law. i have...
0
0.0
Feb 10, 2024
02/24
by
LINKTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and this is conservative justice brett kavanaugh challenging colorado's attorney jason murray. >> lastestion, and trying to figure out what section 3 means to the extent it is vague language, what about the idea we should think about democracy, think about the right of the people to elect candidates of their choice, of letting the people decide? your position has the effect of disenfranchising voters to a significant degree. >> this case illustrates the danger of refusing to apply section 3 as written because the reason we here is president trump try to disenfranchise 80 million americans who voted against him when the constitution does not require him to given another chance. nermeen: for more on this and other cases trump is facing we are joined by elie mystal, the nation's justice correspondent. his new piece is headlined "the supreme court is not going to save us from donald trump." he's the author "allow me to retort: a black guy's guide to the constitution." welcome back to democracy now! if you could just begin by responding to yesterday's oral arguments. >> it was a disaster. a
and this is conservative justice brett kavanaugh challenging colorado's attorney jason murray. >> lastestion, and trying to figure out what section 3 means to the extent it is vague language, what about the idea we should think about democracy, think about the right of the people to elect candidates of their choice, of letting the people decide? your position has the effect of disenfranchising voters to a significant degree. >> this case illustrates the danger of refusing to apply...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice brett kavanaugh.rump appointee. >> what about the idea that we should think about democracy, think about the right of the people to elect candidates of their choice letting the people decide. >> reporter: and justice kagan, appointed by barack obama. >> i think the question you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the united states. >> reporter: trump appointee amy coney barrett agreeing. >> it just doesn't seem like a state call. >> reporter: but looming over these arguments, the national trauma of the attack on the capitol. even though trump himself describes that day as beautiful, justice brown jackson got trump's lawyer to acknowledge the reality of what happened. >> for an insurrection there needs to be an organized concerted effort to overthrow the government of the united states through violence, and this riot -- >> chaotic effort to throw the government is not an insurrection? >> we didn't concede that it's an effort to overthrow the government, just
justice brett kavanaugh.rump appointee. >> what about the idea that we should think about democracy, think about the right of the people to elect candidates of their choice letting the people decide. >> reporter: and justice kagan, appointed by barack obama. >> i think the question you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the united states. >> reporter: trump appointee amy coney barrett agreeing. >> it just doesn't seem...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brett kavanaugh, a trump appointee, brought up a potential flaw or question for the anti-trump positionat whatever might come, donald trump could be convicted in more than one case, donald trump as a legal matter might end up incarcerated but kavanaugh noted he hasn't been charged with the federal crime of insurrection. >> it's a federal criminal statute. and if you're convicted of that you are, it says shall be disqualified from holding any office. and so there is a federal statute on the books, but president trump has not been charged with that. >> fact check, true. that was a point in court and if you watch this program, we actually raised this with one of the plaintiffs, the colorado election official, the secretary of state, because as kavanaugh just repeated, you wouldn't have any cases about this, you wouldn't have a question of which case decided it. you could not be on any ballot. trump faces over 90 counts in four cases. colorado's lawyer stressing the unprecedented nature of this is that basically the court and the country should care more about all of that, that pile of evid
brett kavanaugh, a trump appointee, brought up a potential flaw or question for the anti-trump positionat whatever might come, donald trump could be convicted in more than one case, donald trump as a legal matter might end up incarcerated but kavanaugh noted he hasn't been charged with the federal crime of insurrection. >> it's a federal criminal statute. and if you're convicted of that you are, it says shall be disqualified from holding any office. and so there is a federal statute on...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
next year, trump appointed brett kavanaugh to the bench as well. another presidential election year approached, people started to wonder, what would mitch mcconnell do if another vacancy opened up on the court? when he helped confirm a third trump justice in an election year? >> [inaudible] >> we would fill it. [laughter] >> i would feel. it on september 18th, 2020, supreme court justice ruth bader ginsburg passed away, and with less than two months until the presidential election, mitch mcconnell rushed through the appointment of amy coney barrett. that is how we got the radical conservative majority court we have today. this is mitch mcconnell's legacy. and today senator mcconnell announced that he would be retiring from senate leadership this november. >> i'm immensely proud of all the things i've played some role in obtaining. thoroughly disappointing night critics. i intend to do so with all the enthusiasm with which they have become accustomed. >> mitch mcconnell will no longer be running the upper chamber. after falling out with the former p
next year, trump appointed brett kavanaugh to the bench as well. another presidential election year approached, people started to wonder, what would mitch mcconnell do if another vacancy opened up on the court? when he helped confirm a third trump justice in an election year? >> [inaudible] >> we would fill it. [laughter] >> i would feel. it on september 18th, 2020, supreme court justice ruth bader ginsburg passed away, and with less than two months until the presidential...
0
0.0
Feb 6, 2024
02/24
by
KRON
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so that puts a lot of pressure on someone say like on a john roberts on gorsuch, brett kavanaugh, amy coney barrett, maybe so. you're going to be 2 of those who say that the issues are so important moving forward. you read this opinion. it's a strong opinion that unanimous opinion. it's a love letter to the rule of law at this. 57 page decision is huge and strong and goes against fully. the audacious claims made by the former president. so in that sense, it has both political impact in legal impact. >> so this you know, for people out there might not pay close attention is related to the january 6th incident. do think that because those 3 judges, you know, ruled unanimously one was appointed by a republican president. hw bush 2 by democratic presidents. do you think that the supreme court will most use that as a playbook if they do, in fact, take the case. yeah, i think there's going to be to be fascinating to read the history on this later. but if there will be some internal pressure to to go into this case and the decision says >> that the former president has to make his appeal to
so that puts a lot of pressure on someone say like on a john roberts on gorsuch, brett kavanaugh, amy coney barrett, maybe so. you're going to be 2 of those who say that the issues are so important moving forward. you read this opinion. it's a strong opinion that unanimous opinion. it's a love letter to the rule of law at this. 57 page decision is huge and strong and goes against fully. the audacious claims made by the former president. so in that sense, it has both political impact in legal...
0
0.0
Feb 23, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> they're great people, neil gorsuch, brett kavanaugh, amy coney barrett.ody thought that was even going to be possible. we fought. this was not an easy thing to do. from my first day in office, i took historic action to protect the unborn like nobody has ever done, and i was able to bring this issue for the first time in 54 years back to the states where everybody agrees on both sides, everybody agrees that's where it should be. >> joining us now, nbc news correspondent, vaughn hillyard in rock hill, south carolina, ahead of a campaign event there, and nbc news correspondent, ali vitali who's traveling, as you can see to nikki haley's next campaign stop in mount pleasant. vaughn, donald trump had taken his time to weigh in on this ivf thing. might he have seen polling done by, i don't know, kellyanne conway saying that the vast majority of pro life voters, evangelical voters, support ivf. >> we have seen republican u.s. senate candidates come out in support of ivf. this is where it's notable here. these are the consequences of roe v. wade being overturned
. >> they're great people, neil gorsuch, brett kavanaugh, amy coney barrett.ody thought that was even going to be possible. we fought. this was not an easy thing to do. from my first day in office, i took historic action to protect the unborn like nobody has ever done, and i was able to bring this issue for the first time in 54 years back to the states where everybody agrees on both sides, everybody agrees that's where it should be. >> joining us now, nbc news correspondent, vaughn...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brett kavanaugh today waxed about disenfranchisement of voters. that's what scotus did in bush v. 2000 when it told the florida supreme court it couldn't decide how to do its state's election in terms of a presidential election. bush v. gore federalized a presidential election in violation of the united states constitution. that's why al gore lost, because bush got the electoral college votes. the electoral college is dissen franchiing the voters. if you want to do one person one vote under equal protection, you have to have a popular vote. what's happening is they're federalizing elections through what happened today in the colorado case. states should have states' rights. it works for abortion, right? hey, let's kick abortion back to the states. when it comes to not having trump thon ballot, if you want to have a patchwork result, that's exactly what the constitution contemplated and joy, my last word is that it's what the constitution wants. if you don't like it, amend the constitution. >> that was a word, michael steele. i'm going to go to you on that because they seem to love
brett kavanaugh today waxed about disenfranchisement of voters. that's what scotus did in bush v. 2000 when it told the florida supreme court it couldn't decide how to do its state's election in terms of a presidential election. bush v. gore federalized a presidential election in violation of the united states constitution. that's why al gore lost, because bush got the electoral college votes. the electoral college is dissen franchiing the voters. if you want to do one person one vote under...
0
0.0
Feb 17, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the the law is you know it's brett kavanaugh and it's also your local county judge. it's also true i think that the law enables many things and closes off other things. so, for example, the law enables white supremacy, but it also enables, as i show in my book, a black patriarchy, black men at various points in the story take advantage of their rights, their civil rights, to impose their vision of freedom on black women who are after all the majority of members in most churches at that time. and so you get these really interesting tensions that recur again and again. and then i guess the last lesson that i take from this is that. white supremacy system, violence like we saw committed against george floyd has been with us in this country since before its inception. and i think what's really striking is that black people throughout this history have been using rights in the face of that violence. that is to say that black people using has and can coex exist with police, white supremacist violence committed by the state. and i think that it's really important for us to
the the law is you know it's brett kavanaugh and it's also your local county judge. it's also true i think that the law enables many things and closes off other things. so, for example, the law enables white supremacy, but it also enables, as i show in my book, a black patriarchy, black men at various points in the story take advantage of their rights, their civil rights, to impose their vision of freedom on black women who are after all the majority of members in most churches at that time....
0
0.0
Feb 21, 2024
02/24
by
KNTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
kavanaugh as someone trump was counting on to rule in his favor. >> i think it should be a slam dunksupreme court. i have faith in them you know, people like kavanaugh, who the president fought for, who the president went through hell to get into place, he'll step up. those people will step up. >> seth: she's talking about a supreme court justice the way a mobster talks about one of his street captains. "we need someone to take out the russians don't worry. kavanaugh will step up he owes us for the thing with and the guy and the thing. [ laughter ] now, as you may recall, the colorado supreme court ruled that trump was ineligible for the ballot based on the 14th amendment's insurrectionist clause, which bars anyone who takes an oath to uphold the constitution but then engages in insurrection or rebellion against the u.s. from holding state or federal office. the amendment was ratified after the civil war to bar former confederates from serving in government because after the war, southern states immediately started sending unrepentant traitors back to congress. as one historian expla
kavanaugh as someone trump was counting on to rule in his favor. >> i think it should be a slam dunksupreme court. i have faith in them you know, people like kavanaugh, who the president fought for, who the president went through hell to get into place, he'll step up. those people will step up. >> seth: she's talking about a supreme court justice the way a mobster talks about one of his street captains. "we need someone to take out the russians don't worry. kavanaugh will step...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the next year they appointed brett kavanaugh to the bench as well and another potential election approachedmitch mcconnell do if another vacancy opened up on the court? would he help confirm a third trump justice in an election year? >> i would fill it. >> i would fill it. on september 18th of 2020, supreme court justice ruth bader ginsburg passed away, and with less than two months until the presidential election, mitch mcconnell rushed through the appointment of amy coney barrett. that is how we got the radical conservative majority court we have today. this is mitch mcconnell's legacy. today and senator mcconnell announced he would reap that might be retiring from senate leadership this november. >> i am immensely proud of the compliment i have played some role in obtaining. have enough gas in my tank to thoroughly disappoint my critics and i intend to do so with all the enthusiasm with which they have become accustomed. >> mitch mcconnell will no longer be running the upper chamber of a falling out with the former president, mcconnell may be trying to wash his hands clean of the trump e
the next year they appointed brett kavanaugh to the bench as well and another potential election approachedmitch mcconnell do if another vacancy opened up on the court? would he help confirm a third trump justice in an election year? >> i would fill it. >> i would fill it. on september 18th of 2020, supreme court justice ruth bader ginsburg passed away, and with less than two months until the presidential election, mitch mcconnell rushed through the appointment of amy coney barrett....
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
we should not assume because brett kavanaugh and amy barrett were appointed by trump, they're going to say he's our master. we'll do what he wants. i don't think we should assume that, or judge roberts. >> i can't see roberts doing it, honestly. >> so the two, the unnamed two, yes. >> the vacation twins. >> yes. but the rest, no, i don't think it should be an assumption. reality is it is going to be the supreme court who will decide whether the case will be tried before the election. >> some of the arguments were so brilliant. i recommend honestly, i recommend you read it. it's really not that long. 57 pages but there's a lot of white space. what's brilliant about it is they take his arguments and break them. like one by one. first, they say well, how can it be that gerald ford was pardoned if a former president can't be charged? i'm sorry, gerald ford pardoned nixon. he says, ford issued a full pardon to former president richard nixon which both former presidents evidently believed was necessary to avoid a post-presidency indictment. clinton agreed to a five-year suspension of his law
we should not assume because brett kavanaugh and amy barrett were appointed by trump, they're going to say he's our master. we'll do what he wants. i don't think we should assume that, or judge roberts. >> i can't see roberts doing it, honestly. >> so the two, the unnamed two, yes. >> the vacation twins. >> yes. but the rest, no, i don't think it should be an assumption. reality is it is going to be the supreme court who will decide whether the case will be tried before...
0
0.0
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
things a police officer can do in 2022, a man was arrested outside the home of supreme court justice brett kavanaugh, and later charged with attempting to kill kavanaugh below the supreme court level, the marshals don't have the resources to protect every federal judge 24/7. in 2020, a disgruntled boyer came to the new jersey home. a federal judge, esther salas, trying to kill her and ended up killing her son, who answered the door and wounding her husband let's start ceiling personally identifiable information of judicial officers. make it hard for people to track us down and shoot us in our homes that's actually one piece of advice from former us marshall jim shield to judges and prosecutors on how to protect themselves. in addition to disguising their home addresses, he advises them to always be conscious of their surroundings, especially when they're traveling to and from work and to stay away from social media. brianna, what a lot for them to take on as they deal with it? yes. if it's this isn't what they used to have to deal with brian. not at all. it's really dangerous for them. it'
things a police officer can do in 2022, a man was arrested outside the home of supreme court justice brett kavanaugh, and later charged with attempting to kill kavanaugh below the supreme court level, the marshals don't have the resources to protect every federal judge 24/7. in 2020, a disgruntled boyer came to the new jersey home. a federal judge, esther salas, trying to kill her and ended up killing her son, who answered the door and wounding her husband let's start ceiling personally...
0
0.0
Feb 10, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> i am happy to define what insurrection means for brett kavanaugh any day.smann, george conway. george, go help the chiefs win, friend of ten issues with that you are, and hello to bonnie climate picture behind you. >> do you want one of these? >> one of what? >> one of these, look at this. >> what does it say? in my chiefs. >> yes george, i would like to wear that next week on the show, and thank you guys so much for being here. i appreciate it. andrew joyce, i will get you guys want to. coming up next, ballot battle, florida's supreme court will soon decide about language they could redefine constitutional protections for abortion access in the sunshine state. we are going to discuss that next. ine state. we are going to discuss that next. here's to getting better with age. here's to beating these two every thursday. help fuel today with boost high protein, complete nutrition you need... ...without the stuff you don't. so, here's to now. boost. ♪ ♪ sois this yours?w. you ready? surprise! i don't think you can clear this. i got this. it's yours now. there's
. >> i am happy to define what insurrection means for brett kavanaugh any day.smann, george conway. george, go help the chiefs win, friend of ten issues with that you are, and hello to bonnie climate picture behind you. >> do you want one of these? >> one of what? >> one of these, look at this. >> what does it say? in my chiefs. >> yes george, i would like to wear that next week on the show, and thank you guys so much for being here. i appreciate it. andrew...
0
0.0
Feb 5, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
when pressed by justice brett kavanaugh, if states and individuals were precluded from challenging this lack of enforcement, the president's own solicitor general responded, that is correct. but the framers intended political checks and congress has tools at its disposal. justice cavanagh responded, i think your position is, instead of judicial review, congress has to resort to impeachment or dramatic steps in defiance of the laws passed by congress. in the face of dramatic abdication of statutory responsibility, by the executive branch, such steps would be warranted. in other words, the biden administration's own legal position -- it is the biden administration's own legal position before the court that impeachment is a proper remedy for dramatic abdication of statutory responsibility. meaning, if a secretary is not adhering to the laws passed by congress, the only recourse because the states now don't have standing is for the congress to impeach. that is the rulings of the supreme court, and the argument brought forward by president biden's own solicitor general. >> while the gentlema
when pressed by justice brett kavanaugh, if states and individuals were precluded from challenging this lack of enforcement, the president's own solicitor general responded, that is correct. but the framers intended political checks and congress has tools at its disposal. justice cavanagh responded, i think your position is, instead of judicial review, congress has to resort to impeachment or dramatic steps in defiance of the laws passed by congress. in the face of dramatic abdication of...
0
0.0
Feb 23, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> michel is a lifelong republican in 2018, she helped trump get his supreme court nominee, brett kavanaugh finish line with our hardline questioning of christine blasio ford, who had accused cabinet of sexual assault. >> how were you? able to narrow down the timeframe? >> i can't give the exact date another cross-country political standoff, not over yet. >> we're saying we're going first county. >> da mitchell has i don't know how say it. >> just gotten it wrong. it every single term >> and what options does bragg have here? yeah. so this murder suspect elements already has to go in front of a judge in arizona for an extradition hearing. of course, there he can either consent to come back here to new york or he could stay there more than likely, he's going to stay there. so bragg said he's really not going to back down here. he's going to put together an extradition package which would then go to new york's governor, kathy hochul and i reached out to her to see how she's going to get involved in this. if she's going to get involved in this, no answer back. >> but >> again, clear, neither s
. >> michel is a lifelong republican in 2018, she helped trump get his supreme court nominee, brett kavanaugh finish line with our hardline questioning of christine blasio ford, who had accused cabinet of sexual assault. >> how were you? able to narrow down the timeframe? >> i can't give the exact date another cross-country political standoff, not over yet. >> we're saying we're going first county. >> da mitchell has i don't know how say it. >> just gotten it...