from 2015 to 18, lyudmila volkova was a member of the council of judges of ukraine. then, as part of the working group, she did not find any violations in the actions chairman of the court of appeal of the cherkasy region, volodymyr babenka, who systematically pressured judge serhiy bondarenko. the latter did not make the decision that the head of the court demanded from him in the case regarding the office premises of the azot plant. owned by ukrainian oligarch dmytro firtash. the history of serhii bondarenko's conflict with volodymyr bobenko, who was the head of the court where bondarenko worked, is known throughout ukraine. and so serhii bondarenko turned to the council of judges, to the body that could actually protect him rights, however, lyudmila volkova, as the person who could make the appropriate decision and really defend herself before the judge, and... as part of the group, signed and concluded that there was no pressure from the judge, mr. babenko, such a classy head of the court, therefore there is no right to defend in fact. the explanation of this sto

lyudmila volkova was a member of the council of judges of ukraine from 2015 to 18. then, as a member of the working group, she found no violations in the actions of the head of the court of appeal of the cherkasy region, volodymyr baben, who systematically put pressure on judge serhii bondar. the latter did not make the decision that the head of the court demanded from him in the case regarding the office premises of the azot plant, which belongs to the ukrainian oligarch dmytro firtash. the history of serhii bondarenko's conflict with volodymyr bobenko, who was the head of the court where bondarenko worked, is known throughout ukraine. and so serhiy bondarenko turned to the council of judges, to the body that actually could protect his rights, but... lyudmila volkova, as the person who could make the appropriate decision and really defend herself before the judge, as part of the group signed, made up the conclusion that there was no pressure on the judge, mr. babenko, such a classy head of the court, therefore he actually has no right to defend. the explanation of

lyudmila volkova was from 2015 to 18 years old a member of the council of judges of ukraine.p, she did not find any violations in the actions of the head of the court of appeal of the cherkasy region , volodymyr baben, who systematically pressured judge serhii bondarenko. the latter did not make the decision that the head of the court demanded from him in the case regarding the office premises of the azot plant, which belongs to the ukrainian oligarch dmytro firtash. the history of serhii bondarenko's conflict with volodymyr bobenko, who was the head of the court where bondarenko worked, is well known. and here is serhiy bondarenko appealed to the council of judges, to the body that actually could protect his rights, however, ludmila volkova, as the person who could make the appropriate decision and really stand up for the judge, signed as part of the group, concluded that the pressure there was no judge, mr. babenko, such a cool head of the court, so he defended. actually has no right. the explanation of this story by volkova herself was specific. i directly spent three, wel

from 2015 to 18, lyudmila volkova was a member of the council of judges of ukraine.he working group, she did not find any violations in the actions of the head of the court of appeal of the cherkasy region, volodymyr babenko, who systematically pressured judge serhiy bondarenko. the latter did not make the decision that the head of the court demanded from him in the case regarding the office premises of the azot plant, which belongs to the ukrainian oligarch dmytro firtash. serhiy bondarenko's history of conflict. with volodymyr bobenko, who was the head of the court in which bondarenko worked, is known throughout ukraine, and serhiy bondarenko turned to the council of judges, to the body that actually could protect his rights, however, lyudmila volkova, as the person who could accept the relevant decision and really stand up for the judge, ah, as a member of the group, she signed the conclusion that there was no pressure on the judge. mr. babenko is such a classy head of the court, that's why he has no right to defend himself. the explanation of this story by volkov

lyudmila volkova was a member from 2015 to 18 years old. by the council of judges of ukraine.n, as a member of the working group, she did not find any violations in the actions of the head of the court of appeal of the cherkasy region, volodymyr baben, who systematically pressured judge serhiy bondarenko. the latter did not make the decision that the head of the court demanded from him in the case regarding the office premises of the azot plant, which belongs to the ukrainian oligarch dmytro firtash. the history of the conflict between serhiy bondarenko and volodymyr bobenko, who was the head of the court, in which bondarenko worked, is known throughout ukraine. and so serhiy bondarenko turned to the council of judges to the body which, in fact, could protect his rights, but... ludmila volkova, as the person who could make the appropriate decision and really stand up for the judge, signed as part of the group, made the conclusion that there was no pressure on the judge, mr. babenko is such a classy head of the court, therefore there is no right to defend in fact. the explanati

of a candidate for the post of judge to the supreme council of justice. career growth. the transfer of judges from one instance to another also takes place through the higher qualification commission of judges, that is, it is a very important body, which direction depends on who our judges are, in which judicial positions. the powers of the previous members of the commission were terminated in november 2019, after amendments were made to the law of ukraine on the judiciary and the status of judges and other provisions on the activities of judicial bodies. governance, and only in july 21st , president zelenskyy by a new law... resumed work at the bks. however , due to russia's full-scale war against ukraine, the competitive selection of commission members could only be started in the fall of 2022. and only on june 1, 2023 , the sccc was fully formed with the help of a competitive commission, which included three ukrainian judges, a prosecutor from the netherlands and two retired judges from canada and the united states of america. as part of its activity,

from 2015 to 18, lyudmila volkova was a member of the council of judges of ukraine. then, as part of the working group, she did not find any violations in the actions of volodymyr baben, the head of the court of appeal of the cherkasy region, who systematically put pressure on judge serhiy bondarenko. did not make the decision demanded of him by the head of the court in the case regarding the office premises of the azot plant, which belongs to the ukrainian oligarch dmytro firtash. the history of serhiy bondarenko's conflict with volodymyr bobenko, who was the head of the court where bondarenko worked, is well known ukraine. and so serhii bondarenko turned to the council of judges, to the body that could actually protect his rights, but, ah, people. volkova, as the person who could make the appropriate decision and really stand up for the judge, signed as part of the group, concluded that there was no pressure on the judge, mr. babenko, such a classy head of the court, therefore he has no right to actually defend . the explanation of this story by volkova herself was

the judge appealed this decision, and the supreme council of justice dismissed the judge altogether.onkin committed a significant disciplinary offense that is incompatible with the status of a judge. voting is over, eight members of the vrp voted for, four against, thus the supreme council of justice passed. apply to the judge poltava court of appeal. disciplinary action in the form of a motion to dismiss a judge from office. now the supreme council of justice has to make a formal decision, but serhii galonkin can still appeal it. the higher qualification commission of judges continues to weed out unworthy representatives. and recently, this process has gained momentum. many unscrupulous servants of themis were already one step away from being released. the commission recognized the judge as unworthy of office. ihor bonchev of the fastiv city district court of the kyiv region. it is so difficult to say here, because all this nobody knows the truth. ihor bonchev has delayed cases for drunken driving, inconsistency of life with official income, and dubious sources of wealth. well, not

the judge appealed this decision, and the supreme council of justice dismissed the judge altogether.nkin was allowed a significant disciplinary penalty. which is not compatible with the status of a judge. voting is complete. eight members of the vrp voted in favor, four against. in this way, the supreme council of justice decided. disciplinary action in the form of a petition for dismissal of the judge from office should be applied to the judge of the poltava court of appeal, galonkin serhii anatoliyovych. now the supreme council of justice has to make a formal decision decision, but serhii galonkin can still appeal it. the higher qualification commission of judges continues. vat unworthy representatives, and recently this process has gained momentum. many unscrupulous servants of themis were already one step away from being released. the commission recognized ihor bonchev, judge of the fastiv city district court of the kyiv region, as unworthy of office. it is so difficult to say here, because no one knows the whole truth. on the account of igor bonchev, the delay of cases for carel

supreme council of justice, the judge complained about such posts, believing that he was being pressuredthe supreme council of justice recognized that such posts were too critical the activity of the court, the judge and try to incline him to make other decisions than he considers correct, despite the fact that, for example, there was in those cases the possibility of appealing such decisions, where the appeal judges could also review the judge's position and make a possible different decision . however, sometimes public activists can also use their posts to discredit the authority of the judge, who has his own position based on the results of the case, and he makes the appropriate decision, and the institutions, mr. radoslavy, or representatives of certain institutions, well, in simple language, uncles and aunts in uniform, so to speak, they have no desire to somehow help this or that court to make a decision that would be within or within the limits. personal interest, or within the framework of the implementation of this or that plan entrusted to the department, that is precisely what

the judge appealed this decision, and the supreme council of justice dismissed the judge altogether.iplinary offense that is not compatible. with the status of a judge. voting is complete. eight members of the vrp voted in favor, four against. in this way , the supreme council of justice decided. disciplinary action in the form of a petition for dismissal of the judge from office should be applied to the judge of the poltava court of appeal, galonkin serhii anatoliyovych. now the supreme council of justice must make a formal decision, but serhii galonkin can still appeal it. the higher qualification commission of judges continues to screen out no. native representatives, and for recently, this process has gained momentum. many unscrupulous servants of themis were already one step away from being released. the commission recognized igor bonchev, judge of the fastiv city district court of the kyiv region, as unworthy of office. it is so difficult to say here, because no one knows the whole truth. ihor bonchev has delayed cases for drunken driving, inconsistency of life with official in

decision, and the supreme council of justice dismissed the judge altogether.d a significant disciplinary offense that is incompatible with the status of a judge. voting completed, eight members of the vrp voted in favor against four, thus the supreme council of justice passed. disciplinary action should be taken against the judge of the poltava court of appeal, galonkin serhiy anatolyovych, in the form of a motion to dismiss the judge from office. now the supreme council of justice has make a formal decision, but serhii galonkin can still appeal it. the high qualification commission of judges continues to weed out unworthy representatives, and recently this process has gained momentum. many unscrupulous servants have already found themselves one step away from dismissal themis. the commission recognized ihor bonchev, judge of the fastiv city-district court of the kyiv region, as unworthy of office. it is so difficult to say here, because all this truth. no one knows. ihor bonchev has delayed cases for drunken driving, inconsistency of life with official income

is the judge's decision appealed, and the supreme council of justice dismissed the judge altogether.onkin committed a significant disciplinary offense that is incompatible with the status of a judge. voting has been completed, eight members of the vrp voted for, four against, thus the supreme council of justice passed. apply a disciplinary sanction to the judge of the poltava court of appeal galonkin serhii anatoliyovych in the form of a motion to dismiss the judge from his position. now the supreme council of justice must make a formal decision, but serhii galyonki. can still appeal it. higher qualification the commission of judges continues to weed out unworthy representatives. and recently, this process has gained momentum. many unscrupulous servants of themis were already one step away from being released. the commission recognized igor bonchev, judge of the fastiv city district court of the kyiv region, as unworthy of office. yes, it's hard to say here. because no one knows the whole truth. igor bonchev has a delay on his account. your fulfillment of the duty to maintain your qu

this is the judge's decision appealed, but the supreme council of justice dismissed the judge altogetheriplinary offense was committed by galonkin, which is incompatible with the status of a judge. voting has been completed, eight members of the vrp voted for, four against, thus the supreme council of justice passed. to impose a disciplinary penalty on serhii anatoliyovych, the judge of the galonka court of appeal of poltava . application for dismissal of a judge from office. now the supreme council of justice must make a formal decision, but serhii galonkin can still appeal it. higher the qualification committee of judges continues to weed out unworthy representatives. and recently, this process has gained momentum. many unscrupulous servants of themis were already one step away from being released. the commission recognized ihor, a judge of the fastiv city district court of the kyiv region, as unworthy of office. it's so hard to say here because no one knows the whole truth. on the account of ihor bonchev, the delay of cases due to sloppy management, the discrepancy of life with offici

this decision, and the supreme council of justice dismissed the judge altogether.nkin committed a significant disciplinary offense that is incompatible with the status of a judge. voting is complete, eight voted in favor vrp members, against four. in this way, the supreme council of justice decided. to apply a disciplinary penalty in the form of a motion to dismiss the judge from his position against the judge of the poltava court of appeal, serhiy anatoliyovych galonkin. now the supreme council of justice must adopt the format. decision, but serhii galonkin can still appeal it. the high qualification commission of judges continues to weed out unworthy representatives, and recently this process has gained momentum. many unscrupulous servants have already found themselves one step away from dismissal themis. the commission recognized igor bonchev, judge of the fastiv city district court of the kyiv region, as unworthy of office. it is so difficult to say here, because no one knows the whole truth. ihory bonchev has delayed cases for reckless driving, inconsistency o

the judge appealed this decision, and the supreme council of justice in general dismissed the judge.n committed a significant disciplinary offense that is incompatible with the status of a judge. voting has been completed, eight members of the vrp voted for, four against. in this way, the supreme council of justice decided. apply a disciplinary sanction to the judge of the poltava court of appeal galonkin serhiy anatolyovych in the form of a motion to dismiss the judge from office. now the supreme council of justice must make a formal decision, but serhii galonkin can still appeal it. the higher qualification commission of judges continues to weed out the unworthy representatives and recently, this process has gained momentum. a lot of unscrupulous femi servants were already one step away from being fired. the commission recognized igor bonchev, judge of the fastiv city district court of the kyiv region, as unfit for office. it is so difficult to say here, because no one knows the whole truth. ihor bonchev has delayed cases for drunken driving, inconsistency of life with official inc

the judge appealed this decision, and the supreme council of justice. in general dismissed the judge.d a significant disciplinary offense that is incompatible with the status of a judge. voting has been completed, eight members of the vrp voted for, four against, thus the supreme council of justice passed. disciplinary action should be taken against the judge of the poltava court of appeal, galonkin serhiy anatolyovych, in the form of a motion to dismiss the judge from office. now the supreme council of justice has to make a formal decision, but serhii galonkin can still appeal it. the higher qualification commission of judges continues to weed out the unworthy representatives, and recently this process has gained momentum. many unscrupulous servants of themis were already one step away from being released. the commission recognized igor bonchev, judge of the fastiv city district court of the kyiv region, as unworthy of office. it is so difficult to say here, because no one knows the whole truth. on the account of ihor bonchev, delaying the cases for drunken driving did not answer. yo

higher judicial bodies, the higher council of justice and the higher qualification commission of judges formed virtually from scratch, however, the course of judicial reform, which is a key requirement on ukraine's path to the eu, is influenced by other events, in particular the total exposing corruption schemes in the judicial system. since the time when the head of the state judicial administration , oleksiy salnikov, was arrested for bribery, this position has remained vacant. the competition has been running since march of this year. we will tell you about those who apply for the high chair. today, but let's start with the news. oleksiy tandyr, the judge of the makarivskyi district court of the kyiv region, who last year in a state of alcoholic intoxication beat to death a soldier of the national guard, vadym bondarenko, at the checkpoint at the entrance to kyiv , has finally been released. the supreme council of justice rejected his appeal against the decision of the second disciplinary chamber regarding dismissal from the post of judge. 11 members of the vrp voted in favor, zero -

in general , the ethics council already had a lot of questions about the integrity of the judge of therict administrative court natalia panchenko. soon we will find out whether the servant of themis managed to convince the experts in accordance with her position, a member of the supreme council of justice. and for today i have everything, it was judicial control and i, tetyana shustrova. if you know of corruption in the judicial system, or you want to report an unscrupulous judge who makes illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or by e-mail. whose address you see on the screen. it's all good, we'll meet in exactly one week. we are looking for ten-year-old artur kuznytsov from the kherson region. the boy lived in the left bank part of the region in the city of oleshki. from the first days during the war, the settlement was occupied by the russians, and at the same time information was received about the disappearance of the child. there is an assumption that artur could have been taken to russia, but it is possible that he may still be somewhere in the occupied territories of ukrain

public council of integrity also drew attention to the likely second fictitious divorce of judge gorbasenko and his wife, deputy of the kyiv city council hanna sveridenko. for the first time, they allegedly broke up at the end. 2014, however, they remained in such a wonderful relationship that they went to europe together 5 days after the divorce. in february 2017, the former couple had their first child, joint trips abroad became more frequent. in 2022, the couple remarried, gave birth to a second child within a year and divorced again, filing two identical lawsuits for divorce. presumably to manipulate the distribution system. one claim was returned, the other was accepted and considered. at normal speed in a matter of days with violations of all procedural terms. the divorce took place just before the opening of the register of declarations. so there is every reason to believe that the couple's goal was to hide part of their income and property. grobosenko submitted, firstly, a clarifying declaration for 2022, and secondly, we still have to check some of his declarations, and we see that

in general , the ethical council had many questions about the integrity of the judge of the kyiv districtative court natalia panchenko. soon we will find out whether the servant of themis managed to convince the experts of her suitability positions, members of the supreme council of justice. and for today i have everything, it was judicial control and i, tetyana shustrova. if you know of corruption in the judicial system, or you want to report an unscrupulous judge who makes illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or by e-mail. whose address you see on the screen. it's all good, we'll meet in exactly one week. this is now our home consumption, there, by the way, the guys are now cooking an electric welding machine right from the generation, and this little red thing on top is the network, well, you can see that we have nothing from there we take it, because there is a minus. this is the control point of a hybrid solar power plant, which was installed on the roof of their own house by the residents of a high-rise building in the holusiiv district of the capital, it is 59 solar panels, a

the competition for the selection of members of the supreme council of law is ongoing. judge the ethical council selects candidates according to the president's quota. we we will introduce you to the brightest candidates. but first to the news. there are 28 applicants for the single vacant position of a member of the higher qualification commission of judges. among the candidates are judges of the supreme court, the high anti-corruption court, a judge of the court of appeal, judges of local judges and retired judges. the vacant position in the supreme court of appeals appeared after a member of the supreme court of appeals of kyiv, roman ignatov, voluntarily resigned on march 27. he held the position of the chairman of the central committee of the central committee of the people's republic of china. the competition is ongoing. selection of members. vkk implements a competitive commission consisting of three ukrainian judges and three foreign experts in the field of law. foreign experts have the controlling vote during the voting procedure. updated in 2022 as part of the

in general , the ethical council had questions about the integrity of the judge of the kyiv districtourt natalia panchenko. quite a lot, soon we will find out whether the servant of themis managed to convince the experts of her suitability for the position of a member of the supreme council of justice. and for today i have everything, it was judicial control and i, tetyana shustrova. if you know the facts of corruption in the judicial system, or you want to report an unscrupulous judge who makes wrongful decisions, write to me on facebook or to the ... mail, the address of which you see on the screen. it's all good, we'll meet in exactly one week. do ordinary things become unreal? heavy bags are not for my sore back. for back pain, try dolgit cream. long-acting cream relieves pain, reduces swelling and improves joint mobility. dolgit is the only yellow cream for joint and back pain. when buying a large package of 150 g, you save up to 50%. there are discounts representing the only discounts on magnesium. 10% in pharmacies plantain, bam and savings in the latest edition of the magazin

of the right for the second time. judge. interesting that at the same time she is a member of the all-ukrainian association of administrative judges, which called on the president to promise a law on the reform of the administrative court, because it allegedly threatens sovereignty of ukraine, as it contains instruments of influence of foreign states. in this way, zaichko is desperately trying to become a part of the reform, which he considers to be a violation of judicial independence. not very logical. last year, despite numerous facts of dishonesty, the ethical council approved olena zaichko as a candidate for the position. member of the vrp, but was not elected by the verkhovna rada. in march of this year, the supreme council of justice opened a disciplinary case against zaichko. in case of a positive decision on it, the judge faces dismissal. soon we will find out whether olena zaichko will eventually manage to slip through and sit down in her dream chair. and this is another candidate for the supreme council of justice

the public council of virtue also drew attention to the likely second fictitious divorce of judge gorbasenko wife, kayvrada deputy hanna svyredenko. they allegedly broke up for the first time at the end of 2014, but remained in such a wonderful relationship that they went to europe together 5 days after the divorce. in february 2017, the former spouse... had their first child, joint trips abroad became more frequent. in 2022, the couple got married again, within a year, she gave birth to a second child and divorced again, for this she filed two identical lawsuits for dissolution of marriage, presumably for manipulation of the distribution system, one lawsuit was returned, the other was accepted and considered with an abnormal speed in a matter of days, with violations of all procedural terms. the divorce took place just before the opening of the register of declarations, so there is every reason to believe. that the purpose of the spouses was to hide part of the income and property. first, gorosenko submitted a clarifying declaration for 2022, and secondly, we still have to check some of his

in general , the ethics council had a lot of questions about the integrity of the judge of the kyiv district administrative court natalia panchenko, soon we will find out whether the servant succeeded. to convince experts of their suitability for the position of a member of the supreme council of justice. and for today i have everything, it was judicial control and i am tetyana shustrova. if you know the facts of corruption in the judicial system, or you want to report an unscrupulous judge who makes wrongful decisions, write to me on facebook or to the e- mail address you see on the screen. for everything. ok, see you in exactly one week. and now the legendary polish dissident will work on the espresso tv channel, one of the creators of the new democratic poland, the founder of the equally legendary electoral newspaper adam michnik. greetings, mr. editor, to the espresso studio. good day, thank you for these kind words, even though they are exaggerated. of course, every word is some kind of exaggeration, but the most important thing that we see is the creation of perhaps the most important

council integrity drew attention to the likely second fictitious divorce of judge gorbasenko and hisncil member hanna svyredenko. they allegedly broke up for the first time at the end of 2014, but remained in such a wonderful relationship that they went to europe together five days after the divorce. in february 2017 , the former couple had their first child, joint trips abroad became more frequent. in 2022, the couple got married again, and gave birth to a second child within a year. and divorced again, filing two identical lawsuits for this purpose divorce, allegedly for manipulation of the distribution system, one claim was returned, another was accepted and considered with anomalous speed in a matter of days, with violations of all procedural terms. the divorce took place just before the opening of the register of declarations, so there is every reason to believe that the purpose of the spouses was to hide part of the income and property. horoposenko first submitted a clarifying declaration for 2022. year, and secondly, we still have to check some of his declarations, and we see

mohseni, especially in the meeting of the high councils the judge criticized the illegal arrest of an economic activist. he said, "i went on the plane. they came from the plane in a certain situation. for example, let's assume that they brought me out with a certain position. they took me to arrest. he said, "i expected you to be there. now there is a mistake, now that i i'm going to introduce myself , i say, sir, i'm so-and-so and who knows me, call them, for example , ask them about my background, if i 'm not charged now, they'll say these things, for example, and they'll say, well, now you ask me, i can offer you none of these things happened when a person like this comes next, you think that he will be harmed because of this, so be it. well , who is responsible for it? it is definitely my responsibility , and then he issued orders to the judicial authorities. the first order to ghazat police prosecutor to reduce restrictions on economic activists. we try to provide investment security. and the next order of the head of the judiciary to the head of the country's prisons organizatio

the public integrity council drew attention to the likely second one as well. effective divorce of judgesenko from his wife, kyiv city council member hanna sveredenko. they allegedly broke up for the first time at the end of 2014. however, they remained in such a wonderful relationship that they went to europe together 5 days after the divorce. in february 2017, she was born to a former spouse the first child, joint trips abroad became more frequent. in 2022, the couple remarried, gave birth to a second child within a year and divorced again, filing two identical ones. lawsuits for divorce, allegedly to manipulate the distribution system, one lawsuit was returned, another was accepted and processed with anomalous speed in a matter of days, with violations of all procedural deadlines. the divorce took place just before the opening of the register of declarations, so there is every reason to believe that the purpose of the spouses was to hide part of the income and property. grobosenko submitted, firstly, a clarifying declaration for 2022, and secondly, we still have to verify some of his

in march of this year, the supreme council of justice opened a disciplinary case against zaichko.a positive decision on it, the judge faces dismissal. soon we will find out whether olena zaichko will finally manage to slip through and sit down in the dream chair. and this is another candidate for the supreme council of justice. lawyer vladyslav ivashchenko. he has had his own apartment for 10 years, but is registered in a dormitory. the developer, who did not enter the property in the register, is to blame for everything. yes, i lived in it because physically, the apartment was ready, but legally, legally, i could not do it until october 23, because i did not have a confirmation, it was not entered in the real estate register until october 23. and in general, lawyer vladyslav ivashchenko believes that there is no difference where a candidate for a key judicial authority is registered, whether honestly in his own large apartment, where he actually lives, or in a dormitory? declaring a place of residence in ukraine is not related to any property rights. the place of declaration is i

in march of this year, the supreme council of justice opened a disciplinary case against zaichko.a positive decision on it, the judge faces dismissal. we will soon find out whether olena zaichko will finally manage to slip through and sit down in her dream chair. and this is another candidate for the supreme council of justice, lawyer vladyslav ivashchenko. he has had his own apartment for 10 years, but is registered in a dormitory. the developer is to blame for everything, because he did not invest in real estate register. yes, i lived there. because physically the apartment was ready, but legally, legally, i could not do it until october 23, because i did not have it. it was not entered in the real estate register until october 23. in general, lawyer vladyslav ivashchenko believes that there is no difference where a candidate for a key body of judicial power is registered. either honestly in his own large apartment, where he actually lives, or in a dormitory. declaring a place of residence in ukraine is not related to any property rights. place declaration is appointed. or for e

in case of a positive decision on it, the judge faces dismissal.we will find out whether olena zaichko will succeed in the end. and sit down in the dream chair, which is another candidate for the supreme council of justice, lawyer vladyslav ivashchenko. he has had his own apartment for 10 years, but is registered in a dormitory. the developer, who did not enter the property in the register, is to blame for everything. yes, i lived in it because physically, the apartment was ready, but legally, legally, i could not do it until october 23, since i did not have a confirmation. it was not entered in the real estate register until october 23, and in general lawyer vladyslav ivashchenko believes that there is no difference where a candidate for a key judicial authority is registered, whether honestly in his own large apartment where he actually lives or in dormitory? declaration of residence in ukraine is not related to any property rights? the place of declaration is designated. or for postal correspondence, or, for example, to exercise certain rights,

in march of this year, the supreme council of justice opened a disciplinary case against zaichko.case of a positive decision on it, the judge faces dismissal. soon we will find out. will olena zaichko finally manage to slip through and sit down in her dream chair. and this is another candidate for the supreme council of justice, lawyer vladyslav ivashchenko. he has had his own apartment for 10 years, but is registered in a dormitory. the developer is to blame for everything, because he did not invest in real estate register. yes, i lived in it, since the apartment was physically ready. but legally, legally, i have until october 23rd to do it. i could not, because i did not have confirmation, it was not entered in the real estate register until october 23, and in general, lawyer vladyslav ivashchenko believes that there is no difference where a candidate for a key judicial authority is registered, whether honestly in his own large apartment, where he actually lives, or in a dormitory? declaration of residence in ukraine is not related to any property rights. the place of declaratio

list, i look at what the public council of virtue submits, there are many judges who may continue to i am not saying now that it is... specifically the names i mentioned are directly involved in the maidan affairs, but if, as they say, two terms of two presidents have passed, the judges are the same and do the same things, then the question arises, what else can be done in these circumstances? well, the first thing is to go back and state the fact that all laws, so-called legislative initiatives were implemented after the maidan. at the request of the maidan, the main demand of the maidan was the right to ensure the right to justice by the state, this was the driver of certain events that took place even before the maidan, and it was this that caused these protests related to the refusal to sign association, as the citizens of ukraine considered the association, the signing of the association and further possible pressure, including from our partners. under the commitments that will be signed with this association, precisely for the improvement of the situation, first of all in the j

in march of this year, the supreme council of justice opened a disciplinary case against zaichko.case of a positive decision by the judge. threatened with dismissal, soon we will find out whether olena zaichko will finally manage to slip through and sit down in the dream chair. and this is another candidate for the supreme council of justice, a lawyer. he has had his own apartment for 10 years, but is registered in a dormitory, the developer who did not enter the property in the register? yes, i lived in it, because physically the apartment was ready, but legally, legally, i could not do it until october 23, because i did not have confirmation, it was not entered in the real estate register until october 23 property lawyer vladyslav ivashchenko believes that there is no difference where a candidate for a key judicial authority is registered, whether honestly in his own large apartment, where he actually lives, or in a dormitory? declaring a place of residence in ukraine is not related to any property rights. the place of declaration is intended either for postal correspondence or,

of the appropriate level, in particular, conducts the qualification evaluation of judges and makes ancil of justice on the appointment of a candidate for the position of judge, the career growth of a judge from one instance to another also occurs through the supreme qualification commission of judges, i.e. it is a very important body, from which it directly depends on who our judges are, in which judicial positions. the powers of the previous members of the higher-ranking commission were granted in november 2019 after amendments were made to the law of ukraine on the judiciary and status judges and other provisions regarding the activities of judicial governance bodies. and only in july of the 21st year, president zelenskyi resumed work in the bks with a new law. however , due to russia's full-scale war against ukraine, the competitive selection of commission members could only be started in the fall of 2022. and only on june 1, 2023, the vkks was fully formed. with the help of a competition commission, which included three ukrainian judges, a prosecutor from the netherlands and two

in march of this year, the supreme council of justice opened a disciplinary case against zaichko.positive decision on it threatens the judge with dismissal. soon we will find out whether olena zaichko will finally manage to slip through and sit down in the dream chair. and this is another candidate for the supreme council of justice, lawyer vladyslav ivashchenko. he has had his own apartment for 10 years, but it is registered in... a dormitory, it is all the fault of the developer, who did not enter the property in the register, so i lived in it, since the apartment was physically ready, but legally, legally, i until october 23 i couldn't do it since i didn't have a confirmation, it wasn't until october 23rd was entered in the register of real estate, and in general, lawyer vladyslav ivashchenko believes that there is no difference where a candidate for a key judicial authority is registered, whether honestly in his own large apartment, where he actually lives, or in a dormitory? declaring a place of residence in ukraine is not related to any property rights, the place of declarat

judges and three foreign experts in the field of law.oreign experts have the controlling vote during the voting procedure. updated in 2022 as part of the judicial reform , the supreme council of justice still does not work in full force. from 21 participants verp. currently has 17 members, has a quorum and the selection of its members is ongoing. the collegial body of state power and judicial governance, which is responsible for the honesty and transparency of the entire judicial body, the independence and professionalism of judges and prosecutors, consists of ten persons is elected by the congress of judges of ukraine, two are appointed by the president, two are elected by the verkhovna rada, two more are elected by the congress of lawyers, two are delegated by the all-ukrainian conference of prosecutors, and two more are elected by the congress of scientists and legal representatives. universities, the head of the supreme court is an ex officio member of the supreme court. currently , there is not a single representative of the ukraini

in general , the ethical council had many questions about the integrity of the judge of the kyiv district administrative court natalia panchenko. soon we will find out whether it was successful servants of themis to convince experts of their suitability for the position, members of the supreme council of justice. and for today i have everything, it was judicial control and i, tetyana shustrova. if you know of corruption in the judicial system, or you want to report an unscrupulous judge who makes illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or by e-mail. whose address you see on the screen. it's all good, we'll meet in exactly one week. there are discounts that represent the only discounts on exodoril. 15% at travel pharmacies for you and savings. there are discounts represent the only discounts on estazy fin, 20% at travel pharmacies and. there are discounts representing the only discounts on glycyset and glycyset max 20% in the pharmacies of travel bams and vasyl zima's great ether. my name is vasyl zima, this is a big ether on the espresso tv channel. two hours of airtime, two hours of y

the florida judge ruled the appointment of special council. jack smith violates the constitution comes through active by saying all criminal and civil cases against whom we should now be thrown out. okay, finkelstein is a professor of law at the university of pennsylvania. she says the judge's ruling on comes classified documents, case up ends decades of president. the stems from the separate concurrence that that was written by justice thomas in the immunity case, in which he said that he believed that the entire appointment of jack smith was unconstitutional. under the appointment's clause, but now that was not a view that was shared by any of the other justices. we need to be clear. so here she took a very fringe view of view that conservatives had been touting for a long time to say that the appointment of special council was unconstitutional. in this case, one needs to be clear, however, that we did not hear justice thomas or conservatives in general. objecting to the appointment of uh, john durham, who was special cancelled to look into

the supreme council of justice does not consider complaints against such judges, as a result of which we may have dismissal, and so on we have such a warm bath for the judges of oascu, when doing nothing you can get such a high judge's grape. 1,884 judges, local and appellate courts had to pass the qualification assessment. during the first year of work, the vkks managed to carry out only more than 130 interviews, there were panels that found out the source of the funds and the acquisition of property, and even certain decisions that the candidates made, however, unfortunately, there were some colleagues who did not take such information into account, they could simply read such application, the candidate could give a formal one an answer to one or two sentences, for example, the second panel above... the qualification commission of judges, judging by everything, is very tired. ruslan sydorovych, lyudmila volkova and roman kydesiuk expertly manage to conduct the fastest interviews with candidates. for example, one of them lasted only 7 minutes with olena mikhalyuk, assistant to the he

in march of this year, the supreme council of justice opened a disciplinary case against zaichko. in case of a positive decision on it, the judge faces dismissal. soon we will find out whether olena zaichko will finally manage to slip through and sit down in the dream chair. and this is another candidate for the supreme council of justice, lawyer vladyslav ivashchenko. he has had his own apartment for 10 years, but is registered in a dormitory. in all the developer who did not register the property is to blame. yes, i'm in it. lived, because the apartment was physically ready, but legally, legally, i could not do it until october 23, because i did not have confirmation, it was entered in the real estate register before october 23, and in general, a lawyer vladyslav ivashchenko believes that there is no difference where a candidate for a key judicial authority is registered, whether he honestly lives in his own large apartment, where the facts... live, or in a dormitory. declaration of residence in ukraine is not related to any property rights. the place of declaration is intended

documents before the judge ruled the appointment of special council. jack smith violated the constitution crumbs we acted by saying old criminal and civil cases against him. we should now be thrown out. scott, the on from pull soon be officially nominated to go up against the democrats and joe biden, for the u. s. presidency at the republican national convention in milwaukee, who is also expected to announce is wanting made for november's election. thousands of washington legos have travel day for the full day event. the full process to nominate donald trump has begun known as a vocal listener, sitting for a moment. $22.00. madam secretary, my name is corey lou and data security and i served as president trump campaign manager in 2016 that is stored victory. i stand before you today on behalf of the great state of new hampshire. the granted states, the 1st in the nation, primary state, the state that delivered president cons, 1st election victory way back in february of 2016 new hampshire proudly cast all 22 votes from my good friend, the 45th, and soo

and they didn't have an opportunity then just to become judges open limitation of the national council of judiciary. some of that are the people that made a choice of be candidates for hire just to show positions by his national council of judy sharp. so i think that went on with my task is to find like the best way to make a bad thing of those judges and 2nd, to make those with this. but i think it's such a way as not to undermine if i know the judgment of having to you shouldn't be reached by with the participation. because if we were to show it, i know that all the documents you should buy them. then of course, it would mean because the legal system, so that's why it is the issue that requires that the reflection that i'm going to ask for the advice commission for the, the deep um evaluation of with different procedures for of i think of judges. and i know that i have to meet here like to uh, conflicting values on do i tend to do to show the independence of the time to do the show. and the goal is to ability and pull it. but there is a danger that your efforts that reform could caus

, at the end of the day , the judges of this law must vote in the court and make the final decision. for those who want to issue a document, give advice to those who want to help organize official documents . finally, all friends were present in the meeting and their points of view were expressed. in addition, for the implementation of the same points that we have in the meeting now, we present the same queries of the system. self-written in collaboration with the ministry and the document registration organization system has been formed, well , he wanted coordination, maybe this coordination would have taken two or three months if it wasn't for these meetings . i am going forward with strength to tell you that there was a place for me to express my gratitude to the honorable food department for the good implementation of the law that is being implemented, mr. keshavarz, this system that is supposed to be prepared so that all the documents are official there anyway. be sure to register. it is also what you said in the previous meetings where we talked together here you don't even nee

the fraud, a judge rule that the appointment of special council jack smith violated the constitution. trump reactive by saying old criminal and civil cases against him should now be dropped. prosecute to say the appeal, the decision. ok, i finkelstein is a professor below the university of pennsylvania. she says, the judges rooting up ends decades of precedence. the stems from the separate concurrence that that was written by justice thomas in the immunity case in which he said that he believed that the entire appointment of jack smith was unconstitutional under the appointment's clause. um, now that was not a view that was shared by any of the other justices. we need to be clear. so here she took a very french view of view that conservatives had been touting for a long time to say that the appointment of special counsel was unconstitutional. in this case, what needs to be clear, however, that we did not hear justice thomas or conservatives in general objecting to the appointment of john durham who was special cancelled to look into the origins of the rustic case. nor did we hear them

before the judge ruled that the appointment of a special council jack smith validate to the constitution. trump reacted by saying all criminal and civil cases against him should now be thrown out, prosecute to say, the appeal, the decision on the spot. some legal relief for the former us president is a reminder of his 3 criminal trials pending at different stages. trump has been found guilty on 34 felony charges for falsifying business records by new york courts. he's appealing that case, essentially the same expected in september. if i says 10, find the charges for a norfolk conspiring to change the 2020 election outcome in the state of georgia, but that trial is on hold. likely until next. yes. trump also faces full federal charges related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and for his actions during the attack on the capital on the january 6th 2021 in this case, will also like to stay significant delays. okay, i think holstein is a professor from the what the university of pennsylvania she says the judge's ruling on the trumps classified documents, case offense, deca

at the end of the day , the judges should vote on this law in the court and make a final decision, and the registry offices that want to issue the document should ask nemela's advisor to help organize the official documents. all friends, finally, they were present in the meeting and the points of view were expressed. in addition, in order to implement the same points that we have now in the meeting, we will present the same queries of the self-authoring system, which was formed in cooperation with the ministry and the system of the document registration organization . well, coordination was needed, maybe this if it wasn't for the coordination of these meetings, maybe it would have taken two or three months, and because of the interviews that took place in the meeting , inquiries could be made within a week or two. i want to have a respectable food system for the good implementation of the law that it has it is happening, mr. keshavarz, this system that is supposed to be ready so that all the documents are officially registered there, i remember that in the previous meetings when we tal

before the judge ruled that the appointment of a special council jack smith bothered to the constitution from proactive by saying all criminal and civil cases against him should now be thrown out. prosecute to say the appeal, the decision. okay, i think we'll start as a professor of the university of pennsylvania. she says the judge's ruling on trump's classified documents, case, pens, decades of precedent. the stems from the separate concurrence that was written by justice thomas in the immunity case, in which he said that he believed that the entire appointment of jack smith was unconstitutional under the appointments clause. but now that was not a view that was shared by any of the other justices. we need to be clear. so here she took a very fringe view of view that conservatives had been touting for a long time to say that the appointment of special council was unconstitutional. in this case, what it needs to be clear, however, that we did not hear justice thomas or conservatives in general objecting to the appointment of uh, john durham, who was special cancelled to look into the or

so the judge made this decision on the procedural appointment of the central council, not on the charges against trump price. that's correct, and this stems from the separate concurrence that um uh, it was written by justice thomas in the immunity case in which he said that he believed that the entire appointment of jack smith was unconstitutional under the appointment's clause. um, now that was not a view that was shared by any of the other justices. we need to be clear. so here she took a very french view of view that conservatives had been touting for a long time to say that the appointment of special counsel was unconstitutional. in this case, what it needs to be clear, however, that we did not hear justice thomas or conservatives in general objecting to the appointment of uh, john durham, who was special cancelled to look into the origins of the rustic case. um, nor did we hear them objecting to the appointment of special council and the hunter biden matter. so suddenly this becomes a view that is being used to eliminate special counsel. in the case of donald trump . it's not a view