0
0.0
Apr 6, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the court. i think that's really the confluence of two largely unrelated developments which is a general disengaged by congress in the historical role it had played vis a vis the court which predates the more recent polarization of congress. i mean, which really starts, gosh, the 1940s and fifties, and that that sort of builds, builds and builds and builds so that by the 1980s, when the court goes to congress and says, hey, congress, take away all the remain in, you know, handcuffs on our jurisdiction, conflict sure. what else can we give you? and that's you know, that's before think the current generation. and then you have really fluky historical moments that provide for radical transitions in the center of gravity on. the court. i mean, you know, if justice marshall had not retired when he did he died a month into bill clinton's presidency. right. a world in he replaced by bill clinton as opposed george h.w. bush is a world in which you know, i mean, he was replaced by clarence thomas. imagin
the court. i think that's really the confluence of two largely unrelated developments which is a general disengaged by congress in the historical role it had played vis a vis the court which predates the more recent polarization of congress. i mean, which really starts, gosh, the 1940s and fifties, and that that sort of builds, builds and builds and builds so that by the 1980s, when the court goes to congress and says, hey, congress, take away all the remain in, you know, handcuffs on our...
0
0.0
Apr 2, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
what would a court do? would a court look at the statute -- a statutory term like that that's a hard -- presents a hard interpretive question and say: well, this is hard, it's sort of 52/48, it's kind of close. i think the law has run out and i'm just not going to be able to decide this. i think the court would go with the best interpretation. justice kagan: the -- the -- the -- the court might -- the court in that case would have to make a choice. but, you see, here, the court can say, you know, the best option is to listen carefully and to defer if it's reasonable and if it's consistent with everything that we know that congress has said, to defer to people who actually know things about these things -- martinez: but -- justice kagan: -- to -- you know, to people who understand the way particular questions fit within a broader statutory and regulatory scheme, to people who have understanding of the policies and of the facts that led to this. i'll give you a third example. martinez: can i respond? justice
what would a court do? would a court look at the statute -- a statutory term like that that's a hard -- presents a hard interpretive question and say: well, this is hard, it's sort of 52/48, it's kind of close. i think the law has run out and i'm just not going to be able to decide this. i think the court would go with the best interpretation. justice kagan: the -- the -- the -- the court might -- the court in that case would have to make a choice. but, you see, here, the court can say, you...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
last december, the world's highest court, the international court ofjustice, began considering a case which has stirred debate and controversy around the world. the state of south africa accused the state of israel of violating the genocide convention in gaza. in its initial ruling, the court overwhelmingly found there was a plausible case to answer, but a finaljudgment is likely to take years. today i have an exclusive interview with joan donoghue, thejust—retired president of the icj, who delivered that initial court ruling that sent shock waves around the world. in a sense, the whole idea of international justice is on trial. how will it fare? joan donoghue, welcome to hardtalk. happy to be here. you sat on the international court ofjustice for pretty much 14 years. the last three years as president of the court. one of your last cases was the case brought by south africa against israel on the basis of genocide in gaza. were you aware of the scale of international scrutiny on that particular case? yes, absolutely. it was very clear. and in particular, or, for example, outside of
last december, the world's highest court, the international court ofjustice, began considering a case which has stirred debate and controversy around the world. the state of south africa accused the state of israel of violating the genocide convention in gaza. in its initial ruling, the court overwhelmingly found there was a plausible case to answer, but a finaljudgment is likely to take years. today i have an exclusive interview with joan donoghue, thejust—retired president of the icj, who...
0
0.0
Apr 30, 2024
04/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
of holding a preparatory court session, it was, the case was held from april 2 in court, and the court could hold this meeting and consider all issues during these days. this very opinion was quite clear to us, and we believed that on april 19, since the client's preventive measure ends at night, he should be released, because this issue was not considered in this way. we were also informed by the activists who were present at this trial. session, which lasted 3 minutes, and the court itself informed us that the session will no longer take place, a break was announced, at 18:00 5 minutes, we will inform you of the next date after the court session. what is reflected in the court documents documents, after, after that, this is important, my colleagues, lawyers, kostyantyn globa and andriy yosypov, they arrived at the court there and tried to get into the territory of the court, they could not do this, it was immediately after the closing of the court session, its postponement, no, they were not allowed, the kirovohrad court is threatened with a fence, sorry for the russianism, and there
of holding a preparatory court session, it was, the case was held from april 2 in court, and the court could hold this meeting and consider all issues during these days. this very opinion was quite clear to us, and we believed that on april 19, since the client's preventive measure ends at night, he should be released, because this issue was not considered in this way. we were also informed by the activists who were present at this trial. session, which lasted 3 minutes, and the court itself...
0
0.0
Apr 28, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
they see national law journal's supreme court reporter. jimmy hoover was at the court today. what is former president trump's legal team arguing here? >> former president trump's legal team is arguing that he is absolutely immune from criminal conversation over anything that can be considered his official actions while taken in office. it is a fairly sweeping argument to say the least. it was fully rejected by the d.c. circuit below. as we saw today at the supreme court, there is more receptiveness to the immunity claims that trump was making than perhaps many court watchers had anticipated, but basically it boils down to the idea that presidents can't operate if they are looking over their shoulder thinking about prosecutors coming down the road and charging them with criminal conspiracies after they leave office for continue controversial actions is essentially what it boils down to. a separation of powers and that the president is a unique office that should be cloak dmd this type of immunity so the president can make the the tough decisions that the president needs to mak
they see national law journal's supreme court reporter. jimmy hoover was at the court today. what is former president trump's legal team arguing here? >> former president trump's legal team is arguing that he is absolutely immune from criminal conversation over anything that can be considered his official actions while taken in office. it is a fairly sweeping argument to say the least. it was fully rejected by the d.c. circuit below. as we saw today at the supreme court, there is more...
0
0.0
Apr 8, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court. so what do i mean by that? right i mean, so look at sort of some of the big things that have happened with the supreme in the last couple of years. you might have noticed there have been some ethical questions about behavior. some of the justices, many of the most sincere issues that have arisen related behavior that was in some cases, 15 or 20 years ago. why are we only learning about it now? because there's an entire press corps that covers the supreme court that never thought this was part of their job. right. to actually look at the justices personal behavior and that it took propublica and its reporting. when we look at sort of the supreme decisions. i suspect you guys have been following some of them lately. this is a it's relatively new for the court to be in the headlines every. right. and yet is. how did that happen? well, that actually happened because quietly. but gradually over the 20th century, congress gave and the court took more and more power over stuff no one cares a
the supreme court. so what do i mean by that? right i mean, so look at sort of some of the big things that have happened with the supreme in the last couple of years. you might have noticed there have been some ethical questions about behavior. some of the justices, many of the most sincere issues that have arisen related behavior that was in some cases, 15 or 20 years ago. why are we only learning about it now? because there's an entire press corps that covers the supreme court that never...
0
0.0
Apr 2, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
because people often think of court as a conservative court or even a radically conservative court. my thesis is a little bit different. it's that it's a captured court in exactly same way that in the bad old days the railroad captured and ran for own benefit. the railroad commission. so that's come stepped one concept to to keep in mind is covered operations. i was on the intelligence committee for a while. my father spent an early part of his career before he officially became a state official as an agency. the official and i love reading spy novels. so for all those different reasons, you know, you see how a covert operation runs and very often governments run operations against and in other countries and very often they have the purpose of trying disrupt the foreign country to foment dispute to prop up political parties to put poisonous propaganda into the political discussion in that country, to bribe and cajole and even capture organizations that country. and my thesis is what has happened in the united states is internal covert operation and run largely by the fossil fuel ind
because people often think of court as a conservative court or even a radically conservative court. my thesis is a little bit different. it's that it's a captured court in exactly same way that in the bad old days the railroad captured and ran for own benefit. the railroad commission. so that's come stepped one concept to to keep in mind is covered operations. i was on the intelligence committee for a while. my father spent an early part of his career before he officially became a state...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
to the supreme court. first off, supreme court justice thomas should behind anything near anything like this. we all know his wife backed the insurrection and it is just disgraceful. but that court, the lower court said that he is not -- that he cannot get presidential immunity. >> there is not absolute immunity. >> absolutely not. and there shouldn't be absolute immunity when they were discussing how it is personal or presidential. nothing he is doing is presidential. there is -- i keep hearing the word unprecedented. everything is unprecedented. i'm really tired of hearing that word. to me, that is an excuse, and there is no excuse for anything this man has done. he has treated the united states like it's his own personal bank account. i am so tired of hearing from anything from him and i told my husband, my worst nightmare is when he does not get elected this time because he still didn't get a second term, is he still going to run his mouth for the next four years, four more years of campaigning until g
to the supreme court. first off, supreme court justice thomas should behind anything near anything like this. we all know his wife backed the insurrection and it is just disgraceful. but that court, the lower court said that he is not -- that he cannot get presidential immunity. >> there is not absolute immunity. >> absolutely not. and there shouldn't be absolute immunity when they were discussing how it is personal or presidential. nothing he is doing is presidential. there is -- i...
0
0.0
Apr 5, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
for the court to understand the destabilizing consequences of that reading in the lower court. just as was -- just last week, the court invalidated the prohibition statute on its face as applied to the most violent and horrific crimes imaginable on the theory the government did not have a sufficiently precise historical analog. several district court have credited perception by armed criminals who have multiple convictions for criminal assault, drug trafficking, armed robbery, clearly violent crime because we do not have a historical analog, and the court has also invalidated on its face the provision of federal law that prohibits possession of firearms with obliterated serial numbers, again on the theory that we don't have a founding era analog that is sufficiently precise. i think those are clearly untenable. they are profoundly destabilizing, and bruin does not require them. once the court correct the misinterpretation, i think the constitutional principle is clear. you can disarm dangerous persons, and under that principle, section 922 g8 is an easy case for three reasons.
for the court to understand the destabilizing consequences of that reading in the lower court. just as was -- just last week, the court invalidated the prohibition statute on its face as applied to the most violent and horrific crimes imaginable on the theory the government did not have a sufficiently precise historical analog. several district court have credited perception by armed criminals who have multiple convictions for criminal assault, drug trafficking, armed robbery, clearly violent...
0
0.0
Apr 28, 2024
04/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court, they could not do it, it was already immediately after the closing of the court session, its adjournment, no, they were not allowed, the kirovohrad court was threatened. a fence, sorry for the russianism, and there is even a small hole into which they tried to pass, it was closed, respectively, and that is, they did not succeed even to go to the territory of the court, not that in the premises, we appealed to the court with the relevant petitions, that we are asking to extend the preparatory session, because we arrived at it, it was already 7 p.m. there, we applied in writing through an e-mail address with electronic signatures - digital, and i and my colleagues, but the court session was extended and did not take place, from which we concluded that roman should actually be released, but roman was received all this time in a car of the convoy service under the court and somewhere only about at 10 p.m., he was taken somewhere. where did they take us? at that time it was unclear, unknown, he was actually not released. what did roman himself say when the court session was held a
court, they could not do it, it was already immediately after the closing of the court session, its adjournment, no, they were not allowed, the kirovohrad court was threatened. a fence, sorry for the russianism, and there is even a small hole into which they tried to pass, it was closed, respectively, and that is, they did not succeed even to go to the territory of the court, not that in the premises, we appealed to the court with the relevant petitions, that we are asking to extend the...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
RUSSIA24
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
, each judge... considered approximately 60 cases, in arbitration courts, arbitration courts considered somewhere around 170 cases per month, and if we talk about the workload, it is uneven between the courts, but as the chairman of the judicial panel for economic disputes, these figures are closer to me, i can tell you that with an average workload of 170 cases, somewhere there are such courts. when making changes to the civil procedure code, one of the proposals was to increase the threshold of cases that are considered in simplified procedures; previously, simplified procedures considered cases where the amount of the claim was up to 100.00 rubles. we contributed proposal to increase this amount to 500,000 rubles. we hope that our proposals will be adopted in the second reading, which will put a very heavy burden on the arbitration courts. give cases of insolvency and bankruptcy so that you understand that there are such isolated disputes, they are simple - in terms of their plot and in nature, they are not difficult for the courts to consider, but their number, last year there were
, each judge... considered approximately 60 cases, in arbitration courts, arbitration courts considered somewhere around 170 cases per month, and if we talk about the workload, it is uneven between the courts, but as the chairman of the judicial panel for economic disputes, these figures are closer to me, i can tell you that with an average workload of 170 cases, somewhere there are such courts. when making changes to the civil procedure code, one of the proposals was to increase the threshold...
54
54
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 54
favorite 0
quote 1
shannon, you are at the court. this is the last case that the court is going to hear this year and arguably, no question, the most consequential. >> absolutely to all of these federal actions now pending against the former president. and there has been criticism of the supreme court they didn't handle this quickly enough. actually we all know in covering the court this is rocket speed for them to get a petition, take it up, have briefing and arguments and add something to the calendar this quickly. normally the most sub staetive cases come in late june and early july. because of what's at stake in this case we think it could come sooner than that. >> gillian: trump wanted to be here today at the supreme court. he is not. he is at new york supreme court facing criminal charges in his trial there. do you think his presence here today would have made an impact, any kind of difference on the judges' mindset coming into the oral arguments? >> i don't think it would change the judges' mindset. in some ways having them in
shannon, you are at the court. this is the last case that the court is going to hear this year and arguably, no question, the most consequential. >> absolutely to all of these federal actions now pending against the former president. and there has been criticism of the supreme court they didn't handle this quickly enough. actually we all know in covering the court this is rocket speed for them to get a petition, take it up, have briefing and arguments and add something to the calendar...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
for violating a gag order from the court, a court order, a binding court order that supposedly forbids them from attacking potential witnesses, jurors, and officers of the court. this question is taking a surprisingly long time to answer. before today, prosecutors had already put in front of the judge 10 different posts or comments made by trump or his campaign which they said violated the terms of the gag order. today, prosecutors brought in for more comments that made that they say violate the gag order, including one which happened while trump was on his way to court today. interestingly, though, there was no ruling on the alleged violations that have already been presented to the judge before today. the judge looked at the new ones that were presented to him just today and said he will hold a hearing on those late next week. nbc news says that hearing will happen on thursday and there will be a hearing but it does seem like it is kind of far away. the question is why is this taking such a long time to resolve? >> the judge wants to be very careful and knows that everything is subje
for violating a gag order from the court, a court order, a binding court order that supposedly forbids them from attacking potential witnesses, jurors, and officers of the court. this question is taking a surprisingly long time to answer. before today, prosecutors had already put in front of the judge 10 different posts or comments made by trump or his campaign which they said violated the terms of the gag order. today, prosecutors brought in for more comments that made that they say violate...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 6
supreme court. just yesterday, the folks of the nation at the supreme court yesterday. will be back there again today. and we're hearing your thoughts on the immunity case that will be argued in three hours from now. don in california, a republican, good morning. caller: hi. good morning. thanks for the call tell supreme court should not even taken up this case. two courts who have already turned down the immunity clause. clarence thomas should be excused. his wife was involved in overthrowing the 2020 election. he shouldn't even be involved. but donald trump, this is -- you know, they're just playing his fate but i wish his base would listen to the court transcript in new york. david becker, "national inquirer," "the globe," american media enterprise, he intentionally said they intentionally produce fake news. this is what donald trump runs ground on. everybody else is fake news and all of his forcing is fake news. david becker admitted. it was all fake. fox news in -- we've got to stop these guys.
supreme court. just yesterday, the folks of the nation at the supreme court yesterday. will be back there again today. and we're hearing your thoughts on the immunity case that will be argued in three hours from now. don in california, a republican, good morning. caller: hi. good morning. thanks for the call tell supreme court should not even taken up this case. two courts who have already turned down the immunity clause. clarence thomas should be excused. his wife was involved in overthrowing...
0
0.0
Apr 23, 2024
04/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
— likely to hear in court? the gag order hearing _ likely to hear in court? the gag order hearing will _ likely to hear in court? the gag order hearing will take - likely to hear in court? the gag order hearing will take a - likely to hear in court? the gag order hearing will take a chunk| likely to hear in court? the gag l order hearing will take a chunk of the morning and then we do have a limited court schedule because of passover, the court will go just until the afternoon and that is when we will see the prosecution resume questioning of david packer, and he is the publisher of the newspaper tabloid the national enquirer, and prosecutors are starting with him rather than perhaps some more controversial figures such as michael cohen or stormy daniels because he is a long term friend of donald trump and can frame this catch and kill scheme that prosecutors have introduced, where donald trump with his lawyer and david pecker in the lead up to the 2016 election had an agreement to buy up any negative stories about donald trump to protect his campaign, prosec
— likely to hear in court? the gag order hearing _ likely to hear in court? the gag order hearing will _ likely to hear in court? the gag order hearing will take - likely to hear in court? the gag order hearing will take a - likely to hear in court? the gag order hearing will take a chunk| likely to hear in court? the gag l order hearing will take a chunk of the morning and then we do have a limited court schedule because of passover, the court will go just until the afternoon and that is...
0
0.0
Apr 23, 2024
04/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court, where he cited cases where the european court ruled against ukraine, this is the third, fifth, sixth article, and these are all violations in specific cases where they were established, they are simply listed in the chervinskyi case, yes, that is, stupidly, on the one hand, the supreme court points to the obligation of compliance. those unequivocal ones, yes, it's not, not now, this practice is not new, it has happened more than once, in relation to ukraine such decisions were made, yes, they are a systemic, general problem, this was emphasized by the supreme court, and in view of this, well, prosecutors should react in some way, this is discredit, no matter what they prove, this case will be discredited precisely their actions. at the stage of the pre-trial investigation, if you comment on this process in this way, look, mr. vitaly, but on the other hand, we understand that they grind the journals of european justice carefully, but believe me a little. in your opinion, if the whole thing came to of the european court of human rights, how long could it be considered there, tak
court, where he cited cases where the european court ruled against ukraine, this is the third, fifth, sixth article, and these are all violations in specific cases where they were established, they are simply listed in the chervinskyi case, yes, that is, stupidly, on the one hand, the supreme court points to the obligation of compliance. those unequivocal ones, yes, it's not, not now, this practice is not new, it has happened more than once, in relation to ukraine such decisions were made, yes,...
0
0.0
Apr 28, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it was not raised in the district court and it was not raised in the court of appeals. the analysis i would use to get there is a fusion of a couple of principles. the court has often resolved threshold questions that are a prerequisite to an intelligent resolution of the question presented. in a case like united states versus grubbs, the court reached out to decide whether anticipatory warrants are valid under the fourth amendment before turning to the question of whether the triggering condition for an anticipatory warrant had to be in the warrant. that is one principle. and then a precedent that bears some analogy to this is vermont natural resources agency v. united states. the first question was whether a state agency was a person within the meaning of the act and the second question was whether if the state agency was 11th amendment immunity kicked in, and the court wrote an analysis of why it could reach both questions. reaching the person question did not expand jurisdiction and it made sense as a matter of constitutional avoidance to do that. there are consider
it was not raised in the district court and it was not raised in the court of appeals. the analysis i would use to get there is a fusion of a couple of principles. the court has often resolved threshold questions that are a prerequisite to an intelligent resolution of the question presented. in a case like united states versus grubbs, the court reached out to decide whether anticipatory warrants are valid under the fourth amendment before turning to the question of whether the triggering...
0
0.0
Apr 2, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and may it please the court. throughout the litigation at times this morning, petitioners have characterized this case as presenting a fundamental question of the separation of powers and a test of article iii. will courts continue to say what the law is? but i want to make sure what doesn't get lost in the shuffle is that petitioners have made an important concession that i think illustrates that the issue here is actually far narrower and their attacks on chevron lack merit and are unnecessary. the concession is this. petitioners acknowledge congress can expressly delegate to agencies the authority to define terms and fill gaps. and imagine if the statute said they were asked to define the administrator. i take both petitioners to give that up and recognize that is a delegation and courts should respect that. the role of the court in that circumstance is to make sure the agency has followed the procedures and stated within whatever outer bounds congress has set. and all of that complies with the constitution, o
and may it please the court. throughout the litigation at times this morning, petitioners have characterized this case as presenting a fundamental question of the separation of powers and a test of article iii. will courts continue to say what the law is? but i want to make sure what doesn't get lost in the shuffle is that petitioners have made an important concession that i think illustrates that the issue here is actually far narrower and their attacks on chevron lack merit and are...
0
0.0
Apr 21, 2024
04/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
this is the judge. for the civil court of cassation of the supreme court of ukraine allainyk. she loves her family very much. the professional activity of a judge is very often intertwined with personal life. and it is sometimes impossible to determine where this limit is. from 2011 to 2015, ala oliynyk lived with her nephew in a one-room apartment in kyiv. at that time, the boy was studying at the kyiv national university of culture and arts, where, by a sudden coincidence, oliynyk. taught, i did not take any exams from him, i did not communicate with anyone, and it would even be immoral for me, because i know that i am a judge, and my reputation is quite important to me, on the contrary, these are strict requirements , regarding his studies, regarding his behavior, in fact, in the third year , i taught civil procedure to him, because i was the only teacher, after graduating from the university, my nephew was looking for a job for... however, with the course of circumstances, he was able to get a job at the higher specialized court where his aunt worked, then he went to work
this is the judge. for the civil court of cassation of the supreme court of ukraine allainyk. she loves her family very much. the professional activity of a judge is very often intertwined with personal life. and it is sometimes impossible to determine where this limit is. from 2011 to 2015, ala oliynyk lived with her nephew in a one-room apartment in kyiv. at that time, the boy was studying at the kyiv national university of culture and arts, where, by a sudden coincidence, oliynyk. taught, i...
0
0.0
Apr 21, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court, up and down, from the district court level down to the local court level, have enforceable codes of ethics that the supreme court has refused to adopt. it will not police itself. we spent many months vetting this bill with constitutional scholars to understand how it into place of checks and balances and the separation of powers. this is the best way to make sure there is a culture of transparency brought to this body by having them shed the light on what is happening in the court and ultimately report to congress what's going on. that is how this bill deals with it and we are hoping that in the process, it also encourages the court and those acting in the shadows to do so. now, do you think republicans will jump on board overnight? we've talked about this. there are republicans in the house and in the senate who care very much about our constitution and care very much about what's happening to our institutions in this country, but we are also seeing actors, most of whom are supported by trump, who are set on undermining our institutions. we just had an oversight hearing a couple
court, up and down, from the district court level down to the local court level, have enforceable codes of ethics that the supreme court has refused to adopt. it will not police itself. we spent many months vetting this bill with constitutional scholars to understand how it into place of checks and balances and the separation of powers. this is the best way to make sure there is a culture of transparency brought to this body by having them shed the light on what is happening in the court and...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
down to lower courts for more litigation. the hearings that's a win for donald trump. it delays the trial. now, the supreme court can say that what we did the institutionally proper thing, and ensured that this question of what constitutes an official act gets the proper hearing it deserves. but to be clear, wolf, they could have resolved this back in december. that is when they first got this case. that's when it was first brief. if to the supreme court and they could have issued a ruling right then and set this to trial. and so some of this is the supreme court doing punches pilot, washing their hands and saying they want nothing to do with it. >> how do you see the implications of all of this for the country job? >> well, the delay parts 193 days until election day of people start voting, even a couple of months before that with early voting and all that. so if this is not resigning solved, it's another giant question mark, about 20% of republicans in poll say that they would view trump is unfit to be president if he is co
down to lower courts for more litigation. the hearings that's a win for donald trump. it delays the trial. now, the supreme court can say that what we did the institutionally proper thing, and ensured that this question of what constitutes an official act gets the proper hearing it deserves. but to be clear, wolf, they could have resolved this back in december. that is when they first got this case. that's when it was first brief. if to the supreme court and they could have issued a ruling...
0
0.0
Apr 30, 2024
04/24
by
ALJAZ
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
is that something that nobody knows the court has already said what's happening. and you have the obligation of body committed directly to me that you have to respect each other because i think that's a, that's where you would be better students. i mean, as i said, it seems to be important thing with everything we are doing here is that if we have mobilizing a part of the motivation that have to think all over the world to demonstrate that we are against, that we are flags of what's happening there, so that's at the moment that is, the only thing that is happening in the court will continue studying the case. would be all the evidence necessary in any way from our point of view, from the point of view, i think i wouldn't bring it this case. what we tell the news, those countries that have been involved in the pacific paving, in a bidding, giving a it's really what is happening have to be, i notice that you have violated international that, that, that, that is so small contribution to what we are doing well, i began coming to the court 40 years ago in a case agains
is that something that nobody knows the court has already said what's happening. and you have the obligation of body committed directly to me that you have to respect each other because i think that's a, that's where you would be better students. i mean, as i said, it seems to be important thing with everything we are doing here is that if we have mobilizing a part of the motivation that have to think all over the world to demonstrate that we are against, that we are flags of what's happening...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
in 2017 , the competition in the supreme court is ongoing. the highest court of the country. for the post of judge in bohdan lviv claims this newly reformed institution. this was a big and loud reform of 2017. then the public integrity council , having analyzed the activities of lviv and its property status, came to the conclusion: the judge does not meet the criteria of integrity. however, lviv still got to the reformed court. how was the selection? is a person admitted to state secrets without restrictions. in the written questionnaire, then still a candidate. when dad asked a fundamental question whether he has the citizenship of another country, lviv said: no, but we know what yes, he had the citizenship of the russian federation both at the stage of the competition and has not lost it until now. bohdan lviv received his russian passport at the end of the 90s. at that time, he was already administering justice in ukraine, as a judge of the military court of the central region. here is an extract from the official register of rospassport, which schemes they received. there
in 2017 , the competition in the supreme court is ongoing. the highest court of the country. for the post of judge in bohdan lviv claims this newly reformed institution. this was a big and loud reform of 2017. then the public integrity council , having analyzed the activities of lviv and its property status, came to the conclusion: the judge does not meet the criteria of integrity. however, lviv still got to the reformed court. how was the selection? is a person admitted to state secrets...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so how did he spend his day away from court? golfing. 11th hour just getting underway on this thursday night. looking for a smarter way to mop? try the swiffer powermop. ♪♪ an all-in-one cleaning tool, with a 360-degree swivel head that goes places a regular mop just can't. ♪♪ mop smarter with the swiffer powermop. weeds... they have you surrounded. take your lawn back! with scotts turf builder triple action! it gets three jobs done at once - kills weeds. prevents crabgrass. and keeps it growing strong. download the my lawn app today for lawn care tips and customized plans. feed your lawn. feed it. to me, harlem is home. but home is also your body. i asked myself, why doesn't pilates exist in harlem? so i started my own studio. getting a brick and mortar in new york is not easy. chase ink has supported us from studio one to studio three. when you start small, you need some big help. and chase ink was that for me. earn up to 5% cash back on business essentials with the chase ink business cash card from chase for business.
so how did he spend his day away from court? golfing. 11th hour just getting underway on this thursday night. looking for a smarter way to mop? try the swiffer powermop. ♪♪ an all-in-one cleaning tool, with a 360-degree swivel head that goes places a regular mop just can't. ♪♪ mop smarter with the swiffer powermop. weeds... they have you surrounded. take your lawn back! with scotts turf builder triple action! it gets three jobs done at once - kills weeds. prevents crabgrass. and keeps...
0
0.0
Apr 21, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court justices go from elite schools into elite law jobs than probably court judgeships. and then a supreme court seat, they're not working in factories earlier in life. so you could say that the kinds of scientific information in a case like mueller would have been really because that's not something that the justices would have had rattling around in their mind to begin with. right. so what do you guys think? how comfortable are you with using science as a way to advance a legal argument? now, let's start here. i was just thinking about that and i feel like with people using scientific evidence, it's something that justices can't ignore because if they ignore it, then the public, i mean, their reputation could come under fire for not caring about the people who are supposed to protect and i also feel like it's effective way to kind of give up your judgment on a certain matter because you not the subject matter expert. yeah. so it's like knowledge of in a judicial humility that you don't know all the facts and you can't just get all the facts from first. emma got you did
supreme court justices go from elite schools into elite law jobs than probably court judgeships. and then a supreme court seat, they're not working in factories earlier in life. so you could say that the kinds of scientific information in a case like mueller would have been really because that's not something that the justices would have had rattling around in their mind to begin with. right. so what do you guys think? how comfortable are you with using science as a way to advance a legal...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court today. did you get a sense from the line of questioning there is a view that some level of presidential immunity might be required? >> the first thing i noticed was the gravity of the day. it felt a lot like the january 6 hearings where you just had to get it right. we knew on the committee we had to get the facts right. you could feel from the justices today they really wanted to not just create a rule for today but create a rule for future misconduct as well. there is competing interests going on. you can see it from the justices. one of a ruling that would have a chilling effect on the president being able to act in practice. on the other side, whether a president really should think about not violent criminal statutes. that is really what's going on here today. it will be interesting to see what the court comes down within its ruling. caitriona: given the gravity you are talking about, there seem to be a suggestion the whole issue needs a deeper examination and perhaps needs to go back t
supreme court today. did you get a sense from the line of questioning there is a view that some level of presidential immunity might be required? >> the first thing i noticed was the gravity of the day. it felt a lot like the january 6 hearings where you just had to get it right. we knew on the committee we had to get the facts right. you could feel from the justices today they really wanted to not just create a rule for today but create a rule for future misconduct as well. there is...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
respected by the court. what i expect out of this case is two things, they will explore presidential immunity, outer bounds of it and it will bog down when they talk about actual actions president trump took. the court has not found fact finding at the trial level, difficult for supreme court to h hypothetically determine what is immune. one likely outcome, supreme court sends back to trial court to show what facts president trump is accused of committing. two of the four charges in the d.c. case are on appeal in a different case and question of interference with official congress proceedings. all of this is to say, one, this is not going to trial any time soon. two, presidential immunity question is fairly broad ultimately and donald trump may be immune from whatever jack smith has accused him of. >> carley: former president has been posting on truth social a lot making case, if you take presidential immunity away from me, you are taking it away from current president biden and can blackmail president by sa
respected by the court. what i expect out of this case is two things, they will explore presidential immunity, outer bounds of it and it will bog down when they talk about actual actions president trump took. the court has not found fact finding at the trial level, difficult for supreme court to h hypothetically determine what is immune. one likely outcome, supreme court sends back to trial court to show what facts president trump is accused of committing. two of the four charges in the d.c....
0
0.0
Apr 11, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it will live in the supreme court. your vote will live on in the hands of federal judges, in their 40s, appointed by joe biden, who will serve for another 40 years. your vote will decide what century we live in. will we live in an age of legal and constitutional enlightenment? or will we live in 1864? your vote is not just about the next four years. the importance of your vote has never been more clear. not just as a vote to preserve democracy in this country, we already knew about that. your vote for who chooses supreme court justices is nothing less than an exercise in incredible intergenerational power that will live long after you. leading off our discussion tonight is democratic senator of the senate judiciary committee, and chairs the subcommittee on federal courts, also the author of captured, the corporate infiltration of american democracy. senator, i really wanted to be able to talk to you about this tonight, because when i say, i'm going to hold up this chart that you've created that shows the republican mul
it will live in the supreme court. your vote will live on in the hands of federal judges, in their 40s, appointed by joe biden, who will serve for another 40 years. your vote will decide what century we live in. will we live in an age of legal and constitutional enlightenment? or will we live in 1864? your vote is not just about the next four years. the importance of your vote has never been more clear. not just as a vote to preserve democracy in this country, we already knew about that. your...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> argument for absolute immunity goes before the supreme court. >> this court never recognized criminal immunity for any public official. >> a private attorney who was willingly -- to spearhead his challenges to the election results. >> what was up for the party with president nixon? if everybody thought presidents couldn't be prosecuted, then what was that about. >> if it feels completely,'s because we destroyed our own democracy. >> rachel maddow, nicolle wallace troy reed, lawrence o'donnell, ari melber, all here as msnbc special coverage of trump on trial begins. >>> who has the time? who has the time? you are telling me that simultaneously we have nearly three hours of oral argument at the united states supreme court of the former president claiming he is immune from prosecution for any crime he did while president and debt the exact same time he is being criminally prosecuted. the first star witness against him just had his first full day of testimony. who has the time? there isn't time to pay attention to all of this. let alone everything else that's happening too. because of tha
>> argument for absolute immunity goes before the supreme court. >> this court never recognized criminal immunity for any public official. >> a private attorney who was willingly -- to spearhead his challenges to the election results. >> what was up for the party with president nixon? if everybody thought presidents couldn't be prosecuted, then what was that about. >> if it feels completely,'s because we destroyed our own democracy. >> rachel maddow, nicolle...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and the court in this case, and this is a fairly rare thing fo the court to do inhe early 1900s. is the court at that time was really conservative. and yeonhis particular issue, all nine justices came together behind one opinion and said that gender differences justify why what they called at the time protective legislation regarding work hours. so what is it that is in the due process clause that might restrict the flexibility of state governments to pass the kinds of health, safety, welfare and morals regulations that it sees fit? well, the 14th amendment says that no state, meaning no state government, shall deprive to any person life, liberty or property without due process of law. note a couple of things. one, the obligation of state governments does not apply only to citizens. it applies to any person who happens to be in that state. you're not a state student here at umbc. you have the state of maryland has just as much a due process obligation for you as it does someone who was born and raised in baltimore county. another thing is, well, how should we construe this senten
and the court in this case, and this is a fairly rare thing fo the court to do inhe early 1900s. is the court at that time was really conservative. and yeonhis particular issue, all nine justices came together behind one opinion and said that gender differences justify why what they called at the time protective legislation regarding work hours. so what is it that is in the due process clause that might restrict the flexibility of state governments to pass the kinds of health, safety, welfare...
0
0.0
Apr 8, 2024
04/24
by
ALJAZ
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so the mr. president, members at the court. good morning is my on the to come before you're representing, you cut out what, in your case involving its rising obligations as one of the social, the entire international community. and most importantly, those are the palestinian people. the case before us involves my interests, events affecting the life, and well being of hundreds of thousands of people, heating the destruction of an entire people. but in spite of the gravity of the situation, defects in the law of very simply explained serious breaches of international humanitarian will think of it. the rent of the norm slipping to national, including genocide, taking place in palestine. these preachers of being committed openly at the witness on the ground by thousands of people who have been viewed in public new services in social media. but probably the majority of the population of the world we're in a situation with this nature occurs always in dangers of, of occurring. publication for states are clear. not only just takes mo
so the mr. president, members at the court. good morning is my on the to come before you're representing, you cut out what, in your case involving its rising obligations as one of the social, the entire international community. and most importantly, those are the palestinian people. the case before us involves my interests, events affecting the life, and well being of hundreds of thousands of people, heating the destruction of an entire people. but in spite of the gravity of the situation,...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. this really ticked along, and we did not hear much from buy any at all from clients, so i'm curious to see what you have to say about that. >> hello harris, we heard a letter from justice thomas but not from what we've heard in the past two years since he we have heard from these cases. one of these justices, like it or not are now square in the center of the 2024 presidential campaign. no question about it. sometimes you hear these cases and you can get a inkling of how these justices are going to rule, it is a tough one here, this one on almost three hours. this is something that the supreme court typically said an hour or a hour and a half. this was three hours. this case is about so much more than trump, a goes into the future with presidential immunity. the former president charged with attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. a train set allegations surrounding a time where he was the president, he says that he cannot be indicted because he ws presid
supreme court. this really ticked along, and we did not hear much from buy any at all from clients, so i'm curious to see what you have to say about that. >> hello harris, we heard a letter from justice thomas but not from what we've heard in the past two years since he we have heard from these cases. one of these justices, like it or not are now square in the center of the 2024 presidential campaign. no question about it. sometimes you hear these cases and you can get a inkling of how...
0
0.0
Apr 11, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
who knows whether trump is back to appellate court tomorrow morning but appellate court has made itself heard three days in a row. he is coming in with a last minute bid to delay the trial and gets rebuffed by three separate judges. he has tried to halt this trial more than ten times. it is 11 times by the da's count. and every time it gets rebuffed. >> thank you both very much for joining us tonight. >> thanks. >>> coming up, will wisconsin now be forced to go back to 1849 and live under an 1849 abortion law? tammy baldwin running for reelection in wisconsin will join us next. ll join us next. if advanced lung cancer has you searching for possibilities, discover a different first treatment. immunotherapies work with your immune system to attack cancer. but opdivo plus yervoy is the first combination of 2 immunotherapies for adults newly diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer that has spread, tests positive for pd-l1, and does not have an abnormal egfr or alk gene. opdivo plus yervoy is not chemotherapy, it works differently. it helps your immune system fight cancer in 2 different wa
who knows whether trump is back to appellate court tomorrow morning but appellate court has made itself heard three days in a row. he is coming in with a last minute bid to delay the trial and gets rebuffed by three separate judges. he has tried to halt this trial more than ten times. it is 11 times by the da's count. and every time it gets rebuffed. >> thank you both very much for joining us tonight. >> thanks. >>> coming up, will wisconsin now be forced to go back to 1849...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and what's really important here about this, john, is that the high court, the 2 high court judges that are heard julian's, the hearing on february 20 and 21. what we're talking about here, this is by the way, just to hearing so that drilling assange could have an appeal. this is an appeal about an appeal, because he had been denied the right to have an appeal or to leave for an appeal. so those judges said in their 66 page ruling, 2 very important things on the death penalty. there were strongly blunt. i'm going to quote, they said, if extradition of a shot would quote be contrary to the convention rights us european convention. you human rights, under the british human rights act of 1998 article 3, which is against georgia in human degrading treatment to punch. in other words, the death penalty and other words, if the extradition is contrary to that right, the extradition must be refused. that means without the assurance from the united states that they will not seek the death penalty. there's an automatic refusal of distribution freelance on goes free. why haven't they given that ass
and what's really important here about this, john, is that the high court, the 2 high court judges that are heard julian's, the hearing on february 20 and 21. what we're talking about here, this is by the way, just to hearing so that drilling assange could have an appeal. this is an appeal about an appeal, because he had been denied the right to have an appeal or to leave for an appeal. so those judges said in their 66 page ruling, 2 very important things on the death penalty. there were...