0
0.0
Mar 18, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
here is justice jackson about that ketanji brown jackson. >> my biggest concern is that your view hasdment hamstringing the government in the most important time periods. i mean, what would you have the government do? i have heard you say a couple times that the government can post its own speech. >> bret: what did you make of the oral argument and some of that exchange? >> well, i was certainly struck to hear justice ketanji brown jackson say that the first amendment under the view that she clearly does not support would hamstring the government in important moments. that's the whole purpose of the first amendment is to hamstring the government. to prevent it from abridging, as the constitution puts it, freedom of speech and these platforms that are in question here are for freedom -- for free speech, and people said all kinds of things about covid, for example, including the government. some of which turned out to be true and some which did not. the theory of our first amendment, bret, as i'm sure you well know is that out of the voices that are heard and people can think about and
here is justice jackson about that ketanji brown jackson. >> my biggest concern is that your view hasdment hamstringing the government in the most important time periods. i mean, what would you have the government do? i have heard you say a couple times that the government can post its own speech. >> bret: what did you make of the oral argument and some of that exchange? >> well, i was certainly struck to hear justice ketanji brown jackson say that the first amendment under...
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice ketanji brown jackson was not having any of it. especially given the highly unlikely and totally hypothetical harm that could be done to this group of seven physicians and dentists. >> counsel, can i ask you about the remedy and sort of the way i was talking with the sg. i mean it makes perfect sense for the individual doctors to seek an exemption, but as i understand it, they already have that. and so what they're asking for here is that in order to prevent them from possibly ever having to do these kinds of procedures, everyone else should be prevented from getting access to this medication. so why isn't that plainly overbroad scope of the remedy the end of this case? >> from that question we finally, finally got ms. hawley's central argument to why national restrictions must be imposed to shield these seven doctors. >> these are emergency situations. respondent doctors don't necessarily know until they scrub into this operating room whether or not it may be abortion drug harm. because these are abortion emergency situations they
justice ketanji brown jackson was not having any of it. especially given the highly unlikely and totally hypothetical harm that could be done to this group of seven physicians and dentists. >> counsel, can i ask you about the remedy and sort of the way i was talking with the sg. i mean it makes perfect sense for the individual doctors to seek an exemption, but as i understand it, they already have that. and so what they're asking for here is that in order to prevent them from possibly...
0
0.0
Mar 12, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and ketanji brown jackson and all those changes. all of that happened despite your state being in some ways a marquee for voter suppression. your governor, brian kemp, who when he was secretary of state almost arrhythmatically attempted to remove voters from the polls and very ceremoniously signed a voter suppression law under a portrait of a plantation, and yet, you have had your state had very high voter registration. what do you make of the state of voting rights at this point, senator? because there is a john lewis voting rights act that does exist, that i understand is potentially going to be reintroduced in the senate. what's the state of voting rights in your state and nationally? >> i reintroduced the john lewis voting rights advancement act just a few days ago. i testified regarding it in the senate judiciary hearing earlier today. after i won, after jon ossoff won, the state of georgia actually doubled down on its voter suppression tactics. and the question we have to ask ourselves is why and also how? we know why. they lo
and ketanji brown jackson and all those changes. all of that happened despite your state being in some ways a marquee for voter suppression. your governor, brian kemp, who when he was secretary of state almost arrhythmatically attempted to remove voters from the polls and very ceremoniously signed a voter suppression law under a portrait of a plantation, and yet, you have had your state had very high voter registration. what do you make of the state of voting rights at this point, senator?...
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
LINKTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
as justice ketanji brown jackson said, who is decide in these cases?do we leave it to the fda where there are scientists who are trained to do these kinds of reviews to hold to account the pharmaceutical industry, people who have the capacity, the knowledge, the experience to review the data that comes in from both the pharmaceutical industry and as well the data collected by the government? who is best qualified, those individuals or would it be judges and justices? she made note of the fact that with the evidence presented by the plaintiffs in this case, which included anonymous blog posts and that to serve as credible evidence before judge kaczmarek in amarillo, texas, basically showing the emperor has no cothes, that judges are not in the best position to review the scientific evidence. and for the alliance of who brought the suit in the first place, they really had no response to that. amy: just as good time to brown jackson asked the lawyer representing the mifepristone manufacturer to layout her concerns about judges parsing medical and scientif
as justice ketanji brown jackson said, who is decide in these cases?do we leave it to the fda where there are scientists who are trained to do these kinds of reviews to hold to account the pharmaceutical industry, people who have the capacity, the knowledge, the experience to review the data that comes in from both the pharmaceutical industry and as well the data collected by the government? who is best qualified, those individuals or would it be judges and justices? she made note of the fact...
0
0.0
Mar 16, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brown jackson, so many other people, so this was monumental for you to come in here and put delta ons pedestal. we know for as long as we can remember of voting rights, democracy, lots of social issues have been on the plate and frankly it is what helps catalyze the president into his role, and was the work of deltas, afrin american women who helped him solidify this presidency was a what would you cite is the value of black women specifically in foreign policy and national security and how can we continue to elevate black women in the space? amb. jenkins: thank you. the bio needs to be updated. jalina: we have to put that on the bio. amb. jenkins: yeah, briefly, it was great. i was accepted as an honorary member of delta along with an illustrious line of other women, and it really did, it is great to be part of this wonderful organization. but you know, being around all these other you know, black women, i have had an opportunity to do a number of activities with delta the power of black wn working together. i know that the deltas were also a strong proponent of course of supreme co
brown jackson, so many other people, so this was monumental for you to come in here and put delta ons pedestal. we know for as long as we can remember of voting rights, democracy, lots of social issues have been on the plate and frankly it is what helps catalyze the president into his role, and was the work of deltas, afrin american women who helped him solidify this presidency was a what would you cite is the value of black women specifically in foreign policy and national security and how can...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
KPIX
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justices sonya soto mayor, elena kagan, anton g ketanji brown jackson expressed frustration saying thatn protects donald trump from "future controversy." cbs's robert costa has a former president's reaction. >> a crucial decision today with sweeping political consequences. the high court's ruling that former president trump cannot be removed from colorado's ballot. due to the state court's view that he stoped dead january 6th insurrection. >> you cannot take somebody out of a race, the voters can take a person out of the race very quickly, but a court should not be doing that. >> with this ruling, two other states also have their efforts to remove the former president stole, three justices and a separate concurring opinion said allowing the colorado measure to go forward would we agreed create a chaotic state-by-state patchwork of made a tense political landscape, justice amy coney barrett also urged americans to see unity from the unanimous decision. writing "in this circumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up." colorado's democratic secretary
justices sonya soto mayor, elena kagan, anton g ketanji brown jackson expressed frustration saying thatn protects donald trump from "future controversy." cbs's robert costa has a former president's reaction. >> a crucial decision today with sweeping political consequences. the high court's ruling that former president trump cannot be removed from colorado's ballot. due to the state court's view that he stoped dead january 6th insurrection. >> you cannot take somebody out...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brown jackson. now, justice barrett, one donald trump's appointees. the third one, in fact, split off a bit also, but not joining the liberals. >> interesting and aly, i'm just wondering read, it looks like page 13 of those it says for the reasons given responsibility for enforcing section three against federal office holders and candidates rests with congress and not the states, right? the judgment the colorado supreme court therefore cannot stand. so they're saying essentially that congress has to make this decision >> whether there >> are insurrectionist who need to be kept off of ballots. is that essentially what they're saying? essentially what they're saying is it's up to congress to tell us how this works. so if congress had, let's say 50 years ago, congress had passed a law saying, we're going to let the states do it, so long as they they abide by due process, then what colorado did would have been fine, but congress has done essentially nothing in the 150 years since the 14th amendment was
brown jackson. now, justice barrett, one donald trump's appointees. the third one, in fact, split off a bit also, but not joining the liberals. >> interesting and aly, i'm just wondering read, it looks like page 13 of those it says for the reasons given responsibility for enforcing section three against federal office holders and candidates rests with congress and not the states, right? the judgment the colorado supreme court therefore cannot stand. so they're saying essentially that...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
KPIX
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justices sonia sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson expressed frustration in a concurring, saying the decision protects donald trump from, quote, future controversy. cbs's robert costa has the former president's reaction. >> reporter: a crucial decision today with sweeping political consequences. the high court ruling that former president donald trump cannot be removed from colorado's ballot due to the state court's view that he stoked the january 6th >> you cannot take somebody out of a race. the voter can take a person out of the race very quickly, but i couldn't shouldn't be doing that. >> reporter: with this ruling, two other states also had their efforts to remove the former president stall. three justices in a separate concurring opinion said allowing the colorado measure to go forward would, we agree, create a chaotic state-by-state patchwork amid a tense political landscape. justice amy coney barrett also urged americans to see unity from the unanimous decision, writing, "in this circumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up
justices sonia sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson expressed frustration in a concurring, saying the decision protects donald trump from, quote, future controversy. cbs's robert costa has the former president's reaction. >> reporter: a crucial decision today with sweeping political consequences. the high court ruling that former president donald trump cannot be removed from colorado's ballot due to the state court's view that he stoked the january 6th >> you cannot...
0
0.0
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
KPIX
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
liberal justices sonia sotomayor and ketanji brown jackson questions the law's constitutionality andd it will upend the long-standing federal state balance of power and so chaos. but the moment multiple local loggers and officials till they are already short-staffed and don't have the training to enforce the law. appeared to be good is not illegal put them in general, we can't do that. we can't stereotype someone from mexico and do that. >> that potential for racial profiling cross texas is what concerns migrant activists like dylan corbett. >> it's not just against recently arrived migrants. migrants coming to the border. this really goes after texans throughout the state. >> reporter: tonight, the mexican government says it won't accept migrants that texas officials try to send back under the new law. campaigning here in nevada, president biden had no comment on the ruling. coincidentally, he is headed next to the border states of arizona and texas. norah? >> norah: ed o'keefe, thank you very much. today, former trump white house advisor peter navarro became the first person from t
liberal justices sonia sotomayor and ketanji brown jackson questions the law's constitutionality andd it will upend the long-standing federal state balance of power and so chaos. but the moment multiple local loggers and officials till they are already short-staffed and don't have the training to enforce the law. appeared to be good is not illegal put them in general, we can't do that. we can't stereotype someone from mexico and do that. >> that potential for racial profiling cross texas...
0
0.0
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
KGO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
but in a scathing dissent, joined by justice ketanji brown jackson, justice sonia sotomayor warned that the decision "invites further chaos and crisis in immigration enforcement." sotomayor added, "this law will disrupt sensitive foreign relations, frustrate the protection of individuals fleeing persecution, and deter noncitizens from reporting abuse or trafficking." the ruling comes as federal migrant apprehensions across the southwest border reach an average of 4,200 daily, a sharp decline from the peak of nearly 11,000 in a single day back in december. so, now this case goes back to the u.s. court of appeals for the fifth circuit, with a nudge from some of the justices to move quickly, and that could mean this texas law could be back before the supreme court soon, perhaps within days. still, the white house tonight is saying that the court's order today will, quote, sow chaos and confusion at the border. david? >> david: but not over yet, as you point out. terry, thank you. >>> we turn now to that chilling case that made national headlines. a horrific racial attack in mississippi. to
but in a scathing dissent, joined by justice ketanji brown jackson, justice sonia sotomayor warned that the decision "invites further chaos and crisis in immigration enforcement." sotomayor added, "this law will disrupt sensitive foreign relations, frustrate the protection of individuals fleeing persecution, and deter noncitizens from reporting abuse or trafficking." the ruling comes as federal migrant apprehensions across the southwest border reach an average of 4,200...
0
0.0
Mar 10, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brown jackson .use] and passing histoc gun ú2safety laws. my husband is the author of the violence against women, an him n yellow legal paper by hand■ car lifting up women. but donald trump -- [crowd booing] he spent a lifetime tearing us down and devaluing our existence. >> yeah! >> he mocks women's bodies, di our accomplishments, and brags about assault. now he's bragging about killing roe v. wade. again for enabling states like georgia to pass cruel abortion bands -- bans that are taking away the right of women to make their own health care decisions. how far will he go? when will he stop? you know the answer -- he won't. he won't. he said it himself last night in his own words. he is considering a national abortion ban. donald trump is dangerous to women and to our families. we simply cannot let him win. we cannot wake up on november 6 like we did in 2016,■ terrified of the future ahead of us, thinking, oh, my god, what just happened? what are we going to do now? we must harris. [cheers and appla
brown jackson .use] and passing histoc gun ú2safety laws. my husband is the author of the violence against women, an him n yellow legal paper by hand■ car lifting up women. but donald trump -- [crowd booing] he spent a lifetime tearing us down and devaluing our existence. >> yeah! >> he mocks women's bodies, di our accomplishments, and brags about assault. now he's bragging about killing roe v. wade. again for enabling states like georgia to pass cruel abortion bands -- bans that...
0
0.0
Mar 20, 2024
03/24
by
LINKTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
this is justice ketanji brown jackson. >> so i guess some might say the government actually has a dutyo take steps to protect the citizens of this country and you seem to be suggesting that duty cannot manage the past itself and -- manifest itself in the government encouraging or pressuring plat from's to take down harmful information. so can you help me? i am really worried about that because you have got the first amendment operating in an environment of threatening circumstances of the government's perspective and you are saying the government cannot interact with the source of those problems. amy: and the environmental protection agency announced a full ban on asbestos. the carcinogen had been largely prohibited in previous environmental orders but chrysotile asbestos had been permitted until this latest ban and is used in a range of products, including brake linings, gaskets, and in chlorine bleach and sodium hydroxide production. it's been found to cause lung cancer, mesothelioma and other cancers, and is linked to over 40,000 u.s. deaths each year. and those are some of the head
this is justice ketanji brown jackson. >> so i guess some might say the government actually has a dutyo take steps to protect the citizens of this country and you seem to be suggesting that duty cannot manage the past itself and -- manifest itself in the government encouraging or pressuring plat from's to take down harmful information. so can you help me? i am really worried about that because you have got the first amendment operating in an environment of threatening circumstances of the...
0
0.0
Mar 18, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
you had the fbi doing that but the big take away today was ketanji brown jackson when she said to theal from louisiana she said you have the first amendment hamstringing the government. while that's when it is supposed to do. it was literally the craziest things. you can have a justice on the united states supreme court say that in the oral argument. it made no sense to me. that is frightening because if she really believes that, that is scary where we are heading. understand what took place here. this was censorship by her surrogate. big government telling big tech to take down speech they disagree with and it was political speech. it was supposed to have heightened scrutiny before you can take that down but that is what took place and then to have a justice on the supreme court say what she said, that is frightening. >> john: some of the things that the government was coercing, facebook, twitter, and others to take down now seem to be conventional wisdom such as what was the origin of covid. as we pointed out, some of the plaintiffs in this case are physicians. one of them aaron cur
you had the fbi doing that but the big take away today was ketanji brown jackson when she said to theal from louisiana she said you have the first amendment hamstringing the government. while that's when it is supposed to do. it was literally the craziest things. you can have a justice on the united states supreme court say that in the oral argument. it made no sense to me. that is frightening because if she really believes that, that is scary where we are heading. understand what took place...
0
0.0
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the six conservative justices voting in favor of texas with three liberals including ketanji brown jackson voting against justice sotomayor calling the texas law a novel scheme that invites further chaos and crisis. the white house weighing in karine jean-pierre says we fundamentally disagree with the supreme court's order allowing texas harmful and unconstitutional law to go into effect. s.b. 4 will not only make communities in texas less safe, it will also burden law enforcement and sow chaos and confusion at our southern border. the next step as governor abbott said this will go to a federal appeals court. ultimately could drive migrants from texas to other border states. bret? >> bret: david spunt, thank you. david, some of the other supreme court news today involves former president donald trump. >> bret, that's exactly right. the supreme court received a formal written notice from president donald trump's legal team about why he wants to take his case of presidential immunity before the the justices. he believes he should be immune from prosecution from special counsel jack smith, ar
the six conservative justices voting in favor of texas with three liberals including ketanji brown jackson voting against justice sotomayor calling the texas law a novel scheme that invites further chaos and crisis. the white house weighing in karine jean-pierre says we fundamentally disagree with the supreme court's order allowing texas harmful and unconstitutional law to go into effect. s.b. 4 will not only make communities in texas less safe, it will also burden law enforcement and sow chaos...
0
0.0
Mar 29, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
to possibly hear ketanji brown jackson say something about how it could be issued.orsuch or someone else or alito say well no. surely it would take months for us to figure this out. it would be fascinating to hear that particular point engaged. >> absolutely. it would have the effect of those people who may not be looking at this in good faith having to actually articulate the reason for delay here. that isn't just what they are trying to do is just avoid a trial. they may decide in very flowery language that presidents are not immune from prosecution but at the same time, what they will really be doing is saying this former president is immune. >> what other issues should be easily clarified in oral arguments? >> one of them is that there should be some small area where a president may be immune from criminal prosecution for conducting foreign relations with adversaries and allies. that that might be an area where it is hard to have normal rules and it seems to me that you could have everyone saying you know what? that may be the case and that may be a debate worth
to possibly hear ketanji brown jackson say something about how it could be issued.orsuch or someone else or alito say well no. surely it would take months for us to figure this out. it would be fascinating to hear that particular point engaged. >> absolutely. it would have the effect of those people who may not be looking at this in good faith having to actually articulate the reason for delay here. that isn't just what they are trying to do is just avoid a trial. they may decide in very...
0
0.0
Mar 31, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice ketanji brown jackson's point underscored why the pharmaceutical industry was filed an amicusnd the ripple effect around innovation, this disruption that can happen and medications that we need and depend on having them litigated by the courts, takes it out of the purview of the experts. that was a critical thing. as well as the calm stack act. it was a question in the conversation. what i thought was interesting is the court was forecasting or they could come back. find someone who has harm and come back so standing is not off the table. it's personhood away to come back around this conversation as well as harkening back to a 150-year-old law that is saying, we are not done. i think what alabama showed us in this moment is that the south has something to say, places we had written off, in terms of building state power. particularly around this issue shows it's an issue that cuts across so many demographics and parties. >> can i follow up on this, comstock act. it is a sleeper. >> [ laughter ] >> i don't think people appreciate with those two justices are doing. we've seen thi
justice ketanji brown jackson's point underscored why the pharmaceutical industry was filed an amicusnd the ripple effect around innovation, this disruption that can happen and medications that we need and depend on having them litigated by the courts, takes it out of the purview of the experts. that was a critical thing. as well as the calm stack act. it was a question in the conversation. what i thought was interesting is the court was forecasting or they could come back. find someone who has...
0
0.0
Mar 29, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
brown jackson say something about how quickly it could be issued and then, gorsuch or someone else ort would take months for us to figure out and it would be fascinating to hear that particular point engaged during an oral argument. >> absolutely because i think it would have the salutary effect of those people who may not be looking at this in good faith, having to actually articulate the reason for delay here, that is in just what they are really trying to do, just trying to avoid a trial. they may decide in flowery language that presidents are not immune from prosecution but at the same time, what they will really be doing is saying, presidents in general are not immune but by delaying this trial in this case, this former president is immune. >> one of the other issues that should be easily clarified in oral argument? >> there are people who say that there should be some small area where a president may be immune from criminal prosecution, for instance, in conducting foreign relations, that might be an area where it's hard to have normal rules with respect to criminal prosecution a
brown jackson say something about how quickly it could be issued and then, gorsuch or someone else ort would take months for us to figure out and it would be fascinating to hear that particular point engaged during an oral argument. >> absolutely because i think it would have the salutary effect of those people who may not be looking at this in good faith, having to actually articulate the reason for delay here, that is in just what they are really trying to do, just trying to avoid a...
0
0.0
Mar 10, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
elena kagan, sonia sotomayor, ketanji brown jackson agreed that states lack the authority, but that wasn't for the critics. >> the supreme court does it again, handing another major win to donald trump, allowing him to stay on the colorado ballot and is choosing to ugh e near the question at the heart of the cases which is whether trump is an insurrectionist under the 14th amendment. >> a lot of americans out there, their blood is boiling for what donald trump did on january 6th. they just think he's getting let off the hook scot free. >> the truth is, of course, these people don't trust the voter, and they don't much like the voters, at least not the 74 million who voted for trump. today we really saw their anger and their hatred consume them. howard: cassie, the anchors and commentators who said of course colorado and maine and illinois should be able to kick donald trump off the ballot under section three of the 14th amendment, how do they look now in the wake of this unanimous supreme court ruling? >> silly, unhinged, not cred credible. -- not credible. 9-0, when do you hear that in th
elena kagan, sonia sotomayor, ketanji brown jackson agreed that states lack the authority, but that wasn't for the critics. >> the supreme court does it again, handing another major win to donald trump, allowing him to stay on the colorado ballot and is choosing to ugh e near the question at the heart of the cases which is whether trump is an insurrectionist under the 14th amendment. >> a lot of americans out there, their blood is boiling for what donald trump did on january 6th....
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
ketanji brown jackson and elena kagan said, quote, section three provides that what an oath breaking insurrectionist is disqualified, congress may by a vote of two thirds of each house remove such a disability. it is hard to understand by the constitution would require a congressional super majority to remove a disqualification if a single majority could nullify section 3's operation by repealing or declining to pass implementing legislation. it is worse than they know. it would not take a simple majority to decline to pass implementing legislation, to vote against implementing legislation. it would only take 41 out of 100 senators to block implementing legislation which, according tito the procedural rules of the united states senate, requires a 60 vote majority threshold to pass. so, if a group of 59 senators agreed on implementing legislation tomorrow for section three of the 14th amendment, it could not become law. it could be blocked by 41 senators who support an oath breaking insurrection and want to see insurrectionists and want to see an oath breaking insurrectionist become r
ketanji brown jackson and elena kagan said, quote, section three provides that what an oath breaking insurrectionist is disqualified, congress may by a vote of two thirds of each house remove such a disability. it is hard to understand by the constitution would require a congressional super majority to remove a disqualification if a single majority could nullify section 3's operation by repealing or declining to pass implementing legislation. it is worse than they know. it would not take a...
0
0.0
Mar 18, 2024
03/24
by
FBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> well the big takeaway was actually judge ketanji brown jackson, what she said something i couldn'telieve. she actually said to the solicitor general to the state of louisiana, he said your position on the first amendment, you have the first amendment hamstringing the government. think about that, larry, that is what the first amendment is supposed to do for goodness sakes. she actually said that, oh, my goodness. that was pretty scary. judge alito had it right. this was government pressuring big tech to censor their political opposition. the way they, the leverage they had as judge alito said they had section 230 and of course the antitrust in their back pocket to use implied, if you don't do what we want we can -- in fact we have an email from nick college, one of the people at meta, we have bigger fish to fry. we is may have to go along with the government. there is other concerns here. i think that what is judge alito said, that is a big concern. day three from the biden administration, email from the white house, january 23rd, 2021, email from twitter take down this tweet asab.
>> well the big takeaway was actually judge ketanji brown jackson, what she said something i couldn'telieve. she actually said to the solicitor general to the state of louisiana, he said your position on the first amendment, you have the first amendment hamstringing the government. think about that, larry, that is what the first amendment is supposed to do for goodness sakes. she actually said that, oh, my goodness. that was pretty scary. judge alito had it right. this was government...
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
begins with justice ketanji brown jackson. >> do you have concerns about judges parsing medical and scientificsignificant concerns about that. you have a district court that among other things relied on one study that was an analysis of anonymous blog posts. you have another set of studies that he relied on that were not in the administrative record and would never be because they post date the fda decisions here. they have since been retracted for lack of scientific rigor and misleading presentations of data. those source of errors can infect judicial analyses. judges are not expert ins statistics or in the methodology used for scientific studies for clinical trials. it is relevant to a lot of cases making it to the supreme court these days. the idea that agencies of specialists headed by people approvalled by the united states senate are not to be trusted with the things that fall into their expertise. but that should be adjudicated in the court or determined by congress. that could lead to a mess in the way government runs. it would be unprecedented in the modern developed world. but there
begins with justice ketanji brown jackson. >> do you have concerns about judges parsing medical and scientificsignificant concerns about that. you have a district court that among other things relied on one study that was an analysis of anonymous blog posts. you have another set of studies that he relied on that were not in the administrative record and would never be because they post date the fda decisions here. they have since been retracted for lack of scientific rigor and misleading...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
in one of the concurrences from justice sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson, they referred to trump as an oath breaking insurrectionist not once, not twice, but four times in six pages. and they question the propriety of the court's conservatives seeming to dictate how the 14th amendment should be enforced. quoting no less than the dobbs decision that overturned roe v. wade in their opening line. quote, if it is not necessary to decide more to dispose of a case, than it is necessary not to decide more. and then closing with nothing less than bush v. gore. the case that three of their colleagues worked on as bush side attorneys. writing, quote, what it does today, the court should have left undone. ouch. ouch. and in her own brief concurring opinion, conservative justice amy coney barrett may have giving us a glimpse affwhat to expect from the conservative majority in the coming supreme court hearings on presidential immunity. as she agreed that her fellow conservatives did too much but for a different reason. writing, the court has settled a politically charged issue in the
in one of the concurrences from justice sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson, they referred to trump as an oath breaking insurrectionist not once, not twice, but four times in six pages. and they question the propriety of the court's conservatives seeming to dictate how the 14th amendment should be enforced. quoting no less than the dobbs decision that overturned roe v. wade in their opening line. quote, if it is not necessary to decide more to dispose of a case, than it is...
0
0.0
Mar 1, 2024
03/24
by
KNTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
then justice ketanji brown jackson said, "please the american people are counting on us can we speed then justice neil gorsuch said, "we -- are -- going -- as - fast - as - we - c-a-n. [ laughter and applause perfect. we got mixed messages there. >> steve: wow. well, congress has struck a deal to delay a government shutdown until march 8th, which means in one week we'll have another looming shutdown it just keeps happening. and it's hard not to be bored by this whole thing to be honest which explains why c-span released this new promo trying to make it seem more exciting. watch this >> what's up, america? on march 8th, the biggest rivalry in politics is back for another historic showdown. but this time, there are no holds barred the fight over debt is a fight to the death two parties in the steel cage of negotiation, where no one leaves until a fiscal budget is approved schumer has lowered his glasses, and he's ready to kick some asses but mcconnell's prepped for a shutdown showdown staredown. >> jowl-chi-wa-wa. [ gobbling ] >> and who the [ bleep ] is this guy he's dead meat in the
then justice ketanji brown jackson said, "please the american people are counting on us can we speed then justice neil gorsuch said, "we -- are -- going -- as - fast - as - we - c-a-n. [ laughter and applause perfect. we got mixed messages there. >> steve: wow. well, congress has struck a deal to delay a government shutdown until march 8th, which means in one week we'll have another looming shutdown it just keeps happening. and it's hard not to be bored by this whole thing to be...
0
0.0
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
here is just test, ketanji brown jackson on first amendment has print -- hamstring the government. here's what she said. >> your view has the first amendment hamstring and the government insignificant ways in the most important time periods. if the government actually has a duty to take steps to protect the citizens of this country. at -- encouraging or even pressuring platforms to take down harmful information. >> martha: i mean isn't that the point of the first amendment, michael? that freedom of speech allows us to say whatever we want about our government? >> reporter: >> that's right grandmother first amendment there is supposed to limit government stability to limit or bridge freedom of speech. i think -- our country was founded on the idea not that the government gives us permission to see what whatever we want but say that an inalienable human rights so i was really disturbed by this comments. it's one thing to have politicians tell a newspaper -- another thing to have a mass censorship initiative which they operated that was censoring people like top ab damages at harvard
here is just test, ketanji brown jackson on first amendment has print -- hamstring the government. here's what she said. >> your view has the first amendment hamstring and the government insignificant ways in the most important time periods. if the government actually has a duty to take steps to protect the citizens of this country. at -- encouraging or even pressuring platforms to take down harmful information. >> martha: i mean isn't that the point of the first amendment, michael?...
0
0.0
Mar 9, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brown jackson . and passing historic gun safety laws. my husband is the author of the violence agast women act, and i saw him write that bill on had he spent his entire career lifting up women. but donald trump -- [crowd booing] he spent a down and devaluing our existence. >> yeah! >> heen's bodies, disrespects our accomplishments, and brags about assault. now ling roe v. wade. just last night, he took credit again for enabling states like georgia to bands -- bans that are taking away the right of women to make their own health care decisions. how far will he go? when will he stop? you know the answerhe said it hn his own words. he is■rional abortion ban. donald trump is dangerous to women and to our simply cannot . we cannot wake upno like we did in 2016, terrified of the future ahead of us, thinking, oh, my god, what just happened? what are we going to do now? we must reelect joe biden and kamala harris. [cheers and applause] so how we going to well, just look around you. women for biden-harris! 02
brown jackson . and passing historic gun safety laws. my husband is the author of the violence agast women act, and i saw him write that bill on had he spent his entire career lifting up women. but donald trump -- [crowd booing] he spent a down and devaluing our existence. >> yeah! >> heen's bodies, disrespects our accomplishments, and brags about assault. now ling roe v. wade. just last night, he took credit again for enabling states like georgia to bands -- bans that are taking...
65
65
Mar 8, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 65
favorite 0
quote 0
and then we see justice ketanji brown jackson, that's a privilege that you are allowed, we should alsos are extended to former members of congress, there's been a buzz about expelled member of congress, george santos, sort of proudly returning and using his floor privileges to try to attend this evening. he has pled guilty to multiple felony charges, had he been convicted of any the felonies, you would not be allowed on the house floor but as a former member, even one that's been expelled, he technically can be there. so he can be there. lurking somewhere, and hoping desperately that we will talk about him and put his picture on television. while i have just talked about him now, maybe that will do it. >> nobody ever thinks of someone like him existing. >> i've been doing one of my favorite things to do, it's te
and then we see justice ketanji brown jackson, that's a privilege that you are allowed, we should alsos are extended to former members of congress, there's been a buzz about expelled member of congress, george santos, sort of proudly returning and using his floor privileges to try to attend this evening. he has pled guilty to multiple felony charges, had he been convicted of any the felonies, you would not be allowed on the house floor but as a former member, even one that's been expelled, he...
0
0.0
Mar 26, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
now, judge ketanji brown jackson, she had an interesting framing. i mean, she asked lawyers actually on both sides, she said, why is it that the only remedy in this case is to limit access to this drug for everyone, let's take a listen to what she said. >> council, i ask you about the remedy and sort of the way that i was talking with the sg. i mean, it makes perfect sense for the individual doctors to seek an exemption but as i understand it, they already have that and so what they're asking for here is that in order to prevent them from possibly ever having to do these kinds of procedures? everyone else should be prevented from getting access to this medication. so why isn't that plainly overbroad scope of the remedy, the end of this case so this point, it appears a majority of the justices would be unlikely to limit access to mifepristone, >> but we'll see what they ultimately decide. does this interesting? we also heard from a lawyer representing a drugmaker because there are serious consequences in this case, not only for drug manufacturers, bu
now, judge ketanji brown jackson, she had an interesting framing. i mean, she asked lawyers actually on both sides, she said, why is it that the only remedy in this case is to limit access to this drug for everyone, let's take a listen to what she said. >> council, i ask you about the remedy and sort of the way that i was talking with the sg. i mean, it makes perfect sense for the individual doctors to seek an exemption but as i understand it, they already have that and so what they're...
0
0.0
Mar 2, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and frankly, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson, and sonia sotomayor, should be standing up and screamingabsolute disgusting abuse of power. and let me make this clear for the non lawyers out there. because i have -- the one lawyer who's here. i'm explaining this, i'm on campus right. it's like explaining this case to my students today. and they are literally saying well, why is this taking so long? this isn't that complicated. i literally had to show them a video from lethal weapon to about a diplomatic immunity to explain how silly presidential immunity is. this is not complicated. it is very clear, that we have an absolutely corrupted supreme court. that at least three of the judges have financial dealings that we can't explain. gorsuch, kavanaugh, and clarence thomas. and rather than the court demonstrating that the only audience that matters is the american people, they have shown that the only audience that matters is republicans. that is the problem with this. it's not complicated, it doesn't require a lot of legalese. they are stalling in order to allow donald trump to get into th
and frankly, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson, and sonia sotomayor, should be standing up and screamingabsolute disgusting abuse of power. and let me make this clear for the non lawyers out there. because i have -- the one lawyer who's here. i'm explaining this, i'm on campus right. it's like explaining this case to my students today. and they are literally saying well, why is this taking so long? this isn't that complicated. i literally had to show them a video from lethal weapon to...
0
0.0
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justices sonia sotomayor ketanji brown, jackson, and elena kagan. and i'll just read briefly from their descent because the majority itself did not explain itself. it just had an order that said that texas can enforce this two justices on the right. did concur in that. i'll get to that in a second. but i just wanted to explain what the dissenters road they said today, the court invites further chaos and crisis in immigration enforcement. texas passed a law that directly regulates the entry and removal of noncitizens in explicitly instructs it its state courts to disregard ongoing federal immigration proceedings that law appends federal state balance of power that has existed for over a century. that's what justices sotomayor and jackson road and then justice kagan wrote separately, the subject of immigration generally and the entry and removal of noncitizens particularly are matters long thought. the special province of the federal government that's that's kinda the crux of the argument, even though this is playing out in such human terms at the bor
justices sonia sotomayor ketanji brown, jackson, and elena kagan. and i'll just read briefly from their descent because the majority itself did not explain itself. it just had an order that said that texas can enforce this two justices on the right. did concur in that. i'll get to that in a second. but i just wanted to explain what the dissenters road they said today, the court invites further chaos and crisis in immigration enforcement. texas passed a law that directly regulates the entry and...
0
0.0
Mar 9, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
you know, ketanji brown jackson. he called out the supreme court in a really pointed way last night on abortion, on that abortion decision. were you comfortable with that? >> yes, absolutely. i think the decision was wrong. i think the president was good in saying that it was that he felt like it was wrong. but more importantly, what he did was he turned the decision and red them back their own words and said, you're about to find out the power of women when it comes to the voting in this country. so i was absolutely comfortable with him doing that. i think that that has been a rallying cry for democrats, and it is, frankly, something that republicans still have not figured out how to run on. but it is, as we've said before, and i think it's been said on your show, the dog caught the proverbial car and they don't know what to do with it. joe biden knows what to do with it. kamala harris does so today. >> no labels. that's the group that's considering a third party challenge, says they are moving forward with that. if
you know, ketanji brown jackson. he called out the supreme court in a really pointed way last night on abortion, on that abortion decision. were you comfortable with that? >> yes, absolutely. i think the decision was wrong. i think the president was good in saying that it was that he felt like it was wrong. but more importantly, what he did was he turned the decision and red them back their own words and said, you're about to find out the power of women when it comes to the voting in this...
0
0.0
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justices sonia sotomayor and ketanji brown jackson said this today, the court invites further chaos and crisis and immigration enforcement. texas passed a law that directly regulates the entry and removal of noncitizens and explicitly instructs its state courts to disregard any ongoing federal immigration proceedings. the law appends federal state balance of power that has existed for over a century. and then the third liberal joining in was justice elena kagan, who said the subject of immigration generally, and the entry and removal of noncitizens that's particularly are matters long thought. the special province of the federal government. and that's the point here. briana you're looking at all the human drama at the border right now with those pictures and we've just seen so much turmoil as migrants have tried to make their way to america across the river there. but what this is about at this point is essentially state powers versus federal powers. and as it said, it's been for more than a century that the federal government has had control of immigration. and this is the first time a
justices sonia sotomayor and ketanji brown jackson said this today, the court invites further chaos and crisis and immigration enforcement. texas passed a law that directly regulates the entry and removal of noncitizens and explicitly instructs its state courts to disregard any ongoing federal immigration proceedings. the law appends federal state balance of power that has existed for over a century. and then the third liberal joining in was justice elena kagan, who said the subject of...
0
0.0
Mar 26, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it was interesting, justice ketanji brown jackson flip that question and basically asked should the courts then decide what the fda authorizes as a legitimate medication or not it's a fascinating argument. how soon could we expect a decision, paula, from the court >> so boris, since this is one of the biggest cases that they're hearing, we expect a decision likely in late june and that is of course, going to be at the heart of a presidential campaign season. and while for decades, republic hello kids have successfully rallied a lot of their supporters around the idea of overturning roe. now that that has happened in the past two years, democrats have been very successful in galvanizing it. supporters around the issue of protecting abortion rights. so depending on how this works out, this could have an impact on the outcome of the november election now the white house repeatedly putting reproductive rights at the center of their message. paula reid, from outside the supreme court. thank you so much. jessica, for more on all of this. we're joined now by amy hangs from miller. she is the foun
it was interesting, justice ketanji brown jackson flip that question and basically asked should the courts then decide what the fda authorizes as a legitimate medication or not it's a fascinating argument. how soon could we expect a decision, paula, from the court >> so boris, since this is one of the biggest cases that they're hearing, we expect a decision likely in late june and that is of course, going to be at the heart of a presidential campaign season. and while for decades,...
0
0.0
Mar 26, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brown, jackson pressed on why the group believes restricting everyone's access to the drug is necessary. given the doctors can raise religious objections under federal law. >> i mean, it makes perfect sense for the individual doctors to seek an exemption but as i understand it, they already had that. and so what they're asking for here is that in order to prevent them from possibly ever having to do these kinds of procedures. everyone else should be prevented from getting access to this medication. so why isn't that? plainly, overbroad scope of the remedy. the end of this case >> we expect this decision to come in late june. of course, that'll be the heart of the presidential campaign season. so whatever the justices designed to do here could play a factor in that critical race as you know, after roe was overturned aren't democrats have used abortion to galvanize their supporters of former president trump has taken credit for roving, overturned. he's also said, look, there have to be some concessions because we want to win elections. >> wolff, sorry, paula. thank you. paula reid reporti
brown, jackson pressed on why the group believes restricting everyone's access to the drug is necessary. given the doctors can raise religious objections under federal law. >> i mean, it makes perfect sense for the individual doctors to seek an exemption but as i understand it, they already had that. and so what they're asking for here is that in order to prevent them from possibly ever having to do these kinds of procedures. everyone else should be prevented from getting access to this...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> i have three answers to that, and that is justice kagan, justice sotomayor, and justice ketanji brown jackson. in other words, this is a unanimous decision, and it's a point of law. i think, you know, this is really about, should the states have the ability to disqualify somebody versus it being decided by some federal mechanism? and that's where there's a disagreement among the justices, whether congress is the exclusive means or not. it seems like actually all the justices agree that it may not be the exclusive means, but it's certainly a primary means to congressional action. notably justice coney barrett says that the reason she didn't want to go so far to say that it's only congress is that she thinks it's very important in a political season to have the sort of rhetoric of a political season. the temperature taken down, not up, and so i think she's trying to say in her short concurrence is she's saying, this is not a political decision. this is just about who should be able to decide this issue saying it should be left to the feds, not to the states, and to reiterate something i
>> i have three answers to that, and that is justice kagan, justice sotomayor, and justice ketanji brown jackson. in other words, this is a unanimous decision, and it's a point of law. i think, you know, this is really about, should the states have the ability to disqualify somebody versus it being decided by some federal mechanism? and that's where there's a disagreement among the justices, whether congress is the exclusive means or not. it seems like actually all the justices agree that...
0
0.0
Mar 26, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brown jackson talking about the balance, that you are talking about a small group of doctors who, byions already written into law, versus the over 60% of women who choose to use this abortion medication when seeking an abortion. so your question, this all came out of dobbs. we wouldn't be having these arguments right now. this came out of dobbs. we used to have protections for the women of this country. that was called roe v. wade. that dobbs decision turned it on its head. now we are seeing a patchwork. if the judges went the other way on this, it wouldn't just be states where abortion is banned, it would be every state in the country banning a safe and effective drug. this is just the beginning. whether it's the alabama ivf ruling, whether it's these cases out of texas, whether it's the assault on emergency care, we're going to continue to see because of the dobbs decision, and the failure sadly of many republicans to side with us on codifying roe v. wade into law, we are not able to do that right now. that's why this is so important. not just this decision but this election that's
brown jackson talking about the balance, that you are talking about a small group of doctors who, byions already written into law, versus the over 60% of women who choose to use this abortion medication when seeking an abortion. so your question, this all came out of dobbs. we wouldn't be having these arguments right now. this came out of dobbs. we used to have protections for the women of this country. that was called roe v. wade. that dobbs decision turned it on its head. now we are seeing a...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
nope, this time the so-called liberal justices, sonia sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson in a concurring opinion basically told her cat there are colleagues quit while you're ahead, you have them at patchwork. >> see you? i did there. you're waiting for c. rozanna day where you were all trying to you we're leaning into your tv is going how is lara coates going to bring j. maguire back the supreme court >> you're welcome. america. >> well, they agree that there was going to be some chaos if every state gets to decide whether trump can be on the ballot they got to have consistency. that's going to come from congress. they said, not the states. otherwise, you've got this will not a hilou, but patchwork that was as far as they wanted the court to go. but i mean, tell a baby not to cry the rest of them all. but amy coney barrett, that is said, i see your patchwork and i raised you instructions for congress on what they ought to do next. now, we call that legislation, but forgive me for being a little bit cynical here. show me the money figures speaking. you see what happens in
nope, this time the so-called liberal justices, sonia sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson in a concurring opinion basically told her cat there are colleagues quit while you're ahead, you have them at patchwork. >> see you? i did there. you're waiting for c. rozanna day where you were all trying to you we're leaning into your tv is going how is lara coates going to bring j. maguire back the supreme court >> you're welcome. america. >> well, they agree that there...
0
0.0
Mar 20, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brown, jackson. she said the court invites further chaos and crisis in an immigration enforcement texas up ends the federal-state balance of power that has existed for over a century in which the national government has had exclusive authority over entry and removal of noncitizens. this is the key part. this is what this all comes down to, is who's responsible and for age she does, of course, it has been the domain of the federal government but as i mentioned, john, i wanted to just refer briefly to the little word we did get from two of the justices in the conservative dominated majority yesterday, justices amy coney barrett and brett kavanaugh referred to the unusual procedural posture that this case was in. and just as they wrote i think it unwise to invite emergency litigation in this court about whether a court of appeals abused its discretion at this preliminary step that essentially john was a signal to the fifth circuit to go back and do something more formal to add actually review whether th
brown, jackson. she said the court invites further chaos and crisis in an immigration enforcement texas up ends the federal-state balance of power that has existed for over a century in which the national government has had exclusive authority over entry and removal of noncitizens. this is the key part. this is what this all comes down to, is who's responsible and for age she does, of course, it has been the domain of the federal government but as i mentioned, john, i wanted to just refer...
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brown jackson pointed out, you balance that against the grade harm to all these women seeking to get this care? so this is a almost predictable outcome of this disastrous decision that the trump appointed judges made in the dobbs case. but nevertheless, it did seem today that the majority of the justices were not going to side with that court in texas there's also this notion and the one of the phrases i kept hearing is the second guessing. now, that was a phrase in terms of we often hear about whether the courts, whether different law enforcement officials, whether politicians ought to be in the business of second guessing the decisions that a person makes in the reproductive health or a private conversation with the his or her dr. compare that to now, the second guessing of the fda's decisions and the fda's decision to either evaluate or approved different drugs. that was really stunning to me. and thinking about where we are today that the supreme court might, if standing is met be in a position to decide this >> and that is such a great point, laura, because what's going on here,
brown jackson pointed out, you balance that against the grade harm to all these women seeking to get this care? so this is a almost predictable outcome of this disastrous decision that the trump appointed judges made in the dobbs case. but nevertheless, it did seem today that the majority of the justices were not going to side with that court in texas there's also this notion and the one of the phrases i kept hearing is the second guessing. now, that was a phrase in terms of we often hear about...
0
0.0
Mar 26, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brown jackson addressed whether doctors can consciously object to administering the drug let's listen to a portion of that counsel me, ask you about the remedy and sort of the way that i was talking with the sg. i mean, it makes perfect sense for the individual doctors to seek an exemption but as i understand it, they already had that and so what they're asking for here is that in order to prevent them from possibly ever having to do these kinds of procedures? everyone else should be prevented from getting access to this medication. so why isn't that plainly overbroad scope of the remedy, the end of this case so with respect to the premise of that question, justice jackson, i don't think our doctors necessarily are able to object for two reasons. one of this this is the emergency nature of these procedures. as the fda acknowledges, many women do go to the emergency room. and if we just think about what that might look like, take dr. francis she's on the labor and delivery floor supervisor. no, i'm sorry. i don't want to hypothesize. tell me in her declaration where she talks about not
brown jackson addressed whether doctors can consciously object to administering the drug let's listen to a portion of that counsel me, ask you about the remedy and sort of the way that i was talking with the sg. i mean, it makes perfect sense for the individual doctors to seek an exemption but as i understand it, they already had that and so what they're asking for here is that in order to prevent them from possibly ever having to do these kinds of procedures? everyone else should be prevented...