0
0.0
Jun 13, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court.usal has been up to the individual justices since the courts finding. they will create a panel of judges to■- decide when a justice should be reduced. again, that puts the court, in disarray he one supreme court we have. all i can say, is section 7, where you have to have disclosures of briefs would make it very hard for people to register their opinion about a particular matter for the court because they detroyed by the media. my hope, not only will we stop■8 this exercise and we'll stop it forever, said, i'll with hold my objection at this time. >> is there an objection? >> the right to object. >> senator from louisiana. >> madam president. reserving the right to object. with all the respect i can muster for senator durbin. i mean not believe this bill is about is about abortion. there june of 2022 the united states supreme court decided the dobbs case. it returned the issueet of abortion to the american people through their states. while the supreme court was deliberating that case,
the supreme court.usal has been up to the individual justices since the courts finding. they will create a panel of judges to■- decide when a justice should be reduced. again, that puts the court, in disarray he one supreme court we have. all i can say, is section 7, where you have to have disclosures of briefs would make it very hard for people to register their opinion about a particular matter for the court because they detroyed by the media. my hope, not only will we stop■8 this...
0
0.0
Jun 2, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and there's a lot of discussion among people who follow the supreme court and think about the supreme court about the different in that kind background compared to the background of today's justices. well, when you think about some of the cases we'll momentarily which become so strikingly contradict in ways you mentioned one it's it's interesting to wonder about what that experience brought as well their very large personality is of some of them i think it's interesting you put the four in the and the four because there seem to the ones who are very quiet, you don't see in the news and then the ones who are constantly in the press or at least engage in sort of, say, rivalries. well, that's a very, very interesting point about the fdr justices. so we were talking about the number that he had appointed, you know, seven of the nine appointed and eight elevated to chief justice. and at the time that the roosevelt court really shape in the summer of 1941, many observers and predicted that the justices were going to march in lockstep. and again, they were you know, they were all very close
and there's a lot of discussion among people who follow the supreme court and think about the supreme court about the different in that kind background compared to the background of today's justices. well, when you think about some of the cases we'll momentarily which become so strikingly contradict in ways you mentioned one it's it's interesting to wonder about what that experience brought as well their very large personality is of some of them i think it's interesting you put the four in the...
0
0.0
Jun 14, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court?our area of expertise, but would you agree with me that this has grown since 1869. >> the population was considerably increased. we can agree on that. >> it may make sense to do in addition to that, as someone who has practiced in state court and fed■÷eral limits exist in some form in a but we don't have it on the federal can you explain to us how potentially imposing term limits supreme court could allow for hopefully some of the harm that we see coming through the ■court, of the terrible influence to hopefully finally make its way out the court? >> term limits would, among other things, allow for a regular schedule vacancies so that the is not driven by the of who the president is time when the vacancy away, may entire@t08ly, far less crediblee effort that was done to stop merrick garland and install justice gorsuch ih(■ his place. regular and ordinary and it e would make ite■÷■ partisan just their make sure that their part gets tol the vacancy. they claim to be completely th try to
the supreme court?our area of expertise, but would you agree with me that this has grown since 1869. >> the population was considerably increased. we can agree on that. >> it may make sense to do in addition to that, as someone who has practiced in state court and fed■÷eral limits exist in some form in a but we don't have it on the federal can you explain to us how potentially imposing term limits supreme court could allow for hopefully some of the harm that we see coming through...
0
0.0
Jun 4, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court has failed to crisis that has engulfed must d. president, it is a simple fact, there is a chief justice of the supreme court, john roberts. it is within his power to resolve this ethical issue tonight, to have it done by the morning to make it clear that the supreme court is taking a different course, one credible to the american people. justice alito cannot stand in judgment of himself. the fact that we have to
the supreme court has failed to crisis that has engulfed must d. president, it is a simple fact, there is a chief justice of the supreme court, john roberts. it is within his power to resolve this ethical issue tonight, to have it done by the morning to make it clear that the supreme court is taking a different course, one credible to the american people. justice alito cannot stand in judgment of himself. the fact that we have to
0
0.0
Jun 25, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the funding mechanism for the supreme court. the nstutions that there shall be a supreme court. we will give them a nice fancy building. from the constitutional perspective, the supreme court could hold their hearings in the dirt for all the constitution cares.it is congress they give m the money for the nice building. give them the money for their clerks and secretaries and helpers. t pays for the dry cleaning on their roads and congress that can take it away. and one other reform idea is for congress to cut their funding to submit to ethics rules so they are from harlan crow. that is another solution they coulkeso to kind of put it alto, there are lots of things the political branches could do to e political branches won't do voters care enough about the cot of office or vote them into on their supreme court votes. and that ishappening on, republicans on their side of the aie,0l■@ for years, for pretty much my entire life, a gain of voters who were motivated solely by the supreme court and the issues they wanted their judges to decide. and those voters would go to the polls. i
the funding mechanism for the supreme court. the nstutions that there shall be a supreme court. we will give them a nice fancy building. from the constitutional perspective, the supreme court could hold their hearings in the dirt for all the constitution cares.it is congress they give m the money for the nice building. give them the money for their clerks and secretaries and helpers. t pays for the dry cleaning on their roads and congress that can take it away. and one other reform idea is for...
0
0.0
Jun 12, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court.y doing so he made it clear that he already reached a conclusion about the constitutionality of legislation that congress was considering on the issue, legislation that will be before this body today and that could someday come before the court. more recently we learned that the flags that were associated with the january 6 insurrection and far right were displayed outside justice alito's home. this happened even as the court considered cases related to the 2020 presidential election and the insurrectionist attack on the united states capitol. justice thomas continues to hear cases related to the january 6 attacks despite his wife's involvement with efforts t overturn the 2020 election. for years justice thomas served as fundraising draw at the koch political networks annual events. this is the same network that bankrolled another case before the court. the disqualification of a supreme court justice in any proceeding in which the justice's impartiality might reasonably be questioned.
supreme court.y doing so he made it clear that he already reached a conclusion about the constitutionality of legislation that congress was considering on the issue, legislation that will be before this body today and that could someday come before the court. more recently we learned that the flags that were associated with the january 6 insurrection and far right were displayed outside justice alito's home. this happened even as the court considered cases related to the 2020 presidential...
0
0.0
Jun 30, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so i applaud the supreme system that we have -- supreme court system that we have. applaud the people who have been appointed to the court. i have listened to many of their discussions, when they are trying to decide issues. we have people who do not understand america trying to tell them what to do, and -- i think ignorance is a very severe problem our nation, and that is when our nation falls, when you have a lot of people who really do not take the time to learn about a lot of things that are important in our government. i like the fact that the supreme court is already separate, that they are not under pressure to decide issues one way or the other, and a lot of people who have opinions, they really have not done a lot of true assessments themselves to really find out what issues are involved. i am not an attorney, but i did study one course in law in college, and that helped me understand how difficult it is. i just admire the supreme court's, and i think people should not be picking out one judge or another does not agree with their ideology and thinking that
so i applaud the supreme system that we have -- supreme court system that we have. applaud the people who have been appointed to the court. i have listened to many of their discussions, when they are trying to decide issues. we have people who do not understand america trying to tell them what to do, and -- i think ignorance is a very severe problem our nation, and that is when our nation falls, when you have a lot of people who really do not take the time to learn about a lot of things that...
0
0.0
Jun 23, 2024
06/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court.♪ >> the supreme court has never been us out of kilter as it is today. i mean never. >> are setting up to got american democracy toward the end of the season. >> there and they're trying to make much to do about nothing but. >> the bottom line is i do not like a lead out. they do not like thomas a jat conservative justices. shannon: democrats target the supreme court had the announcer the key opinions could have a seismic impact on the race for the white house. we'll get reaction from a top ally of president biden senator chris coons that leader public on the senate judiciary committee lindsey graham. then we are just four days away from a cnn presidential debate. president biden former president trump gearing up for the big nights. >> note is going to watch the debate on thursday night, right? send a pan on the key issues sure to make news at the head to head to show down from the border, to inflation, foreign policy to fitness for office. all right now on "fox news sunday." ♪ live at
supreme court.♪ >> the supreme court has never been us out of kilter as it is today. i mean never. >> are setting up to got american democracy toward the end of the season. >> there and they're trying to make much to do about nothing but. >> the bottom line is i do not like a lead out. they do not like thomas a jat conservative justices. shannon: democrats target the supreme court had the announcer the key opinions could have a seismic impact on the race for the white...
0
0.0
Jun 26, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court it has become evident supreme court wife to life like upside down by the honor of the rights of women to make decisions for their bodies. the supreme court said they wouldthey'renot logan's precedent but they had. what makes you them that not a pr immune there is a divideup president trump is immune to anything he are going to go the powers of that community. oks like that's a situation where and in this country. we are clearly divided as we should be i believe the left is galvanized against donald trump.nk we are with this whole divided supremede court? d forward with making changes. >> a better point thank yuest: first of all i do not think the supreme court hasonsistency. i do think they are perfectlype capable of saying donald trump is immune the only reason i do not think they'll say t because democratic president happens to be the one in power now. that hurts them right now to say that intellectuals not this report has been i've already talked about court extent expansion is one way to court. to bring them to heal. there are othal powers the branches could used to bring
supreme court it has become evident supreme court wife to life like upside down by the honor of the rights of women to make decisions for their bodies. the supreme court said they wouldthey'renot logan's precedent but they had. what makes you them that not a pr immune there is a divideup president trump is immune to anything he are going to go the powers of that community. oks like that's a situation where and in this country. we are clearly divided as we should be i believe the left is...
0
0.0
Jun 4, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
to make it clear that the supreme court is taking a different course.ible to the american people. justice alito cannot stand in judgment of himself. the
to make it clear that the supreme court is taking a different course.ible to the american people. justice alito cannot stand in judgment of himself. the
0
0.0
Jun 6, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and the supreme court, 59 years ago to this day, june 7 the supreme court recognized the griswold versus connecticut the right for americans to use contraception. just a few years later, in 1972 the supreme court expanded with their right to privacy means anything it is the right of the individual married or single to be free from unwarranted government intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting as a decision whethero to bear or beget a child that was a supreme court 1972 and recognizing the fundamental rights to contraception the supreme court affirmedhe what we know the right to contraception is essential to americans health and freedom. this was a step towards freedom and decades of reproductive coercion rooted in the nation's7 history. in 1927 the supreme court had forced sterilization that steeped in enable is and tosterh 150,000 women. half were black teaching hospitals in new york and boston experimenting on black and puerto r rican women as practice for medical students. immigrant women in detention faced forced sterilization black and brown and immigrant and those is stil
and the supreme court, 59 years ago to this day, june 7 the supreme court recognized the griswold versus connecticut the right for americans to use contraception. just a few years later, in 1972 the supreme court expanded with their right to privacy means anything it is the right of the individual married or single to be free from unwarranted government intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting as a decision whethero to bear or beget a child that was a supreme court 1972 and recognizing...
0
0.0
Jun 4, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court has failed to crisis that has engulfed must d. madam president, it is a simple fact, there is a chief justice of the supreme court, john roberts. it is within his power to resolve this ethical issue tonight, to have it done by the morning to make it clear that the supreme court is taking a different course, one credible to the american people. justice alito cannot stand in judgment of himself. the fact that we have to come to the floor of the senate to plead this case makes it clear that there are no avenues to be followed for ethical consideration before the court today. that can change. the bill that is pending on the calendar is a step in the right direction, and i totally support it. i close by asking unanimous consent that the letter sent to me by justiceg officer: without objection. mr. whitehouse: tha you very much. as the presiding officer knows, i have come regularly to the to aspects of the scheme run by a bunch of right-wing control the bunch of right-wing control the president, you and i both know that it is fundamenta
the supreme court has failed to crisis that has engulfed must d. madam president, it is a simple fact, there is a chief justice of the supreme court, john roberts. it is within his power to resolve this ethical issue tonight, to have it done by the morning to make it clear that the supreme court is taking a different course, one credible to the american people. justice alito cannot stand in judgment of himself. the fact that we have to come to the floor of the senate to plead this case makes it...
0
0.0
Jun 30, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so i applaud the supreme system that we have -- supreme court system that we have. applaud the people who have been appointed to the court. i have listened to many of their discussions, when they are trying to decide issues. we have people who do not understand america trying to tell them what to do, and -- i think ignorance is a very severe problem our nation, and that is when our nation falls, when you have a lot of people who really do not take the time to learn about a lot of things that are important in our government. i like the fact that the supreme court is already separate, that they are not under pressure to decide issues one way or the other, and a lot of people who have opinions, they really have not done a lot of true assessments themselves to really find out what issues are involved. i am not an attorney, but i did study one course in law in college, and that helped me understand how difficult it is. i just admire the supreme court's, and i think people should not be picking out one judge or another does not agree with their ideology and thinking that
so i applaud the supreme system that we have -- supreme court system that we have. applaud the people who have been appointed to the court. i have listened to many of their discussions, when they are trying to decide issues. we have people who do not understand america trying to tell them what to do, and -- i think ignorance is a very severe problem our nation, and that is when our nation falls, when you have a lot of people who really do not take the time to learn about a lot of things that...
0
0.0
Jun 12, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
leaves the supreme court?>> i don't know. >> it is 78 years of age. do you know the number of years they typic s 28 years. longer than any point in american history. my question for you is, would you say that a court that has an average age of 63 within the average age leaving 78, that the justices serving for two or three decades may explain why they are so blatantly out of touch with the most basic facts of modern life including abortion rights, lgbtq rights, and contraception? >> i think having younger justices on the court would be a salutary development. think it's a commission of a massively powerful supreme court and life tenure and lack of accountability that are the brew we are experiencing. i think that's one aspect of what is so broken about the supreme court right now. >> are there any requirements in the constitution the saloon appointed to the spring court for life? i know you have to be a judge for life but is there any requirement you have to be on the supreme court for life? >> holding office
leaves the supreme court?>> i don't know. >> it is 78 years of age. do you know the number of years they typic s 28 years. longer than any point in american history. my question for you is, would you say that a court that has an average age of 63 within the average age leaving 78, that the justices serving for two or three decades may explain why they are so blatantly out of touch with the most basic facts of modern life including abortion rights, lgbtq rights, and contraception?...
0
0.0
Jun 18, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
is not up to the supreme■ecide .right b themselves and to the fact-finding in those decisions. there is nothing writtenóiyúsect power to congress to decide that and the supreme court wrote language into section three that does not exist. laura is next in washington. caller:■: i'm calling because i question your ability to be able tondhe code of ethics that the justices do follow and what i see as basically pole vaulting over a flag of a justice that has done well in the biased, and neither has justice thomas. i know justice thomas has been targeted by biden for decades. justice thomas is a good justic. all of them are. this constant barrage from aoc and want courts hey it is the conservative all have good reason for it. the roe v. wade■c, we did not know 50 years ago what we know n■;ow about babies in the womb. that is why they broughtti way f the casant get up there and tell me what i have reseched and found out to be an absolute lie. justice thomas is an exceptionally just man, unbiased, and a good human being. are
is not up to the supreme■ecide .right b themselves and to the fact-finding in those decisions. there is nothing writtenóiyúsect power to congress to decide that and the supreme court wrote language into section three that does not exist. laura is next in washington. caller:■: i'm calling because i question your ability to be able tondhe code of ethics that the justices do follow and what i see as basically pole vaulting over a flag of a justice that has done well in the biased, and...
0
0.0
Jun 4, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
to make it clear that the supreme court is taking a different course. one that's credible to the american people. justice alito cannot stand in judgment of himself. the fact that we have to come to the floor of the senate to plead this case makes it clear avenues to be followed for ethical consideration before the court■ today. that can change. the bill that's pending on the calendar is a step in the right direction and i totally support it. i close by asking unanimous consent that the letter sent to me by justice alito part of the congressional record. without objection. >> regularly to the floor to scheme run by a bunch of right wing billionaires to capture and control the supreme court and how that has come to affect so many americans' lives. well, in case there were not enough ethics problems already at the supreme court after the ionaire gift program for certain justices gave them luxuriouspre-undisclosed travel, gifts aroun paid for homes for parents, even an expensive motor coach that appears never to have had the principal repaid, now we know th
to make it clear that the supreme court is taking a different course. one that's credible to the american people. justice alito cannot stand in judgment of himself. the fact that we have to come to the floor of the senate to plead this case makes it clear avenues to be followed for ethical consideration before the court■ today. that can change. the bill that's pending on the calendar is a step in the right direction and i totally support it. i close by asking unanimous consent that the letter...
0
0.0
Jun 2, 2024
06/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
he is to fine-tune supreme court ruling sees that tax supreme court justices.upreme court has a militia of the dobbs decision is harassing and threatening to supreme court justice he did not say anything about any of it. he didn't say a thing when his buddy schumer when you say to joe biden, leo? do not listen. he's going to lecture us from the white house. this meant has no credibility when it comes to the supreme court whatsoever or the court system for he does not respect him. he was bragging last week about ignoring the supreme court ruling on student loans. this man only uses the supreme court or the legal system to his advantage. no it in this country should respect a ruling that came out on thursday against president trump. why? because you had a district attorney, a state judge hijacking on the criminal justice system but the election system. there is no credibility whatsoever. what is happened is this, zeros has used state judges, district attorneys to basically take over not only local crime and local issues involving states they've hijacked the feder
he is to fine-tune supreme court ruling sees that tax supreme court justices.upreme court has a militia of the dobbs decision is harassing and threatening to supreme court justice he did not say anything about any of it. he didn't say a thing when his buddy schumer when you say to joe biden, leo? do not listen. he's going to lecture us from the white house. this meant has no credibility when it comes to the supreme court whatsoever or the court system for he does not respect him. he was...
0
0.0
Jun 13, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
this is a the supreme court created.e roberts, himself, and jural judicial conference can solve. we'll set up the conference. we set up the recusal laws. let them enforce it. i yield the floor. he canfloor. mr. blumenthal: mr. president. the presiding officer: the senator from connecticut. mr. blumenthal:■t thank you, mr president. president. >> if there is no objection. amanda, senator mercly head to the floor. senator durbin, i have been proud of this working the minimal kind of ethical standards in the highest court in the land. right now, that court has noe code-- enforceable code of conduct. they are elemental and matter of simple ethical conduct and appearance. the supreme court has squandered. it's almost mystical authority. it'sth unique power. this came after the constitution was written. you can thank justice marshall for that idea the supreme court ethics can strike down what we do here. powerful branch of government. theut most powerful and think of it for a moment. as a democratic republican.an it's unelecte
this is a the supreme court created.e roberts, himself, and jural judicial conference can solve. we'll set up the conference. we set up the recusal laws. let them enforce it. i yield the floor. he canfloor. mr. blumenthal: mr. president. the presiding officer: the senator from connecticut. mr. blumenthal:■t thank you, mr president. president. >> if there is no objection. amanda, senator mercly head to the floor. senator durbin, i have been proud of this working the minimal kind of...
0
0.0
Jun 10, 2024
06/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
said while i supreme court will not take up the case, they took that case to the supreme court but theyeven sure how to characterize their case as an emergency appeal the court accepted as written it does not matter. on december 84 -- 3 decision florida supreme court ordered immediate manual recounts up over votes for the office of president and all county were such recounts had not already taken place they were changing state election law. there were chair picking counties out help gore and the bush campaign petition the u.s. supreme court for first day ofe recount order which was granted on december 9 treating the petition as it former request for review. the court agreed to take up the case bush versus gore. the florida supreme court was out of control for their interfering with the eventual electoral count in florida brother trying to deliver the race to gore. the justices, among other things, their flesh and blood. they are human beings for the shower like we did with the eat like we did they do other things like we do and they see what is taking place they saw this court was out o
said while i supreme court will not take up the case, they took that case to the supreme court but theyeven sure how to characterize their case as an emergency appeal the court accepted as written it does not matter. on december 84 -- 3 decision florida supreme court ordered immediate manual recounts up over votes for the office of president and all county were such recounts had not already taken place they were changing state election law. there were chair picking counties out help gore and...
0
0.0
Jun 18, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that never should have made its way toit let alone the supreme court freed the supreme court s rightfullybeing way too extreme of an interpretation. >> i suppose one of things your organization would be watching for is how the court willentualr president claims about immunity. >> as far as what you are watching for,■b■et's tation andr gut tell you at this point? >> thel signals predict it too much with the court is going to do. i amot by the weight took place. >> because?>> my sense was the s were working to create a distinction that the constituti. between actions and office being protected versus actions outside of office not being protected. that the constitution.owhere in it would be a privacy made an oa t uphold to uphold the constitution or somehow be exempt actions while an offic law. that is just not■6 acc are not t a kingdom the president i king's should be held responsible just like any other no one is above the law. >> host: jake with the ls for just a few and to ask him questions 202-748-8001 for republicans two 202-748-8000 for demod independence to 202-748-80 two. point to t
that never should have made its way toit let alone the supreme court freed the supreme court s rightfullybeing way too extreme of an interpretation. >> i suppose one of things your organization would be watching for is how the court willentualr president claims about immunity. >> as far as what you are watching for,■b■et's tation andr gut tell you at this point? >> thel signals predict it too much with the court is going to do. i amot by the weight took place. >>...
0
0.0
Jun 13, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
even if the supreme court and local supreme courts are saying that you can have access to abortion inse certain ways, you think of places like texas where you say women bring a lawsuit that said they wanted -- they wanted the texas supreme court to clarify whether or not there are instances where you can have an abortion under emergency circumstances, they lost that. they are saying there are doctors that they could be put in prison for giving women health care, emergency access to care if they were having complications with abortion, a miscarriage. a lot of confusion around the country. i have been talking to women and doctors in particular who say they are scared because the landscape is shifting and unclear. >> absolutely. a lot more discussion to come. thank you both. >>> a tale of two presidents. president biden talks global policy with america's allies overseas. former president trump holds court in washington. that's all next when "andrea mitchell reports" is back in 90 seconds. indigestion iberogast bloating iberogast thanks to a unique combination of herbs, iberogast helps re
even if the supreme court and local supreme courts are saying that you can have access to abortion inse certain ways, you think of places like texas where you say women bring a lawsuit that said they wanted -- they wanted the texas supreme court to clarify whether or not there are instances where you can have an abortion under emergency circumstances, they lost that. they are saying there are doctors that they could be put in prison for giving women health care, emergency access to care if they...
0
0.0
Jun 15, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
very clear supreme court case law.nd doctrine for chief justice roberts seems to have come up very quickly and said no, that cannot happen. the court is not going to get involved. what is it we can do to try to vindicate very intuitive notion that no judge, no person should be a judge in his or her own case. >> the most obvious thing we could do would be to make sure that there is proper and honest fact-finding about what actually took place. the baseline for any process of law is proper neutral fact finding. everywhere you go, and government officials are subject to proper fact-finding when claims are brought against them. except for nine individuals who are the supreme court justices. we have seen this play out in the recusal context because justice thomas has refused ever toto disclose what the facts are about what he knew about his wife's insurrection activities and when he knew a it. that's the facts that determine whether he should have recused himself and generate six related cases. similarly we have seen justic
very clear supreme court case law.nd doctrine for chief justice roberts seems to have come up very quickly and said no, that cannot happen. the court is not going to get involved. what is it we can do to try to vindicate very intuitive notion that no judge, no person should be a judge in his or her own case. >> the most obvious thing we could do would be to make sure that there is proper and honest fact-finding about what actually took place. the baseline for any process of law is proper...
0
0.0
Jun 14, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
you'll see this go back to the supreme court. right now, i think you see the supreme court end run that challenge in the future. >> laura, in reference to the las vegas shooting in 2017, the court's majority opinion says an event that highlights the need to amend a law does not itself change the law's meaning and that's what katie was talking about, about, you know, how it is that they focus on what they decide to focus on, and so your reaction to this? >> there is no question this is a conservative majority, a super majority, that was appointed by donald trump, that does not believe that it is their role as justices to search for facts and then sort of tailor those facts to the law. they think they're there to just execute the plain version of the law, and they think under this rule, a bump stock does not meet the definition of a machine gun. so they're saying, if congress wants to do something about that, and the people's representatives want to do something about that, by all means go ahead, but they're not going to do it, the
you'll see this go back to the supreme court. right now, i think you see the supreme court end run that challenge in the future. >> laura, in reference to the las vegas shooting in 2017, the court's majority opinion says an event that highlights the need to amend a law does not itself change the law's meaning and that's what katie was talking about, about, you know, how it is that they focus on what they decide to focus on, and so your reaction to this? >> there is no question this...
0
0.0
Jun 25, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
just an inio week, sometime the supreme cour. this conference about gun violence as a public health issue. there you had an tobacco, and firearms agency determining that bump stocks fie and were prohibited as machine guns.ss then you have nine unelected justices. a-- of the supreme court come along and some are engaged in these decisions where they are really parsing finally -- just as thomas justice thomas put his-n his opinion becse to try to explain that in his expert opinion a bump stock a machine gun. under tpherlederal law. we are seeing second-guessing of medical expertise, scientific expertise, of professionalism within agencies. expertise. what i found intesti is a lot of the health sector' very nervous about as well not just on expertise but uncertainty and i wonder if any of you could comment on the role of the in is and how that would affect the■be decisions are made. >> it's believed if the chevron congress treupbaway that would agencies and the public. erin: the reason ishe process by which a rule, process used to m
just an inio week, sometime the supreme cour. this conference about gun violence as a public health issue. there you had an tobacco, and firearms agency determining that bump stocks fie and were prohibited as machine guns.ss then you have nine unelected justices. a-- of the supreme court come along and some are engaged in these decisions where they are really parsing finally -- just as thomas justice thomas put his-n his opinion becse to try to explain that in his expert opinion a bump stock a...
0
0.0
Jun 27, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
just ann opinion issuedhis week i think sometimes the supreme court confuses me. stocks, we heard during the conference about gun health issue. there you had of alcohol determining that it would fit within the scope oftute and was prohibited as machine guns. then you have nine unelected the justices of the supreme court longhand some of them decide theyey and in each of the decisions they are parsing. lot of pictures in opinion that in his expert machine gun under federal law so we are just eing second-guessing of medical expertise scientificexrtise, professionalism within: >> you mentioned the expertise. what i f the sectors are very nervous about this as well, not just on expertise but on certainty and timing. ing wondered if any of you could comment on the this one of the role ofrts inserting themselves and how that would affect the processes by which decisions are made. >> it is largely believed that if that that would introduce a lot more public and the reason is that the long process rulemaking goes mhrn if the agencies followed the procedures n because of t
just ann opinion issuedhis week i think sometimes the supreme court confuses me. stocks, we heard during the conference about gun health issue. there you had of alcohol determining that it would fit within the scope oftute and was prohibited as machine guns. then you have nine unelected the justices of the supreme court longhand some of them decide theyey and in each of the decisions they are parsing. lot of pictures in opinion that in his expert machine gun under federal law so we are just...
0
0.0
Jun 9, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. this and more on another hour of velshi starting now. >>> good morning it's sunday june 9th. president biden is wrapping up his trip to france today where he spent much of the week recognizing d day. this morning he will be at a cemetery near paris and he and the first lady will fly back home. but in a few days he will head back to italy. biden's upcoming trips to europe are valuable opportunities for him to highlight the importance of america's role in the world stage. he's cast his opponent as a strong man who will usher in an era of corruption in america and support such things abroad. trump's first term also saw the country shift toward a more isolationist stance which raised concerns among our partners that america might abandon its alliances. biden has taken the opposite approach. he's touted the importance of america, this has been one of its goals to france as well. biden called his country, called france quote our first friend. and during remarks at a d day ceremony on thursd
supreme court. this and more on another hour of velshi starting now. >>> good morning it's sunday june 9th. president biden is wrapping up his trip to france today where he spent much of the week recognizing d day. this morning he will be at a cemetery near paris and he and the first lady will fly back home. but in a few days he will head back to italy. biden's upcoming trips to europe are valuable opportunities for him to highlight the importance of america's role in the world stage....
0
0.0
Jun 23, 2024
06/24
by
KTVU
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. >> the supreme court has never been as out of kilter as it is today. i mean, never. >> they are setting up to gut american democracy towards the end of this season. >> they're in there trying to make much a do about nothing. >> the they don't like alito or thomas or conservative justice. >> democrats including president biden target the supreme court ahead of the announcement of key opinions that could have a seismic impact on the race for the white house we get reaction from a top ally of president biden senator chris coons and lead republican on the senate judiciary committee lindsay graham. four days away from the cnn presidential debate president biden and former president trump gearing up for the big night. >> nobody's going to be watching the debate on thursday night right? nobody. >> our sunday panel on the key issues sure to make news at the head to head showdown from the border to enflailings foreign policy to fitness for office all right now on fox news sunday live from the
supreme court. >> the supreme court has never been as out of kilter as it is today. i mean, never. >> they are setting up to gut american democracy towards the end of this season. >> they're in there trying to make much a do about nothing. >> the they don't like alito or thomas or conservative justice. >> democrats including president biden target the supreme court ahead of the announcement of key opinions that could have a seismic impact on the race for the white...
0
0.0
Jun 21, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
do they come out and criticize this supreme court and say, this supreme court that has executed some of the most radical right decisions, one could ever imagine is too liberal, the one that donald trump himself appointed? or do they turn around and say that, no, they were correct and we have to tack to the middle? i'm interested to see what they say here because they're in an awful political position. >> david jolly, you look at the polls, gun violence is not necessarily one of the top issues for voters this election cycle. do you see this ruling motivating pro gun republicans for the election to turn out and vote? >> i do. and, look, unfortunately sometimes it takes a tragedy for that number to spike. it is one where joe biden and democrats are on the right side of history and, look, i think democrats today, in modern american politics, can always talk about the fact that if you have a democratic-led legislature and can reshape the court, america will be safer from gun violence, that is a democratic message that resonates with voters. >> thank you so much for joining us. that does i
do they come out and criticize this supreme court and say, this supreme court that has executed some of the most radical right decisions, one could ever imagine is too liberal, the one that donald trump himself appointed? or do they turn around and say that, no, they were correct and we have to tack to the middle? i'm interested to see what they say here because they're in an awful political position. >> david jolly, you look at the polls, gun violence is not necessarily one of the top...
0
0.0
Jun 24, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
guest: good morning, great to be here.t the supreme court.nd before we start talking about specific cases, when is the supreme court scheduled to be finished this term? it seems like they have a lot oa cases left on the docket. guest: well, they added another day this week, so we should hear from themednesday, thursday, friday. but as you indicate, there's about a dozen cases still waiting to be delivered, and there's some major issues, crimr donald trump and other presidents, also ano&%ther big criminal case that could affect hundreds of january 6 insurrectionists who have been convicted for their role on that day,nd a handful of cases involving the intersection of the first amendment and social media. lot coming down. justice alito was not on the bench for two days week, so we can speculate. my guess is we'll get it apped and maybe it will go into july, but that would be ua answers from the court. host: you mentioned theanuary 6. you write in politico magazine that this case could be theiantd upend jack smith's prosecution . and i wonder if
guest: good morning, great to be here.t the supreme court.nd before we start talking about specific cases, when is the supreme court scheduled to be finished this term? it seems like they have a lot oa cases left on the docket. guest: well, they added another day this week, so we should hear from themednesday, thursday, friday. but as you indicate, there's about a dozen cases still waiting to be delivered, and there's some major issues, crimr donald trump and other presidents, also...
0
0.0
Jun 15, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
think about the wisconsin supreme court race. that is a state that is very evenly divided but the more liberal justice candidate won by 11 points. a referendum on reproductive rights and gerrymandering. the people spoke in the court has changed its actions. >> we are moving to other venues. a lot going on with the courts. thank you so much for joining us this morning.>>> coming up. new nbc report on the democrats plans to continue investigating supreme court justices over possible ethics violations. >>> democratic congresswoman of kansas joins me to explain exactly why the supreme court's ruling is not a sweeping victory for reproductive freedom. >>> earlier this morning the princess of wales made her first public appearance since announcing her cancer diagnosis in march but we will go to buckingham palace for the latest. all of that is next. next. listen. what you really need in life is some freakin' torque. [ engine revving ] oh yeah man, horsepower keeps you going, but torque gets you going. ♪ ♪ [ engine revving ] oh now we're
think about the wisconsin supreme court race. that is a state that is very evenly divided but the more liberal justice candidate won by 11 points. a referendum on reproductive rights and gerrymandering. the people spoke in the court has changed its actions. >> we are moving to other venues. a lot going on with the courts. thank you so much for joining us this morning.>>> coming up. new nbc report on the democrats plans to continue investigating supreme court justices over...
0
0.0
Jun 15, 2024
06/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i think the supreme court isn't in step in i supreme court isn't in step in and _ supreme court isn't't in step in and i come _ supreme court isn't in step in and i come from a community who, — and i come from a community who, this _ and i come from a community who, this week eight years ago, experienced the pulse nightclub shooting where 49 innocent individuals were slaughtered in a nightclub. and what i think is wrong _ a nightclub. and what i think is wrong with the way we approach gun safety in this country— approach gun safety in this country is that we tend to legislate to the most recent lui'i legislate to the most recent gun violence situation, so it was — gun violence situation, so it was bump stocks after las vegas, _ was bump stocks after las vegas, it— was bump stocks after las vegas, it was, and itjust changes— vegas, it was, and itjust changes depending on the issue, but the _ changes depending on the issue, but the reality is americans want — but the reality is americans want some reasonable gun safety measures— want some reasonable gun safety measures that also protect
i think the supreme court isn't in step in i supreme court isn't in step in and _ supreme court isn't't in step in and i come _ supreme court isn't in step in and i come from a community who, — and i come from a community who, this _ and i come from a community who, this week eight years ago, experienced the pulse nightclub shooting where 49 innocent individuals were slaughtered in a nightclub. and what i think is wrong _ a nightclub. and what i think is wrong with the way we approach gun...
0
0.0
Jun 30, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
host: and the supreme court putting a limit. >> and the supreme court. i often say that -- that the supreme court we saw this in another case. if it is a corruption case, the supreme court narrowly interprets it. there was a case about whether or not under a law that criminalized state or local officials from receiving bribes, whether or not the way that statute was worded which had -- literally had the word. i forget the first word. it was or rewarded. which to me sounds like after. you are rewarded after. you are not rewarded before you do something. whether or not that law covers bribery and gratuities which you would receive afterwards which is the nice word for post action bribery. and the court said, no, because both the law looks more like the federal bribery statute relating to federal officials. we're just going to say it has to do with bribery. when you have a corruption case, the court interrupts the law narrowly. other criminal cases, they often interpret them broadly. the one exception that i have written about is if justice neil gorsuch had
host: and the supreme court putting a limit. >> and the supreme court. i often say that -- that the supreme court we saw this in another case. if it is a corruption case, the supreme court narrowly interprets it. there was a case about whether or not under a law that criminalized state or local officials from receiving bribes, whether or not the way that statute was worded which had -- literally had the word. i forget the first word. it was or rewarded. which to me sounds like after. you...
0
0.0
Jun 26, 2024
06/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but this means that there's not a second chapter from the supreme court. if indeed it plays out the way it looks it's like it's playing out according to the bloomberg's obtaining of this draft draft document. >> yeah. raises a lot of questions about that. joan, if you can stand come by for us, we do have four questions for you, but i do want to bring paula reid back in. apollo. i understand. you have some new information. we have the full statement from the supremum court. i referenced it earlier when we're breaking this story, but in response to the reporting from bloomberg law, the supreme court has issued a statement and we're to read it in full. they're saying, quote, the opinion and moyle v. united states and idaho, the united states, this case has not been released. the court's publications unit inadvertently and briefly uploaded a document to the courts website. the court's opinion and moyle view, united states and idaho, the united states, will be issued in due course so it seems in this statement they are making a differentiation between documents
but this means that there's not a second chapter from the supreme court. if indeed it plays out the way it looks it's like it's playing out according to the bloomberg's obtaining of this draft draft document. >> yeah. raises a lot of questions about that. joan, if you can stand come by for us, we do have four questions for you, but i do want to bring paula reid back in. apollo. i understand. you have some new information. we have the full statement from the supremum court. i referenced it...
0
0.0
Jun 26, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
elizabeth: a case wehe supreme court that gives lie that the supreme court is out of the the medication abortion pill decision. they have another case pending on the issue of emergency medicalmend labor act. and the degree to which federal state law. now it is. that's a constitutional s right there federal law wins. that should be the end of it don't preempt mtala. and that will require abortions in very really serious health threats due tocy complication. but those situations arrive. and in a states there are bans that are so narrow they only to save a person's life. so a c teed up involving abortion ban and should be a very easy case is apparently struggles. and there might be a way through but ihink most people anticipate the federal government is going lose the mtala case to the detrime of pregnant people in states with abortion bans but with realtore pregnant people across the country. everybody. this emergency labor act in law labor a intended decades ago passed by congress was to intend all americans would be able to be twere traveling not in their home states some place and they
elizabeth: a case wehe supreme court that gives lie that the supreme court is out of the the medication abortion pill decision. they have another case pending on the issue of emergency medicalmend labor act. and the degree to which federal state law. now it is. that's a constitutional s right there federal law wins. that should be the end of it don't preempt mtala. and that will require abortions in very really serious health threats due tocy complication. but those situations arrive. and in a...
0
0.0
Jun 21, 2024
06/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so the supreme court didn't decide those cases today.ll it said was, hey, fifth circuit, you went too far. these big questions are very much still to play for andrew, but no decision on immunity for trump. i mean, that's the big one that is just sort of looming over everything has so many massive employment occasions. >> that's the one that has the greatest chance of really sending shockwaves out as soon as it's dropped. and i think for that reason alone, the court has some incentives to hold onto that until the very last moment. now, i don't want to make predictions. i'll be quickly proven wrong, but it just seems likely that that when that case comes out, every other case that gets released on that day will be overshadowed. >> so to bring some of these other cases out into the light, i think there maybe carving a little space in terms of the release, flushing out the pipes a little bit, are there, so we've got about 15 to 17 decisions left them the supreme court. we've got five today, four of them gym or i think cases, folks were not p
so the supreme court didn't decide those cases today.ll it said was, hey, fifth circuit, you went too far. these big questions are very much still to play for andrew, but no decision on immunity for trump. i mean, that's the big one that is just sort of looming over everything has so many massive employment occasions. >> that's the one that has the greatest chance of really sending shockwaves out as soon as it's dropped. and i think for that reason alone, the court has some incentives to...
0
0.0
Jun 18, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court tips further in a conservative way, we could be in big trouble. >> jon, the supreme court is not a kitchen table topic for most voters, but the impact of the supreme court that is that conservative for the foreseeable future is huge. how does the president get the american voter to understand at? >> this is an issue for the biden base. something i think those persuadable voters we have been talking about will pay less attention to. we heard hyperbole there from the president saying the supreme court is the most out of kilter it's ever been. we can think of some pretty terrible supreme court decisions whether dred scott and on and on. i think the president's point that whoever is elected president to have the opportunity to make one or more selections. we do not know what the future is for samuel alito or clarence thomas, both of them younger -- >> they will be fine. >> we don't know they will retire. we don't know if other justices could retire. it could be zero or could be nine. the point joe biden is making is salient with democratic voters which is they have seen
the supreme court tips further in a conservative way, we could be in big trouble. >> jon, the supreme court is not a kitchen table topic for most voters, but the impact of the supreme court that is that conservative for the foreseeable future is huge. how does the president get the american voter to understand at? >> this is an issue for the biden base. something i think those persuadable voters we have been talking about will pay less attention to. we heard hyperbole there from the...
0
0.0
Jun 16, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it either makes the supreme court look good because the supreme court is slapping it down.t record of the supreme court was 2-9, that's pretty pathetic. or it gets to agree with the fifth circuit as it did in the bump stock case. the fifth circuit is kind of good news for the supreme court. >> i want to probe that the. is almost a symbiotic relationship between the high court and fifth circuit. october term 2024, a number of cases on the court's docket come from the fifth circuit. what is the interaction between the score which recently affirmed one fifth circuit decision but also reversed on another? >> the fifth circuit generates a lot of the supreme court's docket because it's the petri dish for whatever the latest unhinge theory is among the conservatives. the court to assist states could challenge the indian welfare act. the supreme court reversed that. the court that attempted to invalidate the funding structure the consumer financial protection bureau. they reversed that decision. they are the core that said we can slip on some additional restrictions on mifepristone
it either makes the supreme court look good because the supreme court is slapping it down.t record of the supreme court was 2-9, that's pretty pathetic. or it gets to agree with the fifth circuit as it did in the bump stock case. the fifth circuit is kind of good news for the supreme court. >> i want to probe that the. is almost a symbiotic relationship between the high court and fifth circuit. october term 2024, a number of cases on the court's docket come from the fifth circuit. what is...
0
0.0
Jun 28, 2024
06/24
by
ALJAZ
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
a, with the supreme lee, the wielding enormous palace. how much difference with a new president may an house, this phone viewed both regionally and low, blake, this is the inside story. the hello welcome to the show. i'm sammy's. i then following the southern death of president abraham, the se, in a helicopter crash last month, voters in iran, now tutoring his successor. the guardian council initially approved 6 male candidates from a pool of 80. they include one reformist and 5 conservatives, but some dropped out. the nation facing political unrest, economic challenges, and tension with the west, over the nuclear program, the stakes, all high and potential conflict between israel and 11 and further increases that significance. so what pos might the country take cost of the vote? what might be the outcome for a wrong and for the world, we'll discuss all of this shortly. but 1st, this report by x of zion of which the installation at record levels and wide spread short digits of essential goods. after years of sanctions imposed by the us in
a, with the supreme lee, the wielding enormous palace. how much difference with a new president may an house, this phone viewed both regionally and low, blake, this is the inside story. the hello welcome to the show. i'm sammy's. i then following the southern death of president abraham, the se, in a helicopter crash last month, voters in iran, now tutoring his successor. the guardian council initially approved 6 male candidates from a pool of 80. they include one reformist and 5 conservatives,...
0
0.0
Jun 22, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
these cases come up to the supreme court, then the supreme court has to explain to the fifth circuite gone too far. you may remember, chris, that it was a case involving the gun rights of domestic abusers that caused clarence thomas in 2016 to break his then decade-long period of silence during oral arguments. in a case called, that suddenly i was in the courthouse that day and we suddenly heard his voice. he has been solicitous of this issue of whether or not guns can be kept from domestic abusers since then. so there are judges on the fifth circuit who are taking cues from clarence thomas. and so, today there was this 8- 1 decision which was very important, it was also important because in some ways the chickens are beginning to come home to roost. and this supreme court is having to untangle the gordian knots that it created in some of its jurisprudence, like the bruin case which has left lower courts believing that it, the second amendment is essentially a free-for-all and a little suicide pact in our society. now the supreme court is trying to bring some order, at least from thi
these cases come up to the supreme court, then the supreme court has to explain to the fifth circuite gone too far. you may remember, chris, that it was a case involving the gun rights of domestic abusers that caused clarence thomas in 2016 to break his then decade-long period of silence during oral arguments. in a case called, that suddenly i was in the courthouse that day and we suddenly heard his voice. he has been solicitous of this issue of whether or not guns can be kept from domestic...
0
0.0
Jun 27, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court come a-- of the supreme court come along and some decide they disagree.cisions where they are really rsin just as thomas put pictures in his -- ps opinion because he wanted to try opinion a bump stock is notine . under federal law. we areee of medical expertise, scientific expertisf professionalism within agencies. what i found interesting is a hy nervous about as well nott on expertise but uncertainty and timing. timip÷d comment on the role of the courts in inserting themselves and how that would affect the processes by which some of these desi made. >> it's believed if treupbaway d introduce a lot more uncertainty for public. erin: the reason is the long process by which ang goes throut process used to mean that as long as the agency followed the procedures and did its rulemaking, thecause of chevron deference, any permissible or reasonable construction of the statute or■g authority would stand. what this does isuse of a second-guessing, the opportunite -- somehow your industry is penalized or yoo ity rules, not just the new ones, but pa for grabs. that
supreme court come a-- of the supreme court come along and some decide they disagree.cisions where they are really rsin just as thomas put pictures in his -- ps opinion because he wanted to try opinion a bump stock is notine . under federal law. we areee of medical expertise, scientific expertisf professionalism within agencies. what i found interesting is a hy nervous about as well nott on expertise but uncertainty and timing. timip÷d comment on the role of the courts in inserting themselves...
0
0.0
Jun 26, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. what do you make of this move?k we have to be cautious about overreading it. what was posted on the website by bloomberg was the court saying -- dismissing a case that they granted, meaning we're not going to rule on the merits or say if women in idaho have a right to access these procedures, we're not going to talk about preemption, we're going to say we shouldn't have intervened this early in the litigation and it will continue in the lower court. so this is not -- i don't think if it urn its out it be accurate, not a big win for reproductive freedom rights, it is just people could come back and raise the same claims down the road. this same litigation will continue. so we simply don't know. and we won't know until after the election how this is going to rule. i think everyone else is absolutely correct that the stakes are huge for patients not just in idaho, but across the country. patients with wanted pregnancies who are being denied access to life and health preserving care. but we simply can't say based on th
supreme court. what do you make of this move?k we have to be cautious about overreading it. what was posted on the website by bloomberg was the court saying -- dismissing a case that they granted, meaning we're not going to rule on the merits or say if women in idaho have a right to access these procedures, we're not going to talk about preemption, we're going to say we shouldn't have intervened this early in the litigation and it will continue in the lower court. so this is not -- i don't...