0
0.0
Jan 5, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and if the united states supreme court disagrees, they can say so. i do think he we have to be very careful in saying a judicial process was not fair. the colorado courts acted fairly. there were witnesses. there was a standard of evidence and procedure. and donald trump had due process. now, we can disagree with that -- >> you wouldn't say he had the due process of like a criminal defendant, would you? >> no, because it's not a criminal case. there's different standards for a criminal case than a civil case. but i do think it's really dangerous to say that the courts in colorado did not do an efficient job that respects the law and due process rights. and i highly disagree with you saying this sets a downward spiral precedent. if a candidate or someone wanting to run for office again engages in insurrection, we need a court to adjudicate those questions and do it looking at evidence, looking at witnesses, having a standard of procedure, just like what happened in colorado. so i don't think that this case should notbe adjudicated. donald trump is a d
and if the united states supreme court disagrees, they can say so. i do think he we have to be very careful in saying a judicial process was not fair. the colorado courts acted fairly. there were witnesses. there was a standard of evidence and procedure. and donald trump had due process. now, we can disagree with that -- >> you wouldn't say he had the due process of like a criminal defendant, would you? >> no, because it's not a criminal case. there's different standards for a...
0
0.0
Jan 25, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
been rejected, by all 11 members, of the appeals court, is to appeal to the united states supreme court where donald trump also has three judges that he appointed. the appeals court opinion against donald trump says mr. trump is a former president and current candidate for the presidency, and there is a strong public interest in what he has to say. but mr. trump is also an indicted criminal defendant, and he must stand trial in a
been rejected, by all 11 members, of the appeals court, is to appeal to the united states supreme court where donald trump also has three judges that he appointed. the appeals court opinion against donald trump says mr. trump is a former president and current candidate for the presidency, and there is a strong public interest in what he has to say. but mr. trump is also an indicted criminal defendant, and he must stand trial in a
0
0.0
Jan 28, 2024
01/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
because you see, what the united states supreme court took, congress can put back in place. [applause] so we need a majority of leaders in congress who simply agree -- here's the thing, simply agree, that the government should not be making those personal decisions for folks. and when congress passes a law that puts back the protections of roe, joe biden will sign it. [applause] so i will close with this. it's going to take all of us to get us to that place. everybody here, and momentum is on our side. we are winning. if roe was overturned, every time freedom was on the ballot, the people of america have voted for freedom. from kansas to california to kentucky, in michigan, montana, vermont, and ohio, the people of america have voted for freedom. and not by a little, by overwhelming margins. proving also, this is not a partisan issue. tens of millions of americans in red states and blue, including here in wisconsin, marched to the polls in defense of fundamental freedom. the voice of the people has been heard, and it will be heard. and then i finally asked, today, wisconsin,
because you see, what the united states supreme court took, congress can put back in place. [applause] so we need a majority of leaders in congress who simply agree -- here's the thing, simply agree, that the government should not be making those personal decisions for folks. and when congress passes a law that puts back the protections of roe, joe biden will sign it. [applause] so i will close with this. it's going to take all of us to get us to that place. everybody here, and momentum is on...
0
0.0
Jan 4, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
states, with 50 different secretaries of state, 50 different supreme courts in the united states, thatcould reasonably end up with different opinions about this? >> that could happen. every state has different laws on the books, different procedures, some states allow disqualified or unqualified candidates on to their presidential primaries. states like colorado, we do not allow that. and that's why i think it's so important for the supreme court to step in. you know, this is a big question. it's novel. it's unprecedented. because usually, we do not have presidents trying to steal the presidency. usually, we do not have people who engage in insurrection run for president. but now that we do, i do think it's important for the supreme court to act quickly. i filed a brief yesterday urging their expediency, and i hope that they will do exactly that. >> colorado secretary of state jena griswold in the center of history tonight. thank you very much for joining us. >> thank you. >> and coming up, federal appeals court judges appointed by donald trump last night ruled in favor of a texas law
states, with 50 different secretaries of state, 50 different supreme courts in the united states, thatcould reasonably end up with different opinions about this? >> that could happen. every state has different laws on the books, different procedures, some states allow disqualified or unqualified candidates on to their presidential primaries. states like colorado, we do not allow that. and that's why i think it's so important for the supreme court to step in. you know, this is a big...
0
0.0
Jan 4, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
regardless of my sentiments, this is a big case in front of the united states supreme court. and i do believe that the united states supreme court should tell the american people whether a president can engage in insurrection and then again run for that office. >> well, joining me now to discuss, former january 6th investigative counsel marcus childress and also former trump attorney tim parlatore is here as well. gentlemen, let's just take a step back for a moment because this is a very consequential moment. any idea of taking somebody off of the ballot is going to be important, let alone in a presidential election year. it is surprising that maybe trump is just now appealing to the supreme court. but we all know that it was going to end up there at some point anyway. but the fact, tim, that he is saying look, it's not just a matter of me not having been convicted of insurrection, this is a congressional issue, it's up to them to do something about it, does that hold weight for you? >> i think it does. one of the things i was kind of expecting in this brief, it was addressed
regardless of my sentiments, this is a big case in front of the united states supreme court. and i do believe that the united states supreme court should tell the american people whether a president can engage in insurrection and then again run for that office. >> well, joining me now to discuss, former january 6th investigative counsel marcus childress and also former trump attorney tim parlatore is here as well. gentlemen, let's just take a step back for a moment because this is a very...
0
0.0
Jan 31, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
to the united states supreme court. neal katyal, will join us tonight, has argued 50 cases, to the united states supreme court, 50. that means, as i just said, neal katyal has written more supreme court briefs than i have read. and so, i am more than eager to hear neal katyal's assessment of the briefs, that have been submitted so far, in the case of donald j trump versus norma anderson -- that is the name of the case, the supreme court will hear next thursday. with donald trump appealing a decision of a supreme court of colorado to ban donald trump from the presidential ballot in colorado, on the basis of section three of the 14th amendment, which bars anyone from holding federal office if they have betrayed an oath to uphold the constitution. today, the board of elections in illinois decided that they don't have the authority to ban donald trump from the ballot. they follow the advice of a retired republican judge on that point. and that judges report to the board of election, the judge said the evidence presented at
to the united states supreme court. neal katyal, will join us tonight, has argued 50 cases, to the united states supreme court, 50. that means, as i just said, neal katyal has written more supreme court briefs than i have read. and so, i am more than eager to hear neal katyal's assessment of the briefs, that have been submitted so far, in the case of donald j trump versus norma anderson -- that is the name of the case, the supreme court will hear next thursday. with donald trump appealing a...
0
0.0
Jan 25, 2024
01/24
by
ALJAZ
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and so the case was all the way up to united states supreme court hope and pray to god. the supreme court ruled that the board call was late because i think that's one of the only means with black people have. and i wanted to let people know in the world them know that we will no longer go back to where it was in the past. and the justices hold unanimously that the 1st amendment protects the right to boycott. and what they say is that boycotting is a practice. deeply embedded in the american political process is a way in which individual citizens can band together to make their voices collectively heard when individually their voices would be lost or silence. html. a safety says that while it is the immediate beneficiary of the fort gibson ruling, the ruling goes beyond that to allow any organization anywhere to use boy cards and select the buying campaigns to support its political grievance. the are appealing, the district court decision in arkansas. and i think that's what appeals parts are for us to correct decisions when district works got it wrong. the . ringback ri
and so the case was all the way up to united states supreme court hope and pray to god. the supreme court ruled that the board call was late because i think that's one of the only means with black people have. and i wanted to let people know in the world them know that we will no longer go back to where it was in the past. and the justices hold unanimously that the 1st amendment protects the right to boycott. and what they say is that boycotting is a practice. deeply embedded in the american...
0
0.0
Jan 30, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
states supreme court.now, our main argument is that these plaintiffs have no standing to challenge the michigan constitution. there is no real or perceived or future harm that would come to any of these groups or any of these individuals who have brought this lawsuit. but, you know, really all the jurisprudence in the laws regarding standing have pretty much gone out the window with this iteration of the united states supreme court. and, you know, whether it is the texas law, where basically anyone could sue an individual if they had an abortion or if they aided or assisted in someone having an abortion, even if they didn't know that person, had never met that person before in life, that apparently was fine to still sue that person as though you had suffered some sort of, you know, perceived injury, which, of course, we know is not true. we have the mifepristone case, the abortion medication case that is now pending in the united states supreme court, which could up end 30 years of an fda approved, incredi
states supreme court.now, our main argument is that these plaintiffs have no standing to challenge the michigan constitution. there is no real or perceived or future harm that would come to any of these groups or any of these individuals who have brought this lawsuit. but, you know, really all the jurisprudence in the laws regarding standing have pretty much gone out the window with this iteration of the united states supreme court. and, you know, whether it is the texas law, where basically...
0
0.0
Jan 4, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but regardless of my sentiment, this is a big case in front of the united states supreme court.lieve that the united states supreme court should tell the american people whether a president can engaged in insurrection and then again run for office. >> yes. i want to ask you about one of the arguments being made by trump's lawyers. they are basically saying that this will deprive the american people from choosing to vote for or against a candidate of their choosing at a national level for the presidency of the united states, what do you make of that? and do you think that that will factor into the supreme court as they weigh this question? do you think that there is a risk here, disenfranchising voters? >> i think the biggest risk of disenfranchising voters happened on january 6th, when donald trump tried to steal the presidency from the american people. make no mistake, that is exactly what he intended to do. we are a country of laws and constitution's. there are qualifications for offense, right? so, for example, if a lot of voters wanted to vote for arlette schwarzenegger, it
but regardless of my sentiment, this is a big case in front of the united states supreme court.lieve that the united states supreme court should tell the american people whether a president can engaged in insurrection and then again run for office. >> yes. i want to ask you about one of the arguments being made by trump's lawyers. they are basically saying that this will deprive the american people from choosing to vote for or against a candidate of their choosing at a national level for...
0
0.0
Jan 5, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but ultimately, it's up to the united states supreme court. united states supreme court needs to give clarity to the american people, whether someone who commits insurrection can hold the highest office in the land again. >> what the 14th amendment section 3 is very clear about is members of congress are officers of the court who took an oath and can be barred for insurrection. i'm going to put up a nonexhaustive list of people who could be considered insurrectionists. these are people who attended a meeting to overturn the election. andy biggs, scott perry, andy harris, paul gosar, and then there's lauren boebert. a lot of people would consider a supporter of insurrection. are you surprised that no one has attempted to remove her, who has now switched district in your state of colorado or other members of congress, the same way they're attempting to remove trump from these ballots? >> we have seen some cases over the last year and a half, taeflting to remove candidates. and it has worked in the state of new mexico, where actually i believe th
but ultimately, it's up to the united states supreme court. united states supreme court needs to give clarity to the american people, whether someone who commits insurrection can hold the highest office in the land again. >> what the 14th amendment section 3 is very clear about is members of congress are officers of the court who took an oath and can be barred for insurrection. i'm going to put up a nonexhaustive list of people who could be considered insurrectionists. these are people...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
ultimately it will be up to the united states supreme court. but even more so, it will be up to the american people. no matter what happens in this litigation, it will be up to the american people to save american democracy in 2024. >> as you were classifying that sound bite and the point that trump's attorney made as being unbelievable, are you concerned that making a statement like that might also be influential as it pertains specifically to kavanaugh? >> trump acts or tries to act in many situations like a mob boss, giving people things to try to demand their loyalty. it's one of the many reasons he is a danger to this country. you know, whether or not the supreme court is influenced by that, i shower hope not, because that's not how a court should act. but, again, i'm not waiting for the supreme court to save american democracy for the american people. i'm waiting for the american people to do that, because whether or not trump is on the ballot, the american people will make their voices heard. i believe that colorado supreme court got it
ultimately it will be up to the united states supreme court. but even more so, it will be up to the american people. no matter what happens in this litigation, it will be up to the american people to save american democracy in 2024. >> as you were classifying that sound bite and the point that trump's attorney made as being unbelievable, are you concerned that making a statement like that might also be influential as it pertains specifically to kavanaugh? >> trump acts or tries to...
0
0.0
Jan 1, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
its way to the united states supreme court.e the teams will make the arguments at that time that the 14th amendment does not apply to the president of the united states. that there are a number of specific officials that are named in that section, one of them does not include the president of the united states. i think that's going to be the basis upon which they make this appeal and i do believe that the united states supreme court is going to agree with the trump team on this one at least. >> so what about the argument, though, that the office of the presidency is so obvious that it doesn't need to be physically written out in the constitution? does that carry any weight from your perspective? >> so the fact that it's so obvious isn't a real legal argument here, right? they specifically -- the text of the constitution matters in this instance and in this instance they're going to make the argument that it was specifically -- they enumerated a number of officials, but they left out the president of the united states? that's ve
its way to the united states supreme court.e the teams will make the arguments at that time that the 14th amendment does not apply to the president of the united states. that there are a number of specific officials that are named in that section, one of them does not include the president of the united states. i think that's going to be the basis upon which they make this appeal and i do believe that the united states supreme court is going to agree with the trump team on this one at least....
0
0.0
Jan 19, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
to the united states supreme court. and today donald trump got a head start on his lawyers in appealing directly to the united states supreme court on social media, where he said, a president of elated states must have full immunity, without which would be impossible for him her to properly function, any mistake even if well intended would be met with almost certain indictment by the opposing party at turn and. donald trump did not explain why no president has ever been prosecuted at the end of his term. the trump statement continued saying, even events that cross the line must fall under total immunity. of course, if presidents had total immunity, or thought they had total immunity, certainly the supreme court would have already thought they had total immunity and donald trump would not have to take an appeal all the way to the united states supreme court, asking the court to invent the concept of total immunity for presidents. non trump ended his statement saying all presidents must have complete and total presidentia
to the united states supreme court. and today donald trump got a head start on his lawyers in appealing directly to the united states supreme court on social media, where he said, a president of elated states must have full immunity, without which would be impossible for him her to properly function, any mistake even if well intended would be met with almost certain indictment by the opposing party at turn and. donald trump did not explain why no president has ever been prosecuted at the end of...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
at the supreme court of the united states. i will say this, the supreme court does not want to decide this case. and it will likely look for every legitimate way possible, legitimate way possible, to avoid deciding whether the former president is disqualified from the presidency. having studied the disqualification clause myself for three years now, there are very, very few, if any, off-ramps that would allow the supreme court to avoid a decision in this case. indeed, i believe there are none. section three of the 14th amendment simply could not be any clearer. that the former president is disqualified from the presidency as the colorado supreme court held. >> judge luttig, as you know, we have great respect for you here on the show, and our viewers are grateful to you for your actions before january 6th and your continued articulation of what the law and the constitution says. we thank you again, sir, thank you for being with us. >> thank you, ali. >> judge jay michael luttig is a former federal judge of the united states cou
at the supreme court of the united states. i will say this, the supreme court does not want to decide this case. and it will likely look for every legitimate way possible, legitimate way possible, to avoid deciding whether the former president is disqualified from the presidency. having studied the disqualification clause myself for three years now, there are very, very few, if any, off-ramps that would allow the supreme court to avoid a decision in this case. indeed, i believe there are none....
1
1.0
Jan 7, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
how in principle the supreme court of the united states states can support trump, or could it be that the decision of the supreme court will become sensational and really for the first time in the history of the candidate for the position of the president of the united states will not be allowed to participate in the election campaign? look, i would be glad if it were so, that's how. you just said, but, i'm not a lawyer, but i think that the supreme court is in favor of trump in this case, unfortunately, well, the point is that whatever the ideological views, the ideological beliefs of the supreme court justices, they are judges after all, they follow the law, the point is that trump's pre-election ban, according to the third part of the 14th amendment. to the constitution of the united states, since trump has not been found guilty by any court of law of having participated in rebellion against the united states, it is subject to interpretation by specific officials, such as the state of maine, the state's secretary of state, which is responsible for conducting elections, or the parti
how in principle the supreme court of the united states states can support trump, or could it be that the decision of the supreme court will become sensational and really for the first time in the history of the candidate for the position of the president of the united states will not be allowed to participate in the election campaign? look, i would be glad if it were so, that's how. you just said, but, i'm not a lawyer, but i think that the supreme court is in favor of trump in this case,...
0
0.0
Jan 4, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
they want the united states supreme court to, quote, return the right to vote for their candidate of choice to the voters. colorado's high court is not the only one grappling with this question. last week maine's secretary of state barred trump from that state's primary ballot. and trump's candidacy is being challenged in 17 other states. the supreme court 6-3 conservative majority is expected to take up the question of whether trump is constitutionally eligible to run for president and its decision could reshape the race. joining me now is barbara mcquade, former united states attorney for the eastern district of michigan and an msnbc legal analyst and author of a new book coming out next month titled "attack from within how disinformation is sabotaging america." can't wait to get my hand on that. thank you for being here. donald trump's lawyers are latching onto something that has been popularized in the media recently, and that is notwithstanding the constitution, section 3 of the 14th amendment which disqualifies someone who has taken an oath from running for office. the people s
they want the united states supreme court to, quote, return the right to vote for their candidate of choice to the voters. colorado's high court is not the only one grappling with this question. last week maine's secretary of state barred trump from that state's primary ballot. and trump's candidacy is being challenged in 17 other states. the supreme court 6-3 conservative majority is expected to take up the question of whether trump is constitutionally eligible to run for president and its...
0
0.0
Jan 4, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the nine justices on the united states supreme court receive is up to 8,000 requests to hear a case every oral
the nine justices on the united states supreme court receive is up to 8,000 requests to hear a case every oral
27
27
Jan 18, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 27
favorite 0
quote 3
but this is the kind of day-to-day way in which the united states supreme court can have this country people won't notice. >> yeah. people don't know what the chevron doctrine in. you can stop somebody on the street and say hey, what's the chevron doctrine? and unless they're a very particular kind of lawyer, they won't know. but what it is, is the doctrine that lets america's regulatory agencies make the decisions where they have expertise. and it's really important when you're up against big industries, that have a lot of experts, to have experts against them, that can call bs on them, who can call their bluff, who can understand the complexities and don't get fooled. and what these industries want to do is shut down the regulatory piece of that and move so that they can make their arguments to courts, which are not expert, which are much more easily fooled, and which, if you pick the right judge, are on the side of the big industries now anyway after all of the federalist society's work packing various courts. >> and one of the things we've grown accustomed to hearing from the repu
but this is the kind of day-to-day way in which the united states supreme court can have this country people won't notice. >> yeah. people don't know what the chevron doctrine in. you can stop somebody on the street and say hey, what's the chevron doctrine? and unless they're a very particular kind of lawyer, they won't know. but what it is, is the doctrine that lets america's regulatory agencies make the decisions where they have expertise. and it's really important when you're up...
0
0.0
Jan 10, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the united states supreme court has said that a president is immune for their official acts. well, if there was an assassination or all these things, that's not an official act. that's what we call beyond the bounds. we want to take this well-establish rule that works, your honor. it's in civil cases. it should apply more in criminal cases. the danger to the normal functioning of our country is greater. we don't want bush prosecuted. we don't want biden prosecuted. we don't want president trump prosecuted, either. let's not apply the rule -- the district court even refused to apply this rule. please remand to district court so they can follow common sense. >> you play that role. you have been u.s. attorney before. what's the argument? >> with respect, my friend's st lack confidence. the presidents haven't broken the law before. but the difference between a republic that punishes its highest officials after they have left office -- this is not while he or she is in office. but after they have left office, not only is there no reason to withhold the criminal process from them,
the united states supreme court has said that a president is immune for their official acts. well, if there was an assassination or all these things, that's not an official act. that's what we call beyond the bounds. we want to take this well-establish rule that works, your honor. it's in civil cases. it should apply more in criminal cases. the danger to the normal functioning of our country is greater. we don't want bush prosecuted. we don't want biden prosecuted. we don't want president trump...
0
0.0
Jan 3, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
united states supreme court., what they have done and they have done different things, but if the united states supreme court steps in, as i think they ought to, you will have one ruling, i hope, that sets the standard across the country. the danger whether you loathe mr. trump or love mr. trump is that you might have proceedings in different states with different rulings from each, and that's unattainable. i expect maine will move quickly unless the supreme court tells them to stop because they are going to take the case and issue a single ruling. >> whether it's the superior or supreme court, there could be a backlash and there's some that say that might need to be considered? what is the job -- bring it down to if you discipline the child for getting into a fight, and then you think maybe i will not discipline him because the other kids might get mad? >> good morning, mika. it's not supposed to be the political backlash, and that's why you give federal judges and justices lifetime appointments, and they are no
united states supreme court., what they have done and they have done different things, but if the united states supreme court steps in, as i think they ought to, you will have one ruling, i hope, that sets the standard across the country. the danger whether you loathe mr. trump or love mr. trump is that you might have proceedings in different states with different rulings from each, and that's unattainable. i expect maine will move quickly unless the supreme court tells them to stop because...
0
0.0
Jan 2, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that is the case that is going to go up first in the united states supreme court and there is a very good chance that if and when the united states supreme court takes the colorado case, it will announce a rule of law, a decision that will apply to all of the states considering these 14th amendment challenges. whatever the supreme court says in the colorado case i think will likely apply also to the proceedings and maine and oregon. >> there is an article in rolling stones magazine saying that trump's attorneys are going to turn the case from special counsel, jeff smith into a freak show and try to flood the trial with all these various conspiracies. do you think they will be able to succeed in getting these conspiracy theories into the trial and what impact that could have? >> reporter: from what we've seen of the district court judge, i think the trump team will have an uphill battle if they try to flood the zone with irrelevant information. we have seen this is a judge who is pretty serious about running a tight ship in the courtroom, about ensuring the case focuses on the facts,
that is the case that is going to go up first in the united states supreme court and there is a very good chance that if and when the united states supreme court takes the colorado case, it will announce a rule of law, a decision that will apply to all of the states considering these 14th amendment challenges. whatever the supreme court says in the colorado case i think will likely apply also to the proceedings and maine and oregon. >> there is an article in rolling stones magazine saying...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court of the united states to exclude the possibility of pre-emption to primary elections in those american states where the authorities have already made such a decision, well, for now this is the state of colorado, there is also the state of maine. to what extent, in principle, can the supreme court of the united states support trump, or can it be that the decision of the supreme court will become sensational and indeed, for the first time in history, a candidate for the office of the president of the united states will not be allowed. to participate in the election campaign? look i'd be happy if it was , like you just said, but i'm not a lawyer, but i think the supreme court is on trump's side in this case, unfortunately, well, the thing is because whatever the ideological views, the ideological beliefs of the supreme court justices, they are still judges, and they follow the law, the fact is that ... trump's exclusion from the election, according to the third part of the 14th amendment to the constitution of the united states, since trump has not been found guilty by any
supreme court of the united states to exclude the possibility of pre-emption to primary elections in those american states where the authorities have already made such a decision, well, for now this is the state of colorado, there is also the state of maine. to what extent, in principle, can the supreme court of the united states support trump, or can it be that the decision of the supreme court will become sensational and indeed, for the first time in history, a candidate for the office of the...
0
0.0
Jan 23, 2024
01/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
wade, the united states supreme court recognized the fundamental, constitutional freedom.nd for nearly half a century, americans relied on this freedom , protected by row. howe 19 ago, the highest court in our land, the court of thurgood and our bg, rm the people of america, from the women of america, and now, on the 51st anniversary of rowe, we speak of it in the past tense. in the last 19 months, in states across our nation, extremists have proposed and psed la s that criminalize doctors and punish women, laws that threaten doctors and nurses with prison time, even care. laws that in some states make no exceptions, even for rape and now many of you know i started my career as a prosecutor, specializing in crimes against women and children. what you may not know is one of the reasonwhy.when i was in higi learned that one of my best friends was being molested by her stepfather. and so i said to h got to come stay with us. i called my mother, and my mother said, of course she should, and she did. so the idea that someone who survives a crime that is violence to their body,
wade, the united states supreme court recognized the fundamental, constitutional freedom.nd for nearly half a century, americans relied on this freedom , protected by row. howe 19 ago, the highest court in our land, the court of thurgood and our bg, rm the people of america, from the women of america, and now, on the 51st anniversary of rowe, we speak of it in the past tense. in the last 19 months, in states across our nation, extremists have proposed and psed la s that criminalize doctors and...
0
0.0
Jan 10, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> the government is distorting the we'll establish roofs the united states supreme court's articulatee case of naked nixon v fitzgerald, it's already the lawyer honor. that a president is not immune for these wild hypotheticals we've been hearing, the united states supreme court has that a president's immune for their official acts, if there was an assassination, or all these things. that is not an official act, that is beyond the bounds. we simply want to take this well-established rule that works, it is in civil cases, it should apply in criminal cases, the danger to the normal function of our country is greater. we don't want bush prosecuted, we don't want biden prosecuted, we don't want to bomb a prosecuted for ordinary activities. we don't want president trump prosecuted either. but, let's just apply the rule, we're not even you asking you to prejudge the rule this car refuses to apply the rule let's see how it goes please remand to diss report so they can follow common sense. >> let's hear from counsel for the government, we'll have you play that role harry, you've been attorney
. >> the government is distorting the we'll establish roofs the united states supreme court's articulatee case of naked nixon v fitzgerald, it's already the lawyer honor. that a president is not immune for these wild hypotheticals we've been hearing, the united states supreme court has that a president's immune for their official acts, if there was an assassination, or all these things. that is not an official act, that is beyond the bounds. we simply want to take this well-established...
0
0.0
Jan 3, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i think that is why the supreme court of the united states will take this up to prevent exactly what you were talking about from happening. >> andrew, very quickly, i have to ask, i'm a political science professor, i look at the entire planet. it galls me, that every time we talk about trump trials, this comes to mind. last year, july 2023, brazil's bolsonaro was barred from running for office until 2030. he lost the election in 2022 on january 8th his right wing supporters went and attacked the capital. it took less than six months for the brazilian supreme court to say, hey, this guy engaged in insurrection. are we feeling in this country? that were running up and almost the three year anniversary of trump of january six, and trump is not in, jail when a country like the brazil, where we we think we have a stronger institutional democracy than they do, they seem to have handled this in six months. >> i love people that look at the international perspective, because americans are so parochial. we think obviously this is a great country but we are not the first country on the globe w
i think that is why the supreme court of the united states will take this up to prevent exactly what you were talking about from happening. >> andrew, very quickly, i have to ask, i'm a political science professor, i look at the entire planet. it galls me, that every time we talk about trump trials, this comes to mind. last year, july 2023, brazil's bolsonaro was barred from running for office until 2030. he lost the election in 2022 on january 8th his right wing supporters went and...
2
2.0
Jan 7, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 2
favorite 0
quote 0
of the supreme court of the united states, to rule out the possibility of pre-election to premiums inhose american states where the authorities have already made such a decision. so far this is the state of colorado, it is still the state of maine, how much in principle can the supreme court of the united states support trump, or can it be that the decision of the supreme court will become sensational and indeed for the first time in history a candidate for the position of president of the united states will not be allowed to participate in the pre-election campaign campaign? look, i'd be happy if it were, but as you just said, i'm not a lawyer, but i think the supreme court in this case... holding trump, unfortunately, well, the fact is that whatever the ideological views, the ideological beliefs of the supreme court justices, they are still judges, and they follow the law. the point is that not allowing trump to run for office, under the third section of the 14th amendment to the united states constitution, because trump has not been found guilty by any court of law that he... he pa
of the supreme court of the united states, to rule out the possibility of pre-election to premiums inhose american states where the authorities have already made such a decision. so far this is the state of colorado, it is still the state of maine, how much in principle can the supreme court of the united states support trump, or can it be that the decision of the supreme court will become sensational and indeed for the first time in history a candidate for the position of president of the...
0
0.0
Jan 3, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
in addition to john berman and elliott williams, bill barr, it's for the united states supreme courtme sword of guidance to lower courts, state attorneys general and whoever it might be to make that call. >> last point and i'll make clear is that the supreme court may go through this whole process and never actually weigh in on who is or isn't an insurrectionist, per se. there are way for them to decide this and make it go away without actually ruling on the key points there. elliott williams, always a pleasure to have you. >> thanks, john. take care. >> all right. still ahead for us, brand-you in numbe numbers of nikki haley's war chest behind trump. >> harvard president claudine gay stepping down weeks after the controversial congressional hearing. coming up, we will speak with a harvard student. to duckduckgo on all your devie duckduckgo comes with a built-n engine like google, but it's pi and doesn't spy on your searchs and duckduckgo lets you browse like chrome, but it blocks cooi and creepy ads that follow youa from google and other companie. and there's no catch. it's fre. we
in addition to john berman and elliott williams, bill barr, it's for the united states supreme courtme sword of guidance to lower courts, state attorneys general and whoever it might be to make that call. >> last point and i'll make clear is that the supreme court may go through this whole process and never actually weigh in on who is or isn't an insurrectionist, per se. there are way for them to decide this and make it go away without actually ruling on the key points there. elliott...
0
0.0
Jan 12, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
united states supreme court will get that case and stopped his trial pending it. i'm just not sure that's right. there is so little to trump's claims that it is perfectly plausible to think u.s. supreme court's not gonna hear the case and not going to delay trump's trial. so much fourth or thereabouts can still occur. >> andrew, what do you still see when you have this trial calendar? >> the same reaction as neal listening to the argument, and particularly judge pan take apart the argument. many ways just getting the lawyer to actually say what they are arguing because it was so preposterous. so the more that argument went on, the more you thought, i think, as neal does that the odds of the supreme court saying, you know what? don't need to hear this. what you are arguing is just so preposterous. it doesn't mean that they won't, but if that does happen, it's possible for this to go, the federal case to go in march. if not, i think we are going to see a reversal. we are going to see the state new york case go at the end of march. that should take 4 to 6 weeks and i
united states supreme court will get that case and stopped his trial pending it. i'm just not sure that's right. there is so little to trump's claims that it is perfectly plausible to think u.s. supreme court's not gonna hear the case and not going to delay trump's trial. so much fourth or thereabouts can still occur. >> andrew, what do you still see when you have this trial calendar? >> the same reaction as neal listening to the argument, and particularly judge pan take apart the...
0
0.0
Jan 5, 2024
01/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and trump lost before the united states supreme court. all, he lost.applause] trump lost recount after recount after recount in state after state, but out of desperation weakness, his maga followers went after officials who insured -- they had their lives upended by attacks and death threats for simply doing their jobs. in atlanta, georgia, a brave black mother and her daughter were doing their job as election workers, until donald trump and his maga followers targeted, threatened them and forced them from their homes releasing racist vitriol. trump's personal lawyer rudy giuliani was does hit with a $148 million judgment for cruelty and defamation he inflicted against them. other state and local elected officials faced similar personal attacks. in addition, a record 787 main dollars has agreed to be paid for the lives they told -- lies they told about voter fraud. let's be clear about the 2020 election, trump exhausted every legal avenue available to him to overturn the election, everyone. the legal path just took trump back to the truth. that i had w
and trump lost before the united states supreme court. all, he lost.applause] trump lost recount after recount after recount in state after state, but out of desperation weakness, his maga followers went after officials who insured -- they had their lives upended by attacks and death threats for simply doing their jobs. in atlanta, georgia, a brave black mother and her daughter were doing their job as election workers, until donald trump and his maga followers targeted, threatened them and...
0
0.0
Jan 9, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
states supreme court. and if the united states supreme court agrees with donald trump that he can't be prosecuted for crimes committed while president, then the washington d. c. federal criminal case against donald trump for crimes leading up to and on january 6th would collapse. the criminal prosecution of donald trump in georgia for election fraud in georgia would disappear. the criminal prosecution of donald trump by manhattan district attorney alvin bragg would probably collapse since much of the conduct alleged in that case occurred while donald trump was president. the only criminal case that can survive a supreme court opinion saying that a president of the united states has total immunity from prosecution from anything that happens during their presidency would be jack smith's criminal case against donald trump in florida for the illegal possession of classified material in violation of the espionage act, after he was president. that is a case presided over by a judge appointed by donald trump who
states supreme court. and if the united states supreme court agrees with donald trump that he can't be prosecuted for crimes committed while president, then the washington d. c. federal criminal case against donald trump for crimes leading up to and on january 6th would collapse. the criminal prosecution of donald trump in georgia for election fraud in georgia would disappear. the criminal prosecution of donald trump by manhattan district attorney alvin bragg would probably collapse since much...
0
0.0
Jan 8, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
right here in the united states, i strongly agreed with the colorado supreme court's decision. have been two courts looking at the question of whether donald trump engaged in the insurrection. they both said yes. just like the colorado supreme court said, there should not be a loophole in the constitution for the president. i am hopeful that the united states supreme court will uphold colorado's decision, but just like you, we will see. >> at the color of the supreme court, also cheekily including a neil gorsuch ruling from a few years back. we'll be interested to see what he does with this. in the wake of this lawsuit, you said you've received a lot of death threats, so many that you stopped counting, which is horrible to hear. i hope they are safe and well tonight. it just reminds us all that this is not about a one filed insurrection for a january 6th with trump supporters, it's about a ruling insurrection, ongoing threats against election officials like yourself. >> that is right. i think that there is a tendency to get very focused on the latest events. this lawsuit has ca
right here in the united states, i strongly agreed with the colorado supreme court's decision. have been two courts looking at the question of whether donald trump engaged in the insurrection. they both said yes. just like the colorado supreme court said, there should not be a loophole in the constitution for the president. i am hopeful that the united states supreme court will uphold colorado's decision, but just like you, we will see. >> at the color of the supreme court, also cheekily...
0
0.0
Jan 8, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that would require that case going up, jose, to the united states supreme court. and again, there, if the united states supreme court says there is no immunity from criminal prosecution for a former or even current president who exceeds the boundaries of their duties with respect to the conduct with which they've been criminally charged, then, i think, you have an argument that it's not only influnable, but it will be binding on the judge. >> just trying to keep track of all of the different cases the former president is dealing with. on thursday, clorguments are expected in trump's new york civil fraud trial james filed a motion asking the judge to fine the trump organization $370 million. more than the $250 million originally estimate. she also wants to ban trump and two former executives from the real estate industry in new york. trump denying any wrong doing in this case. how did the attorney general's office get to the $370 million figure? >> well, let's start, jose, with the premise that this isn't just an ordinary fine. the relief that they're requesting is
that would require that case going up, jose, to the united states supreme court. and again, there, if the united states supreme court says there is no immunity from criminal prosecution for a former or even current president who exceeds the boundaries of their duties with respect to the conduct with which they've been criminally charged, then, i think, you have an argument that it's not only influnable, but it will be binding on the judge. >> just trying to keep track of all of the...
0
0.0
Jan 2, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but i think the question is, what does the united states supreme court do?going to let the decision in the d.c. circuit court of appeal stand. >> interesting. i told you, we'll be watching this closely. it is one of the biggest questions. year. if they let it be, if they take a sort of beatles approach, you get the case on the same calendar. if they take it, it slows it down, number one, and then number two, what are you taking it for? a close question to remind everyone, the supreme court rejects 99% plus of the questions to get involved. the other thing, when it comes to post presidential immunity, it doesn't exist. period. the constitution specifically imagines a criminal president and it does say you have to impeach him in office. it is complicated. if the doj was trying to try their own boss, that's complex for a four or eight-year problem. i'm reading from this. the constitution explicitly provides for an impeached and convicted president's criminal prosecution for the same. you could be a strict texture list and you would still land on saying the cons
but i think the question is, what does the united states supreme court do?going to let the decision in the d.c. circuit court of appeal stand. >> interesting. i told you, we'll be watching this closely. it is one of the biggest questions. year. if they let it be, if they take a sort of beatles approach, you get the case on the same calendar. if they take it, it slows it down, number one, and then number two, what are you taking it for? a close question to remind everyone, the supreme...
0
0.0
Jan 3, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that could then lead to him appealing to the united states supreme court on this. that is breaking within the last few minutes. mark meadows asking for a hearing of his appeal by the full 11th circuit, all 12 judges, after being rejected by a three judge panel. three judge panel is the normal way federal appeals are handled. it is unusual to try to reach beyond them, although it does happen. we will hear from our legal experts about that breaking news. 2024 is, of course, a presidential election year. but it is also the year of defendant trump. defendant trump, 2024. the first big action of 2024 for defendant trump's next tuesday when the federal court of appeals oral arguments in the case of united states of america versus donald j trump in which donald trump is charged with the first defense contraband offered to those crimes is that he is immune from criminal prosecution because he was president of the united states. if that argument holds, van all four current criminal prosecutions of donald trump will collapse. the appeals court has set a schedule for non trum
that could then lead to him appealing to the united states supreme court on this. that is breaking within the last few minutes. mark meadows asking for a hearing of his appeal by the full 11th circuit, all 12 judges, after being rejected by a three judge panel. three judge panel is the normal way federal appeals are handled. it is unusual to try to reach beyond them, although it does happen. we will hear from our legal experts about that breaking news. 2024 is, of course, a presidential...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the united states supreme court is now set to decide whether the twice impeached, quadruple indicted, one term disgraced ex president has accused of engaged of interaction, can remain on the republican primary ballot in colorado. how this key ruling could entirely reshape the 2024 presidential election. and before criminal trials the president faces. >> with a democracy still americas sacred cause, it's the most urgent question of our time. it's what the 2024 election is all about. >> democracy on the ballot. in his strong -- strongest trump takedown yet, president biden remind americans what's at stake in one of the most critical presidential elections of our lifetimes. as the nation process to remember the violence at the u.s. capitol three years ago today. and later, painting the pain away. the former u.s. capitol police officer returning to art to overcome the trauma from january six. all of that and more is coming up. ♪ ♪ ♪ >> and a good saturday morning to you all, i'm katie phang. we begin today's show with breaking they was out of washington, d.c., with the united states supre
the united states supreme court is now set to decide whether the twice impeached, quadruple indicted, one term disgraced ex president has accused of engaged of interaction, can remain on the republican primary ballot in colorado. how this key ruling could entirely reshape the 2024 presidential election. and before criminal trials the president faces. >> with a democracy still americas sacred cause, it's the most urgent question of our time. it's what the 2024 election is all about....