1
1.0
Jan 29, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
ivanina and her family members. remind, on january 11, the meeting of judges of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv was informed about the conduct of a search in the court, which took place with numerous violations. procedural legislation and without the decision of the investigating judge. at the same time, without proper grounds, sbi employees took photos on a personal mobile phone of a draft of the yet-to-be-announced court decision and searched and examined many people who were in the courthouse at that time. after the interview, the higher qualification commission of judges recommended to the supreme council justice to dismiss the odious judge of the kharkiv district administration olena izovitova vakim. izovito vakim is the judge of the maidan. in 2013, it passed a decision to ban peaceful gatherings in support of euromaidan in kharkiv. at first, the judge banned peaceful actions from november 26 to 29 , 2013, and the very next day she banned protest actions indefinitely. the previous composition of
ivanina and her family members. remind, on january 11, the meeting of judges of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv was informed about the conduct of a search in the court, which took place with numerous violations. procedural legislation and without the decision of the investigating judge. at the same time, without proper grounds, sbi employees took photos on a personal mobile phone of a draft of the yet-to-be-announced court decision and searched and examined many people who were in...
1
1.0
Jan 29, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
yulia ivanina of the district court of kyiv and the meeting's appeal of the court on interference inctivities related to the administration of justice. however, the hearing of the case took place behind closed doors, which was requested by the judge herself for reasons of security. the judge asks for this notification about interference in the judge's activities regarding the administration of justice, i ask that it be considered at a meeting of the supreme council of justice of the council of judges of ukraine in closed session, taking into account the circumstances i have outlined. for the safety of my family members, including young children. the decision on the closed review was supported by 13 members of the vrp. according to his results, the supreme council of justice decided to apply to the office of the prosecutor general and the director of the dbi regarding the verification of the circumstances of the search in the dnipro district court of kyiv two weeks ago. members of the vrp draw the attention of the state bureau of investigations to the need to observe guarantees of ind
yulia ivanina of the district court of kyiv and the meeting's appeal of the court on interference inctivities related to the administration of justice. however, the hearing of the case took place behind closed doors, which was requested by the judge herself for reasons of security. the judge asks for this notification about interference in the judge's activities regarding the administration of justice, i ask that it be considered at a meeting of the supreme council of justice of the council of...
1
1.0
Jan 22, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
ivanina.court statement. found and access was obtained to the draft court decision in the case, as well as to other drafts and court decisions, in which the personal data of the participants in the court proceedings are indicated, while the full text of the specified court decision was not announced at the time of the search. the main purpose of the urgent search was for the investigators to gain access to the official computer belonging to dniprovskyi district court. as stated in the sbi, the search took place within the framework of criminal proceedings based on the fact. alleged assistance to a criminal organization, law enforcement officers assure: the investigative actions are not aimed at exerting pressure on the judge, interfering with the administration of justice and obstructing the judge's activities or the performance of his official duties. however, it is difficult to call what happened other than pressure. the head of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv filed a statement
ivanina.court statement. found and access was obtained to the draft court decision in the case, as well as to other drafts and court decisions, in which the personal data of the participants in the court proceedings are indicated, while the full text of the specified court decision was not announced at the time of the search. the main purpose of the urgent search was for the investigators to gain access to the official computer belonging to dniprovskyi district court. as stated in the sbi, the...
1
1.0
Jan 19, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
ivanina, according to the court statement.to the draft of the court decision in the case, as well as to other drafts and court decisions, in which the personal data of the participants in the court proceedings are indicated, was found and obtained. at the same time , the full text of the specified court decision is not was announced at the time of the search. the main purpose of the urgent search was to get the investigators access to the official computer belonging to the dnipro district court. the sbi stated that the search took place within the framework of criminal proceedings on the fact of alleged assistance to a criminal organization. security forces assure: investigative actions are not aimed at exerting pressure on the judge. interfering with the administration of justice and obstructing the activity of a judge or his performance of official duties. however, what happened was different than it is difficult to call it pressure. the head of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv appealed to the dnipro district pr
ivanina, according to the court statement.to the draft of the court decision in the case, as well as to other drafts and court decisions, in which the personal data of the participants in the court proceedings are indicated, was found and obtained. at the same time , the full text of the specified court decision is not was announced at the time of the search. the main purpose of the urgent search was to get the investigators access to the official computer belonging to the dnipro district...
1
1.0
Jan 16, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
yulia ivanina. the rsu noted that, judging by the chronology of events, the search of the court premises was conducted without the corresponding decision of the investigating judge. already today, the supreme council of justice will consider the appeal of the meeting of judges of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv, about interference in the court's activities regarding the administration of justice. representatives of the dbr are also invited to the meeting of the vrp. let me remind you that earlier on january 12, the supreme court appealed to the director of the dbr from on the evidence of the inadmissibility of pressure, the court. all because of the actions of the investigative bureau, which conducted searches in the premises of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv. in particular, the documents and computer of judge yulia ivanina were seized. presumably, the searches were related to the consideration of a specific court case. the biggest violation is that they came without a c
yulia ivanina. the rsu noted that, judging by the chronology of events, the search of the court premises was conducted without the corresponding decision of the investigating judge. already today, the supreme council of justice will consider the appeal of the meeting of judges of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv, about interference in the court's activities regarding the administration of justice. representatives of the dbr are also invited to the meeting of the vrp. let me remind...
1
1.0
Jan 13, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
in particular, the documents and computer of judge yulia ivanina were seized.o court as well reports on numerous violations during the search and regards them as pressure on the judge to administer justice. after all , the searches were probably related to the consideration of a specific court case. the court draws attention to the fact that conducting investigative actions in courts poses significant threats to the independence of judges, and cases of interference in a judge's activities in connection with the adoption of court decisions by him are inadmissible. at the same time, the sbi also confirmed the actions of its employees in the capital's dnipro court. the department's website states that the law enforcement officers conducted the office of the judge was searched and physical evidence was seized. supreme court. demands a reaction from the supreme council of justice and has already appealed to the director of the dbr that if it is a judge, then there should be a sanction or a general. according to the rules, it is done in order, they turn to the genera
in particular, the documents and computer of judge yulia ivanina were seized.o court as well reports on numerous violations during the search and regards them as pressure on the judge to administer justice. after all , the searches were probably related to the consideration of a specific court case. the court draws attention to the fact that conducting investigative actions in courts poses significant threats to the independence of judges, and cases of interference in a judge's activities in...
1
1.0
Jan 13, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
in particular, the documents and computer of judge yulia ivanina were seized. the dnipro court also reports numerous violations during the search and considers them as pressure on the judge for her administration of justice, because. nor were the searches connected with the consideration of a specific court case. the supreme court draws attention to the fact that conducting investigative actions in courts poses significant threats to the independence of judges. in cases of interference in the activity of a judge in connection with the adoption of court decisions by him, it is inadmissible. at the same time, the sbi also confirmed the actions of its employees in the dnipro court in the capital. the department's website states that law enforcement officers searched the offices of the judge and removed evidence the supreme court is demanding a response from the supreme council of justice and has already turned to the director of the sbi. if it is a judge, then there must be the sanction of either the general prosecutor or his deputy. ot. that is, the petition is s
in particular, the documents and computer of judge yulia ivanina were seized. the dnipro court also reports numerous violations during the search and considers them as pressure on the judge for her administration of justice, because. nor were the searches connected with the consideration of a specific court case. the supreme court draws attention to the fact that conducting investigative actions in courts poses significant threats to the independence of judges. in cases of interference in the...
1
1.0
Jan 22, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
ivanina for 2022 and 2023. these documents and videos are not at all related to saving property and should be. were obtained by employees of the state bureau of investigation in a legal manner, defined by the criminal procedure code of ukraine. in addition, copies of the search protocols in the specified premises were not signed and handed over to any authorized person of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv. the supreme court immediately responded to the illegal actions of the sbi. there they declare the inadmissibility of pressure from the servants of themis and intervention of law enforcement agencies in activities. court the supreme court draws attention to the fact that the conduct of investigative actions, in particular searches in courts, itself carries significant threats to the independence of judges. cases of interference in the activity of a judge in connection with his adoption of court decisions and disagreement with the results of the judicial review of proceedings are inadmissible. the s
ivanina for 2022 and 2023. these documents and videos are not at all related to saving property and should be. were obtained by employees of the state bureau of investigation in a legal manner, defined by the criminal procedure code of ukraine. in addition, copies of the search protocols in the specified premises were not signed and handed over to any authorized person of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv. the supreme court immediately responded to the illegal actions of the sbi....
1
1.0
Jan 16, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
in particular, documents were seized and judge yulia ivanina's computer.umably , the searches were related to the consideration of a specific court case. the biggest violation is that they came without a court order. the law requires a court order to confirm that their actions, that is, the actions of law enforcement agencies , have a legal basis, this is interference with the administration of justice, this is a crime, and if the vrp considers that there are indeed signs of a crime, they turn to the prosecutor general and prosecutor general andriy kostin must immediately enter the data into the edpr and all. all of them are indicative for the whole of ukraine initiate criminal proceedings. is iran provoking the united states of america to war. he attacked american facilities in iraq with ballistic missiles. explosions rang out near the us consulate in the city of erbil. four people died, including a local millionaire. another six were injured, writes reuters. three drones were also shot down near the airport. according to american officials in... no facil
in particular, documents were seized and judge yulia ivanina's computer.umably , the searches were related to the consideration of a specific court case. the biggest violation is that they came without a court order. the law requires a court order to confirm that their actions, that is, the actions of law enforcement agencies , have a legal basis, this is interference with the administration of justice, this is a crime, and if the vrp considers that there are indeed signs of a crime, they turn...
1
1.0
Jan 13, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
judge yulia ivanina the dnipro court also reports on numerous violations during the search and considersm as pressure on the judge to administer justice. after all, the searches were probably related to the consideration of a specific court case. the supreme court draws attention to the fact that conducting investigative actions in courts poses significant threats to the independence of judges, and cases of interference in the activities of judges in connection with the adoption of court decisions by him or her are inadmissible. at the same time, the sbi also confirmed the actions of its employees in the dnipro court in the capital. online department stated that the law enforcement officers searched the office of the judge and seized items. evidence the supreme court requires an immediate response from the supreme council of justice and has already turned to the director of the state bureau of investigation. well, now the economic results of the week. and from oleksandrochevko. alexander, congratulations, please. thank you vasyl. greetings viewers, in the next few minutes we will be addi
judge yulia ivanina the dnipro court also reports on numerous violations during the search and considersm as pressure on the judge to administer justice. after all, the searches were probably related to the consideration of a specific court case. the supreme court draws attention to the fact that conducting investigative actions in courts poses significant threats to the independence of judges, and cases of interference in the activities of judges in connection with the adoption of court...
1
1.0
Jan 16, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
in particular, the documents and computer of judge yulia ivanina were seized. presumably , the searches were related to the consideration of a specific case court case the biggest violation is that they came without a court order. the law required. has a court order to confirm that their actions, that is, the actions of a law enforcement agency have legal grounds, this is interference with the administration of justice, this is a crime, and if the vrp considers that there are indeed signs of a crime, they turn to the prosecutor general, and prosecutor general andriy kostin must immediately enter the data into the edpr and everyone, that is indicative for the whole of ukraine. bring criminal proceedings. the intensity of hostilities is increasing at the front, accordingly, and the losses of the occupiers increase. 100 russian invaders destroyed the armed forces of ukraine in a day, and in total, since the beginning of the full-scale invasion, more than 372 enemies will not return from the front. also, the russians can forget about 24 tanks, 36 bmp, 30 artsystems
in particular, the documents and computer of judge yulia ivanina were seized. presumably , the searches were related to the consideration of a specific case court case the biggest violation is that they came without a court order. the law required. has a court order to confirm that their actions, that is, the actions of a law enforcement agency have legal grounds, this is interference with the administration of justice, this is a crime, and if the vrp considers that there are indeed signs of a...