a drug addict who was left alone and did not cope. well, this story can be similar in your life? how do you think? that i came again pizza i ordered no, why i just went in, i didn’t apologize for the transplant and didn’t make up everything. wait. i know that you are angry with me. i am very guilty. i know you are in a lot of pain. yes, it's very hard to talk.

stas took without asking and began to kill the stone. and broke it was not necessary to take. in life, if he's standing he's alone it's always.

there is a big game on the air today we have a conversation with the ambassador of the russian federation to the united states anatoly ivanovich antonov. to the first question that i inevitably need to ask you. this is where russian-american relations are located. i said it inevitably, because for some reason i suppose that

you probably won’t be able to say anything particularly optimistic, and relations, as you know, are below the baseboard, and just last week the foreign ministers. uh, sergey lavrov , speaking about how the united states behaves towards russia, said that in fact the united states is no longer being led just hybrid, and he said almost a real war and added. and as for the speech of the deputy secretary for political affairs of victoria that she practically admitted that the united states was private to undermine nord stream one nord stream-2 and that in this way, the united states - these are already my words, and not his actually admitting their responsibility for

acts of terrorism against the russian federation and not only do not hide it, but mention it in congress, and they mention it, apparently, even with some kind of pride. and uh, here in in this situation, how would you characterize the state of russian-american relations, and could you say something at least a little positive in this context? dmitry good evening. thank you for the opportunity to talk to you about the pressing issues that uh worries uh many in the russian federation in the united states of america in the world, but i can’t help but start by saying that a i want to unequivocally u confirm u opinion embassy that you managed to create a very interesting and useful program. we, when we have the opportunity,

carefully, look. ah, behind your program , behind the speakers. uh, we are comparing our arguments on channel one. and i want to say that a most of my colleagues speak only in excellent. e your work on russian television. huge to you. thank you. now, in essence , russian-american relations in the political circles of washington do not hide the purpose of their war on ukrainian territory. i did not make a reservation to inflict a strategic defeat on russia to exhaust and exhaust our country , the americans are setting ours against us allied friends. they want to argue, yes , they threaten

them with sanctions with the former soviet republics, they convince them of the need for a complete cessation of cooperation, and in general , they say there are no ties with us, and our country has no future in russophobes. they even agreed on this and speak frankly about it, what should be cut out? the name of russia from the political map of the world is these theses, not propaganda slogans and not a figure of speech, it really is. uh, the real situation of our relationship is the relationship between russia and the united states of america to confirm these theses, which i just voiced , it is enough to take a look at the recently released us national security strategy. uh, also, very remarkable. i think, and dmitry is a hearing. uh, in the senate commission on international affairs dated january 26. and in january this

material is available, you can see it. e on the internet then the conversation was about russia, about the policy of the united states of america towards russia, participated e. musofobka known to us from the state department deputy uh minister of defense, as well as a high-ranking representative of the agency in the international e for international development of course, the anti-russian e. the hysteria was fueled by the well-known hawks from the capitol, the sounded timid thesis of the well-known senator paul rendov, who we all know, to think about through a frenzied anti-russian policy. and to consider the issue of lifting sanctions happiness, and russian legislators, as well as from american senators,

respectively, from our side was simply wrapped up. this, uh, lady was not supported by either one of the senators who attended the event. there is only one satisfaction. here they began to openly admit that the matter is not in ukraine, but in a sideways international order that does not meet the national interests of many states, this is confirmed, by the way, by former us secretary of state mike pompeo, who , speaking recently at the institute of politics university, openly stated that the russian federation has challenged us dominance further , the ukrainian crisis is even more interesting. needs to be considered through the prism of preserving or changing the entire

system of the modern device world. i recall with annoyance my conversations in washington at the end of 1921 and at the beginning of 22, then they openly said that and only one goal was to seize the occupation of ukraine and then proceed to seize other post-soviet republics, i remember how difficult it was to break. this is a perverted presentation. uh, and how difficult it was to explain the goals and objectives of our operation, what we are doing in the western, and the borders of russia for the collective west , ukraine is just a territory instrument in the struggle to preserve the international order, which was created to the detriment of russia's national interests after the geopolitical tragedy. i'm talking now about the collapse of the soviet union, this is what the current

us leaders at all levels are talking about, a recent article is noteworthy. i hope dmitry you saw her article written by, uh, the former secretary of defense, uh, robert gates and the former u.s. secretary of state when woods rice they agree, by the way, representatives of the state department known to us, the obvious intention of the americans is visible in relation to russia, it is said that during the years of the first and second world wars, the americans made a mistake. they sent their e to the front, hundreds of thousands of their soldiers and officers died today, a brilliant opportunity has appeared not to use manpower to pit the russian ukrainians to develop a murderous one about it, but to turn the ukrainians into cannon fodder to force us to fight each other and with the help of e to do it all western weapons, the idea is the same,

by the way, nothing has changed in recent years to put russia back on knees. in a political and economic sense, how did it happen after the collapse of the soviet union. such is the characteristic of russian american relations, here it becomes obvious and the answer to your questions, how can any dialogue be built on this basis and to more specific possible questions. and what do we have left with the americans? well, perhaps you can call today cooperation in outer space and a treaty on the reduction of strategic offensive arms. and even then, with flaws, high-level contacts are episodic. this, by the way, speaking, they consider it normal when, through chukri or through e, some other representatives of sergey viktorovich , some messages from blinkin are transmitted to lavrov. uh,

what, he can't pick up the phone and just call our minister and, uh, have a serious talk. and things we are told on every corner here that the conversation is as before or, as they say, business, as usual, will not work. by the way, to forget only one thing, but we don’t want to. we are only ready for an equal and mutually respectful conversation with the americans on the struides to solve international problems together, as a permanent member of the security council and as the world's two leading nuclear powers, but the prerequisite for such a conversation should be the rejection of uh anti-russian. uh, politicians, uh, recognition of our national interests and the provision of reliable reinforced concrete, and security guarantees for our state, as we see, the americans

are not yet ready for such a conversation with us. mr. ambassador, of course, i really don’t want to agree with you, i’m afraid that i will have to agree with you, and i i remember how we talked. uh, a few months ago, and then it seemed. at least, it seemed to me that there was some interest of the white house administration, and for a formal dialogue with russia , an informal dialogue, of course, a dialogue on american terms, but nevertheless , i got the impression that this interest in the white house lately in the administration as a whole , or disappeared altogether, or at least declined, what do you think? i can i'm forced to just dimitri er, dispel. e. the same

the positive element of a little hope that you hear in your question is that the americans do not want any conversation with us. i, uh, unfortunately said that such good ties in the field of culture, science, human communication between our two states have been destroyed. i am firmly convinced that the peoples of the two countries only lose russian culture and literature from this. here they love to remember and sometimes. it's hard for me to even react to questions when they ask me like this, and when will the mariinsky theater arrive, uh, washington or uh? in new york, the americans want to ban and close , uh, everything that is connected with russia, this thesis, which was used for the first time today , that they want to cut it out. uh, the name of russia from the political map of the world.

that says a lot and uh hmm sets up a very uh hard work to straighten out the situation in the united states of america in relation to the russian federation . ah, secretary of state. uh, condoleezza israel. as you probably know, robert gates started his career in the cia but he always had a career between the cia and some other political departments and during the nixon administration he just happened to be in the white house on the national security council, which he was then recommended. why am i telling you about this, because nixon's policy is to you in international affairs. it was characterized by two

words. the first is nixon's doctrine and the second is widnamization. these were two very closely related concepts no one investigated. how do you know the vietnam war and he started it and he started it wanted, but he did not want to be defeated and that the united states left in disgrace and he began to think about a new form of the american global. dominance vitaminization, that is, to find regimes that would be able to defend themselves using american weapons, using american diplomatic support. and, of course, finances. but how do you know? it did not end well, to put it mildly, in vietnam because congress denied nikshin any further funding for this war. it was already when big, if you like, it interfered with

small c in ethergate with a scandal inside the united states and nixon just lost the ability to effectively manage the rights i er, sir went that now in the face of ukraine the united states finally found the perfect ideal object for a new kind of nomination. find a country. which is ready to fight under the leadership of the united states, of course , for some of its own goals, but above all for the goals of the world order, which the united states and its allies want to support. dmitry, you rightly brought an example of an article, by robert gates and canal rice i would add to this, just 2 days ago an article by the famous mcfall was published, as well as a very

remarkable congressional hearing on russian american relations, or rather , on the policy of the white house administration regarding . e of moscow and a, i want to say that all this is being confirmed today, the americans are not in the mood to solve it through diplomacy. the situation that has developed on the ukrainian territory it is unambiguously said that it is impossible to stop. gotta go ahead and continue to stuff the ukrainian army with various ones. e weapons. and today, it seems to me, we are talking about maintaining the heat of control. uh heat, uh, hostilities on ukrainian territory, and the americans. i think i understand perfectly well that

they won't be able to win. uh, used, and weapons uh, with help. forgive me for such words, cannon fodder in the form, but ukrainian. e military personnel. and this is true. so, what is happening today on ukrainian territory. this is part of the global struggle for the global struggle for a new world order, a new world order, and which is the basis only today its contours are visible and there is a struggle will the americans be able to keep this world order will be able to protect it with their weapons. and with the support of other 500-50 countries, or they won't be able to, and today uh, here uh, very simple theses are heard russia must stop the special military operation. russia must withdraw its troops beyond the 1991 line. start paying

reparations. and of course, it is necessary to put on trial all the e responsible for the situation that has developed in the east of europe a and no other. ah, you can’t hear the thesis from the americans today. pay attention. that's what i even said now is equal, as well as in the article by gates and rice nothing is said. solving the problem now these days , all the media are full of reports about the creation of a tank coalition, tanks must be sent as soon as possible to the ukrainian theater of operations. it doesn't matter. by the way, these tanks will not appear immediately. i believe that the very fact of the appearance of such weapons. and this is an offensive weapon, seriously

e affects the dynamics and character, but the relationship between the west and russia and the situation. uh on the ground when biden says we are supplying defensive weapons, uh in the form of tanks. but that's wrong. we know there is such a register for conventional, armed weapons, which was adopted in new york, for which, by the way , the united states of america voted, where it is clearly stated. eh that tanks are attacking weapons. i remember from personal experience how many western countries urged us to stop supplying weapons to hot dots spoke of a violation of international humanitarian law, and in the case of ukraine , all agreements, including those within the osce , have been forgotten today. i'm talking about the well-known principles of restraint and refusing to supply

weapons to hot spots, it is noteworthy that, in congress, the administration is criticized to a greater extent not for the supply of arms , large arms deliveries. but that the assistance provided by the white house today is not enough, and this despite billions of dollars of injections, e.g., into the economy and the armed forces ukraine american legislators are forcing the white house to give everything that is needed today. look at mcfaul's latest article. he says, and uh, today he is talking about long-range systems, uh, and about fighters. uh, and yet, it seems to me that everything that is happening in the united states of america today should not be viewed only through, uh, black glasses. there are experts here, with whom we meet and maintain contacts, who are not afraid and express their point of view about

the danger of the abyss moving. and falling. where it will be impossible to stop sadly only one thing, that the voices of these experts. e, is heard quite rarely and a. unfortunately, they do not affect the policy of the united states of america. and in the ukrainian direction, yesterday, january 1, you know , reuters reported that another $2.2 billion in military aid would be delivered in the near future, and we are talking about longer-range missiles are small, but more range, compared to e or those missiles that were supplied earlier, they are talking about smart. uh, planning. uh, ammunition is mentioned again. ah, ammo. uh, to the patriot air defense system, uh, from the javelin

it is said, that is, it is about the fact that it is not intentional to stop here, this situation that is happening on ukrainian territory here suits washington. i return to your question by proxy , their tasks are being solved. here is the situation as you described it. e your interpretation. he received strong confirmation. in a recent washington post article, they are well-known and well -informed columnists. uh, david of the worst managed, apparently, a long conversation with secretary of state anthony blinskin, and he uh quotes him a lot, and i know i've often disagreed with him over the years. sometimes he agreed, because he was the editor who published my article at one time,

but i know about nine to one thing. he is a meticulous journalist. and if he quotes blinkin, then i'm sure that he quotes him correctly. and honestly, this article, i'll tell you , made a frightening impression on me, because the main idea of ​​​​the article is that the biden administration. in general, not even now she is very interested in a negotiated solution, that the point is not only and not so much about giving zelensky the opportunity to set the agenda, but about forcing russia to agree on terms that would be acceptable to zelensky and, most importantly, acceptable to biden impossible, because the united states, as you rightly said, wants a victory, or at least what looks like

a victory that could be presented as a victory to the american voter. in the next presidential election in 2024, and if so explained, ah, blinks to his colleague to the journalist, if so, then we should focus not on diplomacy, but on arming ukraine on training the ukrainian armed forces and giving ukraine weapons not only defensive, probably only ivanovich quite deliberately says offensive, because if you want, but to restrain russia's ability to put pressure on ukraine, then one defensive weapon will not do everything here, you need to give ukraine the opportunity. if you want to threaten russia, and it is supposed to do so. well, here they are for a short time in some stage until an agreement is reached. but as a long-term strategy.

do you have, uh, the feeling that this is it? well, if you like, mini-doctrida, blikin becomes really, but an operational guide for the work of this administration. and i would like to attribute dmitry to blinkin, ah, the development of some doctrines. i would talk more about the doctrine of the administration of the administration on e, the achievement of a strategic victory - these are very fashionable words of a strategic victory over the russian federation and in this regard i would give examples and pompeo gates and rice mcfaul and others. e ex-officials on this score, but today they have ceased to be shy here and everywhere at every club. here they say that we will not allow the victory of the russian federation , otherwise it will be putin's victory over the western

world, these words. q. probably, you have also heard tutanberg very actively now, but he is promoting it. uh, being in southeast asia you know the americans. uh, in my opinion, they are doing uh, wise enough they are not only investing money today in their military-industrial complex, but they also provide or, let's say today, ensured the economic dependence of europe, and perhaps more of the world, on their energy resources. you know, well, just uh, it was so unexpected to hear about that explosion, and not so the nord stream. e , during which he turned these theses into rubbish into a pile of iron at the bottom of the sea, which sounded e, in the senate in the senate international affairs commission

, the well-known russophobe from the state department was picked up. no, it's hard to imagine how the west and the european countries themselves got into that the trap that the great ones prepared for them united states of america we remember with you how the war was going on. e on the problem of the gas pipe back in the old days of the soviet union and today we have achieved a brilliant result, when the energy of europe today depends on the united states america is what does it mean, money is money that can be used, including for the production of weapons, including to upgrade your army and direction of the unit. e of these weapons. uh, nah, ukraine today. i firmly believe that the administration is not ukraine as such is of interest, as a state it is not interested. what

the ukrainian people feel is only interested in the task of sending more and more people to the front to create more and more problems for the russian armed forces. prevent. uh, no victory. you are absolutely right that this moment this factor will be actively used during the election race. thank you. we're leaving now for the commercial and will be back in a few minutes. they just shoot at peaceful areas of the city and kill civilians. i went to fight as an artilleryman. i think, than to sit and wait until they call me, but they didn’t call me, i took it myself and left. before that, only in competent games, the guys saw all kinds of weapons, months of hard

training, the boys come. after they visit the combat, their view changes. man woman child and we are in an intelligent society, yes, what

do men say simple pleasures got involved on february 2, a super sale on ozone from february 13 to february 20 and one more snowmania in march for 499 rubles. mixit set for 259 rubles. drill-screwdriver deck for 799 rubles. kagocel already from the first day of admission , the severity of the symptom of influenza and arvi begins to decrease , regardless of the type of virus, therefore kagocel is a higher antiviral measure, and for the excursion , transfer money to mary, 300 rubles each. still dialing the phone number for manual transfer tinkoff launched the first number scanner in russia . gifts

to loved ones on yandex.market with discounts up to 70%. for example, a realme c33 smartphone for 7.99 they say you need to get out of your comfort zone, but how long have you been in it infuriates, spam ends, traffic. look, you can enjoy peace of mind, like a cat on its belly, because on mts messengers work at zero, and with the mts option with a defender , artificial intelligence will save you from spam calls and send a countdown with decryption. connect with qr cat moore. well, a little bit. it's not a business, but to take a credit card and produce more goods. here is the thing. in the center. my business loans and other entrepreneur support measures are at the center of my business for small businesses. do

sore throat hurt tastes. oh, the soup is being prepared by the people, i cook buckwheat and pasta, very tasty roast, fragrant meatballs, ribs, breasts, legs, wings and stewed potatoes. well, soup and a little rose broth for your favorite dishes when the layout is confusing. you just need to decide your father will help proven developers in all new buildings, just to decide nine

nuggets for 69 rubles. kfc when have you already achieved a lot? do not stop 30 years megafon is just the beginning. thank you for being with us, it helps to speed up the withdrawal inflammation and support of pulmonary immunity in tinkoff investments there is a social network of investors with high profitability and earns.

there is a big game on the air and we continue our conversation with the ambassador of the russian federation to the united states anatoly ivanovich antonov antalya ivanovich i will reveal a little secret to our viewers before you became ambassador to the united states and you were also deputy minister of foreign affairs, but most importantly, here for our conversation for the topic that i want to raise you were on for several years as deputy minister of defense. and so i want to ask you about the american contribution to the build-up of weapons in ukraine. because very often in moscow they say that a few dozen, maybe, in the worst case, hundreds and a little tanks matter.

uh, these tanks are unsuitable for e russian conditions , and it will take time, in general, ukrainians learn how to use them, which is far from a gift for any army when you collect tanks from sosenki from different countries with different weapon systems. well, in general , in other words, and here you can what is called spit, and this is to laugh. but speaking with russian military experts. i hear a little different, that firstly they are counting on uh, a serious uh armored fist , which will include not only tanks, but uh systems such as bradley very effective armored personnel carriers, which are called tank killers, what, uh, except this. uh, naturally they want to install new systems,

and heavy weapons are more long-range than those that are at the disposal of the ukrainian army today, and that everyone understands, uh, both in the pentagon and in other american departments in the third forces that did not defeat russia. what is it what is called not the army? victory is not such a task, but he hopes that this can greatly change the dynamics of hostilities and potentially not that so they will invade the crimea and be able to reach what is called sevastopol but that they will be able to extremely complicate living conditions in crimea and make it very, uh, difficult to supply the russian armed forces stationed there, at

least. so i heard about such hopes in washington e. i want to repeat none of the serious people. at least. if i'm not serious people who are going to reach moscow and beyond, but no one and serious military experts. at least those i know i perceive well as competent people. kamennykh does not speak of such a strategic victory, but uh, you yourself understand, we have already talked about the elections, but for biden it would be a very big gift. and if you this fall, just when the company will start, uh, biden, can demonstrate some noticeable positive uh results and take credit for whether i am right, uh, i think that it will not just be some new types of weapons being supplied in minimal quantities symbolic. well , russia should be prepared for the fact that with

american help, with the help of other nato countries , new and serious efforts will be made against russia on the territory of ukraine. and dmitry, it seems to me, we should not have any illusions about policy from the united states of america in the near future, by the way, regardless of whether it will be a or rather, it will definitely be. uh, so that we are, in fact, on the eve of the presidential election race, it is important to emphasize that the united states of america has formed a two-party content. with regard to defeating the strategic defeat of russia, note the words trump threw them a few days ago at one of the campaign rallies. if i'd been in the white house before then with help

strength. i would instantly resolve the situation in ukraine. this is a warning signal that it will and would have happened if the previous administration would have remained in the white house. it seems to me that the americans will gradually increase the supply of weapons to ukrainian territory. they are constantly testing to check public opinion in their country. in fact, they are watching very carefully how we react to these arms deliveries to ukrainian territory, but they do not want to. not allowed in my opinion. uh direct collision between uh, with russia and with the united states of america, they continue their line, and under the slogan that we are not directly involved in this

conflict, but the fact that they will achieve a serious blow to us with the help of ukraine is for sure and they will not stop, therefore my opinion. the most important thing is the success of our armed forces on ukrainian territory, and only, uh, one way out is forward to victory, as it was during the great patriotic war. i think that the zelensky regime would fall instantly if these strings on which it hangs were cut thanks to financial political and military support from western, uh, countries, and first of all, uh, the united states of america , by the way, pay attention a few days ago, uh, the regime decided to get rid of some embezzlers. i have a feeling

that zelensky has decided to spend the americans, who today began to, uh, ask questions about where you spend money. and how accurate is it that the money that the united states of america is allocating today for the fight here, and with russia, e. i i think that, taking into account the new, and the composition of the house of representatives, and possible hitches. in the supply of military aid, but no more aid will continue . uh, strongly opposed to the blind support of ukraine , i would like to ask you, firstly,

do you take it seriously. uh, the desire of these , uh, parliamentarians to somehow change the american approach to ukraine and secondly, they saw in their countries some interest in dialogue with russia, whether with the embassy or with some kind of informal institutions. it's just people who are unhappy with the blind under urban ukraine or they have some broader desire to look at the possibilities of normalization with russia. all these years that i have been working in the united states of america on a full-time basis , i have done everything in order to establish inter-parliamentary ties. between the federal council, and the russian federation and the congress of the united states of america, i always ran into hard rejection of russian initiatives. in this

area, he named only one senator. renda. paula is known to you, which is in my opinion. he looks quite sensibly at the current situation. uh, i think it's a change. uh, in the composition of the lower house of congress does not change anything? it seems to me that today's accusations of the administration of huge billions of pumps. uh, the zelensky regime and weapons. they are more related more related to cross-party parsing. kami no more, so uh, it seems to me that if today the republicans if they were in power, it is absolutely impossible to say that they would stop assisting the zelensky regime. that's what i don't understand. i don’t understand what looks like a lack of some kind of pragmatism and

strategic logic uh in washington well , you uh, i mentioned robert gates uh, a very experienced person and, frankly, far from stupid and talented in many respects. and if you remember, he was one of those people that you said had doubts about the expansion. nato precisely because he was afraid of those very the consequences that we see. today, i also heard a lot about the fact that the main challenge to the united states today is not russia and china. do you know, this expression trap thucydides gromalison, which you know well, speaks about this very eloquently, that in the context of the rise of china and the desire of the united states to maintain its hegemony, the last thing? uh, it seems that america needs to get into a conflict with another

nuclear power, nevertheless. here come experienced people like anthony blinky secretary of state, and jake salons national security adviser, who is well acquainted with all these problems. then there is the issue of nuclear deterrence, which you know very well. but after all, it has always been believed that it is impossible to defeat a nuclear power, that is, it can be defeated in some local local conflict , as the united states was defeated by vietnam in afghanistan . it was considered impossible. and now i hear more and more washington that, in general, there are no red lines, that, in general , everything can be done that the united states is expedient,

that ah, russia is fighting like that in full force, and if she can do something, and for that already does. but no new, but serious effective responses from moscow are not to be expected, and this is in the situation when in russia there is at least a situation of nuclear parity, by the united states. and as it seems to me, even russian superiority in the field of tactical nuclear weapons in europe, here, do i understand correctly that it’s not only the interest in dialogue with russia has disappeared, but the traditional american culture has disappeared. if you want a culture of strategic thinking and traditions, no matter what your views are, no matter how you feel about this or

that state. in general, the people who run the country are expected to think pragmatically, and kohl power, a former secretary of state, was famous for saying that the united states should not get involved in any. well. if they don't know how they will get out of it. that was his famous saying when he was the breaker of that committee of chiefs in the nineties. i don't see any of this in washington right now. is it that a really disappeared or maybe we just don't look carefully enough. it seems to me that the americans. they made an important strategic mistake, they essentially

started a conflict with two nuclear powers or, in simple terms, they are trying to fight on two fronts. you look at the reports that are coming from the pentagon on the central american channels that washington is preparing for a war with china over taiwan, and again. here you mentioned the word red line, and there are no red lines. a and in general, i have a bad idea how the americans will start, uh, direct hostilities. uh, with china for taiwan , while the americans constantly say that they are committed to their policy of one china, as for it is better to go to russia and not judge. about who has what advantages in nuclear weapons. i will refer only to

the latest exchange of information within the framework of strategic offensive arms treaties. it was in september, and there it is clearly clear that we really have deployed warheads and deployed carriers, but parity, and today the americans want to get everything they want quickly, by the way, speaking at our nuclear facility, fill it up to look. what is going on with us there? in order to be even better prepared or with something, in order to more actively pursue their anti-russian policy on ukrainian territory, indeed dmitry, i agree with you that here is the culture of strategic thinking, in the context of the possible prospects for the development of the island of conflict between russia and the united states, in this case, we do not feel here many

times today. i invited our colleagues from the state department and the national security council to sit down for a cup of tea over a cup of coffee and think about what will happen next in 2026, when dsnv expires. here it is very close, but we have nothing that we can offer both our peoples and the international community that could come to replace, and this agreement look at the national security concept that was published. recently there, nothing is said at all in the strategic dialogue with the russian federation, this is an absolutely incomprehensible thesis. it says they are some kind of framework in english , the word is a framework that should come to replace, but tnv ​​what is it? i tried to find out several times. um, i want to get a clearly

intelligible answer to these understandable normal questions. it doesn’t work, moreover , they unequivocally say that we need to negotiate between the administration of the current and the leadership of the russian federation well, excuse me, but what will happen in 2 years, you mentioned, uh, the pre-election period begins in the fall. if all of a sudden, in 2 years , another administration comes to us, why start these negotiations in a new way? you know? here's the work all these years here in washington, i acutely feel the lack of predictability. in the politics of the administration, i want to tell you that regardless of whether it is the republican party in power or the democratic party, and this lack of predictability, but creates, not understanding. eh, the one where it goes in its movement. er, it is a world power with

one of the largest e-nuclear potentials. this is trouble. uh, it’s a disaster that you need to do something first of all, and talk about this topic until the americans are ready for an equal dialogue and until they change their anti-russian policy. i don't think we need to start such a dialogue either. e. well, that's how he is well known. the united states is now accusing russia of refuses. to comply with the conditions in particular refuses to provide the united states with the opportunity of inspection once there is no infection like the united states. they know that russia is not deploying more warheads than russia is allowed under the treaty, what can these americans say to him? uh, the most interesting situation yesterday, january 31, the american

media exploded with the news that the state department accused russia of non-compliance with the treaty on the reduction of strategic offensive arms in a matter of hours published a report, which, by the way , the state department on compliance with this treaty, which previously came out. e, somewhere in april with a big delay, somewhere there were 2-3 pages, but this time there were whole ones. uh, as many as 12 pages are the essence of the current accusations of the american side. we do not allow, as you absolutely correctly said, to conduct an inspection on russian territory, and we are delaying the conduct. e meetings of the bilateral advisory committee the parameters of the activities that are identified are outlined. uh, in dsmv emphasized that the original cause of the freeze inspection activities as well as the holding of a bilateral consultative

commission was covid. and we were forced by both the americans and we not to conduct inspections on russian-american territory, then the situation changed dramatically after the united states of america launched. uh, let me remind you of this anti-russian policy that 13 years ago, when we started to develop this document, the situation in russian-american relations was different, we find it difficult. i remember these negotiations in geneva, we were difficult, but we moved forward effectively, and we worked together over various formulations honed them read. e, that from the first letter to the last point the document is legally binding, and suddenly, a few years after the document came into force, the americans announced. and we deceived you. in fact, the preamble of this treaty is not legally binding on

the united states of america. i remember how we successfully fixed it in our document. uh, a commitment to working towards solidifying new strategic relationships, uh, based on mutual trust openness. uh, we emphasized predictability and cooperation. we laid down a formula in the start, and the indivisibility of security is the formula that washington is so shying away from today, and finally, i will add that in the treaty we fixed that we will pursue a line, or a policy aimed at further reduction of reliance on nuclear weapons dmitry well , what i said today reminded our viewers that there is nothing, the americans have violated these provisions of the treaty, but no one is talking about this. the us uses a very, perverted logic. they proceed from the fact that business, as

usual, cannot be continued in various aspects. but within the framework of the start, this principle can be used and it is necessary to let the americans into our nuclear facilities as soon as possible. listen, they are stuffing. uh, our guys are dying with weapons in ukraine. and we should not pay attention to these circumstances and fully open our e, nuclear arsenals. but it's just not serious. and it is impossible to imagine such a thing. and i want you, i have already said that the americans themselves do not see. what should be replaced? for snv , moreover, you know. this is probably a problem, when the americans e brought out of the account under the contract a hundred strategists. offensive weapons, leading them to the so-called re-equipment for nuclear purposes,

but our experts, our specialists have said 100 times that the procedures that you used for re-equipment are insufficient for us. would like to get uh more information about what happened and whether these lpg can really not be used for nuclear purposes now or to carry nuclear weapons, by the way, the americans have repeatedly in the open press said that as soon as the dsnv ends, they will fix something and again those very strategic access to weapons that cannot be used for nuclear purposes can be used, but for to carry to deliver the required point, and nuclear weapons. and this is very important. uh, united states of america. i mean very disparagingly. these years have dealt with all

russian concerns, and we patiently explained the need to comply from the first e letter to the last dot of all the provisions of this document while, and when we are accused of, uh, violating dsenov. i would like to emphasize and openly say that the russian federation continues to read the treaty to important and useful documents. we still informed the americans that we would adhere to the number of different and qualitative restrictions on strategic offensive weapons fixed in this treaty, to exchange notifications and the corresponding information, we proceed from the fact that the treaty continues to provide predictability in relations between the major e-nuclear powers. now the question arises for you. the normal question is what needs to be done in order for

the treaty to be fully, and to work in full, everything is very simple, you need to change the policy of the anti-russian policy that is being pursued now. uh, the united states of america must give up the desire to defeat or inflict a strategic defeat on the russian federation and then we will be, uh, ready for a constructive look at the american offers. prior to this, any advances on our part would probably be wrong. thank you very much. we're leaving for the commercial and will be back in a few minutes. they say you need to get out of your comfort zone, but how long have you been in it for a month bam ends traffic. look, you can

enjoy peace of mind, like a cat's bellies, because mts messengers work at zero, and with the mts option, the artificial intelligence defender will save you from spam calls and send a decrypted report. connect with qr cat. thirteenth to 20 february and one more in march smartphone flow for 5.99 rubles. harten tv for 6.99 rubles. a set of towels ozone for 599 rubles. do you know that tinkoff investments has a social network for investors millions of people share experiences maxim is a real investor and does not hide how much he earns, and matvey subscribed to maxim and other high-yield investors copy their

transactions and earn as they do install the tinkov investments application and earn the largest in russia social network for investors. he is so alone. choose sovcombank go straight to the point repairs took a loan from sovcombank up to 5 million. and now you are already spontaneous from the color of the wallpaper in children's loans from sovcombank in the branch and online , the plan is done. hello turn on our song. he is the love of my life. buy

a mini station on yandex.market with a discount of 1,000 rubles. every day is a gesture you have enough strength. you take good care of your health. here is aquadetrim vitamin d of the latest generation of strength, supporting the nervous system, immunity , muscles and bones as much as your family needs? how do you love the perfect basket for one of mine basket for 169 rubles at kfc come to magnesium

and you will understand the drinks even on the head from 99.99. can your customers pay for the purchase of a phone? connect the acceptance of payments by qr-code in the tinkoff business application. create a payment code on your phone or terminal in a few seconds. accept payments by qr-code from clients of more than 100 banks. open more for business at tinkoff.ru. receive credits instantly and infinity tinkov, he is such one kagocel from the first day of admission begins to reduce the severity of symptoms of influenza and sars regardless of the type of virus, therefore kagocel is the highest antiviral measure.

m of russia anatoly ivanovich lately, uh, information has appeared in moscow from the embassy of the united states that it is very important for the embassy to get permission to bring more employees, whether it be from the united states, maybe, uh, some amount of uh taking from russia in order to to expand the composition of the consular apparatus and to give faster, and visas to russian citizens who want to visit the united states well on the surface it looks like a noble initiative. well, as i understand it, there is always a key question of reciprocity, what do you think? uh, dmitry, strictly speaking

, we have not heard anything about requests, nor the embassy, ​​and the united states of america in moscow is not the state department, but to hone on increasing the number of diplomats and administrative and technical staff, but the american type of mission. eh, and in general this question is more, of course, about plans. i mean the united states of america with respect to its embassy it was better addressed, of course, to our american, e, colleagues. uh, the americans have only themselves to blame. we have not created any problems for them to increase the number of their diplomats - their diplomatic staff as well as administrative and technical staff, the united states in recent years. uh, russian foreign agencies consistently emasculated. you two are dozens of russian e, diplomats and administrative and technical workers. and

they closed our king consulate you know in seattle san francisco said, uh interference with our elections, even slander in our e, the address has already been opened in washington, however, no one apologized, did not cancel, and the sanctions that were imposed on us in our address and , first of all, no one returned to us the dip property, which was, uh, illegal seized by the united states of america under these conditions, in spite of everything. it is we who are committed to one of our main tasks, and on american soil this is to provide. ak or rendering assistance to our compatriots in difficult political conditions with rampant russophobia of our diplomats. uh, visiting different uh, states, uh, and helping out. uh, the necessary consular assistance to our fellow citizens. right now, by the way, at these hours a group

of our diplomats is in the state of utah, where they came from nevada, our comrades are very much waiting. i have been there for many years, we will do everything to ensure that the russians live. eh, it's better here. and here's the latest update. it's like, i'm doing eyeliner to answer your questions from the side of the connection. actually, in america it was an additional burden. us. there was nothing left for us with a three-year stay in america. how to use the principles of reciprocity that you said and not try. establishing parity is one of our very effective measures, as far as i understand, it has become a ban by the united states. america to hire local personnel and from among russians and citizens of third countries, which make up a significant part of the staff of the american embassy today,

by the way, it is obvious that russian restrictions are not completely carried out by the americans. they try to bypass them only by according to official data, more than 130 so-called administrative workers who are not citizens of the united states of america are working in the american embassy today . in general, the very personnel that is necessary in order to maintain the office and living quarters in good condition. uh, russian emissions, stressed, we do not prevent the arrival in russia in seconded employees pauline state department. americans at any time can exercise this right and

submit their candidatures for work, but in their embassies. this is washington, but not, but russia, but announced when stopping the activities of its consulates general in vladivostok and yekaterinburg regarding the russian diplomatic presence. it is very painful very important and sensitive. uh, questions we, uh, are experiencing the heaviest workload in this part at the end of last year in the united states were forced to leave uh, more than 40, uh, our uh, compatriots of our workers, who were both diplomats and administrative and technical employees by the first of july, several dozen more will leave the united states of america one of these days. uh, dmitry was very helpful to me. i consider a constructive meeting with the new american ambassador or stress, and before leaving we told her about the problems she

is facing. uh, the russian diplomatic missions, here, uh, in america, have made a number of specific proposals. how to make it easier work and americans, and us, uh, diplomas of our diplomats, and in the united states of america, we expect that an american will quickly get used to a new place, and we can continue talking about creating normal conditions. works for our diplomats. thank you. i, too, of course, would like to hope that this will happen, especially because there are really few such areas where there is at least some hint of success, but now uh in washington uh hope for the success of the visit of the secretary of state, and blinkin to beijing and among other things they say

that this visit may be more effective than previous negotiations, because the foreign minister of china is a man who for several years was, uh, the chinese ambassador to washington, and since he was, uh, the chinese ambassador, who are you , apparently it is assumed that he i must have had such a wonderful experience with america that when i return to china he will be, if not about american, then at least more inclined to be flexible in relation to washington when i read this changes a little surprised, because there is still an interview in the magazine were e not so long ago two articles of two words. chinese and russian and russian ambassador, of course you were and both of these articles, well , firstly, the very fact that you could

jointly write articles on key foreign policy issues used to be called speaks for itself. but i also feel like correcting me, if i had the wrong impression, but it seemed to me that, in general, the chinese town of washington a was quite critical of american foreign policy. what really took place? you know, dmitry i succeeded, uh, or we, probably, will have to say, managed to establish very good, friendly , constructive relations with the lord qingan, who was here as an ambassador for some time. we often met, and very frankly exchanged views on various aspects, but strictly speaking, now you remember the meetings. i cannot give you a single example on which or on the issue on

which our positions would differ. i can say my personal impression. i think i won't reveal a big big secret here or i will not cause any damage to the respected minister of foreign affairs, china, in my view, mr. zinkan has become or was, but a smart, talented, literate real.