adam, lives, thank you indeed. our time is up. that meal, it is yours. neil: thank you. he could be the first of many to go. 11.5 million documents on the panama papers. with 72 present or former heads of state or their close buddies and friends, including those in and around vladimir putin with $2 billion in that country about. we are also looking at the fallout from this decision on the corporate inversions. effectively using the president of the united states work in a treasury department to all but make them illegal. many say they can't do that. they are reacting to all of this. looking very dicey with close to 16%. to reincorporate ireland but the tax rate much lower if that goes southbound. pfizer moves up as the choir here.

the inquiry loses all of it done and then some. but the administration has done and the president will outline a stratified away from all the u.s. companies that do business abroad and reincorporate abroad to escape the high taxes here. already some are saying you just can't do this. in order to disincentive as companies are thinking about going abroad, but i could do something like lowering the tax rate here is that they are not tempted to do so. that is another matter. the administration taken light into its own hands and we been up for future president or future administrator down the road to haggle over the details. for now it is put in a very big damper on deals in general, and especially those that involve transactions abroad that will call for reincorporating u.s. companies. this is something on the same day we have ford motor co. want to beef up its operations in mexico.

and trump said go ahead and do that. when they come back to the united states you can imagine how this is going to cut across the political parties on this wisconsin primary day. december riccio on the fallout from all of this. we have not heard from donald trump on the corporate inversions thing. but in a sense, this is the same pitch he's been making that is the white house pitch. it's got to stop. what do you think. >> that's right. it is really resonating with his base. these trade deals have not helped them. it hurt their economies in certain states or they rely on car dealerships and the car plants for jobs. i think it is a good line for trump to talk about trying to keep the tax dollars here. it is definitely not what the republican party is talking about bringing tax dollars back to the united states.

they want to reform the tax code in a way that keeps the companies from thinking about corporate inversions. they wanted lower the corporate tax rate and i've come up with ideas to bring companies back here with a one-time penalty and keep the tax money here. we have the president again taken executive action that he is to try to put his own stamp on this album. whether or not this is going to help trump, will help them with his base. i don't think it will help them broaden his base to expand more conservatives who i think would like to see overall tax reform, not this sort of executive action. if anything to pass the costs on consumers here. neil: you hit the nail on the head unit a lot of these are different examples of the same story. the ford motor company going south of the border to make cars. it's not an inversion at all, but it is taken advantage of cheaper labor they are to get

around baby unions here. the inversion thing is another case of seeking out a lower tax environment. they are joined in this respect good u.s. companies under the gun to find a cheaper alternative anywhere and now potentially in the case of an urchin being penalized for it. you touched on something profound that the out. don't do it. they won't be tempted to have tax rates here are friendly. they are not. >> that's right. republicans feel if they get this trifecta, they get the house, senate and white house. paul ryan told me that he wants to do very early in 2017 to really take a stab at tax reform. a priority and that would be the lower corporate tax rates in a way that keeps companies here and attracts business to the united states. there is also agreement with the white house. where you go from there and how you put together a big deal like

that can't do it now with obama in the white house because they fundamentally disagree on the overall strategy. they need everybody on board. say there was a trump president deeply about what his attitude be about tax reform? he already differs with republicans. he's talking about terrorists. he is talking aboumore taxes. that is going in the opposite direction, but they believe they can work with whoever becomes the nominee with the economic strategy. it will be priority one to forget to try to do as you publicans hope for. >> we are showing you the briefing room at the white house. the president is going to detail exactly what this means. susan touched on the idea of maybe this being part of a broader tax reform message. the simple fact of the matter is we don't have broader tax reform. so then you throw this into the mix and say this is the best we can do. you can imagine republicans won't buy it. there's a mood to mix the

treasury department so congress will have no voice and knowledgebase on the same day as the wisconsin primary. we got that with us right what are your thoughts on this? wisconsin is no stranger to losing jobs abroad even though that is dramatically improved on the last few years. essentially it is the president saying yeah, tax rates are high here, but don't try to do an ayn rand by going elsewhere. what do you make of that? b. macneill, every time i am on your show i encourage the president to date with america to call up the legislators and governor of the great strait of wisconsin and ask for advice. what we've done in wisconsin is keep jobs. today you go on are totally free job search website. 88,000 open jobs because we have listened to our small business owners that are large come names, job creators alike and

we've instituted tax policies that have made it a great and to do business here in wisconsin. neil: you could do it at the state level. these are international companies pushed away. they are going to try to do this and they would love to her contact reform. i think you would agree that it's unlikely in the obama administration. you make me feel than the companies that might be thinking of them. when you think about? >> this is a government takeover of our economy as opposed to empowering the people of america to run our economy. this is scary stuff. what we need to do right now is how politicians in washington d.c. look at themselves in the mirror and wonder if they are perhaps a part of the problem when it comes to companies making decisions to headquarter elsewhere. if we did lower corporate tax rate, and the way they see some

governors of democrat states actually suggest they do right now, we might not be having this conversation. johnson controls, milwaukee-based company had to make a tough decision a few weeks ago. hillary clinton was out here trying to film a tv ad. batted johnson controls got out of of his desk and what outside to chase her down and explain to her exactly what was happening and what was behind the decision making. she sped away before she could even listen to the american companies having to make this terrible decisions. neil: it's not only democrats and hillary clinton. i raise that because as he knows well, ford has decided to invest $1.6 billion to build small compact cars in mexico. donald trump is already said that wouldn't fly with him if he became president and those cars sold back in the united states he would slap a tax on them.

what do you think of his respond to that? he hasn't specifically responded. >> i haven't read donald trump's response to it. i have very deep concerns on the president steps in and says we are going to avoid talking about this and congress completely and the president takes one by executive action. neil: had been against inversion sounds very much joint president. >> what we need to do is empower americans here and not empower the president of the united states to go around commerce one more time. neil: donald trump is taking the populist approach that is very much like barack obama's. these guys tried to do -- to go abroad south of the border. that wouldn't fly with them

anymore than i would fly with iraq obama. what are you thinking? >> what i think about that is donald trump is trying to populist argument. i think there's another side of the populist argument. if the populist argument is where pro-american jobs, it's going to be tough to find any member of the electorate that says i'm against american jobs. everyone wants more jobs. everyone wants more opportunities. this is a matter of looking in the mirror looking in american determining whether a politician is a part of the problem and i think they are. or whether this is just corporate america's problem. everyone needs to be at the table and everyone needs to be a part of the solution including the american worker who is what we are talking about in this 2016 election, what this primary is all about. a new poll came out with the help of the national alliance of manufacturers talks about the fact manufacturing is incredibly

valuable right here in wisconsin, but also countrywide. this is a conversation of him attack we need to have is a country about how much we value the american worker and how much we are going to do in order to keep job creators here in america. neil: well put botanic governor. thank you very much, lieutenant governor. we are waiting to hear from the president of the united states and how it's going to worse this new plan to all but top corporate or martian. the trend of american companies are to change their domicile to cheaper tax haven. ireland is very popular. a lot of folks in southeast asia are very popular. included in the plan 150 between pfizer and allergan. the fact this might be torpedoed is tanking the shares that would be. mainly allergan today.

the deal looks increasingly dicey. you can see why it is falling off better than 16%. the head of that, in the oddity of the candidates essentially taking the same i president the united states, how that helps or hurts, i have no idea. i do know that jeff flock is taking an eye on when bernie sanders and hillary clinton because this is exactly what they've been talking about. >> i was going to say it's one big happy family. everybody agrees, apparently. milwaukee, as you can see behind me, big turnout. that is big for bernie sanders. maybe everyone wins here without populist argument. bernie sanders still in town today. hillary clinton long gone. sanders had a breakfast here a short ways away from where we are and milwaukee. listen to what he had to say about turnout and the weather in milwaukee today. >> it is a beautiful day.

we are hoping that here in wisconsin there will be a record-breaking turnout. people come out to vote in large numbers. we are going to do very, very well. neil: bauxite that is what he's getting so far appeared in milwaukee there could be more hillary clinton friendly territory. he may do better in madison and elsewhere. the fundraising number she finally put out her numbers for march yesterday. he's not winning her five of the six plus contest issued that warning had on the delegate count. we are still 17122 mac 1011. after today i don't suspect much change and not because this is proportional in terms of allegations. they will both probably wind up with roughly the same amount. if bernie wins would be six out of the last seven contests won

by the democratic socialists. neil: this is amazing because this is tailor made today. they build cars in mexico. his folks if i understand correctly were getting angry at hillary clinton for wrapping arms around this whole $15 minimum wage saying we were there for us, baby. reporter: stealing our thunder. this is out there. they knew they were going to do it. i talked to joe heinrichs afford to there's no good time to make this announcement. they got today has less impact on the race, but who knows. neil: thank you very much. jeff flock in wisconsin. the democrats and republicans. about a minute or so away from the president to all that made corporate inversion of the legal. the trend on the part of tax find trying to seek shelter there. ireland of late.

steve moore has been talking about this. you are among the first to say they would do this if taxes weren't so darn high. >> as you know, a lot of people probably don't know this. the corporate tax rate in ireland is 12.5%. did you know that? well, we are at 35%. we have about three times higher business tax rate. neil: they say yeah, but companies it that way. i agree with that. they still don't pay anywhere near the 12% either. >> well, here is a point. if you look at the effective tax rates, not just statutory tax rates. neil: of all time. we are going to the president on the inversion. >> the american economy added 250,000 jobs in march. that means that our businesses extend the longest private sector job creation on record. 73 straight months, 14.4 million

new jobs, unemployment about half of what it was six years ago. this progress is due directly to the great and determination and hard work and the fundamental optimist for the american people. as i travel around the country, what always stands out is the fact that the overwhelming majority of folks work hard and they play by the rules. and they deserve to see their hard work rewarded. they also deserve to know that big corporations are playing by a different edit rules. they are the wealthiest among us, aren't able to game the system. that is why i have been pushing for years to eliminate some of the injustices in our taxes done. so i am very pleased the treasury department said no action to prevent more corporations from taking an advantage of one of the most insidious tax full text they are

and fleeing the country. this got some attention and business yesterday but i wanted to make sure that we highlighted the importance of the action and why did what it did. this directly goes up what is called corporate inversion. they are not new. simply put, when small companies change their address to another country in order to getting out of paying their fair share of taxes here at home. as a practical matter they keep most of their business here in the united states because they benefit from american infrastructure and technology in rule of law. they benefit from our research and development and our patents. they benefit from american workers who are the best in the world did they effectively renounced their citizenship. they declared that they are based somewhere else, thereby

getting all the rewards of being an american company for not fulfilling their responsibilities to pay their taxes the way everybody else is supposed to pay them. when a company is exploiting loopholes like this, and makes it harder to invest in the things that will keep america's economy going strong for future generations. to fix the rest of us with the tab and it makes hard-working americans feel like the deck is stacked against them. so this is something i've been pushing for a long time. since i became president we made our tax code fair. we've taken steps to make sure tax laws are in force, including efforts to crack down on offshore evasion. i will say it gets tougher sometimes when the irs is starved for events raised by the congressional appropriation process so there are not enough people to pay attention to the lawyers and accountants are doing all the time. we have continued to emphasize

the importance of basic tax enforcement. and the news over the last couple days, and we've had a reminder in the data coming out of panama that tax avoidance is a big global problem. it is not unique to other countries because frankly there are folks here in america who are taking advantage of the same stuff. a lot of it is legal, but that is exactly the problem. it's not that they are breaking the laws. the laws are so poorly designed that they allow people if they've got enough lawyers and accountants to wiggle out of responsibilities that ordinary citizens are having to abide by. here in the united state there are loopholes that only wealthy individuals and powerful corporations have access to. they have access to offshore account and they are gaming the system. middle-class families are not in the same dish and to do that.

a lot of these loopholes, at the expense of middle-class families because that lost revenue has to be made up somewhere. alternatively, it means that we are not investing as much as we should in schools and making college more affordable, putting people back to work, rebuilding roads, bridges, infrastructure, creating more opportunities for children. so this is important stuff and these new action by the treasury department ill-timed steps the liberties taken to make the system fairer. i want to be clear, while the treasury department actions will make it more difficult and less lucrative for companies to ask what this particular corporate inversion's loophole, only congress can close it for good and only congress can make sure that all the other loopholes that are being taken advantage of our clothes. i have often said the best way

to end this kind of irresponsible behavior is with tax reform that lowers the corporate tax rate, closes with the loopholes, simplifies the tax code for everybody. in recent years, i have put forward a plan repeatedly that would make our tax system more competitive for all businesses including small businesses. so far republicans in congress have yet to act. my hope is that they start getting serious about it. when politicians perpetuate the wealthy at the expense of the middle class, it is not surprising that people feel like they can't get ahead. it is not surprising oftentimes they produce politics that is directed at the frustration. rather than doubling down on policies that let a few big corporations are the wealthiest among us play by their rules, we should keep building an economy where everybody has a fair shot and everybody please are the same rules rather than protect

wasteful tax loopholes for the few at the top, we should be investing more in things like education, job creation and job training. rather than lock in tax breaks for millionaires, and or make it harder to actually enforce existing laws. let's give tax breaks to help working families pay for childcare or for college. but stop rewarding companies shipping jobs overseas and profit overseas. and create jobs here on the corporate citizens. that is how we battled back from the great recession and restore these past seven years. that can be discerned for the next seven decades if you make the right decisions right now. i hope this topic as i'd been introduced in the broader political debate that will be having leading up to election season. and with that, i turn it over to mr. josh earnest.

[inaudible] >> yeah. >> are you concerned that reflects on the ability of the treasury department to be able to see all the financial transactions across the globe and whether that's an just the sanctions regime that you put in place and a bunch of places around the world might not be as strong as you think it is. >> welcome a win of the sanctions regime is strong because iran would, for example, cut a deal to end their nuclear program in the absence of strong section enforcement. but there is no doubt that the problem of global tax avoidance generally is a huge problem. it has been brought up in g-7 meetings. it has been brought up in g20 meetings. there has been some progress made in coordinating between tax authorities of different countries so we can make sure we

are catching him up the most egregious examples. one of the biggest problems we have is a lot of this stuff is legal, not the legal. unless the united states and other countries lead by example and closing them at these loopholes on probation, in many cases you can trace what is taking place, but you can't stop it. there is always going to be some illicit movement of funds around the world, but we should make it easy. we shouldn't make it legal to engage in transactions just to avoid taxes. that is why it is important that the treasury had backed down from them that is different from what happened in panama. the corporate inversion issue is a financial transaction that his

broker among major fortune 500 companies to avoid paying taxes. the basic principle is making sure everybody is paying their fair share and we don't just have a few people able to take advantage of tax provisions. that is something that we really have to pay attention to you. these are all net outflows that could be spent on the pressing need of the united states. the volume that you start seeing when you combine legal tax avoidance with illicit tax avoidance or some of the activities that we are seeing. you know, this is not just billions of dollars. it not hundreds of millions of dollars. estimates are this may be trillions of dollars worldwide and could make a big difference in terms of what we can do here. i'm going to take one more question and then i'm going to turn it over to josh.

>> mr. president, the republican front runner outlined his plan. [inaudible] -- they are already doing damage to u.s. resolutions. >> the answer to that question is yes. i think that i've been very clear earlier that i'm getting questions constantly about some of the lengthier suggestion that are being made. i do have to emphasize that it is not just mr. trump's proposals. i mean, you are also hearing her about mr. cruz's proposals, which in some ways are just as true conan. the implications with respect to ending remittances, many of which by the way our firm legal immigrant and from individuals

who are sending money back to their families are enormous. first of all, they are impractical. they talk about the difficulties they are trying to enforce huge outflows of capital. the notion will track every western union is money being sent to mexico. you know, good luck with that. then, we've got the issue at the implication a mexican economy, which in turn if it is collapsing actually stands for immigrants north as they can't find it in mexico. this is just just one more example of some pain that is not thought through and is primarily put forward for political consumption. as i have tried to emphasize throughout, we've got serious problems here. we've got big issues around the world. people expect the president of the united states and the elected officials in this

country to treat these problems. lay, to put forth policies that have been examined, analyzed, are expected, where unintended consequences are taken into account. they don't expect half-baked notions coming out of the white house. we can't afford that. thank you, guys. neil: you know, that's very interesting. the president shows no interest in going after olivo's, sending money back home because they're not supposed to be here. but it shows a big interest in going after companies that legally take advantage of lower tax rates abroad. a quick footnote to that. but the president announced the department to give it felt more priority to revoke tax advantages for companies already enjoy, especially tax advantages

of the dead on their books. without getting arcane, i want to get to my buddy steve moore what is at play here. he is saying that companies that have the legal right to do what they are doing to stop doing it. even though what they are doing is taking advantage of what is a huge mathematical differential that would preclude them to find cheaper confines with exorbitantly high tax rate here. >> a couple of observations about what president obama just said. first of all, it was kind of an ode to tax reform. he basically said that tax rates are too high and the companies are leaving the united states and we need to fix our tax system. neil: but he posited by saint stop me before i do this again. >> he had the right diagnosis, but the prescription is all wrong.

look, you can build a berlin wall around the united states to prevent companies from leaving. it's not going to happen. capital can move across orders at a click on the computer. what we need to do is bring those tax rates down so companies don't want them. i could name four or five companies. walgreens is talking about leaving. how many have to leave before we realize that tax rates do matter. isn't it a bit hypocritical that liberal state tax rate don't matter. and the same way, why are all these companies leaving. neil: what i found interesting as they were all tied together today, a snide slap of donald trump the cubicles here from sending money to mexico. they are developing today with the resignation of iceland. i link them all this way.

there is an inflection of the environment where people will seek out tax havens. and this is a global epidemic. those involved in the lower tax havens, whether they did anything illegal or not we're seeking out lower tax environments. you don't see any irish investors rented to panama. my point is to raise. it is usually does who are hit hard by taxes. >> absolutely. that was sort of my point. the high tax rates in the united states, most people know that the business tax rate, the effective tax rate is higher in the united states than anywhere else and is leading the exodus of businesses. now what i am talking about -- by the way, the president said would lower the tax rate in front tax base. i looked over the last three of four years and they would make the tax is higher in businesses, not lower. you've got to lower the rate and another thing we have to think about doing.

there's trillions of dollars of money if american companies overseas. and i've are not back? maybe charge 5% tax, bring it back. we tried this at work. bring the money back, collect revenue and create jobs in america. why don't we do that right now? neil: no one knows if we don't have a reason. thank you. stay well my friend. the president of the united states has taken it upon himself your views on the subject. it stops. they can't change those laws. it's a dramatic tax reform. the rules in place to just incentivize any company from even thinking about this. even more than where they were. the shareholder hoping to take advantage of what would've been $150 pairing with the likes of pfizer. this is telling you all you need

to know. you are down and you are out.

hi...i'm pamela yellen. you may have read my bestselling book "the bank on yourself revolution". over the last 25 years, ....

neil: sometimes joined at the hip. it is first financial victims. residing in the way. handling a financially favored transaction. conducted with his business partner, later wife.

taking advantage of much lower tax rates. he really did not spell out that association. bottom line, he is out of their. this is parts with a bigger problem globally. companies are trying to escape high taxes by doing a variety of creative things. they are not illegal, but they can be taking advantage of the law. the company will seek out small arrivals. scoop them up, incorporate the small arrivals companies. pfizer and our again in ireland. the company's whole base. the combined high tax rates. probably in the mid- 20s when all is said and done. a big savings there. rising on the growing belief of the media deal. done.

ohio senator joining me right now. the president doing this from the white house. the treasury issuing rules. this is your job. congress' job. the president just say you are not doing your job, so i have to do it for you. >> you talked about the pharmaceutical industry. wanting to invert and shy the intended target. they were going to combine the two companies. last time they decided to call it off because of the 80-point rule on the shareholders. coming to the united states. bought four major pharmaceutical companies in the last 14 months. the last one was a $32 billion acquisition. the problem is we have a tax code that makes no sense.

it is deriving investment and jobs overseas. you have to get the rate down. increasing taxes on the u.s. worker which is really what this is about. this is about the worker. this is not about the companies. we have to reform the tax code. neil: making efforts to get it again. it never seems to happen. what seems to be problematic for your party, senator, i know you are back for john kasich. the front runner, donald trump, large emitters the position of the president on this matter. he does not much flip over for investing one half going in dollars to mexico to build small cars. slap a tax on those vehicles when they are shipped here.

is he out of sync with the party, is the party out of sync with them? >> he talks about a lot of stuff. specifically, talking about the fact, as you know, over $2 trillion locked up overseas that could come back. allowing companies to bring that money back at a much lower rate. neil: can the president do what he is doing? >> oh, yeah. >> all of these deals freeze in the meantime. hillary clinton or bernie sanders. i cannot imagine that will change much. u.s. companies to be, you know, you cannot go there. >> some of these regulatory changes will make a difference, some of them won't. this is how you calculate the 80% u.s. shareholder rule.

you do not include those companies that they have bought in america. these are pretty small things. charles: i agree. they do not make a difference on a $150 billion deal going through. i would not be surprised if later today pfizer announces that the deal is off. >> i don't know. i cannot tell you because i do not know the specifics of the deal. going ahead with the announcement of the deal. it it ends. a provision to it as well. the point is, neil, all of this makes u.s. companies even more of a target. think about it. it just makes a u.s. company even more attractive. we are losing companies right and left.

try to find these days. sam adams is the largest brewery. they have all been taken over by foreign companies. that is a problem. the republican leadership ought to be behind this. the president ought to be behind it. >> yes. he is not reading from the same. >> i do not know that. agreeing it is crazy for us. we will not pull that money overseas. >> is against ford holding cars in mexico. >> you have to fix the tax code. in terms of the tax reform side, making money to for america. neil: thank you very much. >> thank you. take care.

neil: the president of the united states has made it clear. i will have to step in the sandbox and start taking over here. can he do that? when it comes to chasing down illegals that are here sending money back to their families, he is not going to. when it comes to foreign companies that have set up shop here, he is not going to do much on. >> donald trump on these bigger issues with the president. a little toward balance here. big time. after this.

♪ nicole: i have your fox business brief. we have been down over 140 points. we are off the lows of the day today. 17,633 for the dow. expressing some concern about global growth. johnson & johnson. a lifetime high. downtown components. 109 and change. and then there is for rise in. number one on the dow jones industrial average this year. they will now have high-speed wireless service that they are working on. it allows access to audio. video streaming. it even gives you software

updates about your vehicle. right now it is down. number one on the dow for this year. ♪

neil: the president says that it is impractical. sending money back home. just trying to stop that. easier said then done. u.s. corporations from merging with markets overseas.

now, whatever. going into mixed signals from the white house today. >> i think that interestingly, i think donald trump is probably hurt by barack obama. the rationale for some candidacy is that washington has been a certain way for all of these years. you are seeing all of these businesses fleeing the united states for better tax. sort of a parasite on the u.s. economy. trump makes the case, hey, if we can lock up the border, we have mexico to pay for it. we tried to bring companies back into the united states by lowering the tax rate. that sounds like the polar opposite. >> chasing billions that leave this country illegally. that is very difficult to do.

to do the same with u.s. companies, setting up shop for extending operations overseas, that is very easy. >> the way it would be easy realistically is lowering the tax rates in the united states. you bring the tax rate down even marginally. bringing down a lot more tax for the united states. i think what you are alluding to his right. people will go as rational actors. going in the direction that leads to them making the most money for their shareholders. neil: thank you very, very much.

that is fine. they want to do that. i am president. i will slap a big old tax on them. the populist here. the united states. wanted to be the president of the united states. weird. ♪ ? is it becoming a better professor by being a more adventurous student? is it one day giving your daughter the opportunity she deserves? is it finally witnessing all the artistic wonders of the natural world? whatever your definition of success is, helping you pursue it, is ours. t-i-a-a.

i've got a nice long life ahead. big plans. so when i found out medicare doesn't pay all my medical expenses, i looked at my options. then i got a medicare supplement insurance plan. [ male announcer ] if you're eligible for medicare, you may know it only covers about 80% of your part b medical expenses. the rest is up to you. call now and find out about an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company.

like all standardized medicare supplement insurance plans, it helps pick up some of what medicare doesn't pay. and could save you in out-of-pocket medical costs. to me, relationships matter. i've been with my doctor for 12 years. now i know i'll be able to stick with him. [ male announcer ] with these types of plans, you'll be able to visit any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients. plus, there are no networks, and virtually no referrals needed. so don't wait. call now and request this free decision guide to help you better understand medicare... and which aarp medicare supplement plan might be best for you. there's a wide range to choose from. we love to travel - and there's so much more to see. so we found a plan that can travel with us. anywhere in the country. [ male announcer ] join the millions of people who have already enrolled in the only medicare supplement insurance plans endorsed by aarp, an organization serving

the needs of people 50 and over for generations. remember, all medicare supplement insurance plans help cover what medicare doesn't pay. and could save you in out-of-pocket medical costs. call now to request your free decision guide. and learn more about the kinds of plans that will be here for you now - and down the road. i have a lifetime of experience. so i know how important that is. >> what do corporate in versions and ford siding to offer $1.6 billion plan of mexico have in common? very different. it is being done for is essentially the same reason. whether it is high tax rates, high labor rates, whatever you want to save.

a lot of companies are looking elsewhere. dagen mcdowell on the latest. what are they hoping to do here? dagen: ford has announced publicly and openly. it will spend it on a new plant in central mexico. north of mexico city. more than 2800 jobs will be created in mexico. we should point out a bunch of different things that are going on. many automakers have made investments in recent years. nissan, mazda, vw, 25,000 workers in the u.s. in the last five years. it has a new contract with the uaw. it was higher wage cost. many people look and say it was good for both sides.

spending $9 billion in the united states. creating 8500 jobs. we will move production of smaller cars. why? cheaper labor costs. ford pays eight to $10 an hour more than toyota and other international automakers in this country. >> he said that he would slap taxes on those vehicles when they come back here. >> most of the cars sold here in the united states are assembled here. i cannot even name one car that is 100% american made. when you start talking about terrorists, it is the people that buy these cars. if you slap a tariff on it. this is a union issue. super clear about ford.

neil: the moaning it. it looks bad. just sort of a more or approach to how you do with labor cost. >> i think that probably we need sanity. not just for corporations, but for individuals. that will hit the individual buyer. there has to be some work around that. this is nafta. that is mr. clinton's trade agreement. >> divorcing herself from that agreement did that is a problem a lot of people have with all the candidates. neil: you do quite another. we mention hillary clinton. she is trailing in wisconsin.

it is a make or break. ditto for donald trump. the latest polls have been trailing going into wisconsin. it could go a long way to deciding whether we have a rough convention. or not, for republicans. ♪ there are two billion people

who don't have access to basic banking, but that is changing. at temenos, with the microsoft cloud, we can enable a banker to travel to the most remote locations with nothing but a phone and a tablet. everywhere where there's a phone, you have a bank. now a person is able to start a business, and employ somebody for the first time. the microsoft cloud helped us to bring banking to ten million people in just two years. it's transforming our world.

neil: the reaction last night when they heard that fox business would be covering. villanova. the winning team. just offering a preview of what could happen in cleveland. connell mcshane does know. where we stand. a last-second finish there. connell: i have no idea what you are talking about.

neil: neither do i. [laughter] connell: the pop culture sports references. tonight will be fun and wisconsin. showing things tightening up. a 10-point advantage. let's look at where we are in terms of the delegates. number 700. what does that mean? 500 more delegates being the nominee. 475 for ted cruz. that is a long way to go. not as far as trump kasich has to go. he will not be getting these are many delegates that he needs to secure the nomination. i am comfortable in saying that.

forty-two and was confident. that is winner take all. congressional districts. i think that is a big story on what we will be hearing. on the 19th. of those 95 delegates in new york, 81 are the congressional district level. a real dogfight for delegates. it is betting a lot on wisconsin. getting 21237. >> a political ball bouncing. neil: peter bolton keeping track of these. stepping back.

that is important. >> it is. almost her publican. this could really change the narrative. i want to show you a few counties. milwaukee. those are right in here. you want to go back to the last contest. you will see where romney really swept that area. milwaukee, really going to be important. it is really where the majority of the electorate is. it is expected to go for cruz. the heart of the governor scott walker. we know donald trump has taken him on. governor walker, of course, has outwardly endorsed senator cruz. it will be a very tight race.

it will be completely avoided. cruz has spent a lot of time there. it will make our job a little bit more interesting this morning. you can go in as a voter, neil. the clerks actually do not know which one you use until they count. neil: i would give you a free cheat with each ballot. à-letter process to use. thank you. i am are it is starting early. it is going to be a late night. corporate ab version. tweeted this out. some of the state &. donald trump has had a tough time in your state. a lot of the press.

i do not think he anticipated what happens. >> donald trump was always going to have, in some ways, a difficult road in this state. maybe a little more difficult. he should have been able to do relatively well here. the large number of white working-class voters. discounts that have not seen their incomes rise adjusted for inflation over the past 10 or 15 years. they could have done better in this state. running into a number of problems here. >> he did not have a good staff that alerted him. going to these guys. you avoid that type of environment. there is evidence going into today.

job was narrowing the gap. were you, are you seeing any evidence about. >> a little bit tighter. again, some of that is just a natural balance. if ted cruz loses this one tonight, it would be a lot like the carolinas stamp last night. it would be quite a thing for donald trump to pull off at this point. neil: if you were to lose, it will be close. winner take all. winner take most. maybe all of them coming. he will say he is in good shape.

walking out with no delegates at all. there are a couple congressional districts that may give him six boats. kasich may win second district. so, you know, maybe even all three candidates walking out. i think that cruise has a chance to take large numbers here. making it harder for trump to get the nomination. neil: potentially denied that building. that kind of percentage which would normally get him the delegates. a congressional district. >> we also had this interesting phenomenon. donald trump has started to complain. he is taking my votes. really, the polling does not necessarily suggest that that is

true. it does suggest that maybe in certain parts of the state like the west and north, trump is concerned that he may fail to get those districts. some of the republicans it was confident have interpreted that to me. neil: all right. well put, jason. great catching up with you. charlie gasparino with me right now. he has a lot at stake tonight. charlie: yes. they admitted it. a quote from one of them. the election is over if he wins it was confident. they know that if they do not win here, it is actually defined as a when. trump calms close. pupils almost as many delegates. the political obituary will be for ted cruz.

people would say donald trump goes into friendly territory. guess what, new york and all these other places. the momentum shifts back to him. if ted cruz wins big, and, i will tell you, the cruz people say this. they have internal polls that have them up comparable it. by 10%. somewhere along the lies over the fox news poll is. that holds true tonight. they think they will hold many, many delegates the overall poll shows donald way ahead. getting 40% of the vote or whatever. they think that they can chip away at that. various districts. they think that they can pull out some delegates there. they will hit him with ads. ads in new york. what they are thinking here is

they going to new york. they win big in wisconsin. they have most of the delegates. they hit him with ads. here is what is interesting about new york state. there is one state that has a conservative party. a conservative party in the state. it is very powerful in new york state. what role did new york state conservative party eventually developed back in the 60s by bill buckley. it will be very interesting. they come out and go after donald trump. will he hurt cruz then? >> i think he helps them. he pulls moderate votes away. the kingmaker here.

they come in and say we believe. >> denying cruz winning out. >> you just have to peel off a lot of donald trump delegates. it is interesting. you think it is real rock solid conservative. i know mike long and jeb bush are pretty close. i have seen them together. they supported joe load up. they are powerful. they are powerful in the republican party. >> that alone. not a lot of screaming. i am a happy camper. >> you are. >> i am a happy warrior.

others were applied to you. happy works for me. >> maybe this time, no good. >> you want a pumpkin spice. neil: do not get me going. anticipated by the president. how we will go after corporate aversion. this much i know. giving up some ground right now. why are we making a big deal out of it? more after this. ♪ you both have a

perfect driving record. >>perfect. no tickets. no accidents... >>that is until one of you clips a food truck, ruining your perfect record. >>yup... now, you would think your insurance company would cut you some slack, right?

>>no. your insurance rates go through the roof. your perfect record doesn't get you anything. >>anything. perfect! for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates due to your first accident. and if you do have an accident, our claim centers are available to assist you 24/7. for a free quote, call liberty mutual at switch to liberty mutual and you could save up to $509 call today at see car insurance in a whole new light. liberty mutual insurance. neil: all right. talking about donald trump coming to wisconsin. making america great again.

tweeting a response to his latest corporate aversion. making it tougher for u.s. companies to look abroad and take advantage of lower tax rates elsewhere. bernie sanders loves these new roles. treasury has announced companies from gaining the system of u.s. taxes. a big supporter and socialist here. we love him. >> ben & jerry's. they got me. neil: i want to do this. tax or form. that never happens. he is saying i will start doing that. >> it is a tough one. if we do not get back to the original problem, it is so expensive to do business in this country. people want lower taxes.

everyone watching the show tries to find a way to lower the taxes. trying to figure out their own individual taxes. that is the bigger issue. how do we get that decision to stay here. how do we grow businesses. you know, we keep saying manufacturing went from 12,000 to almost half of that in the last dirty for years. we can under the current tax regime. neil: going back three years. the way you calculate going to set up shop abroad. disallowing a lot of things that have been perfectly legal. they are doing this by the treasury department fiat here at i am told to take his dad. that is scary. >> retroactively. your advisor, would you go through with the deal?

>> i think that i will try to go through with it. it is the money that they save. the president hinted at this. the money that they save. doing all of those things, we are talking about change your. it is a lot of money. neil: can it be disallowed? >> it would be. trying to find some sort of way. >> finding a much smaller company. a fraction of what we are. >> prefer i did not exist. so great to be donald trump. it you are penalized for success. punishing companies for doing well. in many instances, of course, they have no choice. i am telling you, republicans

and democrats start to say enough is enough with respect to the bottom line on corporations. i saw a lot of backlash on ford. so far, conservatives. you know, when republicans start wondering corporate and democrats do, you start to wonder, it is a worrisome problem. it really is. >> it is not exactly a patriotic act. it is not exactly a patriotic fact to hurt shareholders into her thin employees of companies. >> right. it would be a patriotic act to bailout. there has been these sort of behaviors in the past. we cannot handle both ways. we have to think this through. the highest tax rates.

thousands and thousands of more regulations. more fees. then there are things like part of goals in the air. the craziness of this particular administration. though war on business that they have lost. sitting on the cash. trying to wait it out. >> the panama papers. >> i knew it. as soon as i came out, you just knew. actually, those were big bills. >> i do not know. i do not know any from ireland. we will find. ireland. if you are in a low tax haven, you do not need that. >> absolutely not. it is a pretty in-flight business of names criminal to that as well. late to rushing games with

underage kids. some of it has been linked to syria. some of that was funded through that way. neil: it is what it is. thank you, my friend. all right. in the meantime, the prime minister. i will leave it at the prime minister. [laughter] more after this. ♪ ♪ every auto insurance policy has a number. but not every insurance company understands the life behind it. ♪ those who have served our nation have earned the very best service in return. ♪

usaa. we know what it means to serve. get an auto insurance quote and see why 92% of our members plan to stay for life.

♪ >> welcome back. i have your business headlines from coast to coast. much lower than expected for the first quarter of this year. the stock up two and a half percent. delivery gateways are due to a supply shortage. technology additions to that model s suv.

and paypal announcing its canceling plans to open an operation center after state legislation was enacted that invalidates gay interest in writes. they will continue to work with the community in north carolina. the white house condemning north carolina's decision just moments ago as well. meanwhile, ford announcing today it is opening a small car factory in mexico. 2800 jobs. for does not identify which vehicle will be in the plan. donald trump continues to slam the american companies. neil. neil: thank you very much. the prime minister resigning. all sorts of pressure on 72 global leaders that may be under the same sort of fire.

elizabeth mcdonald has all the details. >> the first political figure to step down in the wake of the panama papers revelation. he still remains the head of the progressive party there. around the world trying to contain the fallout from the revelations that numerous public figures were using offshore accounts and the probes therein. we're talking about russia, china, the ukraine. censoring any discussion on websites. uk is the head of david cameron. denying any involvement with textual. his father may have used them to voice taxes. he had made tax avoidance schemes the center of his summit

discussion. turning back to the united states. the department of justice is looking into the dip's closure in these 11 million documents. what we're we are hearing is the potential focus on violations of sanctions. meaning there are a number of countries that the u.s. has lacked listed. those countries and officials of those countries are popping up in the panama papers. thirty-three blacklisted companies so far. we have more than 600 u.s. middlemen potentially doing some kind of work with these blacklisted companies. that is what the authorities are tracking. the concern is that it involves banks and law firms. both foundations and trusts. they all denied any involvement of any untoward activity. tracking the developments here

for you. neil: the president using this panama situation. going after corporate diversions. joined at the tax dodging hip. >> that is interesting. a lot of talk about tax havens and the like. many people are saying that is illegal. the focus of looting of the public coffers by public figures. any conflicts of interest therein. that is why the prime minister stepped down. he essentially had an offshore company. they invested bonds in the banks. this is conflicts of interest. putting down the prime minister of iceland today. neil: no dow that. thank you. the most revealing part of this entire story.

how much money was involved. vladimir putin. inviting some friends. almost $2 million. the immediate question is whether it is a legal offshore haven are not. how did they get $2 billion. how does john case that justifies staying in a race where he even says his best shot is florida at the contested convention. is it? after this. double logo

. .

neil: you always heard john kasich described as third man in the race because he is the third man in the race but so distant ever delegates, only one home contest, state of ohio, donald trump said what is he doing here? then ted cruz is saying what's he doing here? the guy who thinks he knows. former wisconsin governor, kasich reporter, scott maccallum. good to have you. >> neil, good to be here. neil: good man, critics would say, accomplished governor but not resonating with polls. both of his opponents say you are messing it up for us. what do you say? >> first of all pretty good sign when both opponents want you out. if they weren't concerned about him they wouldn't be saying that. this is going to go to convention. first of all, neil, it is going to be very good for year. it will be great theater.

people will see under the covers what is going on in campaigns and at convention but ultimately up to the delegates, some of whom have been elected. others through caucus. others will be freewheeling who they want to vote for at the convention. as i pointed out the person who seems to be one of the most popular, well-liked and clearly least disliked of all five candidates will have a good shot at it, just as abraham lincoln had a number of years ago. neil: but if you think about it, traditional response, kasich folks, including yourself, sir, he fares best against hillary clinton and he does but he is not making any headway within the party because he hasn't. so the better part of valor for him to recognize that and say, the short of a very divided convention it is just not happening? >> well, first of all it is going to be a divided convention. right now, if you play it through the rest of the, through the primary season, donald trump

needs about 2/3 of the delegates that are still outstanding. cruz needs 102% and kasich needs about 125%. both of those over 100% aren't going to get it. should both get out of the race to leave it to donald trump? i'm not sure, you need the majority of the delegates, governor, you're right, in prior conventions would that have been contested? brought us abraham lincoln and brought us garfield, brought us people who came out of nowhere. having said that though, such acrimony and such nastiness, say he were to become the nominee and he was guy who was in third place going into the convention, how do you think that is going to go down? >> i think it will go down very well because what the delegates will look at, not only who is best-liked, who is disliked the least and here's somebody who has not gotten into the nastiness of the campaign. somebody who tried to keep it

above-ground and talked about issues and policy. and someone who has got a record not only as executive but being able to lead people by bringing people together. if he can have the art of bringing people together at the convention, versus somebody who says he is very good at negotiating which he will use those tools to try to bring people together, that's how it will play out. neil: we'll see. but i can imagine a large camps with those other two guys would disagree with you, but again things can change at the convention. you're right. governor, always a pleasure, thank you very, very much. >> neil, thank you. neil: disney's stock is falling because an heir apparent is on his way out i'm telling you this happens all the time. i'm not saying it is a mickey mouse operation but someone's castle is made of sand. basic cable, free, after this. and i'd like to... cut. so i'm gonna take this opportunity to direct. thank you, we'll call you. evening, film noir, smoke, atmosphere...

bob... you're a young farmhand and e*trade is your cow. milk it. e*trade is all about seizing opportunity.

>> good afternoon from the floor of the new york stock exchange. i'm lori rothman with your fox business brief. stocks are selling off on renewed concerns about the pace of interest rate hikes from the federal reserve. managing director of imf christine lagarde expressed more concern about global economic growth. there you have it, as leading indicator, check out the dow transports. they're way off and have been down for a couple of sessions that tells us there may be more losses ahead. check out shares of disney, down 1.8%.

big surprise in the c-suites chief operating officer, heir apparent, thomas staggs over at disney will be leaving the company. valeant pharmaceuticals, look at that top, 10.25%. the stock has been in the news a big warning couple weeks ago. shares down considerably. an accounting review finds no issues. "coast to coast" continues.

neil: all right. looking at disney's stock it is still sinking after yesterday. thomas staggs, some considered to be bob iger's heir apparent is not so what happens now? this routinely comes up at succession time but he is out. what is going on there? dagen is with us. connell mcshane. connell what is going on here? >> i don't know but it is interesting because the timing is coming after business is obviously changing. used to talk about disney, no matter what goes wrong they still have espn and all the revenue coming in from espn. all of a sudden different landscape people are talking about, as we will, streaming football games and live supports is -- [laughter], not exactly the automatic cash cow that they were. so in a changing business, you know, just making assumptions here, maybe tom staggs is not the person to handle the next phase of the business. neil: for months now, actually years, he's been reportedly groomed for this.

>> he has worked there 26 years. neil: theme park part of the business, right? wasn't film, studio part? >> some discussion, bob iger that he came out of, michael eisner, before him, came out of creative side of it that he has been, tom staggs, the chief operating officer since early last year and the reports are that the board looked at the record over the last year, hey, wait a minute. but don't you wonder, throwing it out there, bob iger, if there is a pointed successor who is just sitting there on the sidelines, he is hey, what if i don't want to leave in couple years. neil: you remember this happened with eisner? they had to kind of do the, all right, it is time to go. >> got to get ready here. >> called shoe on your butt out the door. neil: that is not unusual with this company. real quickly, three issues here. we're learning that now that

pfizer is apparently leaning towards abandoning allergan deal coming from reuters in the face of the president cracking down on inversions. what do you think? >> we would expect that listening to some. conversations you had earlier about this idea. all of these things come down to incentives. the reason you do type of deals, incentives put in place -- neil: retool the rules. >> yeah, exactly right. if the rules are being rewritten you rethink. >> why wouldn't you go after corporate tax rate and get rid of regulations? this president has ripped up health industry. got rid of the colbies. nationalized student loans. neil: to their credit, we want to redo taxes. republicans won't work with us on this. they will do this. how will that fly? >> don't like the way it looks. seems like the president is taking it personally somehow.

neil: thank you, guys. confirmation of that, coming from reuters as expected, we posit at the start of the show here, that in this environment it would be uphill battle for pfizer to go through with this deal to relocate to ireland after closing the deal or thought it was closing the deal with allergan but the stock has sped up selling pressure here, that is allergan, as a result. but it looks like pfizer set to abandon this whole thing, just as we said. in the meantime, you know me, finding football on any device that i can -- >> whatever it takes. neil: that or chopped. but, but, on twitter, i didn't know they could do that. >> i didn't know either. apparently -- neil: connell, did you know? two out of three, we're in trouble. >> they inked the deal with the nfl. neil: what do you get with that. >> stream the game. neil: how does it look? like a hostage-taking? >> we haven't done it yet. neil: someone telling me -- >> good lord. neil: ralph, my producer was

telling me that, do have it, highlights of games or whatever? >> sure. use the video. option would be also you could project it on airplay on to your tv too, on the big screen. neil: for god's sakes. >> you're cool with that. don't pretend. >> look at stock? twitter, essentially flat last time. neil: i call up the stocks here, okay. let's look at the stock. all right, dagen. >> it has lost 2/3 of its value in the last year. this deal did buptkus for the stock. question, how much did they even pay for this. >> supposedly 10 million. they can't sell their own advertising on it. that is the problem. essentially rebroadcasting fee already coming in but can't sell their own broadcasting but i think it's a big deal. being broadcast on ncb, cbs and -- >> nfl network. >> and this. live sports was supposed to be where the cord cutters never got

involved. this is one example. talking about disney with the issues they have had with espn. the cord cutting is having an effect on live sports. people who don't have cable subscriptions do want to find a way to watch live sports and leagues and networks are trying to accommodate them now for the first time. because it -- neil: number of young people, maybe you guys are included, they're giving up traditional -- >> young people don't want to watch these sports. yahoo! broadcast the nfl game, bills and jaguars. >> that was in london. >> it was 2.36 million viewers. you know how many people watched the league of legends world championship which is e-sports, videogame competition. it was online. >> game was on tv. too, in other words, wasn't it? >> it was 36 million people watched the league of legends world championship. neil: that will do it, kids. enough. >> who owns twitch tv? amazon.

neil: i knew it. >> good place for us. neil: absolutely. >> 36 million. neil: twitch tv? >> twitch tv. >> don't be making any jokes. >> don't make me say it eight times fast because you don't know where that will take me. neil: there is this thing going on in wisconsin today. i have a feeling this little twitch thing will blow up in everyone's face. more. ou think about success, what does it look like? is it becoming a better professor by being a more adventurous student? is it one day giving your daughter the opportunity she deserves? is it finally witnessing all the artistic wonders of the natural world? whatever your definition of success is, helping you pursue it, is ours. t-i-a-a.

perfect driving record. >>perfect. no tickets. no accidents... >>that is until one of you clips a food truck, ruining your perfect record. >>yup... now, you would think your insurance company would cut you some slack, right? >>no. your insurance rates go through the roof. your perfect record doesn't get you anything. >>anything. perfect! for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates

due to your first accident. and if you do have an accident, our claim centers are available to assist you 24/7. for a free quote, call liberty mutual at switch to liberty mutual and you could save up to $509 call today at see car insurance in a whole new light. liberty mutual insurance.

neil: wisconsin, reince priebus talking about two things that are mutually incompatable these days. for wisconsinites, their party leader isn't exactly helping matters. peter barnes just spoke with mr. priebus. what did you find out, peter? reporter: wisconsin primary,

reince priebus, from wisconsin, hence and interview. after eight months of debates and contests, slugfest between trump, cruz, kasich, possibility of a contested convention, grassroots turmoil, i asked him how he is handling all of this? >> i would say that i'm a check box type of guy. i know what i want to get done today. i know what i think victory is. i think i'm patient. i try to be steady. i try to think about that every day, be patient, open-minded and be steady. i sort of gotten used to you know many cases not being loved by a lot of people and some cases ignoring the twitter field for a while. >> now he is a former state gop chairman for wisconsin, former general counsel of the rnc. now the longest serving chairman of the party in modern times, in

middle of his third two-year term, neil, that makes him the ultimate insider for a party clamoring for outsiders. but all this experience has given him an intimate knowledge he says makes him comfortable with party and convention rules. that will come in handy in july in cleveland, don't you think. neil: it is thankless task. you're ultimate den mother. boy, it is hurting a lot of very angry cats. thank you very much, peter. more with peter barnes tonight on our wisconsin coverage. meantime wisconsin businessman paul leland, he had it with republican establishment. his own speaker the house, challenging paul ryan. sir, good to have you. obviously you're going up against a giant. other giants have fallen in the past. but what's your message?

>> well, goliath looked like he could obviously couldn't be beaten but david beat him every day of the week. neil: that is true. i understand goliath was a heavy favorite. i want to ask you what message you're sending? a lot of which isites love the fact their congressman is speaker house of and rumored should everything fall out of bed as possible presidential candidate. what do you make of that? >> paul ryan really hasn't represent the people of first district of wisconsin for quite some time. you can really, you can really see that where paul ryan's campaign cash, it comes from outside of this district. 83% came from outside of the district. of that 83%, 65% came in the form of large donations from d.c. and alexandria, virginia. it explains his voting record. neil: doesn't that happen as

some congressman men and women advance, they become national figures? so it is not a surprise a lot of their money and attention comes from national entities? you're saying that won't fly back home? >> no, that doesn't fly. when you're getting large donations from large from d.c. and alexandria firms, that sways your vote. that will sway your vote. honestly he hasn't voted the thoughts and desires of the people of the first district. he is not representing us. neil: what is he not doing and where do you contrast yourself with his position? >> i would say his championing of trans-pacific authority, or trade promotion authority and the the trans-pacific partnership, those plans are, those plans are completely incompatable with the voters of first district. we have a long history of

design, engineering and manufacturing. that plan is terrible. neil: so you would be against those kind of trade deals? >> i'm completely against the trade deals. neil: where else do you differentiate yourself? >> well, on immigration. paul ryan is completely open borders guy. he just went to israel. israel is, not -- neil: why do you say he is open borders guy? he is, he is for reinforcing the border. what is he not saying that you -- >> paul ryan, that border has been, has been, appropriations have been there since 2006. paul ryan put a fence around his house but has not put up a wall. but he has not shopped. shouldn't we know who is coming into our country? paul ryan's omnibus funded every form of refugee immigration settlement program, every possible way that obama was working to get people into this

country, unvetted people i might add. fbi and cia and other agencies -- neil: wait a minute. he fought the president on deportation thing. courts agreed with that. and with speaker ryan. he fought the president on tax hikes for the wealthy and curbing a lot of deductions for all taxpayers. so. he doesn't sound like a complete villain here? >> yeah. paul ryan has funded more and in his time in office, paul ryan, we haven't had a brigitte since two 2007. obama will be the first president to enter be in office two terms and leave with no budget. paul ryan was vaunted as the budget guru. we haven't had a budget. calling him a budget guru. neil: we budgets but budgets have not gone anywhere. we put out calls to mr. ryan. hope spinks eternal that he will join us and what is happeningy with the selloff that is paringa

down a bit after this. that may put you at five times greater risk of stroke - they can pool together in the heart, forming a clot that can break free, and travel upstream to the brain where it can block blood flow and cause a stroke. pradaxa can help stop clots from forming. pradaxa was even proven superior to warfarin at reducing the risk of stroke, in a clinical trial - without the need for regular blood tests. and, in the rare event of an emergency, pradaxa is the only oral blood thinner other than warfarin with a specific reversal treatment to help your body clot normally again. pradaxa is not for people who have had a heart valve replacement. don't stop taking pradaxa without talking to your doctor. stopping increases your risk of stroke or blood clots. ask your doctor if you need to stop pradaxa before any planned medical or dental procedure. pradaxa can cause serious, and sometimes, fatal bleeding. don't take pradaxa if you have abnormal bleeding. and seek immediate medical care for unexpected signs

of bleeding, like unusual bruising. pradaxa may increase your bleeding risk ....

neil: all right. it is weird. it has been almost two hours since the president announced he will go after these corporate diversions. >> it is. we may hear more. thank you so much. voting underway. donald trump gaining in the polls. hillary clinton racing for her sixth loss. i am tricia regan. welcome to the intelligence report. voters are casting their ballot. saving 42 delegates. plus, ms. trump campaigning for her husband. saying this to sean