and a life. how i saved the world. and we will do the best we can with promoting this book. >> you have promotion fatigue. you slammed your own book down. >> jesse: i'm tired of talking about myself. that is how tired i am, imagine that. sorry, everybody. thank you for watching "fox news primetime." i'm jesse watters and i will be back tomorrow at 7:00. tucker carlson is up next. ♪ ♪ >> tucker: good evening and welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." a few weeks ago a driver for a chartered bus company reached out to reporters at fox 17 nashville. told not to speak to the media, but she did it anyway, why? what she was seeing every day on the job was so strange so without precedent 20 year career as a driver, that she felt she had to tell the public about it. starting this april, the bus

driver said, government agents began instructing her to pick up busloads of migrant children's foreign nationals from mexico et cetera pier the driver wasn't giving any information beyond that. she was told to take those children deep into the interior of the united states away from the border and do it as quickly as possible "there have been some drop-offs in asheville, chattanooga, couple in atlanta, the driver said." that is as far as i would go. then the children continue on further. another source familiar with what is going on going on topock 17th of foreign nationals take as far away as new york, chicago, miami. but there is a problem. if you are trying to change the population of a country with people who live there finding out the maid is tough to do with buses because packed with illegal minors from without the proper i.d. or be in this country at all, people tend to notice. so the biden administration came up with a different plan "now

they are flying the kids because the buses were easier to videotape going down the highway." ask yourself, by the way, since we are talking about democracy in this country come everything is a threat to democracy. if you change the population of the country without the consent of the people living there with that democracy, doesn't the country belong to the people who live there question work that is what democracy is. what a small number of dialogues to take away from those people and give it to foreign nationals? that would not be foreign democracy. some of the footage holing illegal migrants from back in march and we have a clip for this. >> what is happening most of the time is they are boarding buses and heading into america's heartland. a conveyor belt of commercial and charter buses just like this one and del rio, texas. carrying tens of thousands sight unseen from texas arizona and california borderlands northward and they are dropping their haitian, venezuelan, cuban,

central american family units in florida, in new jersey, tennessee, massachusetts, michigan, north carolina, georgia, kentucky and two large cities in texas such as dallas and houston. >> tucker: how is this not the biggest story in the country? you are changing the population of america without the consent of americans but doing it secretly on a huge scale and no one is noticing? six months after inauguration day, the borders are more open than ever. it tells you everything you need to know about how the biden administration approach is immigration. they will not stop the flow of migrants across the southern border, no. instead, they get those migrants freed transportation to anywhere in the united states they choose. when you knows they are doing it they don't stop but find a different way to do it, a new method of transportation. how is this not invasion? that is exactly what it is. it is being embedded by the biden administration. here are the numbers.

in may of last year, a total of 24,000 people were encountered by authorities at that southern land border and this year the number had risen to 180,000. 108,000 people. that is equivalent to the entire city of chattanooga, tennessee, showing up the southern border every single month. i'm not sure i'm picking data but last april 17000 people showed up at the southern border. this april number was 178,000. it is that kind of increase dramatic to the point that your eyes are popped open every month of this year since joe biden became president. in all, the numbers of illegal immigrants crossing the u.s.-mexico border with the highest level since 2006 with four months still unaccounted. here is what it actually looks like at the rio grande. >> in less than an hour, the smugglers have brought a group of 16 migrants into the united states just in the spot alone. many of them women and children.

border patrol buses can't get down to the river's edge so agents have to put the migrants up to a process area and that is where they are joined by other migrants illegally crossed in the area. it is big business for the huge smugglers to benefit the most from the ongoing border crisis. >> tucker: so that report makes an important point. a lot of people coming over economic migrants from poor countries to alert just welfare state in the world which is our country. why wouldn't they be? they would do the same if they could appear to be shouldn't allow them but you can't blame him for wanting to. but not all of them are good people with obvious human motives like us. some were very bad people. some of them have pre-existing criminal records. according to customs and border protection immigration authorities have arrested 760 illegal migrants since october on the texas border. last year during the same period, they arrested 60 people. so i think 900% increase in the

number of illegal immigrants detained with criminal backgrounds. by the way, that is not all that came here but those are the ones we detained. we should tell you that include sex offenders and gang members. not just drug traffickers and a lot of drug traffickers. in the middle of a drug war right now, everyone. according to texas department of safety just in the last year, for internal seizures at the southern border have search 800% in texas but keep in mind fentanyl is extremely difficult to detect and doesn't take much but odorless and colorless and y easy to smuggle fentanyl and it's easy to do. the o.d. rates in the united states off of the charts and those deaths are being with the drug trade across the southern border. it is killing americans. so this is a disaster and for numbers prove it but according to kamala harris, it is progress. >> to the men and women on the ground every day, i commend all

of them who they have seen so far, they call it progress. we are not exactly where we want to be yet, but extreme progress over the last few months. >> tucker: extreme progress. as the numbers rise and as the biden administration without your permission or knowledge but at your expense move some unknown thousands of people into the interior of the united states with new lives, again of federal programs. not a slam on them put an attack and we should all join on the people making it possible with questions what can we do about it? there is no oversight at all from congress. certainly not from the media. the stakes could not be higher. at this point, there was only one way to stop it. there is only one man who can in his name is greg abbott, the governor of texas. the governor of texas can send the national guard to the border and seal it. it is his border too. 19,000 soldiers in the texas

national guard. as of tonight, we believe greg abbott has deployed 500 of them to the border. why is that? why not seal the border between texas and mexico? california will not do it, it was may or may not. why aren't they? we wanted to ask greg abbott that question but he refused to come on. when the senior official in the state of texas we will talk to him in a minute. we want to begin with someone who is down there firsthand seeing what is happening. one of the few reporters who has covered the open borders. that is -- last night he was in rome at texas and a coyote showed up across the river in a raft. >> we are here in rome at texas and the rio grande is behind me. and coyotes they were bringing over illegal immigrants right here in this spot come a very popular crossing area. there was no border patrol. no highway patrol.

and there are still more people. this is far from the last trip >> tucker: for senior writer at townhall.com and he was at the border and has been there for a while. and we are happy to have him on tonight. julio, think it's much. what are you seeing down there right now? >> basically, tucker, what i told you back in march and i will see it now and probably say it again in a few months and the fact is the crisis is continuing down here. you know, it is very unfortunate that the vice president of el paso, granted has seen a fair share of crisis but rio grande valley is the epicenter for everything because it is a lot easier to cross into the united states. this area el paso sector. last night, we actually came upon the scene while midway through the people peering across. the border patrol was already

onion dated with the people who have crossed before we got to roma. they continue to cross over for another hour and a half. when they were done with their shift, we asked them, hey, the same time tomorrow? and they said yes. this is happening every day. infect the americans that live here aren't willing to border but as you pointed out earlier in the show, they were other things like the increase in drugs that are flowing across that affects americans further up north. the only good thing with harris' trip was to bring attention to the border because the news cycle. this is happening every single day. >> tucker: so you are one reporter with an iphone and a notepad and you are documenting this. you have to wonder where the federal troops? it seems like this is happening and no one is stopping it from happening. >> what i can say, i spent a lot of time with the pilot patrol.

they are part of operation lone star and the border patrol here along with the national guard. but no, they definitely need more resources and that is why governor abbott asked for additional support from other states because, this is a large section. this, again, a lot of people coming across. and it's not being talked about the border of new mexico at the same time this is happening, we are seeing an increase in violence over there and the cartels are getting stronger, emboldened to carry out the mindless acts of violence over there. so we have been advised not to go across from a gallon and inundated with as well. so open borders that we see in today, not just for anybody. >> tucker: it is not just for anybody, julio rose has come appreciate it. well several hundred mostly senior citizens got frustrated with the election results in january and broke the law and

walked to the u.s. capitol building members of congress were so afraid the physical therapy and she says, that they built the wall immediately around their workplace come around the capital. they brought in the army to protect them. meanwhile, our country has no southern border effectively. you just saw that. and no one is doing anything. that is totally fine. too bad. but the question is why isn't the state of texas stopping it? they are a border too and have the national guard. why aren't they shutting it down? the agricultural commissioner of texas, thank you so much for coming on. now, i know these problems are famously complicated but maybe not that complicated. why don't they shut down the border? >> we should and i'm glad he's doing something. we are finally responding. we have been involved for seven years and i'm hoping it's not political theater but we have the basic questions, you know,

his plan. we need to know where does the wall need to be built and how much of it needs to be built? and how do we pay for it, those are four basic questions that have not been answered. i'm glad he's doing something, but we are not doing near enough. the problem i have, tucker is the timeline. when november 4th, 5th, pick a date, january 6th, when legal avenues were closed or even january 20th when biden was sworn in, we knew there would be open borders. aunt six months ago, that is when we should have been doing something down on the border. we have scholl stomach rolled out the razor wire where the wall had not been built. we should have contracted a high surveillance aircraft and we should have got our own drones up in there to see where the surge is coming from. once the surgery is here, it is too late. we could have been down there on the border when the search got

here and said "look, we don't care what the biden administration says, you're not coming into texas." >> tucker: that is exactly right. most people in texas regardless of political affiliation or ethnicity can appreciate a a country with borders. and actually, protecting our own borders is pressing concern. what is preventing governor abbott who wants to be reelected, hopes to imagine but i think he does. why isn't he sending them in tonight? what is the answer? >> he's only one that can answer that question honestly. i don't know why he doesn't. i don't have the answer. i am glad to see president trump coming back to texas. he is welcome here. he will be well received in the border communities there. they love him down there. he won a lot of those counties and cities in the last election and never carried by a republican before. >> tucker: that is right. >> welcome back mr. president. >> tucker: because of the

border. mr. sid miller i appreciate you coming on tonight. think it's much. >> in a time, tucker god bless. >> tucker: we have heard for years and seen evidence that the nsa charter to spy on foreign countries by surveilling our adversaries has been turning its power on america. but on sunday, that was confirmed for us because we found out exclusively that the nsa has been reading our emails, my emails from my personal email account. we just got off the phone with a very intense conversation with nsa officials about 22 minutes ago. we will tell you what they are saying about it next. ♪ ♪

do you have a life insurance policy you no longer need? now you can sell your policy, even a term policy, for an immediate cash payment. we thought we had planned carefully for our retirement. but we quickly realized that we needed a way to supplement our income. if you have one hundred thousand dollars or more of life insurance you may qualify to sell your policy. don't cancel or let your policy lapse without finding out what it's worth. visit conventrydirect.com to

find out if you policy qualifies. or call the number on your screen. coventry direct, redefining insurance. ♪ ♪ look, if your wireless carrier was a guy you'd leave him tomorrow. not very flexible. not great at saving. you deserve better... xfinity mobile. now they have unlimited for just $30 a month... $30. and they're number one in customer satisfaction. his number... delete it. i'm deleting it. so, break free from the big three. xfinity internet customers, switch to xfinity mobile and get unlimited with 5g included for $30 on the nations fastest, most reliable network.

♪ ♪ >> tucker: last night we told you about biden administration efforts to monitor and intimidate for show. on sunday we heard from a whistle-blower within the u.s. government, someone with direct knowledge who want us the nsa was reading electronic communications, emails and texts and planning to leak them selectively in an effort to hurt us. this person has details from my emails no one outside of the recipient could have known so it was not a delusion. it was entirely real. in fact, it was confirmed. after the show last night after we announced it come other news

organization acted if totally normal for a heavily agency to spy on journalist. it is no big deal, stop whining. but it is a big deal. it is completely wrong, not to mention illegal. this is hardly the first time for so-called intelligence community has done something like this. they have done an awful lot of it, look it up. if they continue to do it, it is the hand of democracy and democracy cannot function with highly politicized intel agencies. it is really dangerous. for instance the biden administration ignored the story. they did not deny the story. they can't. they know what is true. today the president was asked about on air force one. here is the exchange. >> tucker carlson said the nsa is spying on him. is the administration aware of any listening efforts on u.s. citizens by the nsa and tucker carlson is one of them? >> well, the nsa as you are well aware and everyone is aware and

everyone on this plane is aware is entities that focus on foreign threats and individuals who are attempting to do us harm on foreign soil. so that is their purview, but beyond that, i would point to the intelligence community. >> tucker: her wikipedia entry, ask them here at about here is what you notice, no denial. of course she is right the nsa is chartered to spy on foreigners but not americans. that is a legal purity of the nsa does routinely spy on americans, we don't call it spying but millions of americans and sometimes it doesn't for political reasons and everyone knows this. everyone, including sitting members of the intel community. some of them apparent with their own communications, that is true. and in washington it is considered considered a fine but it is dangerous and wrong. some faceless hack and government spy agency decides that he will hurt you and there is nothing you can do about it?

that could happen to you. and when it does happen, trust us. nbc news will call you a cue in on conspiracies to my conspiracists theorist. we called paul mack is on a directly, the left-wing four-star general who runs the nsa. and refuses to put us through. we are american citizens so we kept trying because it is our right. we got his direct line and tried again. his assistant seemed shocked and someone's email that nsa is reading would dare to call the director himself. shut up, sir, obey so they told us he was not there. then minutes before it airs, they sent us infuriating dishonest formal statement with an entire paragraph of lies written entirely for the benefit of it until lackeys at cnn and msnbc come all those people they hire. aunt weeded out a few minutes ago. now last night on the show, we made a straightforward claim.

nsa has read my private emails without my permission. mack. that is what we said appear at tonight statement from the nsa does not deny that. instead, it comes with this, in part "tucker carlson has never been intelligence target of the agency. okay, glad to know but the question remains, did the biden administration read my personal email? that is the question that we asked directly to nsa officials when we spoke to them about 20 minutes ago in a very heated conversation, did you read my email? and again, they refused to say again and again and refused to explain why they couldn't answer that simple question. we can't tell you and we won't tell you why we can't tell you. my emails. and the message was clear, you can do whatever you want. you we can read personal text, emails and send threats your way to brush you back if we don't like the politics, we can do anything. we are our own country and there

was nothing you can do about it. we are in charge, you are not. orwellian does not describe to it until they experience. it is like living in china. now that the biden administration has tens of millions of patriotic americans the kind that serve with flags in front of their homes and potential domestic terrorist. we will see a whole lot more of this kind of thing. a whole lot more. her meet as a civil rights attorney, harmeet dhillon. and we had a couple of hours ago, my frustration and i'm not surprised at all. it seems to me we should be shocked by this and we have a right to be as american citizens but why can't we find any american find out if some bureaucrat and spy agency is reading your private email. it is a simple question, why can't we know? >> you should be able to find out, took her the reason i'm not surprised the last 20 years since 9/11 i and other civil

libertarians have been screaming about the patriot act and other laws but getting back to 1947, the law said spying may only be on foreign and not on american citizens. i mean, we have the example of james clapper lying to congress about spying on american citizens and gathering millions of pieces of data from a phone call records on all of that. so when you ask why, course it is about military you industrial complex, and justify spying on americans who are focusing on foreigners in the american date of that they call that incidental. so i suspect if you are able because you are a person with a lot of connections. and this is the platform and able to find out more information about this, i think what you will find is that you are being described as incidental. so the gathering of your information will be because they were focusing on somebody else. but i really want to break that down. when you look at the carter page

violation, for example, the lies from the fisa court, does anybody think the national security apparatus was trying to find out carter page's activities and communications? no, the truth is if they can get surveillance on individual, what they are able to do is stop all communications of all of the people who reach out to that person, without any predicate. so that is really where it is at pier that is a huge dragnet. when americans have become scandalized or a member of congress asking questions about this, there have been some reining in of these things, but now the current law is that the phone companies gather this data and they have to store it. but the nsa can go over and asked for shopping a treasure trove of billions of pieces of data anytime they want and decide they can go back to 2018, the nsa had looked at or had access to half a billion records of american communications.

you are one of them, frankly, any important enemy of the state should expect there is some way the nsa could get a hold of somebody near you, get an order or a right to ask questions and all of a sudden they have the information and a bunch of unelected faithful bureaucrats going shopping in your data and talking to the guy next door. the cubicle next door, passing around the office. >> tucker: and then threatening me. and then threatening me which is exactly what they did. so the system you described might work if you had patriotic nonpartisan, nonpolitical duty oriented bureaucrats with cold war. but if you change the focus of the war on terror inward against americans who are disobedient or don't support the regime, by definition, you were going to have corrupt audio logs and partisans using this information against american citizens which, by the way, they help of nbc news and cn mike msnbc, and

totally corrupt news agencies. that is a rep recipe for tierney. >> let me add a couple of things which will not make you sleep better when you go into court and challenge these with civil rights organizations, and the american civil liberties union, cases last for over a decade appear at the night circuit, jewel versus national security, agency and for the last 13 year, bounce back and forth and so if you can prove that you are being spied on which, you know in d.c. mocking you for saving, the government says "welcome at the national security issue and we cannot reveal information. we will not give you information but you usually don't get that far." you can't prove an antidote even if you have a witness like you have. so you have no recourse, no lawsuits against the nsa that have been successful in stopping the american citizens. >> tucker: i hate to be put in

a position but i'm actually not doing anything wrong so if i was, you can be sure, but my concern is that this would be used against tens of millions of americans who have no power whatsoever and rp reclassified as white supremacists and terrorist and bear the brunt of this treatment. here are the questions for the nsa and we will keep pressing them on them on behalf of a lot of people in this country in the record spirit does the nsa have any surveillance product on me or our producers? two, who authorized the retention of that product? these are terms of art. the intel community will understand. what are the minimization procedures for the journalist in this case? you've explained that last one. i think this is a key. the key safety mechanism that is supposed to protect us from partisan lunacy from nakasone and people that what is the minimization procedure? >> they are supposed to do their

best to make sure this screening and filtering it goes into place before the data either give thing the nsa to be used or certainly to other agencies. and what is ironic, the nsa may be a monk a monk that the good guys but they don't like to give it to fbi's in recent years bece fbi blatantly abusing the information that the nsa gives them. in reality, these are self policing agencies, secret agencies, there is no effective oversight and congress were in the executive branch. they run rampant with this information and weaponize it against american citizens. >> tucker: that is exactly right. in fact, nsa official just said to me on the phone "we are carefully overseen by congress." since i lived in washington my whole life i had to laugh because that is a lie. whatever the nsa does, mitch mcconnell is happy with it on the right, and of course, the democrats are more than happy to see politicals hassled by the agencies.

harmeet i appreciate your work on this issue. speaking of civil liberties, the youtube and google center of the most popular podcast in the country. why did they do that? the podcast mentioned a drug in silicon valley and they do not want the public to hear about it. the host of the podcast, by the way, joins us next. ♪ ♪

so many people are overweight now and asking themselves, "why can't i lose weight?" for most, the reason is insulin resistance, and they don't even know they have it. conventional starvation diets don't address insulin resistance. that's why they don't work. now there's golo. golo helps with insulin resistance, getting rid of sugar cravings, helps control stress and emotional eating and losing weight. go to golo.com and see how golo can change your life. that's golo.com. ♪

♪ ♪ >> tucker: an awful lot of people are getting censored right now by the big tech monopolies, but occasionally, you see someone censored and think "this isn't really a free country anymore." that is our reaction to weinstein, a biologist and former professor from evergreen college who came on here four years ago. now he host a great popular podcast "the dark horse podcast" june 5th he discussed the drug

which can and is around the world used to treat and prevent the coronavirus. it is not a crackpot fish tank cleaner but a real drug and physicians prescribe it. this afternoon youtube conform to this show it has blocked from generating ad revenue which is how he makes an living. we have the monetized weinstein's channel and suspended them from the youtube program. youtube said they will not allow any channel to discuss "claims that ivermectin is effective in treatment of prevention of covid." and weinstein joins us tonight. thank you so much for coming on. so tell us my think those that bear the phones of the story, tell us what you think this means and why google would be opposed to talking about ivermectin? it is confusing in some ways. >> it is confusing but to understand it is to consider the

question of what would be ideal from the perspective of the pharmaceutical industry at the moment? it would be ideal if vaccines were recommended for all people your respective of their age, irrespective of whether they already had covid-19 and irrespective of whether they were pregnant. it would be essential that there would be no safe and effective alternative to the vaccine because if there were safe and all ohmic effective the emergency use authorization of the vaccines would evaporate. so i think ultimately, that is at the root. what we see as all of those things that i call ideal and essential are in fact the official position of the cdc which the sector has as a censorship on the social media platforms. >> tucker: it is horrifying and particularly striking you spent your life and science. you are a professor of science, hard science too. so you have concluded from watching carefully in your experience that this really is

being driven by the pharma companies. you hate to think that. >> well, it is a little hard to say but i can say that is the only hypothesis i have heard that explains how her current position on who should be vaccinated and what treatments to be administered. at the moment, it is not acknowledged we have drugs that work on covid-19 so they are not being administered. and that is a medical abomination. the fact is, even if the skeptics were right, and they are not, the evidence is strong that ivermectin works as a prophylactic and a treatment if given early. but even if the skeptics were right and the data was inconclusive because ivermectin is a safe drug you would administer to people who show up with covid rather than sending them home until they are so sick they need to be rescued by a hospital. >> tucker: that is exactly right. and of course, all times to my kinds of early treatment around the world including china where hydro clocks a court can is used

for covid to. last question is this country the only country where that where they wait until they are so sick to be intubated or hospitalized? >> no, there is a battle around the world and what we have seen is local authorities have overridden national authorities to good effect when they have distributed ivermectin and ended the waves of pandemic. unfortunately what we see here is the united states linked to the solution with respect to the issues of covid because the hegemony of the pharmaceutical industry and its capture of our public health agency seems to be so thorough. >> tucker: it is terrifying and if they can censor you, we are in trouble. i think you for coming on tonight, thank you. >> thanks for having me. >> tucker: so if you have been awake at any point i don't know the last 13 months, you may

notice the entire political party to defund the police and that party runs the white house. so the white house not telling us that that ever happened, in fact the other party wanted to defund the police. then certain people and the media a talk show host repeat that as a plausible and true and expect you to buy it. so insulting it is not even real, but we have got the tape. we will be right back. ♪ ♪

[swords clashing] - had enough? - no... arthritis. here. new aspercreme arthritis. full prescription-strength? reduces inflammation? thank the gods. don't thank them too soon. kick pain in the aspercreme. ♪ ♪ >> tucker: so all across the country, cities have decided not to enforce the law and to give criminals free reign over huge parts of their territory. chicago, for example told police officers not to chase criminals. and also releasing people from jail, real criminals from jail all the time, constantly. the results, so for this year 1500 people have been shot in chicago. this weekend alone, there were dozens, dozens more shooting victims in chicago. >> it has been a violent weekend in chicago at police headquarters. at least 63 people shot over the

weekend. three fatalities and last night, there were two mass shootings and 17 people worship struck in those two separate incidents. >> tucker: so in chicago mass shooting means a gang shooting and almost shootings in chicago working shootings. they have been virtually every night. the mayor of chicago lori lightfoot actually said homicides introduced in chicago pretty uncommon. >> the many residents in chicago feel the loss of control, now it appears as though you have lost control of the chicago city council. do you owe an apology for the victims of violent crime, thousands of unsolved shootings, murders, stabbings, downtown and northside, west side? do you owe these people any apology? >> once again, i ask you -- crime is not out of control in the city. in fact, crime is on the decline.

all of the major industries show a decline in crime and our homicides and our shootings year-over-year are down. that is a fact, sir. >> tucker: well, it's actually not only not a fact, but it is easily checkable. this is not is there life on mars? we are not really sure. these are shootings and murders. keep the closest track of so we know that what she said is the opposite of the truth. this is a very familiar pattern here. when you can't deal with the reality which you created and solely responsible for, you just say it doesn't exist and pretend it is not true. the white house yesterday, joe biden's grumpy little -- actually it was republicans trying to defund the police. really? >> okay. one of the advisor said this weekend, he said "republicans defund the police by not

supporting the american rescue plan." but that argument to be made when the president never mentioned needing money for police to stop a crime wave with the american rescue. >> the president did mention the american rescue plan, the state and local funding supported by the president. a lot of democrats supported and voted for the bill could help ensure local cops kept across the country. as you know, we did not receive a single republican vote. that is used to keep cops on the beat. >> tucker: crimes up as defund the police. one talk show repeated that talking point like it was true and not just like sum total of the crucifixion written in dnc by teenage summer intern, which is essentially what it is. in fact police departments by and large are not owned by the federal government but by you, local tax dollars pay for them. and city councils and city after city 9 out of 10 controlled by

democrats to defund the police. that is just true. you did it. why not just say, it was a mistake. instead, they are telling us unless republicans vote for a $2 trillion spending bill that has nothing to do with whatsoever, then they are responsible for defunding the police and crime rates shooting up. that is what they are saying. some people on television repeat it as if you will believe it like you are a. they must think you are stupid. do they? he watches carefully at the institution and we are happy to have him on tonight. thank you for coming on. i love this technique. he would accuse the other side of precisely what they are doing and never cracked a smile when doing it. >> yeah commit his projection but i don't think it will work, took her because they are a captive of aoc squad and that fe doesn't believe there is a crime wave and if there is a

crime wave the social redistribution. individuals never culpable for committing a crime. he is the victim. he is the victim of social economical forces whose task is to equalize the playing field. that is what progressives have said. notice in all the cases you cite the one thing especially sensitive is property crime. mayor rawlings said we gave space for people to burn. the mayor of minneapolis said, just brick-and-mortar. the d8 in san francisco said "if $950 of crime, who cares?" hannah jones, the architect of the 1619 project said looting is not a crime. what they mean by that, social redistribution and it will continue because these people are victims. if you make a beautiful omelette, it does not matter if the eggs are broken. that is collateral damage, shooting there accidental shooting is okay because we are engaged in a bigger reset. the only reason we are having

this discussion now, tucker they are worried and one to many swing voters in the suburbs who voted for joe biden who is worried, and went to many professional basketball players were robbed. went to many in the inner cities shot and telling black caucus members, hey, wait a minute. they don't know what to do with it because like i said they are prisoners of their own party. they are lashing out with these ridiculous theories sort of like the portal or racial divisions cosmic agenda and they don't care about the individual who suffered appear they are little people. they are exempt and will never be heard by the crime rate. nancy pelosi, dianne feinstein, chuck schumer they have enough influence of power to shield themselves from the ramifications of their own ideology. >> tucker: they have to be required to live in the hood by law. victor davis hansen, thank you for your wisdom is always. >> thank you. >> tucker: we will end the show and when we come back a photograph of a rival network,

some scan come i will say it out loud, some skin and we will show it to you anyway despite the fact it is a family show. we will be right back. ♪ ♪

>> tucker: i want to end on a strong note and by strong rippling steroid enhanced heavily biceps, cheap body building correspondent spent his sundays on most weekends hanging but strangers on social media exchanging with the fastest proportionally mentally ill digital online, a group for chris who omo and another journalist fills the void for actual loved one should be. who almost was talking about himself when a fellow twitter user essentially told him to be quiet, you will break your arm if you keep the crime for which god spoke down, own it. we won't repeat it. how did chris cuomo respond to this? he didn't seem embarrassed. he wasn't. instead, he sent me a picture of that very arm. how this happened, cuomo wrote,

"don't hate, facilitate." to facilitate? what does that mean. we are not sure but it sounds like a pickup point. when chris cuomo asked her to facilitate online, turn off the ipad and get back to dinner with the family. nothing good can happen next. that is it for us tonight from amazing interview with the chinese for all it just who said the coronavirus came from a lab. tucker carlson today tomorrow. we will see you. john sean hannity. >> sean: your president sippy cup joe biden is not doing well yet again. earlier today, struggling yet again with another public event, more of that creepy whispering came back into play, trouble with the teleprompter and, of course, plenty of mass confusion. we will play the little lights coming up here at plus china's puppets and the w.h.o., the world health organization in