be considered, ukraine if i dictate the economic agenda to the eu about the military nato and the senterith determining the interest of the state. unfortunately, sovereign interests will not always coincide. so the weird ones will have to explain them to each other. the general task of diplomacy is, uh, to link mutual interests, and not to decide problems through war, ukraine will also have to voice its desires to other nato members, if they differ in radicalism, the eldest in the alliance, the comrades will be able to explain their fallacy in discussions. well, i’ll say that this brush has already proved itself, firstly, you can put a full stop after your quote. everything is clear, but once again, even at almost 100 years old, he proved himself to be such a liar? yes, in which even lies are always double bottomed. here he is talking about what, uh, means the us will control ukraine or anyone or anyone there. well, now we are talking about ukraine, which means that he thereby, as it were, says that the united states does not control today. you have to accept it. until then, we have no c