lounge, commercially important people lounge. laughter, producer who you will meet in a minute is from new zealand and showed his passport and they said welcome. i'm from the united states, i showed my passport and two policemen said come with me. [laughter] so we walk over here and i had to be fingerprinted. and i've never been fingerprinted. it is an affront to me to give someone like fingerprints but i realize this is reciprocity. this is saving face. if you are in a yacht club and it won't let you dock the boat, the guys in the yacht built can't dr. plug here, white, reciprocity. if you were a senior and going to athens to getting to the museum the more region gets in for free. using why can't i get in for free by guy increase says when our seniors go to norway they go for free but when they come to the united states there is no reciprocity. this is normal but when you are big and strong like us you say get over it but when you were little and battered around these things matter. this is saving face. so there's a lot of savin

it is a very powerful loung carcinogen. osha had never got the rental updating their workplace protection standard which had been based on preventing these holes in people's noses. based on 1920's studies, and osha many people have pushed for osha to an issue a new standard. finally they were sued by the chemical union and the research group and lost in court several times. but, it became clear in the 1990's to the chromium industry that its some point osha is going to strengthen its standards to protect its workers. the environmental protection agency did a study of its factory in baltimore not to learn more about how to protect workers but because this was a public health problem across the board. if people were exposed to chromium, the only way we could learn about it was by studying workers. the challenge to the chromium industry said we may start to have to clean up our factories. they hired some veterans that i call the tobacco works, some of the same scientist to work for tobacco who cut their teeth questioning signs

fly on virgin atlantic, we have our own drive-through check in service and we can get you into our lounge in about four minutes from the time our limousine drops you off at heathrow. and so if you haven't flown virgin atlantic, give us a try and hopefully we'll win you over to heath row. thank you. >> of all the countries where virgin does air transport, which country has the most restrictive laws and regulations?. >> airline industry is a strange industry in that there are still restrictions in -- on a global basis and we have urged for years that why should the airline industry be any different from any other industry? but america has a lot of rerestrictions but in fairness, most countries around the world have a lot of restrictions when it comes to the airline industry. >> you mentioned some of your innovative ideas like the seat back movies and all those sort of things. who thinks these things up? are they in a room somewhere with chocolate and beer and then how do you implement them? >> all the good ideas thought up by myself and -- [laughter] -- and all the bad ideas thought up by p

the dinner lunchroom, whatever, the press louping, he said you ner have enough -- in the press loungehe said you never have enough pitching. what about berken, never being invited to spring training? i don't think he ever -- he jt worked hard, went to double a for the second straight year. and pitched lights out at aaa and god called to the big league because of injuries. >> gary: there he is in the starting rotation, and lookg for his second win. we will talk with his college coach during the ballgame tonight from. santos has not made an appearance prior to not in ths particular series. santos being given a rest hitting .279, four homers and1 rbis for santos. two down, nobody out. 1-2 delivery, and the fastball, inside. not by much. it will go to 2-2. santos having a good june. he's hitting .290 with one hoe run in this month. 2-2 delivery. swung on and missed. tag will be put on, and that's that. these two pitchers starting ot nullifying hitters in a hurry. one, two, three inning for berken. and he gets his third strikt already. this

as i understand it, the pilot had commuted that day from tampa, florida, and had slept in a pilot lounge and there was no record of an accommodation. and that the copilot had flown from seattle to memphis to newark before they flew as -- didn't fly as a pilot but as a passenger, before they flew on the flight that ended up crashing in buffalo. i think the chairman asked a very -- has a grafter that shows the number of commuters commuting into newark and in fly out, and from what i understand it, being with hartsfield atlanta, how many pilots commute to atlanta and then take their flights. should there be some requirements on the time in the air whether you're flying as a passenger to get to the flight that you are going to fly as a pilot or copilot? >> i would make the observation that when we pulled his industry group together, we might want to look at that. i will tell you for my own personal experience, i had over 20 years of lines long and i commuted myself for five of those years. but i took it upon myself to go off the night before and get a good nights rest. now, i was like for a

this event hosted by the authors lounge in washington, d.c. is just over one hour. >> being the least famous of the authors is my privilege to start first. you all know steve, the ubiquitous presence on tv every time i turn on the tv no matter what channel he seems to be on, and art of course probably the best known economist in

a lounging area, a kidee pool. and these guys, they are sitting there -- like the guys said the other night, they were talking about putting people out on an island. if that is spending $200 million in palao, why don't we buy out the wall doffer astoria. it would be cheaper. i think the world is going to look and say, look at how the administration is reacting to this criticism of guantanamo. pulling them out of a state of the art prison which has state of the art rules and state of the art treatment and they're moving them to the tune of $200 million to an island out in the middle nowhere, which, by the way, these guys aren't on the no-fly list. we voted on that two weeks ago to fut them on the no-fly list and the majority killed it in a big way. now what's to prevent them -- we paid $200 million to palao and they get their feet on the ground and on the great white jet wherever they want to go. and they're not under detention. in the bahamas, they have the island. what's to prevent -- the bahamas, you can go on a

crashed as i understand, the pilot had committed that day from tampa florida and had slept in a pilot lounge and there was no record of accommodation. the co-pilot had flown from seattle to memphis, to newark before they flew-- did not flight as a pilot but a passenger before they flew on the flight that ended up crashing in buffalo. .. should there be some requirements on the time in the air whether you're flying as a passenger to get to the polite that you're going to fly as a pilot or a co-pilot. >> we might want to look at that. i will tell you from my own personal experience, i had over 20 years of flying and i commuted myself for five of those years but i took it upon myself to go the night before and get a good night's rest. the professionalism, that's another reason why we're pulling people in. there seems to be some gap. this type of thing doesn't go on at the major carriers and i think the semantics here, we talk about one level of safety. there is, in fact, one standard of safety and that is the federal regulations. however we're seeing them at some levels, people far surpassing t

indispensable part of either the plaintiffs' case or the defendants dissent, then it provides guidance, loung headon guidance as to what standard he should use. now, i think that the good thing about that is it allows cases to go forward, which possibly will be able to be litigated without any use of the state secrets privilege at all or any substitute for it. if however the judge finds that indeed this is a truly a legitimate case for invitation of state secrets privilege, he then has a series of alternatives which i don't think anybody could object to. they have been long used in seep up. there things such as stipulation, summary. it is not classified or secret etc.. the criteria on which makes the decision as to whether it is a state secret is whether or not significant harm is reasonably likely to occur and i think that is one which is in line with some of what i consider the best judging in the past. the government does have the burden of proving the nature of the harm, the likelihood of occurrence and i think this is very important, say one of the two issues that can legitimately be dis