page 97, line 8, after the dollar amount, insert, redeuced by $8 million. page 97, line 15, after the dollar amount, insert, redeuced by $6,500,000. page 97, line 250, after the dollar amount, insert, reduced by $1,500,000. page 98, line 1, after the first and second dollar amounts, insert reduced by $56,285,000. page 100, line 8, after the dollar ament, insert, redeuced by $606,328,000. page 100, line 14, after the dollar amount, insert, reduced by $606,328,000. page 102, line 20, after the dollar amount, insert, reduced by $235 million. page 102, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert, reduced by $235 million. pa 104, line 20, after the dollar amount, insert, reduced by $100 million. page 104, line 21, after the dollar amount, insert, redeuced by $100 million. page 147, line one, 56 the dollar amount, insert, reduced by $200,000. page 147, line 24, after the first dollar amount, insert, reduced by $3,258,000. page 148, line 2, after the dollar amount, insert, reduced by $2508,000. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from massachusetts, do you reserve

when you account for those that are undermed -- underemployed, those that have seen their hours redeuced. we have day that that shows that un-- we have data that show this is a unemployment is longer than it's been, i believe it's the longest been been in 48 years of unemployment and at the same time, it was extended the length of the unemployment benefit we've seen people who are working fewer hours per week system of we have a lot of underemployed that don't qualify yet as unemployed. . this is the experiment of the keynesian of people on steroids, grow government and replace private sector jobs with government jobs and borrow tax dollars and buy goods made in china and borrow money from the chinese to buy them. this doesn't work. you have to produce things that have value and you have to lay out the truth when you do it. i want to go back to this statement i made earlier and just very briefly point out this is section 108 of the legislative reorganization act of 1970 that says this and without reading that language through, it says three days to read a bill or we aren't going to take

when we have the kind of deficit that we have today, this legislation would strike this funding and redeuce the cost of the bill by a commence rath amount. how can any fiscal conservative say we don't want to do that in this year when we're returning a deficit that could reach $2 trillion? i would say it's time and if we can't do it here, where will we do it? with that i reserve the balance of my time. the chair: the gentleman reserves. >> will the gentleman georgia yield? the chair: the gentleman from georgia has 90 seconds. >> very quickly i just wanted to tell the gentleman from georgia that i will join him in urging a no vote on this amendment. mr. kingston: i thank the gentlewoman and i want to say to my friend, number one, i am working on a number of amendments as we have offered in the subcommittee and in the full committee, some were accepted, some were not. i have one that we will be discussing in a few minutes, a $400 million reduction in the spending on this, and i got to say, it kills me to say this just about but i have to hand it to the democrats. in 2006 this bill had $865 mi

300 diplomatic security positions to better protect and secure diplomatic and security personnel, redeucely nearly $700 million funding to regularalize diplomatic operationses in iraq, usaid is a global leader on health and the proposed cuts would hamper their ability to save the lives of hundreds of thousands of people. the proposed cut in this amendment could result in 18.3 million women being without access to voluntary family planning services which could lead to an estimated 5.5 million additional unintended pregnancies. 300,000 additional under 5 deaths per year and 15,000 additional maternal deaths per year and approximately 800,000 people in four high-burden countries going without planned multidrug resistance tuberculosis diagnostic and treatment services. congress must strengthen civilian agencies to respond to foreign policy crises and not cut core programs in our diplomacy and development initiatives as this amendment seeks to do. so i urge my colleagues to vote no on this amendment. i yield back. i reserve the balance. i reserve the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore:

applied to community health centers, nearly 1.3 million people could see their health care services redeuced or eliminated. applied to special education, idea funding would be cut 7% below the twibe level. applied to pell grant, 7.6 million students could see the grants reduced and the maximum pell award cut by approximately $135. apply to liheap, it would reduce the number of households served by over 900,000. applied to senior nutrition, it would eliminate nearly 240 million meals to 2.5 million vulnerable americans. aflide head start, over 50,000 low income children would apried to comprehensive -- would be denied service. applied to the block grant, over 17,000 families would be eliminated, aflide job corps, it would apply a 50% cut to job corps centers. i don't think anybody on this side of the aisle needs to hear a lecture about deficits. i have opposed the bush policies both economic and war policies, which led to the unraveling of the budget, which led to a huge mount of debt and which led to the collapse of the economy. i don't think we need more of that kind of medicine. i urge a n