god whom we wor d to wm weray, kehrtis d wst also that mepe i willot ierso metapeoñal fite rli abte ricis bond being, ich wderful term. >>exactly. it the bd beg. >how do we interact with t or maybe we don't d at theoint. >>e word "act" wldot apply here. nor would the word interact,bee iñtectlrea implies a ality. wee ter - oñe g ac añd the her ac -t at level u ve tceed the domain of ality. the graeu of iam relatn is relation of 99 mes revealed in e koran which g rself tse for example, gods infini merciful. so when we thi of d, we thinkf niteercç. god is thell-good. god is buty. e preme beso a be reflects his be god llower d fo alsoamesich pearegate tos. for exple,otnly g e giver of life, bute's also the ter of life r of dea.not is heerci t helsa so the diviñe names are in whi first of all mental we grasp certain alities ciated with g. but chore that are ke r thrown tos, which we cng to, a which les to god. >isl g is so inefbly trscde beyond bei, yet reveal through the divine mes, so of ich, wl, are ite rthy ybe srch for god too abrahic. after all, isl añd ristiani, as well asaism c abr the