genes were then an iependent creare, whi originally were parasites andhen took over the direction so to botto then a syiosis, a colborative system which both of them worked tether. that seems to me aeasonable poinof view but i don't claim it true. >>ose: what do yothink about the technologs of nanotechnolo? >> there againt's been hype too much. but, clearly, it's very real. we've got a lot of interesting materials that are deepstancy inthe wam way as geneti. rose: stevin hawking tks about e search for the theory of everything. are you interestein rayheory of everything? >> i hope itdoesn't exist itould show that god h been lock wh imagination. >> wait minute, god would be-- >> ros: howo you get your mind around ligion and science? >> well, i thinkhey both are real and they both say sometng about the univse. but they're qoit different. i think of them as two windo through-- you can look at both athe same time. >> rose: d so for scitists who say tohose peoe of fakt, i appreciate your faitbut i can't believe ything thai can't see ahat i can prove. >>ell, that's, course, correct statent