we have many on the rosenberg and greenglass.ne would talk for me, except for one cousin to apologize for everyone else. but it was the same thing. there was a vision that this would be how our family would act even this many years later because i was compounded by it. >> you do remember what i said, right? i don't think you'll make any friends. >> you did. and as i was making the film, one more point i just want to make about making documentaries which in some ways is like writing history, as opposed to writing fiction. i tried to bring elements of what of fiction writer might approach this. and i had major arguments with some of the producers i was working with the felt that i did not have a film unless i got david greenglass on camera, and a site at the other relative to talk to me, and throughout the process of making the film i came up against this regularly, and i kept saying. the story is still profound. it is almost more profound because it shows just how much it has come down through the generations and affected people,

up next, a conversation or between the eldest son of julius rosenberg and his daughter, heidi, directord producer of rare to execution, which focuses on the legacy of her grandparents. this conversation, moderated by david lewis, is about 50 minutes. >> during the federal trial of julius and ethel rosenberg, there was almost a unanimous response from the public to cheer on the attorney general and the justice department's kennedy's 9 to convict the defendants. very little public protests until a newspaper, the national

and went to rosenberg were executed, i was serving in the army in germany. didn't pay that much attention. i had seen something about in stars & stripes. and then i thought that maybe the story that i can use to connect either the fulcrum between the '30s and '60s. so that's how i landed on that case. i didn't know any of these people. i didn't know any of the prosecution. i start to read some transcrip transcripts, newspaper stories. and then i just started to write from the initial point of view. i put about 150 pages. and i read them, you know, that was part of the writing process to get to see what you are doing every once in while. and one day you devote to reading what you have got. and i read this material, and it was awful. i was bored. i fell into great despair. if i could make a story like this boring, i had no business being a writer. i remember i threw the pages across the room. i have never felt a greater moment of desolation in my life. and anger at myself. i put a piece of paper and typewriter. that's overuse of those days people used typewrit

i'm alan rosenberg.u been to the doctor lately because you pulled something or because what used to hurt a little now hurts a lot? well, you're not alone. baby boomers are falling apart, but we can't stop exercising, right, because that's bad for us? and modern medicine can fix anything, right? well, maybe not. here's how one dedicated runner is dealing with the baffling contradictions. my name is john hobby. i'm an attorney in brooklyn, new york, and i'm 50 years old. (man laughs) how does that make you feel? ooold! growing up, i played lots of different sports. i played a lot of basketball. i played baseball and football. for the most part now, i run long distances, usually 2 or 3 times a week, i do some weight training 3 or 4 times a week, and whenever i can, i get out on my bicycle. when i can't get to working out, whether it be weight training, running; i feel bloated, i feel grumpy, and i feel like i'm missing something. there is a sort of broad cultural trend to feeling that you shouldn't be held

my grandson cooper and little rosenberg. [ laughter ] >> jimmy: in check, rosenberg at least, yeah. >be tough. that's tough having to do all that stuff. >> it's going to be someone's bar mitzvah. can you imagine that speech? [ clicking ] [ laughter ] >> jimmy: it's going to go on forever, yeah. "how did you get so rich?" >> yeah, it starts tomorrow night. >> jimmy: i love it. and that's gonna -- mark burnett. >> mark burnett -- >> jimmy: i hope he knows what he's doing. i love that guy. >> he knows what he's doing. 10:00, tv land and -- >> jimmy: it looks so fun. it was your idea or --? >> my idea, but you travel right? >> jimmy: absolutely. >> and when you go to these strange towns and you see in the middle of nowhere there will be a mansion and you go, "who is that person? how did they get so rich?" i mean, i went in indianapolis to a friend's mother's friend's funeral and they put her in a gucci body bag. do you understand how -- so i said, "we've got to do a show on this." >> jimmy: yeah, who are -- >> who are these people? >> jimmy: who are they and how do they get so rich? >> pe

helene rosenberg, thanks for joining us. >> if you get into the cash for clunkers program, you're going to get more than you bargained for. how the government is using this as a trojan horse into your life. next. glenn: this show is a circuit. this is like a carnival. how about iran, iraq? how about afghanistan? it doesn't work. >> you want to come with me? it would be fun. diabetics on medicare. hello, i'm john fox---you may know that i'm a professional bass fisherman. but you may not know that i have diabetes. and it's never slowed me down thanks to the good folks at liberty medical. i've been a liberty medical patient for years and have relied on them for all my diabetic needs. and, if you call now you'll receive a free meter. it's easy to use with fast results. even the shipping is free and medicare may cover the cost of your other supplies. liberty medical keeps you on track by delivering diabetic supplies right to your door. they even take care of the paperwork, file your claims and send you a free meter. call right now and they'll also send you a free diabetic cookbook. diabetes

helene rosenberg, thanks for joining us. >> if you get into the cash for clunkers program, you're going to get more than you bargained for. how the government is using this as a trojan horse into your life. next. glenn: this show is a circuit. this is like a carnival. how about iran, iraq? how about afghanistan? it doesn't work. >> you want to come with me? it would be fun. andrew: this white house is the most technically savvy administration in history. it wants to own your computer when you sign up for cash for clunkers. it wants to monitor your browsing habits with computer cookies. it wants you to report your neighbor if you notice anything fishy. now it wants us to believe that the most recent internet-related story involving third-party healthcare e-mails is another mistake. the white house is pushing programs and bills down our throats and it knows exactly how to use the internet as a means to its end. but americans hike the viewer that provided glenn beck with the cash for clunkers own your computer story, and some journalists are confronting the government, demanding to know ho

it was pulled in later in the rosenberg a decision by justice kennedy, which said you may not exclude a religious publication from a public university, but he distinguished, saying it was not the same because it was government speech. so it is actually trying to create a division between free- speech principles, in which case there is freedom to be selective, and cases in which it is regulating private speech. and other justices are nervous about this doctrine. justice prior and justice souter wrote saying they would not go so far about it, saying it would undermine. but return from free speech to federalism and to talk about the free major federal some cases of the term, three pre-emption cases, and all came out for the states. why is that surprising? is always free statue-specific. he can never know in advance whether someone will be for or against federal pre-emption until you know what the regulation says. but the reason why this is all levels surprising is that it has been banner headline for pre- emption in the last several terms. several notable cases in which the supreme court

th morning joining us from west roxbury, massachusetts is david rosenberg. he owns prime motor group, one of the largest dealerships here in the northeast part of the country. good morning, david. >> good morning, kate. >> let's touch on some of the things that rachel just mentioned. walk us through what this program has been like on the ground at your dealerships. how's it working? okay? >> well, the program's been working tremendously well, we just enjoyed a record month at several of our dealerships, so we're happy with the underlying theory of the program. >> the theory? how about the practice? >> well, in practice, it's very difficult to administer. the dealership that we're in right now, prime honda, we haven't even been able to register for the program yet, yet, we have 75 trade-ins, clunker trade-ins, that we need to process through the system. >> so what's the bottom line here? how many cars at all of your dealerships have you sold on the cash for clunkers program now that you haven't yet gotten reimbursed for? >> through yesterday morning, we had s

david rosenberg was talking about this today. if you look back to october of 2007 and where that ultimately moved down to, that was the start of all this. there's the shanghai, the shares, the local market in china which was also overly inflated in october of 2007 when all the way down and bottomed in october of 2008, but bottomed before everybody else. >> you know, if you think the dollar's going to continue to rise, which i happen to believe. and if you think the commodity will continue, which i also happen to believe. i think we talked about this last week on the halftime report. i'm not sure. shorting brazil, which is the deep end of the pool trade no doubt, but could be an interesting trade, you might want to take that. i happen to think it could go down to 52. >> and last week we were talking about china, the fxi. they look at the fxi 25, we talk about the fxxp. a lot of call activity, a double short of the fxi. people were buying this because this was on the low end, september 10 calls, they bought over 6,000 of those a we

david rosenberg. >> thank you. >> cash for clunkers. we said this yesterday -- >> look, there's no arguing with david. i'm not going to get in the way of that. on the cash for clunkers, i think we've had pent-up demand on the auto side that this is just feeding. we didn't sell cars -- >> pent-up demand? you think people were waiting for -- >> yeah, i do. i think people -- there was no credit and people -- there was a heart attack in this country. people stopped buying cars. i think what we've seen -- it's given them an access point to bring them out. >> i think they needed some major incentive like this to get them in there to buy. clearly this is working to that extent. >> all right. let's move on. >>> next trade, it is time for our "fast money" street fight. last night, rupert murdock announced newscorp will charge for online news properties, which includes the "wall street journal" and the "new york post." joining us with his call, david joyce. david, great to have you with us. what do you say? once you let the genie out of the bottl

my colleague david rosenberg and claudia lockety did this some work where they believe the equity market in the united states is already pricing in 4 1/4% real gdp growth next year, which we think might be quite ambitious. there's better value in other asset classes like investment grade corporate bonds, for example. >> these guys are pretty pessimistic but the dollar rallied on good nude news. that seems to tell a different story. >> it does. and again, whether it's a data report or when we hit zero. specifically, whether the dollar is moving into a new trading strategy, what we're talking about, viewers, is normally, like treasuries, there is a safe haven bet that's gone on in the dollar. good news? well, you don't need the safe haven. so usually, the dollar goes lower. the fact that it was very strong and strengthened after the data this morning may mean, hey, is it going to be back to the days where good news was good news for stocks and the stock in the current referred to as the currency? i don't know if we're there yet, melissa, but it is interesting to watch. we don't want to dow

we have dell cat sandy rosenberg here. you've been here.nity as a heel is coming to. it's important that people say the streets belong to us, that where we work, where we live, where we shot shop and where we play. they don't belong to the bad guys, to the gangs, they belong to us. people need to feel safe in their community and it's our responsibility as government, to police on the front lines to make that the case. and the group is a little bit threarnlg year. instead of just niche comiewp tease it seeks seems like the entire group is tosmght in your role, what do you see about community and police work together for the best. we need to respond to the community and to the police to make sure that if there's a problem that's not being addressed that it is to make sure that the police respond promptly and in an appropriate way. working together, drying to make little problems, prevent them from becoming big problems. have you seen it work? i mean really the, the connection between the too two? we have a northwest citizens patrol in the com

david rosenberg is convinced that michelle and the other children we've met will conquer their fear.a groundbreaking study, he's now looking closely at the mris of children who have ocd. and he can actually see it. it's chemical. it's physiological. >> and we can see it on an mri. >> reporter: the doctors here say they made a major discovery. they know the chemical glutamate is involved in ocd. and in children with ocd, that light switch is broken. >> they never get the all-clear signal. the brain's arousal center is giving it the message that you have to keep checking over and over. >> reporter: doctors now believe the right medication can reset that part of the brain, along with the therapy we're allowed to witness. but would it work for michelle, who actually has to practice going to school, when the halls are empty. >> my heart's beating much faster now. oh, man. i really don't want to do this. >> reporter: and bridget, who tries to touch the mother she hasn't allowed to hug h in months. >> find your center. show her who's boss. do it. do it. do it. just stay with it. just hold o

is it is quite unclear how they will be used throughout the economy, so i'm going to quote nathan rosenbergn his article about experimentation and this will get at the core of my little talk. the freedom toonduct experiments is essential to any society that has a serio commitment to thnological innovation or to improve production efficiency, but the interesting part is the starng point is that there are many things thatúcannot be known in advance or deduced from some first set of principles, only the opportunity to explore alternatives with respect to both technology and to form an size of our organizations can produce socially useful answers to the bewildering array of questions that are continuing occurring in the industrial and industrializing societies. so just as by way of an example, this is an early advertisement from compuserve, circa, the late 1980's and what you see is a couple and the couple are excited about how they sent a bunch of e-mails to their friends and they called it a party and they only had one glass of wine to clean up. and so this is early experimentation, not in br

merrill lynch, god help them, chief economist, david rosenberg, published a series of pamphlets in 2004 and maybe as early as 2003. one of them had a picture of housing bubbles coming up in front of it and he made the case, this is a bubble, in 2004. nobody wanted to correct the bubble. instead the attitude that you did nelly bubble until it burst, he didn't want to second-guess the investors and anyway, it would be easier to clean up the mess afterwards then to try to stop the excessive behavior in the course. i think we have now learned that was it that calculation and i am guessing that chairman bernanke is revisiting it quite aggressively. in fact, i think he said that. but, one of the astonishing things is, on some levels it was perfectly obvious that there was the housing bubble, which meant that this could only end in tears and it was ignored. >> thank you. >> i thank you for the candor in this book. is what makes this analysis i think so compelling for many readers. i have a question not dissimilar from the previous one and it is about future and regulation. in this country when

i am simon rosenberg.. i<÷raven and the team -- i think raven and the team wanted me to set the stage for speaker later tonight, president bill clinton. i was present at the creation of the clinton campaign back in 1990. i would like to think i was present at the creation of netroots nation and a lot of the work that went into creating what we know here today. i was an original member of the clinton campaign back in 1990. i worked in the general election and was aroundi when wassm was really for -- when clintonism was formed. for those of you who do not know, my organization back in 2003 and 2004 was the first mainstream political organization to host a guy ran a small plot in northern california. i had the temerity to flight marcos all the way to washington in the spring of 2004 to speak at his first gathering in washington. in the year that netroots nation was launched, they invited me to write the foreword to their first book called "crashing the gate," which i was honored to do. i have been around from

i am simon rosenberg.raven and the team -- i think raven and the team wanted me to set the stage for speaker later tonight, president bill clinton. i was present at the creation of the clinton campaign back in 1990. i would like to think i was present at the creation of netroots nation and a lot of the work that went into creating what we know here today. i was an original member of the clinton campaign back in 1990. i worked in the general election and was aroundi when wassm was really for -- when clintonism was formed. for those of you who do not know, my organization back in 2003 and 2004 was the first mainstream political organization to host a guy ran a small plot in northern california. i had the temerity to flight marcos all the way to washington in the spring of 2004 to speak at his first gathering in washington. in the year that netroots nation was launched, they invited me to write the foreword to their first book called "crashing the gate," which i was honored to do. i have been around from the

it was pulled in later in the rosenberg a decision by justice kennedy, which said you may not excludeeligious publication from a public university, but he distinguished, saying it was not the same because it was government speech. so it is actually trying to create a division between free- speech principles, in which case there is freedom to be selective, and cases in which it is regulating private speech. and other justices are nervous about this doctrine. justice prior and justice souter wrote saying they would not go so far about it, saying it would undermine. but return from free speech to federalism and to talk about the free major federal some cases of the term, three pre-emption cases, and all came out for the states. why is that surprising? is always free statue-specific. he can never know in advance whether someone will be for or against federal pre-emption until you know what the regulation says. but the reason why this is all levels surprising is that it has been banner headline for pre- emption in the last several terms. s# state statutory and common law remedies pre-empte

>> yeah, we're joined by david rosenberg president of prime auto group, currently owed over 1 millionome up with the money, mike, it's certainly going to be problematic because no one wants to just throw millions of dollars out the window. >> now, david, hold on a minute. how is it possible that they owe awe million dollars? they're not paying. you've sold cars and the government isn't sending you the rebate money? >> as of wednesday, there's been an 85% rejection rate from the nhtsa to every clunker submission. >> what does that mean? >> there's only been-- >> what does that mean. >> they are rejecting it on a variety of different reasons, ranging from dealer issues that quite frankly, the of submarine contractor handling the program is making a lot of mistakes as well. >> so, if i go in and turn my clunker in, i get a new car, then the application, the submission, the claim goes to the government, but i already have the car, right? >> you're already driving the car, the dealer has taken in your clunker, and the dealer has submitted over the internet an application, pa very lengthsy

on there had been soviet spies although most of it started when the soviets were allies and the rosenbergcase, the alger hiss case, all these ople listen to what fed the paranoia and by the time mccarthy started carrying on about it most of this was over. at any rate, the soviet union did have nuclear weapons and they have the power. that was a phrase of thera of mutual assured destruction and that is what we relied on to say keep the peace, because the wo great superpowers, each one had th power to destroy the other so there was a real threat and something to be concern about. we did know what they were going to do and they didn't know exactly, so we got to the peri. some people thought the cold war would never and, but it did. >> what were mccarthy's charges about the army? what effect did they have one invidual army officers and soldiers >> well, i don't know that they had that much-- it was embarrassing. it was kind of vague. there were spies, which was a very sensitive place and tre were charges investigated. the never found a communist or a spy. what it did and many people contested

is it is quite unclear how they will be used throughout the economy, so i'm going to quote nathan rosenbergn his article about experimentation and this will get at the core of my little talk. the freedom to conduct experiments is essential to any society that has a serious commitment to technological innovation or to improve productionfficiency, but the interesting part is the starting point is that there are many things thatúcannot be known in advance or deduced from some first set of principles, only the opportunity to explore alternatives with respect to both technology and to form and size of our organizations can produce socially useful answers to the bewildering array of questions that are continuing occurring in the industrial and industrializing societies. so just as by way of an example, this is an early advertisement from compuserve, circa, the late 1980's and what you see is a couple and the couple are excited about how they sent a bunch of e-mails to their friends and they called it a party and they only had one glass of wine to clean up. and so this is early experimentation, no

merrill lynch, god help them, the north american economist david rosenberg published a series of pamphletsin 2004 and maybe even as early as 2003. one had a picture of a house with bubbles coming up in front of it and he made the case statistically this is a bubble in 2004. .. did nelly bubble until it burst, he didn't want to second-guess the investors and anyway, it would be easier to clean up the mess afterwards then to try to stop the excessive behavior in the course. i think we have now learned that was it that calculation and i am guessing that chairman bernanke is revisiting it quite aggressively. in fact, i think he said that. but, one of the astonishing things is, on some levels it was perfectly obvious that there was the housing bubble, which meant that this could only end in tears and it was ignored. >> thank you. thank you for the candor in the book, that is what makes this so from time for some mayors. i have a question about the future and at about regulation. in this country or to talk about mortgages where basically talk about consumer protection. the sort of ralph nader ai

is it is quite unclear how they will be used throughout the economy, so i'm going to quote nathan rosenbergin his article about experimentation and this will get at the core of my little talk. the freedom to conduct experiments is essential to any society that has a serious commitment to technological innovation or to improve production efficiency, but the interesting part is the starting point is that there are many things thatúcannot be known in advance or deduced from some first set of principles, only the opportunity to explore alternatives with respect to both technology and to form and size of our organizations can produce socially useful answers to the bewildering array of questions that are continuing occurring in the industrial and industrializing societies. so just as by way of an example, this is an early advertisement from compuserve, circa, the late 1980's and what you see is a couple and the couple are excited about how they sent a bunch of e-mails to their friends and they called it a party and they only had one glass of wine to clean up. and so this is early experimentation,