you always have the paul greenbergs. how do you want to respond to them? i decided early on that i was never going to make it a sign of my own success, that i had silenced the critics. i am not out to convert the world. i simply want people to engage in ideas. if they disagree, fine. the other thing that i decided early on, i would be happy if the people that i cared about, the people closest to me, all what i was doing was meaningful. if my mom likes it, if my editor likes it, it might press for an likes it, i am happy. -- if my best friend likes it, i am happy. those are important roles. if you can have some version of that, some kind of system for making sense of criticism, is easier to function. >> he goes on to " joseph epstein. >> that's an odd -- i don't remember reading that. "outliers"is an example of the opposite phenomenon. i was confronting the simple idea of success and said that it was more complex that. it is not simply about talent but it matters what you're you were born. the particulars of the cultures that you grew into, the book is one