it's going to be harder on perl communities and other communities around the country if this goes through because the folks who look at the parts of the bill that we have seen, they have said that one fifth of the hospitals in this country if they're able to keep their doors open will be operating in a significant loss ten years from now. that's not the best future for health health care in our country. but i had a telephone town hall meeting, people from all around the state of wyoming to call in and asking questions and they said what's in the bill? was coming to the senate? we don't know yet. we haven't seen that. and they said when you find out? to come home in a similar town meetings a week and have some input to what we think. but that's what we have to do as a senator. we had to say what's in the bill? let us go home, let us see its cover letter shared with our friends do we know. because right now the american people, what they think of this part of the bill, this 2000 page bill, the american people really believe that this will increase the cost of their own personal care. >> my

but, there is a relationship -- but have read in stock to the richard perle neoconservative vision and he could have torpedoed gorbachev, could have probably could have caused the cold war to continue for a number of years. he didn't do that. and at reykjavik when he met with gorbachev in this extraordinary summit meeting, he violated all of the pieties of the neo conservatism by offering total nuclear disarmament. i'm sure there's some of you here old enough to remember that. to the horror of the handlers reagan went off in a room by himself with a group of interpreters and came out with a big smile they made a deal they were going to have total nuclear disarmament. very quickly all of riggins's people quickly tried to do this and they did successfully on do it because riggins's condition was that he would have to be able to continue to develop the star wars nuclear missile defense system and gorbachev and his generals concluded because they were not thinking big enough this was an american attempt to get a first strike capability. obviously star wars was a fantasy as something to def

at some level, i'm voting for perl, but what questions are they wanting to solve when a walk in on electionday? let's take a look at some of the presidential election candidat candidates. sometimes it's pretty easy to discern the. 2008, which candidate is going to represent the kind of change that i think needs to be embodied in moving this country forward. obama represent more change than hillary did. so obama won the democratic primary. mccain was sort of the anti-bush inside the republican primary. he ended up winning the republican nomination. you will remember, back after the republican convention, mccain was actually ahead during the first of september. at that point in time the public was thinking yeah, i want change but i want a little more stable kind of change. than september 15 came along, lehman brothers collapses, the public says things really are bad. the kind of change i want needs to be more drastic. obama shoots ahead and becomes a heavily democratic. 2004, the first presidential election after 9/11, i submit you voters are asking which president is going to make us more se