one middle conscientious objector who made a difference. but at any rate, i will move on. i will say this not because of our i operate but in the background this is on the base it is a cut officials are within supplies on the back shelf in his libel sinned of plank of plywood basic simple stuff but the point* i want to make that in these situations we had everything we needed. i am asked all the time did anybody not make it because you did not have what you needed? no. we always had what we wanted. , i remember one time we have these little balloons we were cleaning out blood vessels little balloons on the end i said we will run out but i said we need some of these. i just went back and forth to okinawa faster than you can count. we always got what we needed. contrast less with a bunker at case on. labels cramped quarters but if you look around the sides , these are big 12 by 122 make the walls, but the by the, supplies, accrued and elementary but we had what we needed. but if we said bled the chopper crew would come flying in with day container of blood even in that circu

jonathan was a objector who made his way through boot camp in the marine corps and to vietnam. and ended up on one of the hills outside of khe sanh. he kept saying to his senior officers, i'll do anything you want but i'm not going to shoot anybody. and, of course, the marines were not really happy with that response. [laughter] >> at any rate, instead of court martialing somebody said why don't you send him down to finnegan. so he came to charlie med and we made him a litter bearer. now, again you saw the helicopter. -- helicopters. when we first got up to khe sanh and joe and dr. feldman were actually there before me, it was a -- charlie med was a series of tents. sandbags up to about 4, 4 1/2 feet. i always wondered -- i'm going to ask a general some day if you're 6'1" and the sandbags are 4 1/2 feet high, what am i supposed to do with the upper foot of my body -- i never -- no one ever gave me a good answer to that question. at any rate part of the problem was the casualties would come in by chopper. and there was about a 20-yard run from the chopper to charlie med into the

the objector at this point typically makes a further move and it's here that we start edging onto theterrain of disgust. the very recognition of same-sex marriage as on par with traditional marriage says the objector demeans traditional marriage makes it somehow -- sullies it and makes it valuable. what's being said it seems is something like this. if we include in the hall of fame baseball players who got

it was a serious objector of the framers that people participate in the political process, he has said. if people do not, the country cannot work. it is a great honor to have him here when we can participate in this discussion of foreign law and the courts. please join me in welcoming supreme court justice stephen breyer. [applause] >> thank you. that is a very nice introduction. you realize the point is to get you interested in what i am going to say. it is only fair to bow out that once a reviewer got -- to point out that once our reviewer got a hold of my book that this was the review. he said, in alice-in-wonderland alice emerges from the pool of tears with the dormouse. the dormouse reads the history of england. why are you reading that? this is the driest thing i know. [applause] he said, this is before breyer wrote this book. it lets dampen our expectations. it is very nice for me to be here. i associate your founders -- and they were always great diplomats who set the agenda for the next 100 years. there are always walking in the woods, were they not? it is beautiful outside. y

the recognition of same-sex marriage with traditional marriage says the objector the means traditional marriage, mix it somehow less valuable. what is being said it seems is something like this if we include in the hall of fame baseball players who got the records by cheating by using steroids, that contaminates the whole thing, cheapening the achievements of other athletes. in general promiscuous recognition of low-level or mama serious contenders that honor idea that is the sort of argument people are trying to make when they say that the recognition of same-sex marriage defiles traditional marriage. well, how should we evaluate this in six couples are not like the great athletes or cheating athletes were at least no more so than heterosexual couples. they want to get married for reasons similar mary in heterosexuals. north interpol, talk that way. i've never heard even one person say the state's willingness to marry britney spears or o.j. simpson negative amine sent durham heterosexual marriage had somehow local hokies they have the character intentions and the sepulcher negative th

the unintended consequences of the objectors efforts is likely to result in continuing to push market participants to retail, leveraged markets subject to no oversight by the cftc or congress. rather than push market participants offshore, mdx seeks to list and clear contracts in fully regulated and transparent fashion subject to comprehensive cftc oversight and sound risk management principles. mdx thanks the committee for opportunity to participate in this hearing and answer any questions regarding the a proposed product by the mdxdcm. >> chair would like to recognize mr. pisano, president and chief operating officer, interim chief executive officer for motion picture association of america. >> thank you, chairman moran. [inaudible] this is first for me, members of the committee, thank you very much for allowing us to be here today. i'm appearing today on behalf of the six companies that are represented by the motion picture association but also on behalf of a really unprecedented coalition of members of the industry who are traditionally frankly, warring parties. you have present a

but in america, you have so many people whom have been conscientious objectors or people who have refused to fight. but i don't know of a single one in india if there is a war against pakistan or if it is about kashmir, you can count the pimple on your fingers who will object and we are actually now living through a kind of nationalism which has become so painful because whether it is coca-cola or air conditioners or cars mosquito repellent the oil is sold to you back in the national flag. it is a very difficult time now to deal with things and yet as i said there are people in india who understood what is going on a long time ago so there are resistance movement which are very entrenched. what what the government does in indy 500 of their it's like 1947 the minute india became an independent country it became a colonial power, it began to anex land and use military intervention to sort of political trouble. so from 1947 if you look at what it did with its own borders which are marked out by the british, the land, kashmir, panjab, all of these are military interventions and today the way

in america you have so many people who have been conscientious objectors, our people have refused tofight. but i don't know of a single one in india. you know, if there is a war against pakistan, or if it is about cash needs, you can count the people on their fingers who will object. and we're actually now living through a kind of system of nationalism which becomes so painful because, because whether it is coca-cola or air conditioners or cars or mosquito repellent or all sort of soul do you wrap in the national flag. it's a very, very difficult time to do with things. and yet, i mean, as yet as i have said there are people in india who understood what's going on a long time ago. so that our resistance movements which are very, very entrenched. but what the government does there in india, it's like in 1947 them in india became an independent country, it became a colonial power. it began to and ask land and it began to use military interventions to sort out political troubles. so from 1947, if you look at what it did within its own borders, which were marked out by the british, all t

caucus wants to stand with the large wall street financial institutions who are the major, major objectors to this bill going forward. this morning goldman sachs executives testified, including this afternoon, before a senate committee. we all got another chance to understand why they did feel so -- why they feel so deeply wronged by this legislation. as frank rich said in "the new york times" this weekend -- and i quote him -- "something is fundamentally amiss in the financial culture that thrives on products that create nothing and produce nothing except new ways to make bigger bets and stack the deck in favor of the house." end of quote. our prosperity in this country was built on hard work of generations of americans. it was built in the cornfields of nebraska and kansas, engineered in the laboratories of massachusetts, forged in the foundries of chicago and manufactured, if i may say so, in textile plants such as my home state of connecticut. and it's deeply ingrained in the american ethos that in this land of great opportunity you build wealth by creating something: an idea, a produc