>> i would echo everything mr. rusco said but i would also add, based on what i know and i am far from patrolling engineer, but i believe that what is coming sort of to the fore is that things like the well design, and review and approval of that, the actual practices of when to pull the mud and replace it were the kinds of things that, and there are any number of sort of decision points along the way that may have prevented what we're dealing with now, but i don't know that inspectors are the answer to that sort of issue, that there has to be some much more careful review of those kinds of issues. >> not disagreeing. we're talking about restructuring, reorganization, that all is probably necessary but the law said do these inspections, and they were not done, and a bad thing happened, could have been maybe prevented, if, in fact, those inspections had been done. that seems pretty logical to include maybe they'd have caught something if -- they didn't even do their job. >> i think maybe is certainly reasonable. >> if you