the port commission and rincon park and was not july the port commission and rincon park you are fixing it up good for everyone we are going to have a good time will you help us fix it up i hope you will the port commission and rincon park. >> thank you. if there are no other members of the public that like to speak, we can close public comment. move forward with recommendations. without objection. thank you. >> thank you for coming today. we are here to celebrate the passage of the first phase of the mayor's development stimulus legislation, and with that, i would like to just introduce the mayor. m

the port commission and rincon park and was not july the port commission and rincon park you are fixing it up good for everyone we are going to have a good time will you help us fix it up i hope you will the port commission and rincon park. >> thank you. if there are no other members of the public that like to speak, we can close public comment. move forward with recommendations. without objection. thank you. captioned by the national captioning institute --www.ncicap.org-- supervisor campos: good morning. bottom to the july 20 at board of supervisors rules committee. -- welcome to the july 20 board of supervisors will committee. the clerk of the committee is linda wong. covering the meeting for sf tv argonne gardner and kenny alevia. >> please turn off all public -- cellphone and pagers. if you wish to present documents, please provide donna -- copies for the file. >> thank you very much. supervisor campos: please call item no. 1. >> item number one,motion ordering submitted to the voters an ordinance at annovember 2, 2010 establishing the community policing policyprogram and supplanti

costs to the land and development of the park is then in the $5 to $8 million range and there was a hope that there would be impact fees from other high-rises in rincon hill to pay. that park and there's only one of the five or six towers approved for rincon hill and none of the unbuilt projects have paid the impact fees. what this i.f.d. will do will be to allow the land to be bought from caltrans so we don't lose that opportunity and the park to be developed earlier than it would otherwise be developed. that is why the developer of # 33 harrison is willing to pay for the cost of the i.f.d. to get this process moving quickly so that this park can be developed and opened to the public and several years earlier or the land, in fact, didn't get lost because we can't afford to buy it number one. on the c.f.d. also it is a good idea to get this sort of citywide c.f.d. process started. and i was involved there and you can amortize the costs and the substantial cost of developing the district and having a citywide c.f.d. that's smaller project and the much. practical way and the smaller projects to have access with inexpensive money and pays the fees and t

have a fee deferral system to help us deal in that area and i think that that compelling issue in rincon park is a case study in applying this legislation. and what this this is two resolutions and are issues to consider by the study committee when they look at how they draft the final i.f.d.. and i know mr. cohen is gone, but there is a seat for market octavia and as i understood this legislation, it wants to be inclusive of the area plans and not exclusive and to go forward to make it more clear and i understand that but other people may not have. and i understand that rincon makes the perfect pilot as a funding for a study and that is the critical piece missing for eastern neighborhoods and that this pilot with the formation of the study to look at the outcome will better inform a secretary or third pilot and as we have seen, not a lot of development in the area at this time. i go like the fact that the i.f.d. is closing a gap or increasing the structure and the gap is pretty substantial and starts us in that direction and am not worried about the earmarking issue. and i have seen this at

redevelopment agency of the city and county of san francisco for the maintenance and management of rincon park by the port, extending the term of the agreement from june 30, 2010, to june 30, 2013. >> thank you, terry avalos. --chair avalos. the proposed resolution looks at need agreement between the port and redevelopment agency. this is to extend the term from july 1, 2010 to july 30, 2013. this agreement was first executed in 2003 to accomplish the park improvements in the ring, park development plans. under the existing agreement, the port is maintained with maintaining the park. the four phones and the land. the cost is approximately $219,000 annually. we are here because this third amendment extends the terms more than 10 years. we agree with the it budget analyst recommendations to provide for retroactive approval and to change the date of the extension. i am here with david to answer any questions you may have. >> mr. rose, if you could share the report. >> the only thing that i would add, as ms. forms indicated, the estimated cost under this amendment are about $190,000 annually. that

costs to the land and development of the park is then in the $5 to $8 million range and there was a hope that there would be impact fees from other high-rises in rincon hill to pay. that park and there's only one of the five or six towers approved for rincon hill and none of the unbuilt projects have paid the impact fees. what this i.f.d. will do will be to allow the land to be bought from caltrans so we don't lose that opportunity and the park to be developed earlier than it would otherwise be developed. that is why the developer of # 33 harrison is willing to pay for the cost of the i.f.d. to get this process moving quickly sot

examples already exists in the rincon hill development where wide sidewalks can already accommodate a number of amenities, including little pocket parks seating, outdoor seating, etc. the scenario also includes biplanes that connect chinatown to downtown. jackson street has many positive characters all ready and should be improved. second strategy in general for the whole area would be to extend existing streets to the waterfront as pedestrian rights of way. so it would be done at a number of locations throughout the city area, but they include jackson st., image here, and union street -- image pier. the study has numerous recommendations for open space improvements. there is a significant gap in the open space network along the embarcadero. the existing open space is highlighted in orange. seas from sue bierman park in the south until you reach the plaza. we provide -- we suggest five new open spaces that allow for a variety of open space needs. it is worth noting that the commission expressed broad support for every major recommendation in terms of pedestrian connections and open space, and indeed, we have seen a lot of support acro

weeks later, there was another shooting that started in the parking lot outside the club, and after that, we have seen violence at el rincon. there have been other situations south of market. which leads us to where we are right now. when the entertainment commission was looking into clubs way, the deputy city attorney who was advising them told them that they did not have the powers to permanently revoke the license that club swayed had -- club swayed had, and it took hundreds of attorneys to bring a lawsuit to shut the club down, which i thought was appropriate, but i thought many of us believe was appropriate for the injured to a commission or whatever body is responsible for providing permits to be able to take this permits away, said the legislation that i have drafted helps to remedy this situation by adding two additional grounds for the revocation of place of entertainment permits, extended our permits, and onetime event permits. the first is a public safety ground where the operation of the firm poses a substantial risk of harm or injury to individuals. the second round for revocation would be if a public nuisance