these are access to complaints or discipline imposed relevancey. this is relevant to the public, and these things should be disclosed, especially if there are articles, especially about someone involved in a shooting. these are concerns a public safety concern. they commit a crime. because they are police, they are protected mple if i commit a crime, it is put all over the papers p this is ridiculous. this is not right. people can gain access to my criminal record, which i have had an article printed in the alameda times, they have set me up, called up people and the d.a.'s office, and stheeze an assistant d.a. there, it is oh, this is rack tearing. this is obstruction of justice. there should be sunshine placed on these things. we will follow 1045, how it says in any criminal proceedings the conclusion of any officer pursuant to section 83.25 of the penal code facts thought to be so remote to make disclosure of little or no practical benefit, but these are practical benefits to the city. therefore, there should be no closed session. this is -- thi