under proper 1b, $78 million of the uncommitted current bond allocations, uncommitted to any capital program, so 72.3 would be allocated to central subway, leaving under 6,000,004 other programs. that said, under prop 1b, the agency has also allocated $6 million to other projects other than the central subway, like the rehab program, and the metro east facility, geneva canopy project. motor coach rehab, white motor overhaul -- light motor or halt. so there are other producing the prop 1b funding. commissioner campos: so what is the answer to the question, whether or not the use of this money comes to the expense of other projects? is the answer no, is that what i am hearing? >> out of the prop 1b effort, the agency is assigned it capital funding level. central subway is its number-one priority, and with that number one priority, has garnered a lion's share of that. but there are other programs benefiting from prop 1b. commissioner chu: what you are saying, in terms of the $72 million, that does not come from taking it away from another project that has already been allocated. it was

prop1b, there is $78 million left in the program listed as uncommitted. 72.3 of that $70 million of and committed funding will be allocated to the central subway program. we have been receiving $9 million in savings from this been climate for project phase one, so we will be looking at reprogramming that prop k effort back to central subway. phase two, we recently received federal allocations that allows us to unallocate some of the funds for islais creek. geneva can be project, that project is in close out, $1.2 million in savings for that effort that would be allocated to the central subway project. finally, the its radius system replacement program. there will be some lower-cost program that will be allocated back. some of the lower priority options are like a digital, visual announce the system for cards, along with using their radio system as a means of mapping out the yards. these are lower party options that will be deferred. commissioner campos: commissioner dufty? commissioner dufty: what does that mean, lower priority option. can you go more into what you mean with its? lower

we are also looking at our remaining funds that are uncommitted. $140 million that we were to use for other funds. we may be putting those funds into the central subway and looking at alternative backup funding for those projects. we are also looking at financing. we have possibly grant participation for the $88 million. we are also exploring new funding sources. as we mentioned, some of the new funding sources are unlikely, given the economic environment. we are really looking to our key partners, continued regional support, for the project. in closing, i want to end by saying, it is important to remember most of the major projects in the city, whether it is the central subway, doyle drive, all these projects over time, have had local, regional funding partners. we are looking for that same level of partnership to help us address this project. i want to thank the transportation authority staff. they have been helpful. i also want to thank the commissioners. i think everybody has been supportive of making sure this project moves forward. with that, i will close. i am happy to answer q