voip, skype, tele-medical, and the next generations of those services. we want to make sure users can move onto the internet with predictability, with a certain amount of certainty, and innovators are going to get caught up with the fcc. we may be capping the innovation that has taken place on the internet. >> some people have offered their tepid support, including cable operators and the open internet coalition which represents ebay. >> i think you have hit the key word there, which is tepid support. they want to keep the internet under title i, and as you know, there has been a big debate as to whether to leave the internet in title i or move it to title ii. no one wants to leave under title i, so they said we need some short-term certainty on this. you're going to leave wireless unabated. you are going to allow some things in pricing. we are going to go along wicketh it, but there are several concerns that they have. one is the legality. that is what i meant about the fcc's authority to impose management. because of their action, we are going to face

creative community and you look at some of what are now core services on the internet, things like voip, video conferencing, the use of skype, telemedicine in all of our health i.t. proposals and provisions that are out there as well as next generations of of those innovations. we want to make certain that those innovators can move those services on to the internet and can on to that pipeline with predictability, with a certain amount of certainty. and if those innovators are going to get caught up with regulatory interference by the fcc, we may be capping the innovation that has taken place for the internet. >> host: now, congresswoman, a couple of the large business groups have offered their tepid support including the cable operators and the open internet coalition which represents the googles and the ebays. >> guest: yeah. and, you know, you -- i think you hit the keyword there which is tepid support. because what they were told was, look, you know, let's keep the internet under title i. and as you are well aware and your listeners and your watchers, viewers are well aware, there's

this improves voip offerings, electronic messaging and interoperable video conferencing. in addition, this section requires internet browsers on smartphones and other mobile devices such as those discussed earlier is this morning to be accessible by people who are poor and are visually impaired so that these persons can use devices to find online information, local services for news in the same way that sighted people can. manufacturers and service providers may fulfill this obligation to either integrated or external hardware or software solutions. it also approves smartphones and other mobile devices to be compatible with hearing aids. it also updates the relay services and requires all voip providers to contribute to telecommunications fund. in addition the new law authorizes funding to distribute telecommunications equipment people both and blind. the first time ever that federal policy has addressed the communication need of these individuals. finally, this a lot -- a lot this title gives the fcc to make sure that people with disabilities are able to use the next gen

this improves voip offerings, electronic messaging and interoperable video conferencing.in addition, this section requires internet browsers on smartphones and other mobile devices such as those discussed earlier is this morning to be accessible by people who are poor and are visually impaired so that these persons can use devices to find online information, local services for news in the same way that sighted people can. manufacturers and service providers may fulfill this obligation to either integrated or external hardware or software solutions. it also approves smartphones and other mobile devices to be compatible with hearing aids. it also updates the relay services and requires all voip providers to contribute to telecommunications fund. in addition the new law authorizes funding to distribute telecommunications equipment people both and blind. the first time ever that federal policy has addressed the communication need of these individuals. finally, this a lot -- a lot this title gives the fcc to make sure that people with disabilities are able to use the next gene

thomas voip published only the speeches have to federalists, james wilson and thomas became. you'd think they were debating with goes, except for one place, the guy from western pennsylvania, john manley actually interrupted wilson to fill them in on some point that wilson has alluded to so you know at least otherwise you know they purged are the speeches of those who were not in federalists. in fact, they were further. there was an editor and pennsylvania, alexander dallas went on in another way, who published the pennsylvania herald. he took it in his head that he would publish running debates, were basically almost transcripts of what was said in the convention. these newspapers were very small. they weren't like "the new york times," sometimes four pages to tell the convention, so it took a lot of time and he skipped around the little bit. he was still publishing these after the convention had adjourned. and unfortunately, some of the speeches by what the federalists called anti-federalist seem to be a little too persuasive, so the federalists canceled their prescriptions