mr. blackwell from redevelopment.if there was a change or elimination of redevelopment, would we go back to the old zoning controls that are in those areas and they don't have an answer. the other question is, and that is a pre-existing redevelopment projects that might have been voted on that have not begun yet. the other thing that i think the distinction that the governor made recently is contrasting some kinds of redevelopment with others and my understanding as was pointed out just now is that redevelopment should pay for infrastructure, affordable housing, and affordable uses. we have used redevelopment in the right way and there are some locations where the funding is going back to find a privately- owned structures, which i think is probably something that might be well examined and to make a distinction between the types of redevelopment and what use is our most beneficial. >> i think that one of the interesting questions, since the increment beyond the base level is used within the area, there has always bee

nonstarter because it is a desperate attempt to address different audiences just in one position paper mr blackwell proposition is highly confusing and misleading for different audiences consider it for yourself for native afghans his proposition is it kin to covertly break up of the country for pakistani neighbors it amounts to the beginning of the belkin ization of the whole area starting from afghanistan but is also amounts to open ended u.s. military occupation and commitment to afghanistan we've all developed nation building and counterterrorism that will be in essence the long term consequences of the implementation of this well intentioned but ill advised plan. now take a look at some other stories from around the world and commodious anti troops sooner to leave fire along their border leaving by at least one soldier dead in the biggest confrontation between the countries in years the fighting has sparked fears of an escalation causing thousands to flee the conflict over an ancient temple which both sides claim it's taking place periodically for years it's not clear why it sparked the latest

blackwell propose partition of afghanistan as the best solution but as r.t.s. military contributor explains the so-called plan b. is not going to save the situation for the u.s. despite all the goodwill mr blair will to promote the defacto partition over afghanistan. the whole concept is a nonstarter the u.s. policy in afghanistan has moved in example leave from this snafu to full bar and has crossed and point of no return for native afghans his proposition is keen to covertly break up over the country for pakistani it mounts to the belt counties nation of the whole area starting from afghanistan on the positive side it's a wake up call to the united states commander in chief president obama but at the end of the day this plan b. is not going to save the day for the u.s. president because it doesn't address the most challenge that threatens not only afghanistan and its neighbors bought to the security of the whole world if the united states pulls out from the again a step then build turned into that official narco caliphate. will go directly to the white house turning afghanistan into the world capital of frustration that will be in essence the long term consequences of the implementati