smith phoned and bought, he met voltaire and talked with voltaire and once started to criticize full fare and said there is only one full share and he bought a magnificent bust of him. what a that reminds me is this is smith on full fare. nil and 5 clerical. it is very interesting that in this classic confrontation between unlike meant and religion, the classic implications, all of that, that does not appear on the pages of smith at all. david hume's anti clericalism, religious skepticism is constantly resurfacing in his writing. smith never is. one of the interesting things to ask is why when he has adopted a philosophy which is -- which in fact argues for the irrelevance, philosophical irrelevance of theology, when there is free little doubt that he was alarmed by the consequences of clericalism of david hume, voltaire or anyone why he does not allow it to intrude into the center of his philosophy which he doesn't. >> i think he does. in the following way. he does mention will fare. the answer to your first question is he does discuss the connection to the french enlightenment. the