however you want to legendize -- agendize it. the point is, i just want to have the discussion. >> can we agendize it for both open and closed? >> i will talk to commissioner mazzucco. >> are we at agendizing for next week? commissioner marshall: we are at commission reports that will lead us to d. we will get there. it will be there in some form in a way that maximizes discussion. let's go to item d. >> scheduling of items for future commission meetings. commissioner marshall: we have one? another one? >> we are going to meet with the human rights commission at some point. commissioner marshall: where were we? >> may 4. the human rights commission had their meeting and asked if we could do it may 11. commissioner marshall: what is here for may 11? nothing? >> i will not be here, and i wish to be part of the conversation. commissioner marshall: anybody else? commissioner hammer? commissioner hammer: i will ask that we put it in item four, the current disciplinaryin the coure conversations, we set out to clean this up with some of

when we finally get it agendized. to, you know, focus in on a gameplan. dr. marshall? vice president marshall: what is the committee doing now? we have you can agendize to open up the purpose of the committee, but i don't see why it can't continue doing what it is doing. let the committee do what it is doing. president mazzucco: commissioner hammer, i'm getting looks from the -- that we've really gone far astray. commissioner hammer: i think it is important that we have a brief conversation about that. not that any of us stop doing what we're doing but that we're of one mind about what this commission is going to do. commissioner chan: i agree with commissioner hammer we should clarify. president mazzucco: ok. we'll put that in the agenda. let's move on to commission announcements and scheduling of items identified for consideration at future commission meetings. any commission announcements? commissioner hammer: no. president mazzucco: i think we have discussed this at issue so we can look at the perceptions of the community and provide them with facts and a response

>> for the state to agendize, tehhey need it by the 10th. their meeting is the 11th and 12th of may. commissioner fewer: we have another meeting may 3. we could vote at that meeting if you wanted to agendize it. the budget committee would have to meet asap on this. >> could you call a special meeting after the meeting which has already been noticed? >> the 28th you mean? may 3? >> you would have your budget meeting prior and we would have a special meeting after the closed session. >> when would we hear this item at the budget committee meeting? >> it would be a special budget meeting. >> you can have any meeting you like at any point, you just need 24 hours to post an agenda. from a brown act perspective, if you chose to do that, you can post the special meeting at a few want. >> correct me if i am wrong, is that 24 hours' notice? we could notice a special meeting after our budget meeting on the twenty eighth and be here until midnight? is that correct? so i'm just going to put that out there. if members of the budget committee wants to aug

the director, we have already spoken about types and have the -- >> we cannot discuss -- we can agendize. >> i will talk to you, but that is the category that i just wanted to ask. and that is there any public comment on item 8a? ok, item 8b, future meeting agendas or items. the next regularly scheduled meeting is on may 20. litigation is on the 17. is there any other input from the commissioner? any public comment on item 8b? item nine, review and approval of the minutes of the special meeting of october 7, 2010. for all in favor? item 10, review and approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of november 17, 2010. the move to approve. >> any public comment? >> item 11, adjournment. >> move to adjourn. h all in favor? >>all in vor? >> e. > meeting is adjourned. thank you. the biggest issue in america today? segregation still exists... racism... the repression and oppression of women the educational system stem cell research homeless people cloning government health care taxation announcer: so, is there anything you're doing to help make a change? i'm not really doin' anything. ummmm

we can agendize for next week optimistically. we will be trying to go over it with the other parties. >> you are keeping score for next week? when we get overloaded, say something? >> it is the same issue essentially. item four will be continued until next week. they are the same thing. it is up to the president. >> commissioner marshall, at some point not next week and not necessarily until we have a new police chief, i think we should get community policing on the agenda in terms of where the commission is act and the department -- is at and the department and talk about this issue. >> public comments on item three. hearing none, thank you. we do? i am sorry. we have a public comment on item three. >> commissioners, it is not clear to me exactly what we are doing. regarding crime statistics, i would like to weigh in in favor of using a community policing model. i think people in this town have shown a desire to have more bottom up a neighborhood responsibility instead of it being made according to some computer model. can i ask

. >> it is a generalized - - agendized as an action item. >> i move that we approve this with the addition of the change of the language just to save heatin theg -- the heating equipment would be used for the non-prepackaged food and goods. president o'brien: do i have a second? >> i'll second. president o'brien: can we have a roll call on that ? >> file with modification. that modification being that the reading of food -- reheating of food would be the limited amount of non-packaged foods. and a second by commissioner kasselman. roll call? on that motion -- [roll call vote] that motion is passed. president o'brien: congratulations. we should have you back here again. i will make the proposal later on. i would like to dedicate an evening to nc-20. we'll talk later. >> [inaudible] >> thank you very much. president o'brien: next item, please. >> we are going back to item number four. the approval of the january 11, 2010 meeting minutes. the draft january 11, 2010 minutes. president o'brien: move to approve? motion by commissioner riley, second by commissioner clyde. pardon me, commissioner

supervisor kim: 84 agreeing to the agendize this hearing. let me pull up my notes. i want to welcome the public for coming to the meeting. bed bugs are a real issue across san francisco with infestations occurring everywhere from low income housing too expensive hotels. the exact number of outbreaks are uncertain because dps does not automatically track infestations by the type of bugs involved. it is mainly dealt with by the private sector currently. i want to acknowledge the hard work of our advocates on this issue. deborah walker has called for a hearing this month on the topic. i look forward to working with the community group and others on the issue. since we called the hearing in january, a group of advocates and others have been meeting weekly to talk about the data we have found. they are researching and interviewing tenants, putting together questions, and recommendations for potential legislation in the future. we are hoping to address enforcement of prevention and treatment, particularly for the low income, sr., and monolingual residents. the office rece

supervisor kim: 84 agreeing to the agendize this hearing. let me pull up my notes. i want to welcome the public for coming to the meeting. bed bugs are a real issue across san francisco with infestations occurring everywhere from low occurring everywhere from low income housing too expensive

can we go to the consent agend >> these items will be acted upon by a single roll call vote unless the members request discussion. president chiu: would anyone like to sever any of these items? roll call vote on items 1-3. supervisor mar: aye. supervisor mirkarimi: aye. supervisor wiener: aye. supervisor avalos: aye. supervisor campos: aye. president chiu: aye. supervisor chu: aye. supervisor cohen: aye. supervisor elsbernd: aye. supervisor farrell: aye. supervisor kim: aye. >> there rare 11 aye's. president chiu: item 4. >> ordnance appropriated $1.3 million for the ethics commission public election campaign finance fund. president chiu: roll call vote , please. supervisor mar: aye. supervisor mirkarimi: aye. supervisor wiener: no. supervisor avalos: aye. supervisor campos: aye. president chiu: aye. supervisor chu: no. supervisor cohen: no. supervisor elsbernd: no. supervisor farrell: no. supervisor kim: aye. >> six aye's, five no's. president chiu: the ordinance is passed. >> the community block grant program. supervisor mar: aye. supervisor mirkarimi: aye. supervisor wiener: aye. su

understood the motion to beat is to take this item -- the commissioner is just trying to hedge and -- agendizing it. >> commissioner slaughter,

error on my part, the items on the agenda did not get agenda is as recommendations -- did not get agendized as recommendations. normally those comments are for did to you by e-mail. will we have provided in your packet at the beginning is that at the end of the summary of items staff has provided for you is a list of comments, questions that came from the discussion at the committee, for your reference. >> item 7, and discussion and possible action to make recommendations to the board of supervisors on the business tax and regulations code payroll expense tax exclusion in central market and tenderloin area. ordinance amending article 12- day of the business and tax regulations code to establish a payroll expense tax exclusion for businesses located in the central market street and tenderloin area. this is a discussion and possible action item. supervisor kim: do you have copies of the legislation? >> i need to disclose for the record after speaking to the city attorney -- the privately owned company i work for, the owner owns a building in the mid market area, which is in this enterprise zo

the director, we have already spoken about types and have the -- >> we cannot discuss -- we can agendize. >> i will talk to you, but that is the category that i just wanted to ask. and that is there any public comment on item 8a? ok, item 8b, future meeting agendas or items. the next regularly scheduled meeting is on may 20. litigation is on the 17. is there any other input from the commissioner? any public comment on item 8b? item nine, review and approval of the minutes of the special meeting of october 7, 2010. for all in favor? item 10, review and approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of november 17, 2010. the move to approve. >> any public comment? >> item 11, adjournment. >> move to adjourn. them all in favor? >> all in favor? >> aye. >> meeting is adjourned. thank you. >> i have 2 job titles. i'm manager of the tour program as well as i am the historyian of city hall. this building is multifaceted to say the very least it's a municipal building that operates the city and county of san francisco. this building was a dream that became a reality of a man by the name of james

this brings me to tax reform, the fourth part of our agend this budget recognizes that the nation's fiscal health requires a vibrant, growing, private sector and the tax code that is simple, efficient, and fair. unfortunately our current system fails on all three accounts. this budget attacks complexity, and inefficiency, and on fairness in a code with fundamental reforms drawn from a broad consensus of economic experts and based upon the principle that government should never take the dollar from one of its citizens and us the dollar is needed for absolutely vital national purposes. it draws on the commonly held view that the key to pro-growth tax reform is to lower tax rates walt broadening the tax base. leing people keep more of the money that they have earned of gettinrid of the distortions and the loopholes that deferred economic resources from the most efficient uses. it starts out by asking the right mix of tax increases and spending cuts to balance the budget, and asking what is the purpose of government. then raising only as much revenue as the government needs to fund the things