. >> tiny starting ining a busin.he was showing life after an r and b group. >> i think it makes sense to ask the question what we consider to be bad images. a lot of what we considered to be standard. may or may not be the case. i think for society to say, we see that represented in television too. >> in some ways you did that. you chose to take on a show where a, "i love new york". you tockok a role. what was that like? >> the apprentice is a great brand and i was lucky to be in season ten. it was different. so to come out and say i lost my job, that was a big deal. it gave america the opportunity to say what is the unemployed look like? i think if we have these conversations, that is what is important. you know, for me it was a great experience even being able to be here for this conversation. >> how much behind the scenes shapes what we see on the show? why don't you kiss that guy or have a fight? >> i lot of times they have producers and directors? you know that is saying neenee said this why don't you react? i t

all the surroundi ining busines are affected. if people can't pay their bills on time because they're waiting for a paycheck, that's another effect. businesses, agriculture. agriculture import and export inspections. you know, it sort of permeates society. on the other hand, there's been some hyperventilating about it. for example, social security checks will go out. food stamp money will go out. because that's been already sent to the state. so if it only lasts a few days, it really shouldn't be that big a deal. if it goes on for a week or more, it's costly. it's disruptive. >> belva: well, we can talk about another place where their trouble is not as fast and widespread, but it's been a tough time for pacific gas and electric over this last week, david. >> it has. >> belva: there were hearings that seemed rather emotional. and still the company seems to be trying to figure out just what its next public relations move should be. >> i think that's a good way of putting it. i mean, they've gone through a couple of different phases

>>reporter: busines owners like jody said is hurting their bottom line. because prostitutes and their pimp don't just linger on friday night. in the middle of the morning or early afternoon there's one after the next after the next. parents in the neighborhood say it is happening in front of their kid. and they are fed up, too. >> so we have one right here. >>reporter: this is what him if they have to step over just about every single day when she takes her 2 children to school. >> sometimes they come to next block where i live and they do their things there. and i have to close my blind because i don't want my kids to see this stuff. >>reporter: this case manager with the east bay asian youth center saw prostitutes as young as 13. she sits is tough to get off the streets but so easy to end up there. >> one of the girls i work with she told me her boyfriend told her that they need money and he got a kid that need help no kind of money f.she love him she would go out and do these kind of thing for him. >>reporter: police patrol the area the problem persist

afterall the people in the highest individual income tax brackeare about 80% small busine businesses. at least two-thirds, probably higher than that. how are they going to hire more people or grow their busine if we stick them with their share of a trillion dollar tax increase? well, our plan is not to go that way. to make the savings in spending not to raise taxes. that's obamacare. i have been around health care reform debates for a long time. when i was chairman of the party, clinton care was on the front burner. i never heard anybody say is that they want to make the cost go up but that's what obama's plan does. makes health insurance premiums go up. that's why republicans, among other reasons, want to repeal it. the house has voted to repeal it and we need to repeal it. but another big element of this, how do we expect to hire more people. whether it is tax policy, spending policy, health care policy, in every case they all impede what should be our first goal, economic growth and job creation. that is before you ever talk about energy. as you watch gasoline blow past $4 a gallon

. >> the question is, should the federal government get into the busine of enforcing this principle or should this be lost in the private sector? >> if we keep in the private sector, things will remain as they are now, ateast we hope they would. in forcing net neutrality could be the demise of the internet. >> the technology that they employ to be able to take content and block it and prioritize it is still in the infancy. that is why we want to have basic rules that say we want to preserve the open and neutral networks that will largely have today. >> however, the chairman of net competiti competition.org belies differently. >> i would have to most respectfully disagree quite stngly with you in discussing this is just preserving the status quo. you do not need legislation to maintain the status quo. >> to get from status quo to the land of net neutrality there are several paths the government can take. first, the federal communications division has to apply the old regulation. that happened in 2008 when they decided to block comcast. the sec decided to move on to the next one. -- the

that means passing legislation that wil eliminate or modify misguided regulations that are impeding busines businesses in r country. that effort is already under way in the senate. senator pat roberts of kansas has hoferredz a bill called the regulatory responsibility for our economy act, which i am proud to cosponsor. this bill will give the force of through a presidential executive order issued earlier this year that proposes to review -- quote -- "rules that may be outmoded, ineffective, insurvetion or excessively burdensome and to modify, streamline, expand in some cases or repeal them." if passed, our bill will make sure that we will take a cleareyed look at the rules and help restore regulatory certainty to the markets. when we talk about unwarranted laws and regulations, however, we don't need to look too far into the past. we need only to look at -- we can also look at recently enacted laws that impede job creation and sap economic vitality. last year's federal health care bill, for example, included a 1099 reporting provision that introduced a new level of bureaucracy and expense f

either there's an admission that it's going to cut small busine business -- cost small business more, cost taxpayers more, or it's not. that's number one. number two, this is not about fraud. this is not about somebody seeking something that they did not have the right to receive. the question is, individuals -- fraud is individuals who are deliberately underreporting their income or fraudulently trying to get extra support. that's not what we do. those enforcement provisions in the law to combat fraud and abuse are untouched by my amendment. this is simply about someone who honestly got a subsidy. and we have a providing in the law that deals with how they pay back, but it doesn't throw them over the cliff and send them a surprise $10,000 tax bill. so that is simply not exactly the quite -- quite the same thing. yes, the doc fix, we did use a provision to deal with the s.g.r., with the doc fix, but we did not put small businesses and families at harm, as h.r. 4 does. so the reality is, is this amendment permits repeal to move forward. after the repeal, a study's done. if there is no

afterall the people in the highest individual income tax bracket are about 80% small busine businesses. at least two-thirds, probably higher than that. how are they going to hire more people or grow their business if we stick them with their share of a trillion dollar tax increase? well, our plan is not to go that way. to make the savings inpending not to raise taxes. that's obama care. i have been around health care reform debates for a long time. when i was chairman of the party, clinton care was on the front burner. i never heard anybodysay is that they want to make the cost go up but that's what obama's plan does. makes health insurance premiums go up. that's why republicans, among other reasons, want to repeal it. the house has voted to repeal it and we need to repeal it. but another big element of this, how do we expect to hire more people. whether it is tax policy, spending polic health care policy, in every case they all impede what should be our first goal, economic growth and job creation. that is before you ever talk about energy. as you watch gasoline blow past $4 a gallon