russia is called corruption in america is called chicken ok let's take a closer look at why the jaxon van a commandment is all about a new report out by spotlights union and the media. about one and a half million people and if you were says south of israel in the u.s. say between one thousand nine hundred ninety five and one thousand ninety one when the union collapsed he was working to get an exit visa which wasn't an easy thing to do one of the obstacles was the so-called diploma tax introduced in one thousand seventy two which meant a new one in the greeting and to compensate us to suffer the higher education the sum was astronomical one hundred times the average salary to pressure the soviet union into allowing integration b. jackson there nic amendment was adopted in the us it certainly mutations on trade relations with the soviet union well the fact of jackson vanny on the soviet union is questionable it does have an impact on relations between russia and the us today . although there. and has been regularly we since one thousand nine hundred four it remains in force now one of the

i guess president and i'm not trying to force him to lift their jaxon van a commandment which is discriminating russia because the soviet union thirty years ago did all the jews i'm a great they're from russia and not only jews but other people ok now listen the russians believe today most of the russians believe that the jets and then a command is still alive because it's an instrument to pressurize russia to put pressure put political pressure to make it easier to make it she was russians now on the other side here's a quote from fowler about ms and here's what he says in my opinion this is not true that the jackson valley commandment gives washington some means to pressure on moscow then anachronism cannot serve as a real political instrument are. then current or so which point of view do you support is it a new cement or not. not for administration because i would leave president obama and i want to emphasize that is this is fruitless and we're not trying to punish obama or something or go we want to help you i'm going to help you money from about you know another or even one dollar because

to the jaxon van a commitment is not pulls any real obstacles to russia's accession to the w t o i mean if the lifting of this amendment is delete it doesn't mean russia will have to abandon its intention to join the w t o it will limit the u.s. presence on the russian market in cooperation between russian and american companies will be affected and russian trade relations with other countries will be defined by the dummy teel regulations is not zero american companies are in greater need of waving them ignorant than we are once again russia's. entry can be assured with the amendment still in force but if obama's support of the state has no parliamentary backing in his country politically it will be a certain sign for us we'll draw our own conclusions we don't think no. it's interesting everybody here in washington says they would like to see a more open more transparent in terms of doing business but i've now they're brushy is willing to accept that set of rules set by. which will make it more open and transparent there are still forces opposing it biggest and common sense behind it. t

to a jaxon van a commitment does not pose any real obstacles to russia's accession to the w t o i mean if the lifting of this amendment is delete it doesn't mean russia will have to abandon its intention to join the w t or it will limit the u.s. presence on the russian market of cooperation between russian and american companies will be affected and russian treated relations with other countries will be defined by the county teel great relations that's to see american companies are in greater need of waving their mainland and we are once again russia is the beauty of entry can be insured with them in and still in force but if obama's support of this that gives him a parliamentary backing in his country politically it will be a certain sign for us and we'll draw our own conclusions was a signal. it's in france they never but here in washington says they would like to see a more open more transparent in terms of doing business but now there wash is willing to accept that set of rules set by w t o which will make it more open and transparent there are still forces opposing it do you see a