hester, mr. maher and the basic arguments. and i appreciate all of the work they did on prop k. and i think prop k works. and i think the city as commissioner moore says benefits from legislation such as prop k. but i would like to ask questions of the city attorney, if i may, because to me a great deal of this revolves around the fact that legislation can have mistakes in the manner in which it's written. and i know all three of the people to whom i referred in the audience have been involved for many, many years with legislation and have seen legislation that contains errors. to me, this is revolving around the correction of an error to a good extent. comment? >> deputy city attorney burns. fs my understanding this is not regarding an error in the legislation but rather there was an error in the memo that went with the docket in 1989 by these bodies jointly. and that the correction being proposed today by staff is not to change the standard of 20% that was applied to these parks but rather to correct that this park individually does not meet that standard. staff, of course, ca