so today we're going to talk about the ethics of law enforcement, prevent ago boose of power -- preventing abuse of power. i wanted to read to you a letter to the editor that i happened to run across in the chronicle the other day when i was thinking about this panel. i just want to read it to you. it's entitled "betrayal of trust in the san francisco police department." my thoughts were just those of unbelief after reading your story "new video slap for san francisco cops." it is undeniable that our rights under search and seizure laws must be protected. but cops that blow cases by violating these rights should lose their jobs and be prosecuted themselves. i hope new chief greg suhr follows through on his promises to clean up the san francisco police department that betrays the trust put in it when it pulls stunts like this. so, what happens when those we think are protecting us from criminal activity become the criminals themselves? what is the mentality that causes this to happen? how much can a police department overcome such a betrayal of trust, public trust? so we're going to explore

. >> do you know boose secretary clinton has spoken to? >> she spoke to vice-president taha. dennis spoke to the foreign minister. the secretary spoke to the vice president. and so did i.. john kerry has also been making calls and issued a statement yesterday, which you may see. there have been a lot of calls. >> any further questions? thank you very much. >> thank you all. [captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2011] >> for a third time, the president of human gridley -- refused to sign an agreement ending his 30 plus years in power. we will also hear about a senior u.s. envoy meeting with opposition leaders in libya. this is about 15 minutes. >> hello, guys. welcome to the state department. i have nothing at the top, so happy to take your questions if you have any. or we cannot just wrap this up right away. >> apparently, colombia and venezuela have reached an agreement that will facilitate honduras' return to the ois. response to that? >> i think we will have more to say about that a little bit later. but

host: jackie boose image rights in "usa today -- jackie kucinish writes -- that is in "usa today" this morning. republicans only for the first segment. newts -- newt gingrich for president. what do you think? jamal from indianapolis. caller: i am a member of the black republican coalition here in indianapolis. we would wish that may be mid daniels would throw himself in but newt gingrich is very divisive and if he were to remit -- when the primary, the black independent coalition would go democrat or independent. we have been through this in the 1990's. his ideas are the reasons he is in the position he is. anybody who commits incidentally and says he did it because he loves his country is a sham artist. he is the moral equivalent of farrakhan on the left. host: who are you supporting right now for president? caller: it depends on who is the nomination is for the republican party. divisive, undertone racist type candidates -- i would have to support a re-election of the president who just went and got bin laden and bingm and done several things. actually i am ashamed of my party. i can