that was essentially a legal, because that was stayed according to cequa, chapter 31, 31.16. the superior court ordered the city to refrain from enforcing or implemented policies and objectives identified as changing from the 1990:. therefore, the 1999 element was or is a baseline for the evaluation for 2004 and to of the nine, and we do not have an adequate eir here because on 15 through 32 -- [bell] president chiu: thank you very much. >> good afternoon, supervisors. mark, a moment of discourse by bumper sticker. this eir is the product of regulatory capture at the underlying housing. this is the developer's dream. we have got ab 32 on the other side, and all the splenda department does is meet the developers need. they should have been adequately addressed in the eir. as mentioned previously, there are multiple jobs sites around these differences go. there is no evidence on the table of the folks who live here will work here overtimed. there is a statement the significance of the eir that this will have on mitigate the book impacts to muni, because the impacts were not --