so i'm a huge fan of meja. and i think as we grow into meja, the implementation process will become more mature and more regular, and that's a very positive thing. but i think if she ya's enacted -- ceja's enacted, that's an issue that's going to have to be addressed because now it's going to create bifurcated interests between state and justice or department of energy and justice. so there really has to be unity of effort from the beginning to the end of the criminal investigation and prosecution process. and if there is one great strength of the ucmj approach, that's it. the military initiates the investigation, assigns the prosecutor, prosecutes the case, etc., etc. i think it can be done under meja or ceja, but it just takes a little bit of, um, of coordination. >> for that unity of purpose, shouldn't there be a central prosecuting authority? in other words, perhaps these decisions ought to be elevated to the level of the attorney general rather than have united states attorneys responsible for them. >> wel