by no means is this willy-nilly. supervisor avalos: i did not want to use the word about your work. >> in the spirit, i think it is important that articulate that the police department looked at this very closely. the goal is intelligent licensing. from a policy perspective, which i refer to all of you, obviously, wherever you guys want to take it, we will work with what you give us, but i will tell you this -- we look at these very closely, and this is a unique situation. we do not have a lot of large retail spaces with parking lots like this location has, and that is why this one is working. nonetheless, we are still encouraging you to do a very restricted license. this business plan would not worked in other parts of the city. i think what is unique year -- and that is where we have to always look at all of these business plans, regardless of who they are coming from, on their own merits, exactly where they are going. we all know that what works in one block, two blocks away, just will not work, for whatever reaso

their own they would abandon virtually where bugs farm also and they were penned in by america willy nilly they just walked away from the scene but this time taliban are the only symbols of existence and back then there were seven or eight one taking in iran israel under the law and full of the list and part of the list but this time it's a different story it is only one entity i mean symbolically although there are lots of the public and the odd people who are with you for the sake of the art is not in the fight itself much many of the people are sitting and they are part of the government in kabul. this time there is only one power. and this is fortunate for the planet because whatever transpires then it will be. it will not be power struggle between various factions which can start a civil war but surely parliament must have learnt their lesson. and both would i be annoyed with them because it has to be decided now the issue of who governs us honest and in what person because this is a the state of war but after the state of war we'll be able to win the state public questions because wi

we shouldn't allow government to patrol willy-nilly through millions of records. you've heard of warrantless wiretaps. a lot of these things are unknown because they're so secret that nobody knows, even many of us don't even know the extent of these things. but i can tell you that there's a great deal of evidence that we are looking at millions of records and that millions of innocent u.s. citizens are having their records looked at. now, are we doing anything, are we imprisoning innocent folks? no, i don't think we're doing that. i think they're good people. i think the people i've met with the fib f f.b.i., the people i't in our government, they want to do the right things. but what i'm fearful of is there comes a time when you've given these powers up. you know, when you recognize, for example, the constitutional discussion over war, if you say, well, libya's just a small war, we don't care, and you say that congress has no say in this, what happens when we get a president who decides to send a million troops into war and we simple say -- simply say, who cares,

their own they were abandoned virtually weblogs are multiple and they were abandoned by america willy nilly just for probably from the scene. this time for one are the only symbols of existence there were seven or eight for one thing in iran israel others will also list and part of the list but this time it's a different story it is only one entry and symbolically although there are lots of groups that play a lot of it on the ars people it may be for the people of the art is mark in the fight itself much many of his people are behaving and they are part of the government in kabul. this time there is only one power and this is fortunate for the planet because whatever transpires then it will be. it will not be power struggle between various friction with can start a civil war but surely parliament must have learnt their lesson. and both would i be annoyed with them because it has to be decided now the issue of who govern the planet and in what fashion because this is a real state of war but after the state of war we'll be able to win peace petter big question because winning war is one thing

own they would abandon virtually where pugs are multiple and they were penned in by america willy nilly they just want to live on the scene but this time taliban are the only symbols of a distance that then built seven or eight one sitting in iran israel others will also a distant part of the distance but this time it's a different story it is only one entity i mean symbolically although there are lots of groups the pli probably the odd people who are really for the sake of the art is not in the fight it's pretty much many of those people are taking and they're part of the government problem. this time there is only one power. and this is fortunate for the planet because whatever transpired then it will be. it will not be power struggle between various factions which can start a civil war but surely parliament must have learned better lesson. and goes with the idea not with them because it has to be decided now the issue of who governs the planet than in what person because this is a state of war but after the civil war we'll be able to live in peace better big question because winning

their own billet abandon but really where bugs are multiple and they were abandoned by america willy nilly they just walked away from the scene but this time taliban are the only symbols of existence they were seven or eight to one taking in iran israel others will also have a list and are listed but this time it's a different story it is only one entity i mean symbolically although there are lots of groups the class project on the ars people is really for the economy art is not . good for much and many of the people are sitting and they are part of the government in kabul. this time there is only one power and this is fortunate for afghanistan because whatever transpires them it will be. it will not be power struggle between various factions which can start a civil war but surely taliban must have learned their lesson. and both were dead you know what with them because it has to be decided now the issue of who governs us on a fan and what person because this is a real state of war after the state of war when they'll be able to live in peace that's a big question because winning war is one

they're trying to bring it back into the system but they're using all the money that they created willy nilly to use that to acquire the goal of various states like greece for example which has one hundred eleven tons of gold they've been told now that. there's gold can be used to settle the debts that they themselves without incurring these are debts that were forced upon them from outsiders and now that they can't pay the debts but they have nothing to do in creating the outsiders are saying well we'll take the gold so that's a really great deal. exactly i mean even in their quote max from their press release it's a recognition of gold's growing relevance as a high quality liquid asset this is this isn't a currency that has been around for five thousand years it has been accepted for five thousand years or so you know suddenly it's growing irrelevance but it looks like we've been playing basically farmville for the last thirty forty years since the beginning of a total global free out currency world and we've all been incurring this debt like thinking we're getting away something for nothin

we can't form committees, we can't kick the can down the road, we can't increase the deficit willy-nilly, we have to make tough decisions. that's what i think the congress and the president need to do. most of this deficit has been run up by republican presidents in the last 30 years. it's a bipartisan congress and we need bipartisan cooperation to get it fixed. >> you're a good guy, and i commend you for this operation. your predecessor made a huge deficit, but you also borrowed money in the recovery act, you balanced your budget by borrowing $3 billion against future receipts on transportation to fund your transportation program. you borrowed money from your pension plan that you're going to have to return, and you did it because you were managing through difficult times, and you didn't want to burden the taxpayers of your state through these difficult times, but those bills are going to have to be paid. so you are wrestling with the same problems that the president, governor and marthe mayors are wrestling with and there are no easy answers. >> the federal government for the longest t

wily nilly su have neighbors who are chinese, indian, malasi, and the children haveot to know them, go to the same schoo. so it's a structural device, a social device, social structure that fosters yo to understandhe different races and make you quite used together. >> rose: where did you get these political ideas of yours. >> well, i watched them after two or three riots. >> rose: after two or three riots. >> yeah, yeah there were riots. with these enclaves and they were poor and dirty no sanitation. >> rose: this was before 64-- '65 or after. >> no, before. >> rose: so you began to form an idea that you thought you would like to see singapore become before malaysia in 1960. >> oh, yes, indeed. and we hoped we could make malaysia the same but malaysia not want that. they want a malayse society with the malaise dominance. now they've got a serus problem because the chinese and the indians are separate from them. go to separate schools. chinese go and learn chinese. indians learn malay. they live in different places. they've got disparate communities. where we havene community. one, i'm

which always wanted the debate between a president and congress so we didn't go to war willy nilly orithout careful consideration. >> some argue that maybe the war powers act is unconstitutional. >> we rule on the constitution all the time. once a law is passed and signed by the president, it is the law. i believe in the rule of law that we restrain and control the powers and don't give unlimited power. it's a very dangerous precedent if we let this go forward. >> there's a quote here who said -- >> that doesn't really mean anything. >> yeah. >> staying consistent with it and not following it, i don't understand what that means. >> that's kind of government gobbledygook. i would say he's in violation. the war powers act says there's only three reasons the president can go to war. declaration by congress, authorization by congress or imminent danger. the president, under extraordinary times, if we're attacked or a nuclear attack, the president can take action. but if the president were a real leader, here's what would have happened. when libya escalated and we were out of session and h

not simply within the purview of the united states to go wily anily and violate pakistani -- willie nillye pack a sustain sovereignty. i think if we held osama bin laden bin accountable in the public bar which of very acceptable. >> alan, is it your fear if he was killed by u.s. forces there could be a resurgence of terrorism against the united states? >> i think in the short run there is absolutely that possibility, that there are going to be those who want to avenge the death of osama bin laden bin, who want to turn him into a martyr and who want to portray the united states as wanton murderers and killers. you're going to hear that across the world from our enemies, particularly coming on top of the allegations that we targeted gadhafi and killed his son and some grandchildren. >> i'd like to look forward now once we do hear from the president, then we'll have more details, but looking ahead who is next? what does this mean for our mission in the middle east? >> i don't think it fundamentally changes our mission in the middle east. i think at its noblest our mission in the middle east

you getting any warning, or does it almost seem haphazard the way they're landing and striking willy-nilly all over the place? >> no, we're actually getting some good warning. our news stations with were on top of it. we had as much as 15 to 20 minutes notification that they were on the ground. our news, local media stations have done a fantastic job in advising us. we were watching it as it come in and so we knew exactly where it was going. it took the tracks that they pretty much said it was going to take. so we were able to get notifications out to those communities in advance and hopefully the people were watching. >> all right. well, thanks, jerry, so much. and let's just hope that those casualty figures don't begin to creep up any higher than you already gave to us. >> i know. it's pretty devastating at this point. we've got a lot of structures that are damaged, but we'll know more probably tomorrow when we're able to actually get some roads cleared and get out into those areas where we can do a good damage assessment. >> all right. well, thank you much. we'll be checking back in wit

there are barrier, there are check, foreigners just can't go there just willy-nilly. i know that for a fact and so do others. khalid shaikh mohammed, ksm was found in a similar town in rawalpindi a few years ago. how can this happen without the tacit knowledge or involvement? >> let me proffer another explanation. >> answer the question. >> it's a state, a country with lots of people, it's a very difficult country in the sense of its capacity to deal with the problems. as the national security adviser said, a lot more people have been arrested in pakistan including al qaeda people than in any other country. so pakistan did not have a policy of protecting these people. however, the united states spent much more money in iraq than it did in afghanistan, and then it spent much more money in afghanistan than it did in pakistan. so were there cracks through which things fell through? absolutely and we'll investigate that and get to the bottom of it. >> all right. you've said it is time for pakistan to wake up. is there going to be a credible investigation that leads to som

we shouldn't w allow governmento control willy-nilly through millions of records. we have heard of warrantless wiretaps. a lot of these things areseet unknown because they are so even secret that nobody knows. evekn even manyow of us don't know the extent of these things but i cat tell youha that there is a great deal of evidence that we are re looking at millions of records a and that millions of innocentd u.s. citizens are having their records look that.mprini nongw are we doing anything?no,o are wen' imprisoning innocentth. folks? i don't think we are doing that. i think there are good people. i think the people that i've w t with the fbi and in our government want to do the rightt things.ngs. what i am fearful of is that there comes a time when you have given these powers up.rsou you know when you recognize, for example the constitutional discussion over war. if you say will that be is just a small war, we don't care and you say congress has no say ined this, what happens when we get a resident who has decided to send a million troops into war and we simply say

we demanded our politicians to be more fiscally responsible, quit spending willy-nilly and tell the truthif entitlements add to our deficit, fix them. republican paul ryan is trying. he wants to radically reshape medicare by private advertising it. in other words, instead of funding medicare, it would help elderly americans buy private insurance. critics say that would mean no more guaranteed coverage for seniors, those on the liberal left go a step farther. ♪ >>> i know, it's awful. what is this, medi-scare? this year's version of death panels and quote, obama care? you remember the backlash from that caused the democrats to lose the house in 2010. that ad, as vile as it might be has staying power. in one conservative new york district, a democrat may just win a traditionally public house seat in a special election. the reason, the republican candidate support's ryan's medicare plan. some political analysts say new york 26 is a sign of pending republican doom. others say republicans are engaging in a much-needed dialogue. so our "talk back" question today, are republicans right to radica

we shouldn't allow government to patrol willy-nilly through millions of records. you've heard of warrantless wiretaps. a lot of these things are unknown because they're so secret that nobody knows, even many of us don't even know the extent of these things. but i can tell you that there's a great deal of evidence that we are looking at millions of records and that millions of innocent u.s. citizens are having their records looked at. now, are we doing anything, are we imprisoning innocent folks? no, i don't think we're doing that. i think they're good people. i think the people i've met with the fib f f.b.i., the people i't in our government, they want to do the right things. but what i'm fearful of is there comes a time when you've given these powers up. you know, when you recognize, for example, the constitutional discussion over war, if you say, well, libya's just a small war, we don't care, and you say that congress has no say in this, what happens when we get a president who decides to send a million troops into war and we simple say -- simply say, who cares,

understand in our society as opposed to just a free-for-all, something that happens sort of willy-nilly to us sometimes, you know, in spite of ourselves. >> all right. maybe we should take some questions from the floor. do you want to -- >> thank you very much. thank you for the book. [inaudible] um, i'm asking this question, i'm making a comment then asking a question from the per spctive of someone -- perspective of someone who's been working in the internship field since 1973 doing research since '79, so i have a stake sort of in this. i really appreciate and agree with most of your critique of college internships. i think a lot of them are bogus, i think a lot of them are highly exploitive and should be rethought in the ways you talked about. on the other hand, i also want to question one of the premises you offered at the beginning which was that, basically, the fundamental issue here is getting youth into the work force. in other words, that the assumption is that the internships are all about getting jobs, getting careers filled, exploring careers, developing skills and so on. an

guest: the president has made it sound insurance companies can drop people willy-nilly.is not the case. if they do that, you can take them to court. plaintiffs who do that do very well. insurance companies are dropping people because they found they -- because they thought they found fraud. if people are lying in order to obtain health insurance, they should be dropped from a health insurance plan. the obama administration changed the rules to make it harder to prove it was fraud. i'm sure those questions should be answered at the state level. states will have an easier time correcting bad. it is harder for the federal government to correct that. how to provide the most secure health insurance to six people -- the news as far as lightly regulated markets is good. insurance companies protect people with high cost -- that developed high-cost medical conditions. they deny could drop from their health insurance. there was a study done. those markets are generally less regulated. people who purchase insurance from an insurance company with less regulation or less than half to

i am an american jew and most of the jews i know are not for israel just willy-nilly making sediment everywhere because the people who think that the bible says you should stand by israel, by then making settlements you and up with an apartheid status instead of the two-state solution, which jews like myself seem to be for because then it would be a destruction of israel if they do not do that. the second point i want to make is -- even in syria, or even in the palestine they have this show about, has to do with the blood libel, the not see -- nazis showed it, about taking muslim blood and putting it into the matzah the host: tie this into what you like to see the president say today? caller: unfortunately when discussions are held today about the status of palestinian refugees, the largest number of jewish refugees forced out of arab countries are ignored and few people even think of them as refugees because of like the arab world, it is not always successful. host: what would you like to hear the president say? caller: i hope the says something about a two-state solution because th

i am an american jew and most of the jews i know are not for israel just willy-nilly making sediment everywhere because the people who think that the bible says you should and by israel, by then making settlements you and up with an apartheid status instead of the two-state solution, which jews like myself seem to be for because then it would be a destrtion of israel if they do not do that. the second point i wt to make is -- even in syria, or even in the palestine they have this show about, has to do with the blood libel, the not see -- nazis showed it, about taking musl blood and putting it into the matzah the host: tie this into what you like to see the president say today? caller: unfortunately when discussions are held today about the status of palestinian refugees, the largest number of jewish refugees forced out of arab countries are ignored and few people even think of them as refugees because of like the arab world, it is not always successful. host:: what would you like >> we are live now and the state department in washington. president obama shortly will make a speech, wh

appropriations so that the message is sent down the street that an attorney general or president can't willy-nilly decide that a law that a law they may have voted against at the time is unconstitutional. well, my time is up. and let me say i haven't said the last about this. but you made the wrong decision and i think there ought to be a little bit off the department's back. >> in addition to the determination i made and the president agreed with was made on the decision made in front of us. there were several lower courts ruled that it is unconstitutional. and the notion that this is something that ought to be taken off the backs of the department of justice in a financial way. the lawyers and department of justice that would've worked on that case have more than their full-time job. and they will have to use the time. it might have been used in the doma defense. they will use it in other areas. that is an appropriate -- >> with that objection, the gentleman from wisconsin is recognized. >> well, mr. attorney general, i guess what i can say is that we're in a tough budget time. and we all know w

our house, and they were giving general warrants, which meant we're just going to search you willy-nilly. we're not going to name the person or plashings we're not going to name the crime you are accused of. if a government were comprised of angels, we wouldn't need the fourth amendment. what i argue for here now is protections that protect us all, should we get a despot, should we someday elect somebody who doesn't have respect for rights. we should obey rules and laws. is this an isolated episodehat we're here talking about the pay patriot academand that there is -- the patriot act? it is a deadline, huer rirks hurry, we must act. we have had no sufficient debate on the war with libya. we are now encountered in a war in libya. we now have a war in which there's imn 0 no congressional debate and no congressional vote. but you know what they argue? they say it is just a little war. but you know what? it is a big principle. it is the principle that we as a country elect people. it is a principle that we are restrained by the constitution, that you are protected by the constitution, and if

so he didn't just sort of move willy-nil willy-nilly.does this meet every single criteria in terms of making sure he does not get out. >> you said he has a roof deck. technically that's outside. can they institute what's off limits, alcohol, you said there's a wet bar in the bedroom. can they make those parameters? >> technically not. he says he's not guilty and he's got the money, so technically no -- >> he can live wherever he wants. >> he just can't move at ease any more. >> deb feyerick, thanks. new testimony painting a disturbing picture of the florida mom accused of killing her 2-year-old daughter back in 2008. casey anthony's boyfriend testified that casey seemed happy and having a grand old time the day pros durts allege she killed her daughter caylee. casey asked to borrow a shovel. a heated exchange between antho anthony's attorney and reporters. look. >> can we ask if you plan to invite casey to the stand there? >> come on, guys. [ bleep ]. >> wow. >> get out of the way. get out of the way. >> you guys know we're here. >> get

appropriations so the message is sent down the street that an attorney general for president cannot willy- nilly decide that a lot that they may have voted against have they been in congress at the my time is up, and i have not said the last about this, but you made the wrong decision and i think that there ought to be a little skin of the departments of back as a result of the wrong decision being made, and i yelled back. >> with all due respect, with the addition to the determination i made and the president agreed with, there was an assessment of the legal situation on front of us and there are several lower courts, several that have moved that is unconstitutional. to think that there should be taken off the back of the justice department and a financial is inappropriate. and they will have to use the time that might have been used in them -- indian doma. defense. they will use it in other areas. that is an appropriate -- >> with that objection, the gentleman from wisconsin is recognized. >> well, mr. attorney general, i guess what i can say is that we're in a tough budget time. and we all kn

appropriations so that the message is sent down the street that an attorney general or president can't willy-nilly decide that a law that a law they may have voted against at the time is unconstitutional. well, my time is up. and let me say i haven't said the last about this. but you made the wrong decision and i think there ought to be a little bit off the department's back. >> in addition to the determination i made and the president agreed with was made on the decision made in front of us. there were several lower courts ruled that it is unconstitutional. and the notion that this is something that ought to be taken off the backs of the department of justice in a financial way. the lawyers and department of justice that would've worked on that case have more than their full-time job. and they will have to use the time. it might have been used in the doma defense. they will use it in other areas. that is an appropriate -- >> with that objection, the gentleman from wisconsin is recognized. >> well, mr. attorney general, i guess what i can say is that we're in a tough budget time. and we all know w