you think that we should look into creating tears of risk? if there is a high level of risk for the consumer, then notification should be treated more significant? >> that would add a layer of complexity to an already serious problem. it is notable that, when we have these extreme bridge problems, with citibank and sony and others, very sophisticated companies, and a large number of customers, more than a month later, we still do not fully know the extent of the harm. i would try to go for a simple standard. i think it is easier to manage. >> i would have to give back to you on that. >> we believe your issue can be best addressed by using the term "significant risk" in the bill. >> do think it should more clearly define the size and scope of companies who should have these security measures? >> yes. when talking about -- it depends on the size of the breach. in terms of the company, yes. the focus will have much different to abilities to respond than a larger size business. >> thank you. >> i would like to express gratitude for your time here

, you know, the overall exposure to, you know, risk and credit risk, you know, across the system. in addition, i think, you know, as you're aware, you know, there's also proposals, you know, that are competing between what the u.s. has proposed and what it appears europe is likely to propose as to the types of collateral margin that could be posted for different transactions, and the u.s. proposals, you know, limit the amount of margin that could be posted to, you know, instruments that are basically nominated in u.s. dollars, and so therefore, you know, if there is extraterritorial application of the u.s. rules to, you know, foreign entities, be they affiliates or customers, we would be asking european clients to be posting, you know, u.s. dollar securities as opposed to, you know, european bond collateral or government collateral or a currency which would obviously be the natural currency in which they would have their assets. >> let me just clarify what you just said. so even if these rules were harmonized across borders, is the restriction and cost increase on affiliates, on a

risk. that financial markets function best when there are clear rules, transparency and accountability, and that markets break down, sometimes catastrophically where there are not. if -- if more years a core strength of the u.s. financial system had been a regulatory structure that sought a careful balance between incentives for innovation and competition on the one hand and protections from excessive risk taking on the other. over time those great strengths were undermined. the careful mix of protections we created eventually eroded with the development of new products and markets for which those protections had not been designed, and our regulatory system found itself outgrown and outmaneuvered by the very institutions and markets it was designed to regulate. in particular the growth of the shadow banking system permitted financial institutions to engage in maturity transformation with too little transparency, capital or oversight. the years leading up to the crisis saw the growth of larg

and that's bad because risk taking by you, risk-taking by others is what drives this economy.and those in government have got to be able to respond to that and give you a little more wiggle room. and not do stupid things like some effort today, maybe. on that, i do have to run. let me again thank you as an organization for your being here. it is important that you come and we here. and people on the hill and i thank you for the support of those things that you've been helpful to us and bringing to light, and your questions today. thank you very much. [applause] [applause] >> british chancellor of the exchequer george osborne said this week the british bank northern rock will be put up for sale three years after the british government stepped in to support the mortgage lender. speaking to an annual gathering of bankers, mr. osborne also said it was time for the banking and financial sectors to stop relying on british taxpayers. his comments are about 25 minutes. >> the chancellor of the exchequer, the right honorable george osborne, member of parliament. [applause] >> well, my

risk in a partial risk transfer is not managed that welcome the risk will come back as it did, for example in case of citigroup which are provided huge lines of credit to conduits and liquidity insurance kicked in and came back to the balance sheet of citigroup. now, coming back to dodd-frank and how it touches upon all this, i want to think about the shadow banking in some sense risk repositories, which is depending upon how fragmented the regulation is 40 particular asset class, certain risk but saw -- is great out there. in case of money market funds that paul just spoke about, i think about from the financial center. whatever risk remains in financial sector paper after you diversify it, the repository for that risk are the money maket funds because they're essentially diversified holders of these papers. gses you could call them fannie and freddie, basically broadly speaking credit mortgage, credit risk repositories of the economy. you could think about the new centralized clearinghouse is as the counterparty risk repositories of the system. and you could broadly think about stuff tha

so, which is the greatest risk to your health? >>> and how some girl scouts had such a great idea, they got a patent for it, and now, it is changing lives. at progressive, you can bundle your home and auto policies and save. it's quick and easy. don't worry, tiny people. flo is a gentle giant. yay! bundle your home and auto insurance at progressive.com. hundreds more in your wallet year after year. feed me! you're hungry again? i just fed you a whole roll of quarters. saving you money -- now, that's progressive. call or click today. did you know you can be smart about your calorie intake, and still get the nutrition your body needs? try boost calorie smart nutritional drink. it provides key nutrients your body could be missing. each serving is packed with sixteen grams of protein, and also contains twenty-four vitamins and minerals including calcium and vitamin d. and it's under two hundred calories. get the balanced nutrition you need to help you stay strong and active. try boost calorie smart today. brand power. helping you buy

still do preferred risk. preferred risk is actually, i think in some cases, probably below what the market would actually insure at. in some ways, we have created a structural imbalanceance because the risk is much lower but writing it be low what the private sector would be comfortable writing it as. and in effect, and particularly in large-scale events like hurricanes or tsunamis we are subsidizing a greater risk and suggest that that risk isn't as great. >> senator shelby. >> thank you, mr. chairman. the program's goal of fiscal solvency is defined as charging premiums that will generate enough revenue to cover historical average losses. how does the program's rate-setting policy compare to that of private sector insurers? in other words, would it meet the definition of actuarily sound? >> i think we do a better job on the river flooding and it is not sound when you look at hurricanes and tsunamis. >> but if we don't get first define what is actuaril sound is and get to this, it teams to me every time ther

now, ask yourself: am i at risk? if you're not sure, call for this free information kit to learn more. [ female announcer ] call the toll free number on the screen now to find out what the risks of p.a.d. really are. you'll find a 7-point checklist that helps you understand what could be putting you at risk. if you have symptoms, you'll learn how treating symptoms is different from reducing your risk. you'll also learn about lifestyle changes and treatment options that can help reduce your risk for heart attack and stroke. there's even a discussion guide for you to bring to your doctor that can help you discuss p.a.d. together. call the toll free number on the screen for your free information kit today. the risk is real. take the next step. call today. >> closed captioning brought to you by mancini sleepworld. >>> you are taking a live look from sky7hd of michelle obama and the motorcade leading the event at claremont in berkeley. she is on her way to san francisco for a fund-raiser for 200 people. it's at the mercha

there is a risk. the floodwaters are quite high and if they rise 10 feet, it could knock out the electricity and back-up generators. >> if you compare the cultures in japan and u.s. when it comes to nuclear safety, which do you think is better? >> they are comparable. japan is one of the leading countries in the world. this is not like a backwater country or inferior to the u.s. and they have the same set of problems. they have regulatory agencies that are too close to the industry of cutting corners, they have industry that is not preparing for the worst case but the most likely cases so the risks you saw in japan that emerged three, four months ago are the same set of risks we face in the united states. >> thank you for joining us. >> my pleasure. >> now returning to where the program started in the state of the global economy, while greece suffers, other countries like brazil are experiencing a boom, but could that bubble actually go bust? our economics editor traveled to brazil to see for herself.

the undermine market discipline and promotes risk-taking. they inhabit the restructuring of troubled financial companies and recognition of lawsuits. the keep substandard management in place at preserving suboptimal allocation on capitol they are to the well-run banks to get the bailout for 2008 to to their petition of the entire banking industry and until the competitive balance in favor of some mcginn banks. in the first quarter this year the cost of earning assets is only about half as high for the banks with more than $100 billion of assets as it was for community banks with assets under $1 billion. in the end, why do bailouts violate the principles of limited government on which the free enterprise system is founded. that's why the fdic was determined to press for the board robust and effective resolution from work as a centerpiece of the dodd-frank financial reform legislation that was enacted last summer. titles one and ii authorize the creation of such a resolution framework that can make the sifi resolvable in a future crisis. this

do preferred risk?ferred risk, in some cases, is probably below what the market would insure at. i think we have created a structural imbalance where we are charging a preferred rate because the risk is much lower. we created this incentive to get the private sector to look at that, in effect, in large-scale events like hurricanes or tsunamis, we are subsidizing a greater risk, that when you look at river floods or other things, that suggests that the risk is not as great. >> senator shelby. >> thank you, mr. chairman. fiscal solvency is defined as at the charging premiums that would generate enough revenue to cover historical average loss years. how does the program's policy compared to that of the private- sector insurers? would it meet the definition of being actuarially sound? >> i think we do a much better job on the rivering flooding. i do not think it is actuarially sound when you look at the impacts of hurricanes and tsunami is. >> but if we do not first define what actuarially sound means, it s

that might be true if only the risk and cost to the country with the risk and cost of bank failure. but there are other threats and dangers. if we overregulate and ignore the plans of the rest of the world, then i fear we will push capital industry and jobs out of the country. at a time when each new release of government data seems to underscore the sensitivity of our economic recovery, it is fair to ask trade and other agencies representing -- represented on the first panel, whether they have carefully considered ditching the tip of fact of the tsunami of predatory band-aids unleashed by dodd-frank is having on the real economy. we will be discussing for critical issues during this hearing and raising important questions. i hope our panelists will address. versed is capital and liquidity. willful basel iii rules make the financial sector more stable? and if so, at what cost? is the banking system worth the potential trade off of slower economic growth malaise innovation and diminished credit availability? regulation of si fi is congressman -- governor carrillo's proposal impose ad

risk. knowing this species, including the two endangered, researchers are predicting the extinction of the little brown bats, one of america's most common mammals. that's provide enormous benefits to humans and there are ecological consequences. there is a critical nature to maintaining the balance of nature. they consume huge numbers of insects that can damage crops. a conservative number of the ballot advise the bonn would have consumed 700 tons of insects each year, which is a lot to lose. the study published in the journal science, as you mentioned, estimates the value of bats culturally at around $3 billion per year. impacts on this are as little as four years to five years. there could be an economic burden as well as pollutants to the environment. there's a possibility that it could spread disease. including a month mosquitos. that's may become listed under the endangered species act, which could cause further problems for the economic impact. many states are actively listing the bat

would you be at risk? sometimes we attribute at risk to perform characteristics. sometimes the environment. we adjust. growing up. i needed to leave the environment. i am talking straight up. to survive, i grew up on the streets. the word i did at chad. the number one book that's popular, what book do you think it is? i hear the bible. beautiful. what is it? i have heard that one too. you know what it is? it's called the art of seduction. the first section is called choose a victim. what has happened is this. as an educator. someone who works with gang units. we created oxymorons. we created good people who i think it's good to be bad. we teach them them that passing the standard is success. there is a difference. 3 words they taught me. do you think what 3 words. this is from their world, at riskness. you know what the 3 most powerful words are? i tend to think in love, faith. you know what they said? hate, jealousy and revenge. i am listening to that. i said, we need to go beyond that. what do you think strategically. i still remember. i went to a debut taunt ba

do preferred risk? preferred risk is actually i think in some cases probably below what the market would actually insure at. in some ways, we have created a structural imbalance where we are charging a preferred rate because the risk is much lower, but it is probably lower than what the private sector would be comfortable with, particularly in large-scale events such as hurricanes or tsunamis. we're actually subsidizing higher risks when the risk is not that great. >> thank you. the program's goal of fiscal solvency as i am understand it is charging premiums that will generate enough revenue that will cover a loss year. how does the program's rate setting policy compared to that of the jig compare -- compared to that of private sector insurance? >> i think we do a much better job on river flooding. it is not actuarially sound when it comes to hurricanes and tsunami is. >> first, define what actuarially sound means. it seems to me that every time there is a catastrophic event, it is leading the fund towa

risk. the second reason i think we've to keep that in mind is that economies of scale that they argue are achieved at size is far less than half the size of the sifi. it's clearly over they've been shown this there are economies of scale but no where near -- you don't need to be anywhere near $2 trillion to gain them. and clearly one-stop banking for most activities will remain in place under this proposal. the trading activities, a high risk activity will be out, but the customer will be well served and those activities can be purchased elsewhere in a very efficient environment. finally it seems improbable to me the argument they will pick up their marbles and go to another country. because i have to ask that country outside the united states do they really have the gdp size, the ability to pick up the tab on to big to fail they might think they are gaining by bringing of the institution over. all countries should be focused on bringing stability to the economic system and many are and i t

risk so that justifies putting them in the low risk group. our proposed rule like the tftc's proposed rule requirement does not have end users as long as the exposure is below a threshold that the bank swap dealer established which we believe is consistent with the status quo where banks set limits on their exposures to all their customers, limits above which they would not be comfortable having exposure, so we believe the general structure we've proposed is consistent with the status quo of users. also, the tftcs the rules require trading documentation including an agreement or csa. we understand that would be a change for some commercial end users that do not have that trading documentation. that's an additional burden, both of our rule and the tftc's rule, but in keeping with the general improved transparency and regulation of the derivatives market, we meal that's a reasonable requirement, so that's it. >> okay, thank you very much. >> senator lugar. >> thank you, madam chairwoman. you mentioned as many as 15 agreements may have been coor

risk. the second reason i think we've to keep that in mind is that economies of scale that they argue are achieved at size is far less than half the size of the sifi. it's clearly over they've been shown this there are economies of scale but no where near -- you don't need to be anywhere near $2 trillion to gain them. and clearly one-stop banking for most activities will remain in place under this proposal. the trading activities, a high risk activity will be out, but the customer will be well served and those activities can be purchased elsewhere in a very efficient environment. finally it seems improbable to me the argument they will pick up their marbles and go to another country. because i have to ask that country outside the united states do they really have the gdp size, the ability to pick up the tab on to big to fail they might think they are gaining by bringing of the institution over. all countries should be focused on bringing stability to the economic system and many are and i t

, formula for pricing options, catalysts and pricing models, value at risk and automation of risk investment. think of the course ended in may of 2008, before we are brought into bankruptcy. not a single principal financier todd wasn't violated by the people who were under these institutions. it was incredible. i may just make one comment here and many questioned. the course announcement was posted on the website of gw in december of 07. this is an undergraduate course. i was amazed. i got letters from three staffers at the federal reserve who wanted to take this undergraduate course. i couldn't believe it because there's no way they could get an mba degree. so clearly they knew something was pulling in their. the look in your book -- i looked at references to goldman sachs. behind almost every shady deal that has been exposed, for example, they ripped off dossey, you know, a colleague of mine made a joke that we could get the major investment tanks in china and russia and japan, we could cut our defense budget by $500 billion a year because there is not a single economy in the world that co

the reason banks are not lending more now is the common risk of risk aversion on their part. they have plenty of capacity to lend. they have been raising capital since the crisis started and if they do not already need to those standards, they are well positioned to do so slowly through or earnings. banks that need more time for seamless transition to the new standards, including -- include the surcharge. risk retention is necessary to give insurers long-term interest in the underlying mortgages. given the controversy that has surrounded this rule, i regret that congress also carved out an exemption for all trucks safe mortgages as defined by ultra-safe -- for all xtr mortgages as defined by the predatory industry. the connection they are not making is that this small, extra cost is something we have to pay in the short term to put a little equity behind these mortgages to ensure that incentives are properly aligned and to avoid a repeat of the mortgage crisis in the future. we also need a solid, long-term thinking on other important national policy issues. too often, the res

risk of hospitalization in children and adolescents.dvair is not for people whose asthma is well controlled with a long-term asthma control medicine like an inhaled corticosteroid. once your asthma is well controlled your doctor will decide if you can stop advair without loss of control and prescribe a different asthma control medicine, such as an inhaled corticosteroid. do not take advair more than prescribed. see your doctor if your asthma does not improve or gets worse. is advair right for you? ask your doctor. get your first prescription free. advair helps prevent symptoms. he needs some gellin'. yeahhhhhhh. gellin' is like having a teeny tiny foot masseuse in your shoe. you like ? nice ! dr. scholl's massaging gel insoles. outrageous comfort, all-day long. imagine a day when we can eat what we want and sleep soundly through the night. prevacid®24hr prevents the acid that causes frequent heartburn all day, all night. just don't feel like they used to. are you one of them? remember when you had more energy for 18 holes with your budd

took some wild risks when i was young. but i was still taking a risk with my cholesterol.ne with high cholesterol may be at increased risk of heart attack. diet and exercise weren't enough for me. i stopped kidding myself. i've been eating healthier, exercising more, and now i'm also taking lipitor. if you've been kidding yourself about high cholesterol, stop. along with diet, lipitor has been shown to lower bad cholesterol 39 to 60 percent. lipitor is fda approved to reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke in patients who have heart disease or risk factors for heart disease. [ female announcer ] lipitor is not for everyone, including people with liver problems and women who are nursing, pregnant or may become pregnant. you need simple blood tests to check for liver problems. tell your doctor if you are taking other medications or if you have any muscle pain or weakness. this may be a sign of a rare but serious side effect. lets go... haha. if you have high cholesterol, you may be at increased risk of heart attack and stroke. don't kid yourself. talk to your doctor abou

if they did not say, they lived it, was take a risk. my dad took a risk when he came to l.a. it was not like he succeeded right away. it is what holds people back. i really learned a lot from sports. you fail so much more than you succeed. it helped me when i got in the acting business. i left so many auditions when i did not relate risk, where i played it a little safe. then when i did not get the part, i was always able to say well, i did not really try. if i had given another 10%, i probably would have gotten the job. but risk and fail and pick yourself up and start over. tavis: the thing i have always it mired about actors -- admired about actors in this town is that you hear a lot more no than yes. how do you develop a constitution that allows you to deal with that all the time? >> pitbull talk to me all the time, it young actors -- people talk to me all the time. i tell them to first developed an appetite for failure. your not going to be right every time. you are not going to perform well every time. if you get a screen test, you will know is a big opportunity. the ner

>> i don't know if you can say there is no risk. there is always a risk here.these drums are stored in structures. the los alamos fire department is not adequately prepared -- they're concerned about the capability of the firefighters and there is risk. >> how do u.s. officials reveal the safety? >> one of the good pieces of news is that nebraska, it is not as bad as it could have been. the operators of that plant, there is preventative action. again, there is risk. the floodwaters are quite high. they knocked out the back of generators and you have a real crisis. japan is one of the leading countries in the world for technology and nuclear safety. it is not a backwater country. i would say that they are often comparable and to have the same set of problems. they have regulatory agencies, they are cutting corners, they are preparing for the most likely cases. they are the same set of risks we face in the united states. >> thank you for joining us. >> among the athletes already trading hard, the last olympics, he became the first athlete from afghanistan to brin

>> it is an assessment of the risk and safety of the power plants.e normally do that every ten years. but this is going to be because of fukushima is going to be a special test. it will have like in three areas, one is the insulating vents and a combination of the flooding. and then the launch of safety functions like the blackouts. and the third one, the third part will be the monitoring of severe accidents including the cooling and spent fuel cooling and make sure that they are contained. those are the three areas. >> there are some critics that say there should be another area, not just those three. it should also be the checking things like whether it can withstand terrorist attacks. some say this is just a big pr exercise to reassure the public. >> yeah. but it should be considered in a different context. the governments, the security, the people for security and those outside the plant should be a public debate of the public report. the results will be public. >> germany decided to shut down all of its nuclear reactors. switzerland is saying it

increase the overall exposure to, you know, risk and credit risk across the system. in addition, i think, you know, as you are aware, there's also proposals, you know, that are competing between what the u.s. has proposed and what it appears europe is likely to propose as to the types of collateral and margin that could be posted from different transactions, and the u.s. proposals, you know, limit the amount of margin that would be posted to, you know, instruments that are basically denominated in u.s. dollars so therefore if there is extraterritorial application of the u.s. rules, you know, to foreign entities, be they affiliates or end customers we would be asking european clients to be posting, you know, u.s. dollar securities as opposed to, you know, european bond collateral or government collateral or currency which would obviously be the natural currency in which they would have their assets. >> let me just clarify what was just said. even if these rules were harmonized across borders, is the restriction and cost to increase on affiliates -- on affiliate trades

today we have pradaxa to reduce the risk of a stroke caused by a clot.clinical trial, pradaxa 150 mg reduced stroke risk 35% more than warfarin. and with pradaxa, there's no need for those regular blood tests. pradaxa is progress. pradaxa can cause serious, sometimes fatal, bleeding. don't take pradaxa if you have abnormal bleeding, and seek immediate medical care for unexpected signs of bleeding, like unusual bruising. pradaxa may increase your bleeding risk if you're 75 or older, have kidney problems or a bleeding condition, like stomach ulcers. or if you take aspirin products, nsaids, or blood thinners. tell your doctor about all medicines you take, any planned medical or dental procedures, and don't stop taking pradaxa without your doctor's approval, as stopping may increase your stroke risk. other side effects include indigestion, stomach pain, upset, or burning. if you have afib not caused by a heart valve problem, ask your doctor if pradaxa can reduce your risk of a stroke. >>> now a look ahead at the stories we'll be watching thth monday -- presi

today we have pradaxa to reduce the risk of a stroke caused by a clot.n a clinical trial, pradaxa 150 mg reduced stroke risk 35% more than warfarin. and with pradaxa, there's no need for those regular blood tests. pradaxa is progress. pradaxa can cause serious, sometimes fatal, bleeding. don't take pradaxa if you have abnormal bleeding, and seek immediate medical care for unexpected signs of bleeding, like unusual bruising. pradaxa may increase your bleeding risk if you're 75 or older, have kidney problems or a bleeding condition, like stomach ulcers. or if you take aspirin products, nsaids, or blood thinners. tell your doctor about all medicines you take, any planned medical or dental procedures, and don't stop taking pradaxa without your doctor's approval, as stopping may increase your stroke risk. other side effects include indigestion, stomach pain, upset, or burning. if you have afib not caused by a heart valve problem, ask your doctor if pradaxa can reduce your risk of a stroke. >>> and now, a personal interview with michelle obama. with "world new

today we have pradaxa to reduce the risk of a stroke caused by a clot. in a clinical trial, pradaxa 150 mg reduced stroke risk 35% more than warfarin. and with pradaxa, there's no need for those regular blood tests. pradaxa is progress. pradaxa can cause serious, sometimes fatal, bleeding. don't take pradaxa if you have abnormal bleeding, and seek immediate medical care for unexpected signs of bleeding, like unusual bruising. pradaxa may increase your bleeding risk if you're 75 or older, have kidney problems or a bleeding condition, like stomach ulcers. or if you take aspirin products, nsaids, or blood thinners. tell your doctor about all medicines you take, any planned medical or dental procedures, and don't stop taking pradaxa without your doctor's approval, as stopping may increase your stroke risk. other side effects include indigestion, stomach pain, upset, or burning. if you have afib not caused by a heart valve problem, ask your doctor if pradaxa can reduce your risk of a stroke. >>> once again this week the numbers from the jobs front were not go

today we have pradaxa to reduce the risk of a stroke caused by a clot.a clinical trial, pradaxa 150 mg reduced stroke risk 35% more than warfarin. and with pradaxa, there's no need for those regular blood tests. pradaxa is progress. pradaxa can cause serious, sometimes fatal, bleeding. don't take pradaxa if you have abnormal bleeding, and seek immediate medical care for unexpected signs of bleeding, like unusual bruising. pradaxa may increase your bleeding risk if you're 75 or older, have kidney problems or a bleeding condition, like stomach ulcers. or if you take aspirin products, nsaids, or blood thinners. tell your doctor about all medicines you take, any planned medical or dental procedures, and don't stop taking pradaxa without your doctor's approval, as stopping may increase your stroke risk. other side effects include indigestion, stomach pain, upset, or burning. if you have afib not caused by a heart valve problem, ask your doctor if pradaxa can reduce your risk of a stroke. i have a great fit with my dentures. i love kiwis. i've always had that

risk. this is not a historical a stable part of the world. what fails to be understood is the risk involved spliff staying too long and not just in terms of the costs that people be year as a country and our men and women serving in uniform. on a daily basis, we hear complaints about our military presence. about civilian deaths. about having 150,000 u.s. troops in your country. they are reliant on 150,000 foreign troops here this has a risk attached. you have to strike a balance. if you were to say tomorrow we are just going to stay here for as long as we feel like a comment that would undermine our national security interest. if i have a concern is that we may be staying there too long. i understand that they have a different balance to strike. i look forward to hearing about how this will play out. there is no question that afghanistan and pakistan are in interco. we have to manage a plan their parents this will further elaborate on the plans. >> thank you. i want to thank our witnesses f

took some wild risks when i was young. but i was still taking a risk with my cholesterol. anyone with high cholesterol may be at increased risk of heart attack. diet and exercise weren't enough for me. i stopped kidding myself. i've been eating healthier, exercising more, and now i'm also taking lipitor. if you've been kidding yourself about high cholesterol, stop. along with diet, lipitor has been shown to lower bad cholesterol 39 to 60 percent. lipitor is fda approved to reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke in patients who have heart disease or risk factors for heart disease. [ female announcer ] lipitor is not for everyone, including people with liver problems and women who are nursing, pregnant or may become pregnant. you need simple blood tests to check for liver problems. tell your doctor if you are taking other medications or if you have any muscle pain or weakness. this may be a sign of a rare but serious side effect. lets go... haha. if you have high cholesterol, you may be at increased risk of heart attack and stroke. don't kid yourself. talk to your doctor

risks when i was young. but i was still taking a risk with my cholesterol.nyone with high cholesterol may be at increased risk of heart attack. diet and exercise weren't enough for me. i stopped kidding myself. i've been eating healthier, exercising more, and now i'm also taking lipitor. if you've been kidding yourself about high cholesterol, stop. along with diet, lipitor has been shown to lower bad cholesterol 39 to 60 percent. lipitor is fda approved to reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke in patients who have heart disease or risk factors for heart disease. [ female announcer ] lipitor is not for everyone, including people with liver problems and women who are nursing, pregnant or may become pregnant. you need simple blood tests to check for liver problems. tell your doctor if you are taking other medications or if you have any muscle pain or weakness. this may be a sign of a rare but serious side effect. lets go... haha. if you have high cholesterol, you may be at increased risk of heart attack and stroke. don't kid yourself. talk to your doctor a

mission free credit taishan free transfer charge is free from ancient free risk free. two sides free. download free blog counseling videos for your media projects a free media oh god hard teach dot com. let's . see it's.

took some wild risks when i was young. but i was still taking a risk with my cholesterol. anyone with high cholesterol may be at increased risk of heart attack. diet and exercise weren't enough for me. i stopped kidding myself. i've been eating healthier, exercising more, and now i'm also taking lipitor. if you've been kidding yourself about high cholesterol, stop. along with diet, lipitor has been shown to lower bad cholesterol 39 to 60 percent. lipitor is fda approved to reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke in patients who have heart disease or risk factors for heart disease. [ female announcer ] lipitor is not for everyone, including people with liver problems and women who are nursing, pregnant or may become pregnant. you need simple blood tests to check for liver problems. tell your doctor if you are taking other medications or if you have any muscle pain or weakness. this may be a sign of a rare but serious side effect. lets go... haha. if you have high cholesterol, you may be at increased risk of heart attack and stroke. don't kid yourself. talk to your doctor

in half for women most at risk.avid kerley leads us off tonight. >> reporter: tonight, researchers consider this treatment a stunning success in battling melanoma skin cancer, which when it attacks organs is a stubborn and sadly sometimes impossible disease to treat. >> this is going to be a revolutionary way to treatment patients with cancer. >> reporter: scientists revealed a new drug, which targets genetic cell mutation which affects about half of those with melanoma. corky is one of those, whose melanoma spread to his organs. he tried the drug. >> this drug, if it continues to work, the way it is working, it is fantastic. >> reporter: it was so effective in keeping patients alive, those on chemowere offered the drug instead. >> we have tears of joy in clin clinic, when we have a patient who is really sick, we enroll them on these critical trials and in 72 hours, they're better -- this is unbelievable. >> reporter: also announced today, the already approved yervoy, which stimulates the immune system. it increased

so the clearinghouses have worked extremely well but they don't eliminate risk. the mutual i sit among the people that have the deep pockets. >> thank you very much. senator roberts. >> madam chairwoman, once i was chairman of the subcommittee of the armed services committee. i made it mandatory that every panel member be shackled to their chairs so that they could hear all panels. i just think it would need appropriate here. i am not for shackling. [laughter] but at any rate, it would be interesting to have a panel here with mr. connor and then have this born and then mr. cooper and i would like to place chairman gensler next to chairman damgard and then have at it and have about a 15 roundtable discussion. i think it would be very helpful. chuck, welcome back. thank you for your contribution. thank you for that last statement. what are you going to tell your membership as a result of this hearing? are you going to say you have every confidence that a farmer cooperative is free in regards to some of this cftc rulings that you are worried about? what are you goin

now, ask yourself: am i at risk? if you're not sure, call for this free information kit to learn more. [ female announcer ] call the toll free number on the screen now to find out what the risks of p.a.d. really are. you'll find a 7-point checklist that helps you understand what could be putting you at risk. if you have symptoms, you'll learn how treating symptoms is different from reducing your risk. you'll also learn about lifestyle changes and treatment options that can help reduce your risk for heart attack and stroke. there's even a discussion guide for you to bring to your doctor that can help you discuss p.a.d. together. call the toll free number on the screen for your free information kit today. the risk is real. take the next step. call today. >>> a spectacular shot over hong kong's victoria harbor looking out towards the financial district where the trading day has now come to an end. welcome back, you're watching "world business today" live on cnn. >>> i suppose you could call it a financial brainstorming

many have caveats to reduce risk. for example, spain's 1,500 troops are not allowed to fire a weapon except in self-defense. and they cannot operate at night. gates says there is time for nato to reverse the trend, but he can now leave his post knowing that nato has been duly warned. martha raddatz, abc news, washington. >>> and the west is watching another tinderbox overseas, syria, where an exodus is under way. thousands of refugees are streaming across the border into turkey, trying to escape the president's forces. government helicopters said to be firing randomly at anything that moves. residents are in hiding, sending out urgent messages begging for help. at least 32 people were killed today. >>> and still ahead, a u.s. government worry about a chemical found in some houses, even coffee cups. what's the risk? >>> favorite recipes of presidents released by the national archive. we test a beloved chili. >>> and, the small gestures here at home that really help the fighting men and women overseas. our "persons of t