the report has been posted on the san francisco lafco website and is also available through our clerk, a hard copy. it is a phase two. the original study is also available on the san francisco lafco website. supervisor campos: thank you, ms. miller. can we have the tv screen, please? >> rick hutchinson ith r 3. pleased to be here again. i did want to go through a brief smear of this report. as you know, you asked us to come back with information in four areas. information related to fees and services that were provided by the haulers to the jurisdictions. a correlation between service rates and diversion rates, fees and services, description of fixed assets held in the city of san francisco, and information regarding potential consequences and benefits related to barging. we have met with several entities, and the haulers, willed like to -- we would like to thank the i different team for this information. we listed 13 jurisdictions in the report. i am not going to go through that. what we were able to do is generate information that looked at the fees and services provided by the haul

. >> i am the interim executive officer for san francisco lafco. i have a brief presentation. i know we have thrown a lot of data at you today. i did want to say that this program designed by sfpuc is different from where we originally thought the program would be back when it was adopted by the board of supervisors in 2007. through the process of hiring numerous consultants and having numerous reports, the board adopted a final implementation plan a couple of years ago that revised the original intent of our cca program to say that our rates would be competitive with pg&e, understanding the product we would offer, we would not be able to meet or beat pg&e to be able to offer it to all our citizens at all tiers. marin is only going to the higher tier in their program. we will be targeting in making hours available to all tiers. ordnance still requires we have the low income assistance and follow the care guidelines as well. we will be figuring out how to provide that in this program. the program will be zero dedicated nuclear power, unlike the current pg&e offering. that is an

san francisco? >> i cannot answer that. >> i guess the first step is that this came from money given for this program. we've budgeted money years ago to take care of the expenses of lafco and this program. this did not come from ratepayers. the poll cost about $50,000 to do. it did not come from the ratepayers of san francisco. >> it came from where? >> it came from revenue from power sales to the irrigation district and a variety of other customers we have on the power site. >> the people in the best of pay for this? -- modesto paid for this? >> out of the entire budget, you could pick a line item that paid for it. >> i am not sure the right person is to answer this question. maybe miss hale. commissioner torres was just speaking about the participation rates. what would be the participation rate in a 100% clean program -- green program? i would assume if 100% of the people wanted to sign up, we would not be able to provide power at 100% agreement -- green. i am hoping there is room to grow in that. i am wondering what the target is. >> we are preparing to target at launch 75,000 account holders. the survey information and the slide i set up earlier is indicative. it