language has been changed from will not have a negative impact on the environments provided under sequa , to say that the ordinance does comply with it. page two, lines 1 through 2, ab. it provides a space for that motion and 3, the city attorney corrected some section numbers which were out of sequence. those amendments are for your consideration. supervisor wiener: thank you mr. chairman and thank you to everyone who came up to testify on all sides. it is always taking a big part out of people's day to sit through what can often be a long hearing. thank you. i just want to comment -- putting aside the merits, which will dispose of -- our want to comment on the unfortunate, and i think unnecessarily toxic dynamic that has formed around this project. everyone i have spoken to universally agrees that we are in desperate need of housing for transition-aged youths and i know from my inexperience over years and years in my district and my neighborhood with the lgbt community, we see transition ag is to do not have access to services, housing and we see the problems that result from those us

language has been changed from will not have a negative impact on the environments provided under sequa , to say that the ordinance does comply with it. page two, lines 1 through 2, ab. it provides a space for that motion and 3, the city attorney corrected some section numbers which were out of sequence. those amendments are for your consideration. supervisor wiener: thank you mr. chairman and thank you to everyone who came up to testify on all sides. it is always taking a big part out of people's day to sit through what can often be a long hearing. thank you. thank you. i just want to comment --

improvement is and too great to be paid out of the ordinary revenues, that the project is not under sequa and waiving the time limits set forth. supervisor chiu: supervisor wiener? supervisor wiener: thank you, mr. president. i am proud to be a co-sponsor of this bond, union i am strongly supporting it. this is a key part of our capital plan, and it will play a key role in keeping the infrastructure of our city intact. i think it's important to note where we are, that we have hundreds of millions of dollars of defer maintenance on our roads. this is not a situation where we can just pay to bring our roads up to par out of our general fund. as much as we may want to do that, it is not possible given the 30 years we have neglected our road and allowed them to fall into this state of disrepair. in addition, i wanted to address to points that some who are skeptical of the bond have raised. the first is that this is not an atypical way of funding road reconstruction and resurfacing. the department of public works surveyed other cities, and it actually is a common practice to use bonding to do