i covered the o.j. case. covered all the o.j. cases.'t know, i should say i'm ashamed to admit, every single one, every single day. a completely different case. it would wake too long to go through all the reasons why. it's a completely different case in terms of the charges, the evidence. pt only similarity is, what? the verdict. people don't like it because that was a not guilty verdict and this is a not guilty verdict. that's the comparison being made. everything else about the case is different. look what i have learned in all of my years of covering cases is that people sit in a courtroom and it's like the old adage about the blind men and the elephant. people see different things depending on their perspective, point of view, vantage point in the courtroom and the jury sees it very differently as well. she have to be very, very careful when we assess what we think we've seen sitting in the courtroom or watching at home on television and not watches at all and have an opinion anyway. right? when you talk to the jury, it always fasc

simpson, end up in jail for something else. >> o.j. would have made millions if it weren't for the lawsuits. >> wait. we are saying she is going to be at sports memorabilia signings? all right. it's a little odd. >> it's not far fetched. she could have things associatedded with the crime like a people cover and have her sign t. vi13 of them. >> like with o.j. i think, yes, there will be a book deal and a couple of things. then people are going to be repulsed that we are making this individual wealthy. it is a cultural problem. and then there is the self-creeking where we think, oh, my god and we get self righteous and people will turn back on her again. >> i love the o.j. thing brought up so much. >> marcia clark says this was worse than o.j. i. of course she did -- she lost! [laughter] >> all right. that's it. both of these people -- casey and o.j -- are innocent. >> yes, in the eyes of the law. >> so let's treat them as such when we see them on the street. >> guilty under god. >> coming up, are people clogging up our sidewalks and pa

it's the most controversial verdict since o.j. simpson was acquitted of murder more than 16 years ago. casey anthony not guilty of the murder of her 2-year-old daughter, caylee, a decision that shocked america and the world. >> as to the charge of first-degree murder, verdict as to count one, we, the jury, find the defendant not guilty. so say we all. dated at orlando, orange county, florida, on this 5th day of july, 2011, signed foreperson. as to the charge of aggravated child abuse, verdict as to count two, we, the jury, find the defendant not guilty. so say we all, dated at orlando, orange county, florida, this 5th day of july, 2011. signed foreperson. as to the charge of aggravated manslaughter of a child, verdict as to count three, we, the jury, find the defendant not guilty. >> the jury deliberated for less than 11 hours. casey not guilty on all of the most serious charges. guilty on four counts of providing false information to police. casey's defense attorney, jose baez, suddenly the most successful lawyer in america. >> w

for example, who can forget o.j. acquitted in 1995 of murdering his wife nicole brown simpson and her friend ronald goldman. he had to face consequences. paying out a combined $62 million to the victims' families as a result of a civil suit. o.j. is serving nine years in prison for a 2007 armed robbery in las vegas. in 1992 four white police officers were found not guilty of assaulting rodney king who wassing black on a los angeles roadside even though the beating was caught on camera, as you can see by a bystander. the rationally charged outcome sparked the massive l.a. riots that left 53 people dead and cost a billion dollars in property damage. two of the officers were eventually convicted. and michael jackson's behavior before and after his 2005 child molestation trial may have underdetermined him many the eyes of the public, but the jury let him off. the king of pop went into hiding in the mideast for several years after his acquittal. at the time of his death in 2009 he was preparing for a big come back tour. i

the o.j. case was so crazy.here were books written during the trial by jurors who were dismissed during the trial. i mean, that, i mean, will never happen again. i don't think you need a lot of rules. these cases are very unusual. if people want to write books, i don't see any problem with that. people have a very false idea about the book publishing industry that publishers are throwing around hundreds of thousands of dollars -- i just think making any sort of rules based on these very aberrational cases is probably not a very good idea. >> quickly on this one. >> i don't think -- sorry. sorry. >> i was going to say quickly on this one. so the state loses on the three felonies, wins on the four mississippi misdemeanors. can the state of florida tax or somehow get money back from casey anthony to pay for the prosecution? >> i think that is such a bogus move by the state. you know what happened in this case? casey anthony won and the state lost. the state's got to deal with that fact. maybe they should be better

you know, i look at this and we can compare o.j. simpson and this trial but o.j. are going to say that i brought baggage. people are going to say that conduct of the forensic investigators at the scene were going to bring baggage. well, this case didn't have any of that. this case didn't have racial overtones. this case really in -- and it was almost in a vacuum of your average case when the victim is missing and a close family member where forensics and d.n.a. in the home environment really means very little. so it's all the crime scene. so the crime scene's deteriorated and this jury had an unreasonable expectation of just exactly what forensics and i hear a lot of people talking about the impact of all these crime shows. i agree. well, here's another impact. when you take that tv into a courtroom and you start making people look at these trials in a way that there's a higher level of scrutiny and interest, i think there's a bar that becomes raised for the jury to find guilt. >> excellent point. >> it's really unfortunate. i just -- i cannot believe, i cannot be

the public outcry that derailed o.j. simpson's book if i did it and its connection to murdoch. >>> and william randolph i. >>> the rupert murdoch enterprise includes publishing. but the public outcry was so great, both were shelved. ken wayne brought us this report. >> reporter: the public outrage was quick and furious after it was announced that two tv specials and a book of how o.j. simpson would have carried out his wife's murder. >> everybody took a real stand against this and i'm glad that the news corp. made a decision that protects victim's rights. >> reporter: at least a dozen fox stations had already refused to air the program following criticism that simpson and the network were making money out of a blood crime. >> it took the country, outraged people all over this country yelling and screaming and telling fox, telling reagan books this is disgusting. and they finally got the message. >>> in san francisco, where simpson played football for galliello high and college, people said they are glad the deal was shel

i think the o.j. far more shocking and more wrong than the casey anthony verdict. i really did think the casey anthony verdict was based on the evidence. there you had a case with no cause of death. no motive. no time of death. all of which were completely present and obvious in the simpson case. there was no doubt of how the two defendants or victims died in the simpson case. there was abundant dna evidence. i don't have to persuade marsha clark that o.j. was guilty. i think this case was a lot tougher. it was a lot more questionable. >> let me come back to you. in some of the writing you have done since the verdict came out, you made a distinction of reasonable doubt. all three of us have been prosecutors, you try to describe it to people. reasonable doubt is one thing, reason to doubt is different. describe how you have created this distinction. i think it's a powerful one. >> what i have always seen the defense do and whether or not it succeeds has to do with the juries mind set. the defense will

o.j. simpson white bronco along at 35 miles per hour as police pursued and thousands crowded the overpasses to get a glimpse of the football star turned murder suspect. o.j. wasn't in the drive -- driver's seat that day. do you remember who was? the answer when we return. if you leave now i'm stealing all of your law>> i have o.j. in the car. >> where are you? >> right now you have to tell them to back off, he's still alive but he has a gun to his head. >> june 17th, 1994. the day o.j. simpson's notorious slow speed chase. 95 million watched live. did you guess who was driving that car? if not here's some help. was it: >> the nation found out when a cell phone call from the bronco to police was broadcast on live tv. >> what is your name? >> my name is aj. you know who i am [ bleep ] . >> yes it was al cowlings. close friend and former teammate o.j.'s chauffeur. after the chase ended cowlings was arrested. after months of hearings prosecution had insufficient evidence to file charges. t

o.j. simpson white bronco along at 35 miles per hour as police pursued and thousands crowded the overpasses to get a glimpse of the football star turned murder suspect. o.j. wasn't in the drive -- driver's seat that day. do you remember who was? the answer when we return. if you leave now i'm stealing all of your law thanks to the venture card from capital one, we get double miles on every purchase, so me and my lads earned arip to san francisco twice as fast we get double miles every time we use our card... i'll take these two... ...no matter what we're buying. ...and all of those. and since double miles add up fast, we can bring the whole gang! it's hard to beat double miles! whoa dude. [ male announcer ]et the venture card from capital one and earn double miles on every purchase, every day. go to capilone.com. what's in your wallet? with diabetes, it's tough to keep life balanced. i don't always have time to eat like i should. and the more i focus on everything else, the less time i hav

biggest since o.j., most shocking since o.j.a clark herself called last night the ver digit worse than o.j. thankfully there's no racial component to this case. unlike back then the people are ditch vieded. the voices are loud and angry. >> caylee caylee caylee caylee. some of the people we've seen outside the courthouse. enough anger there and beyond for casey's lawyer to say he fears for his client's life. you can find some of the worst of it online. tom forman takes a look tonight. >> reporter: if you judge by the videos flooding youtube it would be easy to think that casey anthony might just be the most hated woman in america right now. >> you want to know why this [ expletive ] casey anthony misses me [ expletive ] off? i will [ expletive ] explain it for you. >> reporter: over and over again, people served up some nasty words for a mother who was acquitted of murdering her child. >> reporter: thumbs up and comment if you think casey anthony is a stupid [ expletive ] that needs to go to -- >> reporter: on facebook tens of t

o.j. simpson white bronco along at 35 miles per hour as police pursued and thousands crowded the overpasses to get a glimpse of the football star turned murder suspect. o.j. wasn't in the drive -- driver's seat that day. do you remember who was? the answer when we return. if you leave now i'm stealing all of your lawn ornaments. to keep in balance after 50, i switched to a complete multivitamin with more. only one a day women's 50+ advantage has ginkgo for memory and concentration, plus support for bone and breast health. a great addition to my routine. [ female announcer ] one a day women's. so i took my heartburn pill and some antacids. we're having mexican tonight, so another pill then? unless we eat later, then pill later? if i get a snack now, pill now? skip the snack, pill later... late dinner, pl w? aghh i've got heartburn in my head. [ male announcer ] stop the madness of treating frequent heartburn. it's simple with prilosec otc. one ll a day. twenty-four hos. zero heartburn. no h

simpson case. >> that's right, except in the o.j. simpson case you had a murder and the family coming forward. the family was well funded and the family went after o.j. and ultimately he was found liable. >> let's talk about marsh clark, the prosecutors in the o.j. simpson case. what happened to the prosecutors who lost this case. >> i don't think they will be joining marsha clark in any kind of show in the near future. they will be back in the office. they will probably go their merry way. and they have lost a major murder case. >> okay, but does it hurt their career? are they damaged? >> i think it certainly hurts their career. many in the country thought she was guilty and she was acquitted. >> in your experience even after an acquittal like this one, will casey anthony ever be anybody but that woman that everybody thinks got off. >> remember the statement where do i get me reputation back? here is a situation where many people think she did it. she was acquitted. obviously 12 people think she did not do it. >> at least they could

i'm is going to go up to o.j. simpson, the prosecutor in o.j.out the verdict, marcia clark. in every case a defense attorney will do his or her best to give a jury a reason to doubt. some other dude did it. those reasons don't equate with a reasonable doubt. a reason doesn't doesn't equal reasonable. holly, do you agree with that? >> 100%. absolutely. >> all right. that's it. it's done. let's go overseas and talk about "news of the world" in london. hugely popular so that they were tapping people's phones. rupert murdoch shut it don't. does he have a lot of exposure here? >> huge. >> monetary? >> monetary. some of his editors are looking at criminal charges. a corporation can be charged with murder and manslaughter. it's happened in the united states and united kingdom. when you think about what really happen it's so shocking to the conscience, so offensive. they are alleged to have hacked into a missing girl, 13-year-old girl's cell phone voice box while she was still missing. they were deleting messages to make room for more voice males to com

many people compare this to the o.j. simpson verdict.people feel that justice was not served. here is what one person said. >> here is what another person says. >> if you like to continue to the discussions, go to our facebook fan page. we will be talking about this all morning. >> > > 8:13 a.m., we are back in a couple of minutes with the world according to gary. we have a lot to talk about. her >> we are back with the world according to gary. i >> get have a big question for you pop. cahilto the canadian dr for tiger and a rod, he pled guilty to bringing and banned drugs and growth hormones. what does that mean for these big athletes? >> he looks to school cannot be corrected. >> you look at him and say, i will have what he is having. option >> when i go to the doctor i want someone older than me who i think will not harm me in any way. >> does this do anything? >> it leaves suspicion. i believe where there is smoke there's fire. he might tell you, try this or that and so it is legal. when i go to the doctor, if i am in pain, to do we

i didn't like -- -- o.j.uilty, blood evidence was overwhelming i thought that was an instance of jury nullification. people are making the comparison here, i don't see it. this is what separates us. this is not -- we don't have a mob rule in this country. this is not a mob mentality. we have put the standard and burden on proof purposely where it belongs. presumption of innocence is what separates america. it means sometimes if we don't have enough evidence. we don't know how she died if there is no dna. if you have either impeached or conflicting testimony, as we had on every issue in this case this is the verdict that i think the jury had no choice coming up with here. >> sean, 100%. this jury got it perfectly right. as a society we've agreed to a set of rules that we've abided by for over 200 years. those rules are, when you charge somebody with a particular crime, you've got to prove, as the prosecution, each and every element of that crime, beyond a reasonable doubt. it doesn't matter what they think, wh

is this another o.j. simpson travesty? geraldo, lis wiehl. >> the lawyer says the media was unfair and assassinated the character of his client. bernie goldberg will analyze that. >> about ho put duct tape on hr skull and threw her in the swamp? >> bill: also, what does the verdict say about america? i will deal with that. caution. you are about to enter the no spin zone. "the factor" begins right now. >> bill: hi, i'm bill o'reilly. thanks for watching us tonight. the vial casey anthony found not guilty of murdering her two-year-old daughter caylee, that is the subject of the talking points memo. i say she is vial because for 30 days she did not report her baby missing. 30 days. this the time the soas ye socic anthony partied hard and good a tatoo and ignored the flight of her missing two-year-old who was found dead in a swamp. those are facts beyond a reasonable doubt. reasonable doubt in the murder, maybe. i i will not condemn the jury. let's hear from them before we make any judgments. the problem is the jury doesn't w

z o.j. overlook the fact that in o.j.'se there was dna and the perpetrator's footprints in the bloody mess that he left when took the mother of his children's head off and ron goldman's head off. there was a blood trail to his house. and so suggest that the two cases are similar really belies reality. >> bill: i'm going to disagree on two points. number one i'm going stick up for bernie. he is not a racist and didn't have any racial overtones. >> why was it mexican immigrant. he did that to in flame your audience. >> bill: let me explain it to you. calm down. you are are passionate on that issue. you know it and i know it. >> geraldo: i'm passionate about the victims of the poll holocaust and victims everywhere. he knew what he was doing. >> bill: you are known for your passion on the border immigration issue. >> geraldo: what does that have to do with that case of a child killer. >> bill: it wasn't a racial thing. >> geraldo: it was a low blow and a lying -- >> bill: in your opinion it was in his opinion he made an honest

he said 24-hour cable was invented for o.j. simpson. it was invented for the o.j. trial. o.j. does not kill somebody every day, thank goodness. the problem is, these people have to fill those 24 hours even when o.j. has not murdered somebody. so what they do is fill it with michele bachmann. i have a particular grievance with her. i was speaking at the university of indiana. this is a real story. six months ago, i was talking to their honor society. i go back to the hotel room and i turned on the t b. -- i turned on the tv. it is cnn. anderson cooper is doing a story where he is explaining he has to rebut and correct a story he had on the night before. what was the story? congresswoman michele bachmann was on the night before and said that president obama's trip to india was going to cost $2 billion. what ever it was. and he had let it go. he did a wonderful thing, anderson cooper. he'd be constructed the whole -- deconstructed the whole story, showed how it began with an unnamed indian official. as if an unnamed indian official in maharajas and would have any idea what the pr

. >> another o.j. >> in the simpson case, there was so much focus and so much heat from the moment of timing the case and it never stopped. >> he made no reference to the defendant's statement and he didn't even know about the defendant's statement. >> reporter: marcia clark prosecuted o.j. simpson for murder and lost. >> no prosecution can ever answer all the questions. no prosecution can ever resolve all possible doubts. that's why we have a standard of beyond a reasonable doubt. but if a jury is simply looking for a reason, a reason to doubt, they will always find one. >> beyond a reasonable doubt is like swiss cheese. there's holes everywhere. there's big p pces missing. there's gaps. >> reporter: jennifer ford, injure numb juror number 3 in the trial, told us all the evidence prosecutors said point to guilt could have pointed another way, too. >> every expert, like, with anything, i could have been what the prosecution said, it could be the defense. if it's both, it could not be proven. >> there's a disconnect. because people outside see the trial on television. they think of it

and the backdrop, so different than o.j. because with o.j., you had racial overtones. you had the fact that he was a celebrity and then she goes on to write, marcia clark in "the daily beast" there were no bombshells that blew up in the prosecution's face like the mark fuhrman thing at the last minute and also all the collection questions about how stuff against o.j. was collected. it just seems like that this jury needed absolute certitude to convict her of anything. they had a whole list of things they could have convicted her. they wanted evidence. reasonable doubt became absolute certitude they didn't get that. they went with not guilty. not guilty. not guilty. >> we'll be talking with the prosecutor in that kcase, he'll be joining "fox & friends" at 6:50 a.m. eastern time. keep in mind that he submitted his resignation before the verdict came in. >> yep. >> in the meantime, cassy anthony is revealing some jailhouse letters that are very interesting because she apparently writing to another inmate saying she wants more children. she said to this inmate maybe we cou

>> i'll remind you that the jury in the o.j.case was sequestered at nine months and it it took four hours to have a not guilty verdict. diane and i covered that and the michael jackson verdict. i think sequestration could have had an impact. >> so did celebrity. we made casey anthony a celebrity. >> you think that was the impact? to your point about state did the better presentation. but there was duct tape, they couldn't put a tape in hand. there was chloroform. they couldn't have her buying it or making it. there were a lot of -- there was gas enough in their case that a jury could go back and say, well, i have a reasonable doubt. >> excellent insights from two experienced court watchers. very much appreciate your time. >> thank you. >> a number of important developments today in yet another big court case, one that has sparked an international media frenzy. next, a french writer accuses dominique strauss-kahn of attempted rape. [ female announcer ] the healing power of touch can be even more powerful, with precise pain reliev

. >> reporter: unlike other controversial defendants like o.j. simpson and michael jackson, casey has no pre-existing support base. >> in order for there to be any sort of a comeback, there has to be somebody who's your cheering section. whether it's a social racial group. whether it's a certain ethnic group. >> i'm disgusted. >> reporter: like many who were revolted by the verdict, this woman is more disgusted by the thought that casey who left jail with $500 to her name, could cash in on her notoriety with a book deal or pay-per-view special. >> i don't want her to be a millionairepy don't want her to make millions of dollars for killing her head. what does that tell everybody else? >> reporter: casey anthony's been offered $1 million from a tv production company to tell her story. and she wouldn't be the first. there's a long history of notorious defendants cashing in. mike tyson, the former undisputed heavyweight champion, was convicted of rape and sentenced to six years in prison. following his release in 1995, tyson earned an estimated $25

somebody writes back and says -- >> why, your dad helped o.j.ert kardashian, one of the lawyers who represented o.j. simpson, even though he knew he was guilty. some things never change, murderers go free. >> a lot of people are saying this is o.j. 2, this trial. >> that's what some people feel about it, looking for justice in some way. and then of course kim kardashian reacts to that. just because i was close to the o.j. trial can't i have my own opinion in the casey anthony case? so it's interesting that a celebrity feels they can say whatever they want and get offend wednesday other people react to what they say. can't have it both ways. >> celebs sometimes think they're experts on everything. which can be amusing and we definitely use that here in "the skinny." >> yeah, we do. >> there you go. >> let's move on to another celebrity now, justin timberlake, who -- >> j.t. >> who became a minority owner in myspace, along with specific media. they're trying to come up with ways to revive myspace. i think this is a huge uphill battle for them. one

it is not a surprise we talk about the o.j. simpson case, any of the other the barents -- average cases. we are seeking greater intelligence about our justice system. that plays out through the average and the ordinary. that is the garden variety cases that come before the court. when we talk about federal courts we are a screening out a huge portion of the garden variety. nevertheless, we have to actually think about the context in which we increase the public's understanding of the judicial system. by having cameras in the courtroom for those garden variety cases. i do not know for talking about a system in which we're talking like c-span so there would be a running loop of a different courtroom today. i do not know if we're talking at a situation in which management was selecting which cases would be viewed during particular hours. that is important because a lot of what people learn about the justice system when they watch televised trials is actually wrong. the decisions that someone makes about what is going to appear on

. >> the one we compare this to is o.j. simpson. the world also thought, or many in the world, thought that was the wrong verdict. the difference was that o.j. simpson had a community of people. had supporters, fans from his days as an athlete, of people who were behind him, when he came out of prison. there was a significant group of people who thought he was not guilty. that's really not the case here. meaning, there are people who are saying the justice system worked. there are people saying there was reasonable doubt. you don't have almost anyone, who say they put the wrong person on trial here, which was the case in o.j. simpson's case. even harder for her. to make it the other thing that makes this different than the o.j. simpson case is the timing of it. back in the mid-1990s, you didn't have cell phones where you could take pictures of people. >> true. >> you didn't have twitter or facebook. so, anytime anyone sees her anywhere, it's going to be accounted for. that's going to make this is totally different experience for her

is this like a redo of o.j. where the defendant is acquitted of murder but then someone sues civilly. >> except that the plaintiffs in the o.j. simpson case were extremely close personal relationships with the deceased. this is a grandmother who never ever took any affirmative steps to find her granddaughter eve. now, that the spot light is on her and casey might get a million dollar whatever deal now she shows up. it is distasteful. >> judge jeanine: not only distasteful but at the end of the day she can sue and if she wins what are her damages? >> none. people say in a civil case there is liability and then there is damages. let's say she wins on liability and prove that casey did cause the disappearance of caylee. what is your damages? how heart broken are you, grandma, because you haven't seen the granddaughter. >> judge jeanine: i have to live with the fact that i wasn't able to meet my granddaughter that was alive for three years and i never saw her. the d.a. is suing for the cost of the investigation, mar

i've heard a lot of comparisons to o.j. simpson.s was big, but this didn't go on nearly as long as o.j. simpson and didn't have the celebrity, and didn't have the race, it didn't have the class, and all of those things. jurors going to the scene and looking at the evidence and the crime scene and shows being created around it. this is outrageous, but can you compare the two except for the shock of the verdict? >> well, this was the trial of this new century, and it was the first social media trial where we were all watching it together. we were all tweeting, you and me and everybody else, and communicating and discussing everything in realtime as it happened. and i think that the big shocker here was jose baez's opening statement which offered an alternative theory of accidental drowning and essentially pulled the rug out from under the prosecution because remember, in their opening statement, they're like where is caylee? day 24, day 25, where is caylee. well, he acknowledged caylee was dead. so it kind of offered an explanation fo

o.j. simpson trial, the late night comedians had a field day. jay leno created a dance troupe made up of actors dressed up as what figures from the case? dannielynn troupe on whom. cards up please. and the answer is roll the tape. >> direct from the o.j. trial the dancing itos with special guest marcia clark, ladies and gentlemen. >> bill: those were the days. both got them right. here is the easiest question of the five. we throw this in braw because e want everybody to feel good. if you don't get this correct, not good. o.j. simpson captivated the nation with the low speed chase in a white board bronco. >> just throw it out the window. we will let you go out there. just throw it out the window, please, you are scaring everybody. think of your kids. >> i'm not going to hurt anybody. >> i know you're not going to hurt anybody. >> tell them i'm all sorry. >> who was driving that bronco? a, kato kay lin. >> who was driving the vehicle? >> cards up, please. and that is correct, al cowlings. >

a lot of people compareds they case to the o.j. simpson case, which i really take issue with and i'm going to go on a side bar about that for a second, because we have to remember, for those who particularly lived in los angeles, who lived through rodney king, lived lou that whole period, the o.j. simpson trial was about a lot more than the legal system. it was about the african-american community and our distrust of the legal system. it was about racial and socio-cultural changes going on in the countries. that's not in any way, shape or form to diminish the pain of nicole's family, but still it's not the same. this is a case where a woman may or may not have killed her child. we don't know the answer to the question. that happens often in this country, i'm horrified and probably those cases should get more attention and the legal system did what it does when you have a good lawyer and pay the right amount, can you get off. >> you're so unpredictable, jimmy, i can't guess if you're outraged or bored of it all? >> i could actually

we saw o.j. simpson's book "i did it" fall flat and the head of a publishing agency be fired because the public rejected that. we'll see what happens with tot mom. >> i think o.j.'s book was "if i did it." let me ask you -- >> thank you. >> let me ask you about casey. you really have been the voice of outrage on this case, as i said. do you worry at all some people who are in your camp will resort to vigilate justice? are you worried about that? >> first of all, i don't have a camp, as you just put it. anybody that watched the evidence can see that there was overwhelming evidence of guilt. it's not just me. there's many thousands of people newscasters across the country that agree and many, many more thousands of people that agree. i'm in the camp of justice, all right? and i think that anyone that believes in justice does not believe in vigilanteism. that's the answer to that question. >> do you fear it might happen nonetheless? >> no, i really don't. the sheriff's office said they don't perceiv