election results sure the populist party is mainly focused on migration they used to gain significant. successes in elections he does not mean they win more than that i don't think those parties will last for long because they used to be in not a very serious political forces but the main thing the mainstream politicians they they turned. did the right wing. site and for example statements which now used to be done by by heads of states of has a garment like i'm going miracle and it came in and it was so it was the about complete failure of multiculturalism we could not imagine something they had been. two years ago let's turn to some reactions to to to what happened in oslo in russia well here are some some of the reactions from russians from journalists who tend to put the blame for the massacre on noways rather than on the terrorists. some don't really decide what he did was constructs of human history but it would be wrong to say. so broke the law so much for the station not really a humanist values at recess in the relationship human rights it would take to. get there is a reason

. >> the responsibility of these kinds of right-wing populist parties is an indirect force, but they bear responsibility for what they say any false assertions. with the norwegian progress party, that can take many forms. at first, like its danish counterpart, the party was supposed to higher taxes. then there radicalized after their chairman declared immigrants were to blame. that was when the perpetrator was active in this party. >> norway was ill-prepared for such an attack. the assault on utoya island went on. >> liberal norway's looking for a way to bring a mass murderer to justice. >> when you are rich and famous and have all of the obvious trappings of wealth, what is the next must-have a luxury? a french vineyard. for many french film stars such as gerard prado 0-- depardieu and others. >> this is where 77-year-old pierre richard lives when he is not working. it took a lot of negotiations before richard finally moved here. he wanted to make sure he would have privacy in order to devote himself to making wine. >> the wine is wonderful. you can smell the blackberries and red ber

election results sure populist parties mainly focused on migration they used to gain significant. successes in elections it does not mean they win more than that i don't think those parties will last for long because they used to be in not very serious political forces but the main thing the mainstream politicians they they turn. their right wing side and for example statements which now used to be done by by heads of states of has a government lagaan going miracle that it came in the course of the about complete failure of multiculturalism we could not imagine something where there'd been. two years ago let's turn to some reactions to to to what happened in oslo in russia well here are some some of the reactions from russians from bloggers to journalists who tend to put the blame for the massacre are not always society rather than on the terrorists. some called really decide what he did runs contrary to human. but it would be wrong to say. it's homegrown the loss of funds for europe to play station to prevent a human is thousand years at recess in the relation of human rights and

armed it why did that someone is finally as one historian said about the populist party in the late eighteenth hundreds however to say ignorant and even. restoring some democracy to boost republic because that's a seriously what he's trying to do and i'm not insinuating that he's any of those education i was going to address but the tea party i would quickly put it meant category in many instances but nonetheless they are going after what is the heart of this democracy and that's our freedom our civil liberties and so forth which have been much abused since nine eleven particularly by the bush administration but alarmingly in many respects continue the obama administration yeah and here specifically in his threat or his letter he's referring to certain provisions of the patriot act and roving wiretaps and the abuse of national security letters those are many things that he was trying to get answer to before when he was trying to block the patriot act from being extended for another four years so it's good to see him going after and now last question as a little bit off topic but that's what i

social inequality and frankly i'd say that the tea party the whole presence of the tea party movement fundamentally populist movement and sudden aside the koch brothers and and what we saw in wisconsin what we're seeing states all across the midwest is that people are fed up people are people are freaking out it's time for politicians to wake up and realize the very real problems that this kind of inequality will we are right now and can in the future produce and solve those problems by closing that inequality gap by frankly raising taxes on the rich folks back to where they were in the ninety's fifty's sixty's seventy's early eighty's. it's time for our daily pull your chance to tell us what you think here's today's question is wealth inequality in america hurdling our nation toward civil unrest as big new burzynski warn your choices are yes turbulent times could be had for america or no a growing wealth imbalance just doesn't matter log on to founder of an icon and others know you think the pole be open until tomorrow morning. crazy alert only try this at home a virginia man was arrested on tuesday for br

she's obviously appealing to the populist strain within the party. >> enough that she could win the nomination i think it's a difficult road for her, honestly. i think if you look past iowa and perhaps a couple of other states that have traditionally selected the most conservative candidates that have been in the yield, then the path to victory becomes challenging. could she do it? is she up to the job? is she a smart woman? does she have charisma? she has those things. she's nobody's fool. it's not -- i don't think it's a flash in the pan as steve would say. i think she's a real candidate. i just think in terms of having the credentials, the background, the gravitas, having been there before, you know. i think the higher likelihood that you'll see missteps because of her inexperience on the stump. i think these are all real issues. >> interestingly enough when you say the lack of experience, you haven't been, there the lack of gravitas, guess who that was said about? barack obama. >> yeah. >> and he's a guy who won. >> one other thing, when i think about how logical a lot of the arguments you

what she is showing and what trump showed before her is that there is space for a populist insurgeant type of tea partyte who can capture the spirit driving the base here. i personally don't think it will be her. i think it is going to be someone like rick perry or sarah palin but she is peaking too early. the one thing you don't do is too early in the summer before. >> are they waiting joan for another tea party hero to come from the wings like rick perry or sarah palin? is that what we are waiting on? >> i don't know that anyone is waiting. >> i think that a lot of her represents somebody fresh and new and they like the choice of candidates they have. the longer she is in the race and the more reporters are digging into her background and the farm subsidies and medicaid to the clinic while she rails against federal funding, her husband's atrocious words about gay people, her own crazy words -- >> let's talk about that a minute, joan. she stayed out of same-sex marriage for the last little while. but she said publicly in the past, a lot about how same-sex marriage was a critical issue. her husband has

i think you are starting to see particularly among some tea party members, some concern about this divide, particularly through populist members of the republican party of raising this concern about whether goethe and the benefits of the american economy are actually being spread broadly around and you are going to see that probably in this next election in terms of trade policy, in terms of overall economic growth and not necessarily in tax policy but certainly in some other areas. >> john, republican line from palm coast, florida. caller: yes. i had a couple of comments made -- to make about the economy. and it's amazing. there are some very obvious measures to restore america. first, we are blessed with natural wealth. oil offshore, now have better processes that ensure safety. of course, they need government oversight but look how much the government delayed the oil spill that made the news 24/7 recently. you know, as far as taking, i think there was about four weeks, we had offers from all over the world that knew how to take care of that. so they need to be investigated. we have statistics. we have enough natural

i think you are starting to see particularly among some tea party members, some concern about this divide, particularly through populist members of the republican party of raising this concern about whether goethe and the benefits of the american economy are actually being spread broadly around and you are going to see that probably in this next eection in terms trade policy, in terms of overall economic growth and not necessarily in tax policy but certainly in some other areas. >> john, republican line from palm coast, florida. caller yes. i had a couple of comments made -- to make about the economy. and it's amazing. there are some very obvious measures to restore america. first, we are blessed with natural alth. oil offshore, nw have better processes that ensure safety. of course, they need government oversight but look how much the government delayed the oil spill that made the news 24/7 recently. you know, as far as taking, i think there was about four weeks, we had offers from all over the world that knew how to take care of that. so they need to be investigated. we have statistics. we have enough natural gas tha

up between labor unions, populist, green backers, and at the time people call the something much simpler, and to monopolist. a strong anti monopolist wing in the republican party, strong and to monopolist wing in the democratic party. the third party as well, and a monopolist, worker into monopolism. what they mean is corporation. pretty much they use the word synonymous. the reason they dislike corporations is they think control is being taken away from ordinary people. i began to realize that in the 19th century there is something that is not moderate. its managers from current politics. i have not seen it. americans in the 19th century, none of them, but a majority believe that the purpose of an economy, a republican society is to produce the republicans. it is not to produce the highest gross national product. instead, what they say is it should produce citizens are able to take this simple republic and a very clear on what they're talking about. the workers should be able to get a family, a kind of independence among producers. nobody can dictate a but the conditions which they will reach. they really hold these things very, very seriously, and it becomes

populist. by the time you get to martin van buren you have people who have no distinction whatsoever. he was a canny politician part of the best party organization in new york has ever seen probably and catapulted himself into the presidency. it was that popular world. when jefferson heard andrew jackson almost one the world of eight -- was deeply disillusioned the national government that can out of the constitution ten years later so something awful had to have been between 1776 and 1787 to convince people to create a national government hadn't even been on their radar screen, and they know how strong that government is because we still live under it, so the thing that happened was a series of weaknesses in the articles but more important was the future of democracy running amok, and that's what made madison to create his virginia plan and the result of the constitution which acts as a kind of limit on democracy. the courts became a very important federalist device in the democracy. we don't like to think in this term because we have tremendous trust in the people but we know we have all kind of limitations on the people. we don't

populist capitalism. within the circumference of that circle there, you can't say economic populism without sneering or spitting. but in the rest of the states, it is why people know why there is a democratic party in this country at all. economic populism is the basic concept that there is a force in politics to defend the rights of people who have to work for a living or people who would like to work again if they could find a job against corporate interests and reach peoples' interests draining the country dry. a poll just released in wisconsin this week articulates this point better than anything else. for whose benefit is wisconsin's state government run? the percentage of wisconsinites saying their state government is being run for a few big interests is 65%, nearly 2/3. the number saying that wisconsin state government is run for all of the people, just 28%. that's what it looks like in the polls in wisconsin. that's why these messages resonate. and here's what it looks like on the ground in wisconsin. >> governor walker and the republicans just gave over $100 million in tax cuts to corporations. and now they are asking teachers and nurses to pay for it. and attacking workers' rights to n

parties tend to worship at the altar of big business. that's who they tend to listen to, not just republicans. there's almost a populist element going on in the country right anyway in that we bailed out the big banks, big questions don't pay taxes. the small guy and gal in this country has been hammered, and they're not getting bailed out. that's not a partisan issue. that's calvin, respectfully, what a lot of us ran on six or eight months ago. we need to provide relief to the small business man and woman. host: we have about four minutes left with congressman walsh. our program is short today, only till 9:00 a.m. eastern time because the house is coming in session, but our producer has just told us the house will come in at 9:00, and immediately recess until they figure out what their plan of action is for today. so lots of uncertainty. if your body cannot pass a piece of legislation and, in fact, harry reid has become -- comes in, how do you feel about that? guest: equally disappointed. again, susan, what i hope would happen is if we can't arrive at something, we go back to what we arrived at last week and take that