and prosecutors say they've made self incriminating statements. the district attorney said only one of 20 eyewitnesses identified sanchez and none identified norwood. >> like i said awaiting further discoverry. >> so the family says he's making slight improvement and had been able to pucker lips when his sister gave him a kiss. >>> a man accused of killing a teen-aged girl appeared in court today. 27 years after the murder. the 43-year-old arraigned in juvenile court because he was a teenager when the crime occurred. he is accused of killing a 14-year-old class mate in 1984 at 16 years old. the former classmates say they're grateful someone has been arrested for the crime. >>> he hope it's short and they found the perpetrator. >> and the break came in 2007. the fbi crime lab patched dna evidence to carlson, now a registered sex offender with a long rap sheet. he'll be back in court in september. the case will be transferred out of juvenile court and he will be tried as an adult. >>> a san francisco bar is raising money for a 9-year-old boy. a hit

a regular citizen has are right to not self-incrimination. then the police department, you can say that, and you certainly have that right as a citizen of the united states, and you're immediately sent over to the administration of internal affairs, where you were given an admonition, and you were going to say, now you're going to tell me exactly what happens, and they have to tell you or you're fired. that is the circumstance we're going through right now. i can tell the officers to tell me what happened, because if they do not, they are fired. so, they are telling us what went on. and it to the bottom of this investigation. with regard to generically if people do not say what ever -- there is pressure, but i think that largely, now in this day and age, with the light shining on us 100% of the time, i would tell you that when issues come forward, the officers would not have happened. >> mr. herley, do you have comments? >> i would absolutely agree with the chief. there are very few times you were brought before your boss and ordered to tell

a regular citizen has are right to not self-incrimination.

they have made self-incriminating statements. the los angeles district attorney's office also said today that only one of 20 witnesses to the stowe beating could identify sanchez and none could id norwood. sanchez's sister testified before a grand jury, but what she said remains sealed, so it is unclear whether she will testify to her brother. those charges were dropped today. >>> the woman accused of sneaking into alex trebek's san francisco hotel room has told her attorney she is a prostitute. she is accused of entering the room and taking $650 in cash and a bracelet. she claims she was at the hotel to meet a john and never entered trebek's room. but when trebek woke up he gave chase and tore his achilles tendon. you can see him in town to host the national geographic program. she is being held on bail. >>> a memorial in the east bay has run out of room. for eight years volunteers have been adding white crosses to this hillside in loveyette, one for every servicemen killed in iraq or afghanistan. and now the practice is coming

a regular citizen has are right to not self-incrimination. then the police department, you can say that, and you certainly have that right as a citizen of the united states, and you're immediately sent over to the administration of internal affairs, where you were given an admonition, and you were going to say, now you're going to tell me exactly what happens, and they have to tell you or you're fired. that is the circumstance we're going through right now. i can tell the officers to tell me what happened, because if they do not, they are fired. so, they are telling us what went on. and it to the bottom of this investigation. with regard to generically if

a regular citizen has are right to not self-incrimination. then the police department, you can say that, and you certainly have that right as a citizen of the united states, and you're immediately sent over to the administration of internal affairs, where you were given an admonition, and you were going to say, now you're going to tell me exactly what happens

a regular citizen has are right to not self-incrimination. then the police department, you can say that, and you certainly can say that, and you certainly have that right as a citizen of

first amendment rights successfully for the memorized privacy fifth member rights ready and self incrimination tobacconist business companies and fourteenth a member repeatedly for over one hundred years so you know at bottom line should corporations in your opinion have constitutional right as gets down to the actual one of the things you just said which is the fact that. this is been going on for over a hundred years i mean this is a this is longstanding supreme court case law the reasons for the. very simple creating this fiction that corporations are people and it's essentially what they call a legal fiction it's a framework that the courts have invented so that they can get at this question of how you best go about regulating these corporations how you go about treating them in the eyes of the law and so if the government can turn around to do things like confiscate private property from a corporation as it does they do want to understand or that actually goes back to the tenth century in england he literally i mean go back you know read blackstone's law in the seventy's in the eighteenth

investigation by fbi, sec and department of labor ng refused to answer questions for fear of self incrimination. >> i don't think you take the fifth amendment unless you have something to hide. there is something going on there. alleged fraud, mismanagement z you know, he's been told by his lawyers to shut up. >> and richard brown filed a lawsuit accusing ng of embezzlement and lying to investors. and he and his lawyers refused to answer questions or offer anything to those investors dealing with the loss of their life savings. there is a long way to go. i'm let gelting many leads in this story. i'll keep at it in the weeks and months still to come. >> dan, thank you very much. >> coming up next defense secretary pinetta. >> reflecting on his time in >>> former head of the international monetary fund is considering taking legal action against a hotel made who accused him of sexual assaulting her. dominique strauss kahn walked out of court a free man. prosecutor dz not find the alleged victim to be a credible witness. the manhattan district attorney says that his job is to seek justice, not conv

they police said they made self-incriminating statements but only one in 20 witnesses could identify sanchez and none could i.d. norwood. >>> at woman accused of sneaking into alex trebek's san francisco hotel room says she is a prostitute who was in the hotel to meet a john. she is accused of entering the jeopardy star's room on july 26th and taking $650 in cash. she claims she never entered the room. trebek says she injured his leg while chasing her. he was in town to host a world championship in mountain view. she remains in custody on $650,000 bail. >> and this morning, bart is warning passengers that protestors might try to disrupt service in downtown san francisco. last night they put out an alert and sent out a tweet. a group called no justice, no bart had previously hinted on an action sometime in early august. that same group shut down several stations in san francisco protesting the fatal bart shooting at the civic center station. there is no word of organized protest planned for today. bart says it was taking extra measures to try to prevent protestors from causing delays.

the prosecutors say that marvin norwood and louie sanchez have made self-incriminating statements. only one of the witnesses could identify sanchez and none could i.d. norwood. two more items on the case, sanchez sister will not be charged. police say they cannot prove she knew about the beating white truffle she drove the men home that night. stowe's family meanwhile says he is making slight improvements all the time and has even been able to pucker his lips when his sister gave him a kiss. good news. >>> police found an abeen a toned pickup and the atm stolen from a bingo hall in concord but not the money that was inside of it. it shows the men ramming the blue pickup truck through the front door of the blew devils bingo hall. they slam against the atm machine three times before it comes lose. the robbers took $6,000 in cash and caused thousands more in damage. the money was going be used to fund the blue devil's youth program. >> right now they are competing in indiana for the championship. we will run bingo tonight. >> the bingo hall estimates it needs to raise $30,000 to recov

investigation by the fbi, sec and the department of laborening refused to answer questions for fear of self incrimination don't think you take the fifth amendment unless you have something to hide. there is something going on there. we have alleged fraud. mismanagement. breach of fiduciary duty. clearly told by his criminal lawyers to shut up. >>reporter: richard brown filed a class action lawsuit accusingening of embezzlement, vailting federal security law and lying to investors. >> do you have anything to say to all the investors. >>reporter: he and the lawyers refused to answer questions on the way out. to offer anything at all to those investors who are dealing with the loss of their life savings. clearly a long way to go. i'm getting so many lead on the story i'll keep it in the we can and mont months to come. for the i tea team, abc 7 news. >> well expect to see several more changes in a number of bay area newspapers. bay area news group publishes more than a dozen local papers and said today it's rebranding them and stream lining the print operation. 120 jobs will be cut as a result that's about 8

to silence which we will come back to leader is really a constitutional protection against self-incrimination is what is went to the command by the silence of the perils of leaving that the silence and the right to counsel, supervision of free legal services to the indigent suspect some in the ongoing protections of the miranda rights. a commentary on the major points here and doesn't require that you gave the miranda. they said as you need to get the miranda warning or any other fully effective means and the legislatures to consider other options. one option flexible in canada i believe so we have that as a possibility. the supreme court also was clear to a firm you needed the right to silence because otherwise silence in the face of an accusation is itself damming and perhaps of the greatest interest to us here was a later decision of the supreme court in 1981 and which they said there is no special words that are needed, no special words that are needed in giving the miranda and the typical researcher that concluded that by saying there are no incantations required to the scriptures in try

to a constitutional protection against self-incrimination.the pearls or -- perils or danger of waiving the right to silence, and free services to indigent suspects in the ongoing occasions of miranda rights. just a quick commentary on the couple of major points. the miranda decision did not require that you gave the miranda warning. it said that you need to give miranda warning or any other fully effective means. so, in fact, as they were envisioning by the way, the legislate to consider other options. one option, for example, in canada, i believe, as you have a duty, council, who can be called up on an 800 or toll free number. we have that as a possibility. the supreme court also was clear to affirm that you needed the right to silence. otherwise, silence in the face of an accusation is itself damning. perhaps of the greatest interest to us here was a later decision of the supreme court in 1981, in which they said there are no special words that are needed in giving a miranda warning. because the courts allowed more poetry, they concluded th

to silence -- this is a point we'll come to later -- to a constitutional protection against self-incrimination is what is meant by a right to silence. the perils or dangers of waiving the right to silence, the right to counsel, the provision of free legal services to indigent suspects in the ongoing protections of miranda rights. just a quick commentary on a couple of the major points here. actually, the miranda decision did not require that you give the miranda warning. it said that you need to give the miranda warning or any other fully effective means. so, in fact, as they were envisioning and exhorted, by the way, the legislatures to consider other options. i mean, one option, for example, in canada you have a duty counsel who can be called up on an 800 or toll-free number. so we have that as a possibility. the supreme court, also, was clear to affirm that you needed the right to silence because otherwise silence in the face of an accusation is itself damning. and perhaps of the greatest interest to us here was a later decision of the supreme court, california v. presock in 1981, in which